SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Neera Tanden's nomination for director of the Office of Management and Budget was withdrawn by the White House on March 2, 2021.
(Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Pool-Getty Images)
'You Do Love to See it': Progressives Cheer Withdrawal of Neera Tanden's OMB Nomination
"The reason to celebrate the end of Neera Tanden's nomination has nothing to do with her late-night out-of-control rage-tweeting and everything to do with her record."
Mar 01, 2021
Progressives on Tuesday applauded the White House's decision to withdraw the highly controversial nomination of Neera Tanden to lead the Office of Management and Budget, with one leading activist noting that "nasty tweets and nasty politics have consequences."
In a statement, President Joe Biden said that he had "accepted Neera Tanden's request to withdraw her name from nomination" for OMB director.
"I have the utmost respect for her record of accomplishment, her experience, and her counsel, and I look forward to having her serve in a role in my administration," the president said of Tanden. "She will bring valuable perspective and insight to our work."
\u201cThe internet won, folks. Never stop tweeting.\u201d— Ugo Okere (@Ugo Okere) 1614729171
Tanden's left-wing critics pointed to her history of pushing cuts to Social Security, disparaging Medicare for All and other popular ideas, and proudly raising money from massive corporations--as well as what Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) called her "vicious attacks" on progressives--as they welcomed news of her torpedoed nomination.
The progressive advocacy group RootsAction issued the following statement:
RootsAction is proud to have led the progressive opposition to Neera Tanden's nomination and heartened that she will not be OMB director. The opposition of Republican senators over nasty tweets was of course hypocritical and absurd, given their muted response to years of Trump's tweeting. But it was inexcusable for Democratic senators to be silent about the legitimate reasons to oppose her nomination--the potential conflicts of interest raised by her years of coziness with powerful corporate elites.
That silence may be explained by the fact that Democrats in the Senate are beholden to some of the same corporate donors that lavishly bankroll Tanden's think tank. Tanden was the wrong choice to head a federal agency that is vital in the regulatory process. It strains credulity to contend that she would have been a true advocate for the public interest after many years of dutifully serving corporate interests.
Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the peace group CodePink, tweeted: "Goes to show: nasty tweets and nasty politics have consequences."
\u201cAnd that\u2019s what you would call a \u201cW\u201d \n\nWe did #RejectTanden\u201d— RootsAction (@RootsAction) 1614732231
\u201cNeera Tanden just withdrew her nomination for OMB chair. You do love to see it.\u201d— Gravel Institute (@Gravel Institute) 1614729442
\u201cBiden should immediately appoint Neera Tanden Special Counsel to investigate whether Russian bots were responsible for spiking her nomination\u201d— Aaron Mat\u00e9 (@Aaron Mat\u00e9) 1614729859
Although clearly relishing their victory, some progressives kept their eyes on the proverbial ball, pointing to the exclusion of a $15 hourly federal minimum wage in Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief proposal as an example of a critical issue for which Democrats should fight as robustly as they fought for Tanden's nomination.
\u201cCan the @WhiteHouse take the energy they were using to get Neera Tanden confirmed and move it to passing a federal $15 minimum wage?\u201d— People for Bernie (@People for Bernie) 1614729568
"The reason to celebrate the end of Neera Tanden's nomination has nothing to do with her late-night out-of-control rage-tweeting and everything to do with her record," tweeted Guardian columnist David Sirota.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
politicsneera tandenjoe bidenoffice of management and budgetmedicare for allcorporate powercodepinksocial securitybernie sanders
Progressives on Tuesday applauded the White House's decision to withdraw the highly controversial nomination of Neera Tanden to lead the Office of Management and Budget, with one leading activist noting that "nasty tweets and nasty politics have consequences."
In a statement, President Joe Biden said that he had "accepted Neera Tanden's request to withdraw her name from nomination" for OMB director.
"I have the utmost respect for her record of accomplishment, her experience, and her counsel, and I look forward to having her serve in a role in my administration," the president said of Tanden. "She will bring valuable perspective and insight to our work."
\u201cThe internet won, folks. Never stop tweeting.\u201d— Ugo Okere (@Ugo Okere) 1614729171
Tanden's left-wing critics pointed to her history of pushing cuts to Social Security, disparaging Medicare for All and other popular ideas, and proudly raising money from massive corporations--as well as what Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) called her "vicious attacks" on progressives--as they welcomed news of her torpedoed nomination.
The progressive advocacy group RootsAction issued the following statement:
RootsAction is proud to have led the progressive opposition to Neera Tanden's nomination and heartened that she will not be OMB director. The opposition of Republican senators over nasty tweets was of course hypocritical and absurd, given their muted response to years of Trump's tweeting. But it was inexcusable for Democratic senators to be silent about the legitimate reasons to oppose her nomination--the potential conflicts of interest raised by her years of coziness with powerful corporate elites.
