Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) attend a House Oversight and Reform Committee business meeting in Rayburn Building on Tuesday, January 29, 2019.

Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) attend a House Oversight and Reform Committee business meeting in Rayburn Building on Tuesday, January 29, 2019. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

'This Is a No-Brainer': House Democrats Announce Effort to Pass $2,000 Payments as Trump Demands Bigger Checks

"We can pass $2,000 checks this week if the Senate GOP agrees to stand down," said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Jake Johnson

House Democrats are planning to request unanimous consent this week to approve sending one-time $2,000 direct payments to most Americans after President Donald Trump late Tuesday attacked the recently passed $900 billion coronavirus relief bill as a "disgrace" and suggested he might not sign the legislation if it isn't amended to include bigger checks.

Almost immediately after Trump's remarks—made in a video posted to Twitter on Tuesday night—Democratic lawmakers and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) embraced the president's call for $2,000 payments, with many noting that they've been demanding such relief for months. In May, Sanders teamed up with Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) to propose $2,000 monthly payments to most Americans for the duration of the coronavirus crisis.

Last week, as Common Dreams reported, members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus demanded "direct payments of at least $2,000" as part of the new relief package, which was paired with government funding legislation that the president must sign to avert a shutdown on December 29. Trump had reportedly considered pushing for $2,000 checks during negotiations over the new package—which also includes an extension of soon-to-expire unemployment benefits—before backing off at the last minute.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) tweeted in the wake of Trump's video Tuesday that "Democrats are ready to bring this to the floor this week by unanimous consent." One aide told CNN that Democrats are planning the unanimous consent vote for Thursday.

"Republicans repeatedly refused to say what amount the president wanted for direct checks. At last, the president has agreed to $2,000," said Pelosi. "Let's do it!"

Two hours after Trump posted the video, which reportedly "stunned" many of his advisers, Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tweeted out an amendment that would replace the $600 payments currently in the relief legislation with one-time $2,000 payments to most Americans.

"Glad to see the president is willing to support our legislation," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We can pass $2,000 checks this week if the Senate GOP agrees to stand down."

Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and other CPC members backed the amendment.

"People's lives are at stake," said Pressley. "Survival checks now."

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) quickly threw his support behind the amendment offered by Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez, tweeting, "Let's not get bogged down with ideological offsets and unrelated items and just DO THIS! The American people deserve it."

"I'm in. Whaddya say, Mitch?" Schumer added.

Passing the $2,000 payments amendment by unanimous consent will be highly difficult, given that just one member can object and block the effort—as Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) did, twice, when Sanders and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) tried to pass $1,200 checks last week.

If the unanimous consent request fails, as it most likely will, progressive observers urged Pelosi to bring House members back for a full vote on the payments.

"Doing it by 'unanimous consent' means any one member can block it," tweeted Adam Jentleson, public affairs director at Democracy Forward. "The House should actually bring a clean $2k checks bill to the floor, pass it, and send it to the Senate. Do it with the intent of getting people more aid, not just as a stunt."

In the Republican-controlled Senate, "Schumer can start demanding unanimous consent to pass the $2,000 check legislation every day the body is in session—a process that would have the added benefit of putting the heat on Georgia incumbent Republican Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue to pick which side they are on," noted The Daily Poster's David Sirota, Andrew Perez, and Walker Bragman.

Appearing on CNN following Trump's demand Tuesday night, Jon Ossoff—Perdue's Democratic opponent—said Trump is correct to demand $2,000 checks.

"President Trump is as ever erratic and all over the place, but on this point, tonight, he's right: $600 is a joke," said Ossoff. "They should send $2,000 checks to the American people right now because people are hurting."

Noting that Perdue "opposed even the first round of $1,200 checks" provided under the CARES Act, Ossoff added that Congress "should pass $2,000 checks, they should have done it two months ago."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Sanders Says There's 'No Excuse' for Any Democrat to Oppose Lowering Drug Prices

"Now is the time for Congress to show courage and stand up to the greed of the pharmaceutical industry."

Jake Johnson ·


Covid-19 Vaccine Makers Blasted for 'Unconscionable Profits,' Monopolies, and Low Taxes

"Big Pharma's business model—receive billions in public investments, charge exorbitant prices for lifesaving medicines, pay little tax—is gold dust for wealthy investors and corporate executives but devastating for global public health."

Common Dreams staff ·


UN Human Rights Chief Calls for Global Halt to Sales of Dangerous AI Technologies

"The power of AI to serve people is undeniable, but so is AI's ability to feed human rights violations at an enormous scale with virtually no visibility."

Brett Wilkins ·


ICC Approves Probe Into 'Drug War' Atrocities Carried Out by Duterte Regime

"Duterte along with his co-accused henchmen of the war on drugs will be facing justice."

Andrea Germanos ·


Global Indigenous Coalition Echoes Call to Postpone UN Climate Talks

"No equitable or just climate solutions can emerge from such an unjust process."

Brett Wilkins ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo