SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) attend a House Oversight and Reform Committee business meeting in Rayburn Building on Tuesday, January 29, 2019. (Photo: Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)
'This Is a No-Brainer': House Democrats Announce Effort to Pass $2,000 Payments as Trump Demands Bigger Checks
"We can pass $2,000 checks this week if the Senate GOP agrees to stand down," said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.
Dec 22, 2020
House Democrats are planning to request unanimous consent this week to approve sending one-time $2,000 direct payments to most Americans after President Donald Trump late Tuesday attacked the recently passed $900 billion coronavirus relief bill as a "disgrace" and suggested he might not sign the legislation if it isn't amended to include bigger checks.
Almost immediately after Trump's remarks--made in a video posted to Twitter on Tuesday night--Democratic lawmakers and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) embraced the president's call for $2,000 payments, with many noting that they've been demanding such relief for months. In May, Sanders teamed up with Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) to propose $2,000 monthly payments to most Americans for the duration of the coronavirus crisis.
Last week, as Common Dreams reported, members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus demanded "direct payments of at least $2,000" as part of the new relief package, which was paired with government funding legislation that the president must sign to avert a shutdown on December 29. Trump had reportedly considered pushing for $2,000 checks during negotiations over the new package--which also includes an extension of soon-to-expire unemployment benefits--before backing off at the last minute.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) tweeted in the wake of Trump's video Tuesday that "Democrats are ready to bring this to the floor this week by unanimous consent." One aide told CNN that Democrats are planning the unanimous consent vote for Thursday.
" Republicans repeatedly refused to say what amount the president wanted for direct checks. At last, the president has agreed to $2,000," said Pelosi. "Let's do it!"
Two hours after Trump posted the video, which reportedly "stunned" many of his advisers, Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tweeted out an amendment that would replace the $600 payments currently in the relief legislation with one-time $2,000 payments to most Americans.
"Glad to see the president is willing to support our legislation," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We can pass $2,000 checks this week if the Senate GOP agrees to stand down."
Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and other CPC members backed the amendment.
"People's lives are at stake," said Pressley. "Survival checks now."
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) quickly threw his support behind the amendment offered by Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez, tweeting, "Let's not get bogged down with ideological offsets and unrelated items and just DO THIS! The American people deserve it."
"I'm in. Whaddya say, Mitch?" Schumer added.
Passing the $2,000 payments amendment by unanimous consent will be highly difficult, given that just one member can object and block the effort--as Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) did, twice, when Sanders and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) tried to pass $1,200 checks last week.
If the unanimous consent request fails, as it most likely will, progressive observers urged Pelosi to bring House members back for a full vote on the payments.
"Doing it by 'unanimous consent' means any one member can block it," tweeted Adam Jentleson, public affairs director at Democracy Forward. "The House should actually bring a clean $2k checks bill to the floor, pass it, and send it to the Senate. Do it with the intent of getting people more aid, not just as a stunt."
In the Republican-controlled Senate, "Schumer can start demanding unanimous consent to pass the $2,000 check legislation every day the body is in session--a process that would have the added benefit of putting the heat on Georgia incumbent Republican Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue to pick which side they are on," noted The Daily Poster's David Sirota, Andrew Perez, and Walker Bragman.
Appearing on CNN following Trump's demand Tuesday night, Jon Ossoff--Perdue's Democratic opponent--said Trump is correct to demand $2,000 checks.
"President Trump is as ever erratic and all over the place, but on this point, tonight, he's right: $600 is a joke," said Ossoff. "They should send $2,000 checks to the American people right now because people are hurting."
Noting that Perdue "opposed even the first round of $1,200 checks" provided under the CARES Act, Ossoff added that Congress "should pass $2,000 checks, they should have done it two months ago."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
House Democrats are planning to request unanimous consent this week to approve sending one-time $2,000 direct payments to most Americans after President Donald Trump late Tuesday attacked the recently passed $900 billion coronavirus relief bill as a "disgrace" and suggested he might not sign the legislation if it isn't amended to include bigger checks.
Almost immediately after Trump's remarks--made in a video posted to Twitter on Tuesday night--Democratic lawmakers and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) embraced the president's call for $2,000 payments, with many noting that they've been demanding such relief for months. In May, Sanders teamed up with Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) to propose $2,000 monthly payments to most Americans for the duration of the coronavirus crisis.
Last week, as Common Dreams reported, members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus demanded "direct payments of at least $2,000" as part of the new relief package, which was paired with government funding legislation that the president must sign to avert a shutdown on December 29. Trump had reportedly considered pushing for $2,000 checks during negotiations over the new package--which also includes an extension of soon-to-expire unemployment benefits--before backing off at the last minute.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) tweeted in the wake of Trump's video Tuesday that "Democrats are ready to bring this to the floor this week by unanimous consent." One aide told CNN that Democrats are planning the unanimous consent vote for Thursday.
" Republicans repeatedly refused to say what amount the president wanted for direct checks. At last, the president has agreed to $2,000," said Pelosi. "Let's do it!"
Two hours after Trump posted the video, which reportedly "stunned" many of his advisers, Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tweeted out an amendment that would replace the $600 payments currently in the relief legislation with one-time $2,000 payments to most Americans.
"Glad to see the president is willing to support our legislation," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We can pass $2,000 checks this week if the Senate GOP agrees to stand down."
Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and other CPC members backed the amendment.
"People's lives are at stake," said Pressley. "Survival checks now."
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) quickly threw his support behind the amendment offered by Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez, tweeting, "Let's not get bogged down with ideological offsets and unrelated items and just DO THIS! The American people deserve it."
"I'm in. Whaddya say, Mitch?" Schumer added.
Passing the $2,000 payments amendment by unanimous consent will be highly difficult, given that just one member can object and block the effort--as Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) did, twice, when Sanders and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) tried to pass $1,200 checks last week.
If the unanimous consent request fails, as it most likely will, progressive observers urged Pelosi to bring House members back for a full vote on the payments.
"Doing it by 'unanimous consent' means any one member can block it," tweeted Adam Jentleson, public affairs director at Democracy Forward. "The House should actually bring a clean $2k checks bill to the floor, pass it, and send it to the Senate. Do it with the intent of getting people more aid, not just as a stunt."
In the Republican-controlled Senate, "Schumer can start demanding unanimous consent to pass the $2,000 check legislation every day the body is in session--a process that would have the added benefit of putting the heat on Georgia incumbent Republican Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue to pick which side they are on," noted The Daily Poster's David Sirota, Andrew Perez, and Walker Bragman.
Appearing on CNN following Trump's demand Tuesday night, Jon Ossoff--Perdue's Democratic opponent--said Trump is correct to demand $2,000 checks.
"President Trump is as ever erratic and all over the place, but on this point, tonight, he's right: $600 is a joke," said Ossoff. "They should send $2,000 checks to the American people right now because people are hurting."
Noting that Perdue "opposed even the first round of $1,200 checks" provided under the CARES Act, Ossoff added that Congress "should pass $2,000 checks, they should have done it two months ago."
House Democrats are planning to request unanimous consent this week to approve sending one-time $2,000 direct payments to most Americans after President Donald Trump late Tuesday attacked the recently passed $900 billion coronavirus relief bill as a "disgrace" and suggested he might not sign the legislation if it isn't amended to include bigger checks.
Almost immediately after Trump's remarks--made in a video posted to Twitter on Tuesday night--Democratic lawmakers and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) embraced the president's call for $2,000 payments, with many noting that they've been demanding such relief for months. In May, Sanders teamed up with Sens. Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) and Ed Markey (D-Mass.) to propose $2,000 monthly payments to most Americans for the duration of the coronavirus crisis.
Last week, as Common Dreams reported, members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus demanded "direct payments of at least $2,000" as part of the new relief package, which was paired with government funding legislation that the president must sign to avert a shutdown on December 29. Trump had reportedly considered pushing for $2,000 checks during negotiations over the new package--which also includes an extension of soon-to-expire unemployment benefits--before backing off at the last minute.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) tweeted in the wake of Trump's video Tuesday that "Democrats are ready to bring this to the floor this week by unanimous consent." One aide told CNN that Democrats are planning the unanimous consent vote for Thursday.
" Republicans repeatedly refused to say what amount the president wanted for direct checks. At last, the president has agreed to $2,000," said Pelosi. "Let's do it!"
Two hours after Trump posted the video, which reportedly "stunned" many of his advisers, Reps. Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) tweeted out an amendment that would replace the $600 payments currently in the relief legislation with one-time $2,000 payments to most Americans.
"Glad to see the president is willing to support our legislation," said Ocasio-Cortez. "We can pass $2,000 checks this week if the Senate GOP agrees to stand down."
Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and other CPC members backed the amendment.
"People's lives are at stake," said Pressley. "Survival checks now."
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) quickly threw his support behind the amendment offered by Tlaib and Ocasio-Cortez, tweeting, "Let's not get bogged down with ideological offsets and unrelated items and just DO THIS! The American people deserve it."
"I'm in. Whaddya say, Mitch?" Schumer added.
Passing the $2,000 payments amendment by unanimous consent will be highly difficult, given that just one member can object and block the effort--as Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) did, twice, when Sanders and Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) tried to pass $1,200 checks last week.
If the unanimous consent request fails, as it most likely will, progressive observers urged Pelosi to bring House members back for a full vote on the payments.
"Doing it by 'unanimous consent' means any one member can block it," tweeted Adam Jentleson, public affairs director at Democracy Forward. "The House should actually bring a clean $2k checks bill to the floor, pass it, and send it to the Senate. Do it with the intent of getting people more aid, not just as a stunt."
In the Republican-controlled Senate, "Schumer can start demanding unanimous consent to pass the $2,000 check legislation every day the body is in session--a process that would have the added benefit of putting the heat on Georgia incumbent Republican Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue to pick which side they are on," noted The Daily Poster's David Sirota, Andrew Perez, and Walker Bragman.
Appearing on CNN following Trump's demand Tuesday night, Jon Ossoff--Perdue's Democratic opponent--said Trump is correct to demand $2,000 checks.
"President Trump is as ever erratic and all over the place, but on this point, tonight, he's right: $600 is a joke," said Ossoff. "They should send $2,000 checks to the American people right now because people are hurting."
Noting that Perdue "opposed even the first round of $1,200 checks" provided under the CARES Act, Ossoff added that Congress "should pass $2,000 checks, they should have done it two months ago."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.