That silence may be explained by the fact that Democrats in the Senate are beholden to some of the same corporate donors that lavishly bankroll Tanden's think tank. Tanden was the wrong choice to head a federal agency that is vital in the regulatory process. It strains credulity to contend that she would have been a true advocate for the public interest after many years of dutifully serving corporate interests.
Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the peace group CodePink, tweeted: "Goes to show: nasty tweets and nasty politics have consequences."
\u201cAnd that\u2019s what you would call a \u201cW\u201d \n\nWe did #RejectTanden\u201d— RootsAction (@RootsAction) 1614732231
\u201cNeera Tanden just withdrew her nomination for OMB chair. You do love to see it.\u201d— Gravel Institute (@Gravel Institute) 1614729442
\u201cBiden should immediately appoint Neera Tanden Special Counsel to investigate whether Russian bots were responsible for spiking her nomination\u201d— Aaron Mat\u00e9 (@Aaron Mat\u00e9) 1614729859
Although clearly relishing their victory, some progressives kept their eyes on the proverbial ball, pointing to the exclusion of a $15 hourly federal minimum wage in Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief proposal as an example of a critical issue for which Democrats should fight as robustly as they fought for Tanden's nomination.
\u201cCan the @WhiteHouse take the energy they were using to get Neera Tanden confirmed and move it to passing a federal $15 minimum wage?\u201d— People for Bernie (@People for Bernie) 1614729568
"The reason to celebrate the end of Neera Tanden's nomination has nothing to do with her late-night out-of-control rage-tweeting and everything to do with her record," tweeted Guardian columnist David Sirota.
Progressives on Tuesday applauded the White House's decision to withdraw the highly controversial nomination of Neera Tanden to lead the Office of Management and Budget, with one leading activist noting that "nasty tweets and nasty politics have consequences."
In a statement, President Joe Biden said that he had "accepted Neera Tanden's request to withdraw her name from nomination" for OMB director.
"I have the utmost respect for her record of accomplishment, her experience, and her counsel, and I look forward to having her serve in a role in my administration," the president said of Tanden. "She will bring valuable perspective and insight to our work."
\u201cThe internet won, folks. Never stop tweeting.\u201d— Ugo Okere (@Ugo Okere) 1614729171
Tanden's left-wing critics pointed to her history of pushing cuts to Social Security, disparaging Medicare for All and other popular ideas, and proudly raising money from massive corporations--as well as what Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) called her "vicious attacks" on progressives--as they welcomed news of her torpedoed nomination.
The progressive advocacy group RootsAction issued the following statement:
RootsAction is proud to have led the progressive opposition to Neera Tanden's nomination and heartened that she will not be OMB director. The opposition of Republican senators over nasty tweets was of course hypocritical and absurd, given their muted response to years of Trump's tweeting. But it was inexcusable for Democratic senators to be silent about the legitimate reasons to oppose her nomination--the potential conflicts of interest raised by her years of coziness with powerful corporate elites.
That silence may be explained by the fact that Democrats in the Senate are beholden to some of the same corporate donors that lavishly bankroll Tanden's think tank. Tanden was the wrong choice to head a federal agency that is vital in the regulatory process. It strains credulity to contend that she would have been a true advocate for the public interest after many years of dutifully serving corporate interests.
Medea Benjamin, co-founder of the peace group CodePink, tweeted: "Goes to show: nasty tweets and nasty politics have consequences."
\u201cAnd that\u2019s what you would call a \u201cW\u201d \n\nWe did #RejectTanden\u201d— RootsAction (@RootsAction) 1614732231
\u201cNeera Tanden just withdrew her nomination for OMB chair. You do love to see it.\u201d— Gravel Institute (@Gravel Institute) 1614729442
\u201cBiden should immediately appoint Neera Tanden Special Counsel to investigate whether Russian bots were responsible for spiking her nomination\u201d— Aaron Mat\u00e9 (@Aaron Mat\u00e9) 1614729859
Although clearly relishing their victory, some progressives kept their eyes on the proverbial ball, pointing to the exclusion of a $15 hourly federal minimum wage in Biden's $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief proposal as an example of a critical issue for which Democrats should fight as robustly as they fought for Tanden's nomination.
\u201cCan the @WhiteHouse take the energy they were using to get Neera Tanden confirmed and move it to passing a federal $15 minimum wage?\u201d— People for Bernie (@People for Bernie) 1614729568
"The reason to celebrate the end of Neera Tanden's nomination has nothing to do with her late-night out-of-control rage-tweeting and everything to do with her record," tweeted Guardian columnist David Sirota.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.