Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Biden Should Stop Payment on U.S. Funds To Sisi's Egypt. (Photo: CODEPINK)

Members of the women-led peace group CodePink, including co-founder Medea Benjamin (center), protest against Egyptian human rights abuses in this undated photo. (Photo: CodePink)

'Dismaying': Human Rights Groups Blast Biden Plan to OK Millions in Military Aid for Egypt

A coalition of 18 organizations called the administration's decision "a terrible blow to its stated commitment to human rights and to the rule of law."

Brett Wilkins

Left-leaning Democratic lawmakers joined human rights groups Tuesday in decrying the Biden administration's reported decision to withhold a small portion of the $1.3 billion in annual U.S. military aid to Egypt over human rights crimes perpetrated by the government of President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi.

"Egypt has 60,000 political prisoners. They torture political dissidents. The administration should have held back the full $300 million. This half-measure sends a muddled message about our commitment to human rights and democracy."
—Sen. Chris Murphy

A U.S. official speaking on condition of anonymity—the administration's decision had not yet been announced—told multiple media outlets Tuesday that of the $300 million in military aid to Egypt that is subject to human rights conditions, $170 million will be initially authorized.

"If they complete the human rights criteria that we laid out for the Egyptians, they also get the $130 million," the official said of the el-Sisi administration, according to The Washington Post. Details of the conditions for the remaining funds were not disclosed.

Politico reports the unnamed official said that Secretary of State Antony Blinken will take the unprecedented step of not issuing a national security waiver that would allow military aid to flow regardless of human rights violations. Similar "national security"-based waivers were issued annually since 2010 by the Obama and Trump administrations in order to provide U.S. military aid to nations whose militaries use child soldiers.

Eighteen human rights groups on Tuesday issued a joint statement calling the Biden administration's decision "a terrible blow to its stated commitment to human rights and to the rule of law."

"This administration has repeatedly vowed to put human rights at the center of its foreign policy and specifically its relationship with Egypt," the statement said. "This decision, however, is a betrayal of these commitments."

"By immediately releasing $170 million and temporarily withholding the remaining $130 million," the statement continued, "the administration sidesteps the intent of Congress, which passed legislation clearly stating that $300 million in U.S. military aid should be withheld until Egypt has taken steps to 'strengthen the rule of law,' 'implement reforms that protect' basic freedoms, and 'hold Egyptian security forces accountable.'"

Multiple Democratic U.S. lawmakers also criticized the admnistration's move, with Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) calling it "a mistake."

"Egypt has 60,000 political prisoners. They torture political dissidents," Murphy tweeted. "The administration should have held back the full $300 million. This half-measure sends a muddled message about our commitment to human rights and democracy."

According to Amnesty International—one of the 18 groups to sign Tuesday's statement—there is "credible evidence confirming use of U.S.-provided arms in flagrant violations by [Egyptian] security forces, including extrajudicial killings."

"Arbitrary arrests and detainments, torture, and enforced disappearances are regularly carried out against human rights defenders, LGBTQI+ Egyptians, and journalists in Egypt," Amnesty International added. "Egyptian prisons hold thousands of political prisoners, with dozens dying following denied medical care in 2020. The world's third worst executioner, Egypt has executed dozens in 2021, and in June upheld the imminent executions of 12 men convicted via sham trial."

The 18 groups' statement noted that "the Biden administration has frequently sought to distinguish itself from the Trump administration by claiming to take a stronger stance on human rights and promising to be tough on... el-Sisi, whom Biden referred to as [former President Donald] 'Trump's favorite dictator.'"

"It is especially dismaying to see this decision, a notably weaker position than that taken by the Trump administration in the same situation."
—18 groups' letter

"With that context, it is especially dismaying to see this decision, a notably weaker position than that taken by the Trump administration in the same situation in August 2017," the statement said.

Trump denied Egypt $96 million in aid and delayed $195 million in military funding over human rights concerns before restoring the assistance in July 2018. Egyptian authorities subsequently sentenced 75 people to death for taking part in a 2013 sit-in protest against the military ouster of Mohammed Morsi, the former democratically elected president.

While campaigning for president last year, Biden vowed that, if elected, there would be "no more blank checks" for the Egyptian regime. However, in February—on the same day that the administration published a statement supporting a declaration against arbitrary detention, and days after relatives of a prominent Egyptian-American activist were arrested and jailed—the State Department announced the proposed sale of nearly $200 million worth of shipborne surface-to-air missiles to Egypt.

John Hursh, program director at statement signatory Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN), said Tuesday that "the Biden administration's duplicitous allocation of military aid to Egypt is the same sort of doublespeak that we heard when it blocked 'offensive' arms sales to Saudi Arabia while leaving 'defensive' weapons sales in place."

"Just like Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, President el-Sisi has all the reassurance he needs that not much is going to change from this new administration," Hursh added. "The issue here isn't really whether the el-Sisi government will make meaningful reforms—it won't—it's about the United State's persistent breach of domestic and international law that prohibits arming abusive governments and contributing to their abuses."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

ACLU Demands 'Truly Systemic Overhaul' of US Civilian Harm Policies

"While a serious Defense Department focus on civilian harm is long overdue and welcome, it's unclear that this directive will be enough," says director of the legal group's National Security Project.

Jessica Corbett ·


'This Is Not Over': Alaska Supreme Court Rejects Youth Climate Case

"With the state continuing to undermine their health, safety, and futures," said the plaintiffs' lead counsel, "we will evaluate our next steps and will continue to fight for climate justice."

Jessica Corbett ·


Analysis Finds 'Staggering' Rise in Voter Suppression After GOP Restrictions in Georgia

"This is why we are fighting this new law in court," said one voting rights advocate.

Brett Wilkins ·


'Egregious': Pennsylvania Court Strikes Down Mail-In Voting Law

The ruling was stayed pending an appeal to the state's Supreme Court and as one voting advocate put it: "The fight's not over yet, folks."

Julia Conley ·


Big Win for Open Internet as Court Upholds California Net Neutrality Law

One legal advocate called the Ninth Circuit's opinion "a great decision and a major victory for internet users in California and nationwide."

Kenny Stancil ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo