Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

If you’ve been waiting for the right time to support our work—that time is now.

Our mission is simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

But without the support of our readers, this model does not work and we simply won’t survive. It’s that simple.
We must meet our Mid-Year Campaign goal but we need you now.

Please, support independent journalism today.

Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Without your help, we won’t survive.

Drs. against line 3

Health professionals gathered for a solidarity event against Line 3 at Mears Park in St. Paul, Minnesota on August 17, 2021. (Photo: Health Professionals for a Healthy Climate/Twitter)

Joining Fight Against Line 3, Health Professionals Urge Biden to Block Project

"It is essentially science denial to permit a pipeline of this magnitude during a climate crisis."

Jessica Corbett

U.S. doctors, nurses, and other health professionals came together Tuesday for a national day of solidarity against Line 3 that included various events and a letter calling on President Joe Biden to block Enbridge's tar sands project.

The health professionals are pressuring Biden to "take action that climate science demands, listen to the voices of Indigenous frontline leaders," and reverse the federal government's permitting of Line 3 under former President Donald Trump.

Their call echoes demands of Indigenous and climate activists who have long fought against the Canadian company's effort to replace an aging pipeline with one that would have the capacity to transport 760,000 barrels daily.

Noting the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report on the latest climate science that was released last week, the health professionals write to Biden:

We applaud you for rejoining the Paris climate agreement and canceling the Keystone XL Pipeline. We now call on you to revoke the permits for the Enbridge Line 3 pipeline expansion in Minnesota. Line 3 will carry the same product as the Keystone XL Pipeline, dirty tar sands oil. If it is put into operation, Line 3 will accelerate the damage to our climate, releasing carbon emissions equivalent to that of 50 coal plants, every year.​​ This is in stark contrast to your stated goal to reach a net-zero emissions economy by 2050. We have neither the carbon budget nor financial budget to continue investing in fossil fuel infrastructure if we want to meet that ambitious but necessary goal. We also don't have the time—as U.N. Secretary General António Guterres stated, the IPCC report "...must sound a death knell for coal and fossil fuels, before they destroy our planet."

The health professionals highlight that Line 3 is a problem for not only the climate but also environmental justice, warning that letting the project proceed conflicts with Biden's "stated goal to stand up against fossil fuel companies and other polluters who put their own profits over people and disproportionately harm communities of color and low income communities."

"Line 3 cuts through the heart of the Anishinaabe territory in Minnesota, violating treaty rights, damaging sacred wild rice beds, and threatening the health of our Indigenous communities, who have already experienced generations of oppression and trauma due to exploitation of their land and their people," the letter says. "Health professionals across the country stand in solidarity with our Indigenous leaders who are putting their bodies on the line to defend sacred water, land, and climate."

Pointing out that "Line 3 negatively impacts manoomin, a sacred food central to the Anishinaabe way of life," Thaius Boyd, an Ohkay Owingeh tribal member who is also a part of Health Students for a Healthy Climate, said in a statement that preventing the project "safeguards Indigenous health, environment, and future generations."

The letter was spearheaded by Health Professionals for a Healthy Climate and signed by Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR), Medical Society Consortium on Climate Change and Health, Academy of Integrative Health & Medicine, Alliance of Nurses for Healthy Environments, Medical Students for a Sustainable Future, and multiple state groups.

Individual health professionals also spoke out against Line 3 on Tuesday.

"Americans need to—and want to—end our addiction to oil, because it's exacting a terrible toll on our health and destabilizing our climate," said Dr. Jonathan Patz, director of the Global Health Institute at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, in a statement.

Patz—who, for 15 years, served as a lead author for the IPCC, which was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007—also spoke at a Tuesday afternoon event in St. Paul, Minnesota, one of at least a dozen actions nationwide.

"The carbon-intensive extraction from open-pit mining makes tar sands the world's most destructive oil operation threatening our health and the environment," Patz said. "And like tar in cigarettes, the bitumen in tar sands oil, which is released when pipes inevitably burst, is carcinogenic. Use of this hazardous substance must end here and now."

"Americans across the country are experiencing health impacts of climate change this summer—extreme heat, drought, and poor air quality from wildfire smoke," noted Dr. Laalitha Surapaneni, an assistant professor at the University of Minnesota Medical School.

Surapaneni, who is on the PSR board of directors and a member of Health Professionals for a Healthy Climate, asserted that "it is essentially science denial to permit a pipeline of this magnitude during a climate crisis."

Minnesota Rep. Dr. Kelly Morrison (D-33B), a practicing OB-GYN, explained that "as a physician and a state legislator, I believe it is my obligation to advocate for public health."

"The recently released U.N.'s IPCC report has been described as a 'code red for humanity,'" she said. "Climate change has rapidly become the world's existential public health crisis, and to address it we must rapidly decarbonize by ending the extraction and burning of fossil fuels, and that includes ending new investment in fossil fuel infrastructure. Minnesota and the United States can lead by stopping Line 3 now."

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

"I'm sure this will be all over the corporate media, right?"
That’s what one longtime Common Dreams reader said yesterday after the newsroom reported on new research showing how corporate price gouging surged to a nearly 70-year high in 2021. While major broadcasters, newspapers, and other outlets continue to carry water for their corporate advertisers when they report on issues like inflation, economic inequality, and the climate emergency, our independence empowers us to provide you stories and perspectives that powerful interests don’t want you to have. But this independence is only possible because of support from readers like you. You make the difference. If our support dries up, so will we. Our crucial Mid-Year Campaign is now underway and we are in emergency mode to make sure we raise the necessary funds so that every day we can bring you the stories that corporate, for-profit outlets ignore and neglect. Please, if you can, support Common Dreams today.


'We WILL Fight Back': Outrage, Resolve as Protests Erupt Against SCOTUS Abortion Ruling

Demonstrators took to the streets Friday to defiantly denounce the Supreme Court's right-wing supermajority after it rescinded a constitutional right for the first time in U.S. history.

Brett Wilkins ·

80+ US Prosecutors Vow Not to Be Part of Criminalizing Abortion Care

"Criminalizing and prosecuting individuals who seek or provide abortion care makes a mockery of justice," says a joint statement signed by 84 elected attorneys. "Prosecutors should not be part of that."

Kenny Stancil ·

Progressives Rebuke Dem Leadership as Clyburn Dismisses Death of Roe as 'Anticlimactic'

"The gap between the Democratic leadership, and younger progressives on the question of 'How Bad Is It?' is just enormous."

Julia Conley ·

In 10 Key US Senate Races, Here's How Top Candidates Responded to Roe Ruling

While Republicans unanimously welcomed the Supreme Court's rollback of half a century of reproductive rights, one Democrat said "it's just wrong that my granddaughter will have fewer freedoms than my grandmother did."

Brett Wilkins ·

Sanders Says End Filibuster to Combat 'Outrageous' Supreme Court Assault on Abortion Rights

"If Republicans can end the filibuster to install right-wing judges to overturn Roe v. Wade, Democrats can and must end the filibuster, codify Roe v. Wade, and make abortion legal and safe," said the Vermont senator.

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo