SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Asylum seekers prepare to be taken to a border patrol processing facility after crossing into the U.S. on June 16, 2021 in La Joya, Texas. (Photo: Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
Supreme Court Ruling on Asylum Policy Denounced as 'Nothing Short of Cruel'
"We put an end to the Trump presidency but we still need to put an end to his cruel, harmful, and deadly policies including this xenophobic one."
Aug 25, 2021
The Biden administration is being urged to strengthen protections for asylum seekers after the U.S. Supreme Court's Tuesday decision saying the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols, which forced asylum seekers at the southern border to wait in dangerous conditions in Mexico pending legal review of their cases, should be reinstated.
The "decision forcing the reinstatement of the 'Remain in Mexico' policy is nothing short of cruel," said Yael Schacher, senior U.S. advocate at Refugees International, using the phrase commonly used for the policy.
"The government must take all steps available to fully end this illegal program, including by re-terminating it with a fuller explanation."
Enacted in 2019 by the Trump administration, MPP was sharply condemned by human rights advocates who said it was a further display of the administration's xenophobic agenda.
The Biden administration rescinded the policy in June, which Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, called the "correct" move because the policy's "whole point... was to punish people for seeking asylum by trapping them in miserable and dangerous conditions."
The Supreme Court's Tuesday decision, The Hill noted, came "after a federal judge in Texas ordered the Biden administration to reinstate the program in response to a lawsuit by the attorneys general of Texas and Missouri. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit let stand that ruling, prompting the Biden administration's emergency request to the justices."
That request for a stay was rejected.
"The applicants have failed to show a likelihood of success on the claim that the memorandum rescinding the Migrant Protection Protocols was not arbitrary and capricious," the court said in an unsigned decision (pdf), to which liberal Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.
Jadwat of the ACLU said the ruling was "incorrect, and should be reversed."
"The government must take all steps available to fully end this illegal program, including by re-terminating it with a fuller explanation," he said. "What it must not do is use this decision as cover for abandoning its commitment to restore a fair asylum system."
According to the Associated Press, there's "nothing preventing the administration from trying again to end the program."
That's exactly what Erin Thorn Vela, a staff attorney with Texas Civil Rights Project, said should happen.
In a statement calling Remain in Mexico "unfit for all asylum-seekers" and "inherently unlawful policy," Thorn Vela laid out steps for the administration to urgently take.
"We call on the Biden administration to immediately issue a new memo terminating this horrific program, and we will hold the administration accountable to issue exemptions for more vulnerable populations in the interim," she said. "That means people with medical issues and disabilities, asylum seekers in the LGBTQ+ community, and Indigenous language speakers--just to name a few--should be excluded from the reinstated program."
"While all asylum seekers, whether returned to Mexico under Remain in Mexico or expelled under Title 42, are vulnerable in dangerous border towns," said Thorn Vela, "the government must take all available steps to protect those in most immediate danger and risk."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) weighed in on the ruling as well.
"We put an end to the Trump presidency," she tweeted "but we still need to put an end to his cruel, harmful, and deadly policies including this xenophobic one."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The Biden administration is being urged to strengthen protections for asylum seekers after the U.S. Supreme Court's Tuesday decision saying the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols, which forced asylum seekers at the southern border to wait in dangerous conditions in Mexico pending legal review of their cases, should be reinstated.
The "decision forcing the reinstatement of the 'Remain in Mexico' policy is nothing short of cruel," said Yael Schacher, senior U.S. advocate at Refugees International, using the phrase commonly used for the policy.
"The government must take all steps available to fully end this illegal program, including by re-terminating it with a fuller explanation."
Enacted in 2019 by the Trump administration, MPP was sharply condemned by human rights advocates who said it was a further display of the administration's xenophobic agenda.
The Biden administration rescinded the policy in June, which Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, called the "correct" move because the policy's "whole point... was to punish people for seeking asylum by trapping them in miserable and dangerous conditions."
The Supreme Court's Tuesday decision, The Hill noted, came "after a federal judge in Texas ordered the Biden administration to reinstate the program in response to a lawsuit by the attorneys general of Texas and Missouri. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit let stand that ruling, prompting the Biden administration's emergency request to the justices."
That request for a stay was rejected.
"The applicants have failed to show a likelihood of success on the claim that the memorandum rescinding the Migrant Protection Protocols was not arbitrary and capricious," the court said in an unsigned decision (pdf), to which liberal Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.
Jadwat of the ACLU said the ruling was "incorrect, and should be reversed."
"The government must take all steps available to fully end this illegal program, including by re-terminating it with a fuller explanation," he said. "What it must not do is use this decision as cover for abandoning its commitment to restore a fair asylum system."
According to the Associated Press, there's "nothing preventing the administration from trying again to end the program."
That's exactly what Erin Thorn Vela, a staff attorney with Texas Civil Rights Project, said should happen.
In a statement calling Remain in Mexico "unfit for all asylum-seekers" and "inherently unlawful policy," Thorn Vela laid out steps for the administration to urgently take.
"We call on the Biden administration to immediately issue a new memo terminating this horrific program, and we will hold the administration accountable to issue exemptions for more vulnerable populations in the interim," she said. "That means people with medical issues and disabilities, asylum seekers in the LGBTQ+ community, and Indigenous language speakers--just to name a few--should be excluded from the reinstated program."
"While all asylum seekers, whether returned to Mexico under Remain in Mexico or expelled under Title 42, are vulnerable in dangerous border towns," said Thorn Vela, "the government must take all available steps to protect those in most immediate danger and risk."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) weighed in on the ruling as well.
"We put an end to the Trump presidency," she tweeted "but we still need to put an end to his cruel, harmful, and deadly policies including this xenophobic one."
The Biden administration is being urged to strengthen protections for asylum seekers after the U.S. Supreme Court's Tuesday decision saying the Trump-era Migrant Protection Protocols, which forced asylum seekers at the southern border to wait in dangerous conditions in Mexico pending legal review of their cases, should be reinstated.
The "decision forcing the reinstatement of the 'Remain in Mexico' policy is nothing short of cruel," said Yael Schacher, senior U.S. advocate at Refugees International, using the phrase commonly used for the policy.
"The government must take all steps available to fully end this illegal program, including by re-terminating it with a fuller explanation."
Enacted in 2019 by the Trump administration, MPP was sharply condemned by human rights advocates who said it was a further display of the administration's xenophobic agenda.
The Biden administration rescinded the policy in June, which Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, called the "correct" move because the policy's "whole point... was to punish people for seeking asylum by trapping them in miserable and dangerous conditions."
The Supreme Court's Tuesday decision, The Hill noted, came "after a federal judge in Texas ordered the Biden administration to reinstate the program in response to a lawsuit by the attorneys general of Texas and Missouri. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit let stand that ruling, prompting the Biden administration's emergency request to the justices."
That request for a stay was rejected.
"The applicants have failed to show a likelihood of success on the claim that the memorandum rescinding the Migrant Protection Protocols was not arbitrary and capricious," the court said in an unsigned decision (pdf), to which liberal Justices Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented.
Jadwat of the ACLU said the ruling was "incorrect, and should be reversed."
"The government must take all steps available to fully end this illegal program, including by re-terminating it with a fuller explanation," he said. "What it must not do is use this decision as cover for abandoning its commitment to restore a fair asylum system."
According to the Associated Press, there's "nothing preventing the administration from trying again to end the program."
That's exactly what Erin Thorn Vela, a staff attorney with Texas Civil Rights Project, said should happen.
In a statement calling Remain in Mexico "unfit for all asylum-seekers" and "inherently unlawful policy," Thorn Vela laid out steps for the administration to urgently take.
"We call on the Biden administration to immediately issue a new memo terminating this horrific program, and we will hold the administration accountable to issue exemptions for more vulnerable populations in the interim," she said. "That means people with medical issues and disabilities, asylum seekers in the LGBTQ+ community, and Indigenous language speakers--just to name a few--should be excluded from the reinstated program."
"While all asylum seekers, whether returned to Mexico under Remain in Mexico or expelled under Title 42, are vulnerable in dangerous border towns," said Thorn Vela, "the government must take all available steps to protect those in most immediate danger and risk."
Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) weighed in on the ruling as well.
"We put an end to the Trump presidency," she tweeted "but we still need to put an end to his cruel, harmful, and deadly policies including this xenophobic one."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.