SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Kentucky state Rep. Charles Booker speaks at a campaign rally. (Photo: Booker for Kentucky)
Potential Political 'Earthquake' Brewing as Booker Takes Lead Over McGrath in Kentucky
"What's going on in Kentucky, you ask? Something big."
Jun 25, 2020
Progressive state Rep. Charles Booker on Thursday overtook centrist Amy McGrath for the first time in the vote count of Tuesday's primary, raising hopes of a potential upset in the race to face Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in November.
On Thursday morning, with more than 74,000 votes counted and 79% of the state's precincts reporting their in-person, Election Day numbers, officials reported Booker had 43.5% of the vote versus 40% for McGrath.
Since the election, McGrath had previously consistently held more votes than Booker, and was about 4,000 votes ahead of him as of Wednesday.
Results in Jefferson County, where Booker's hometown of Louisville lies, were reported on Thursday just before he took the lead, and Courier-Journal reporter Joe Sonka noted that more than 160,000 absentee ballots have yet to be counted there. Absentee ballot results likely won't be known until June 30.
As Intercept journalist Ryan Grim pointed out, Booker has won 80% of the in-person vote in Jefferson County so far, signaling that many of the incoming absentee votes are likely for him as well.
"McGrath will have to hunt extremely hard to find the votes to make that up elsewhere," Grim tweeted.
Sonka cautioned on social media that hundreds of thousands of votes have yet to be counted across Kentucky and that Booker's victory is far from definite.
But Booker expressed confidence as the results were reported that the Democratic Party, which has supported McGrath and was a driving force behind her fundraising success, could soon be stunned by the election result.
Anand Giridharadas tweeted that a victory by Booker would represent an electoral "earthquake" in Kentucky.
Booker ran on a platform prioritizing Medicare for All, a Green New Deal, and universal basic income, and talked extensively throughout the campaign about growing up in poverty in Louisville and his past struggles to afford insulin for his diabetes. In Booker's introductory campaign video, he vilified McConnell for being disconnected from and dismissive of Kentucky voters during the incumbent's three decades in office while pushing legislation that prioritizes corporate profits and the wealthy.
Booker was endorsed by progressives including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and by Kentucky's two largest newspapers and members of the state's Democratic establishment including former Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes.
In its endorsement of Booker, the Courier-Journal editorial board wrote, "It's time to shake up the establishment" and criticized McGrath for being "overly moderate," "unimaginative, and uninspiring."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Progressive state Rep. Charles Booker on Thursday overtook centrist Amy McGrath for the first time in the vote count of Tuesday's primary, raising hopes of a potential upset in the race to face Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in November.
On Thursday morning, with more than 74,000 votes counted and 79% of the state's precincts reporting their in-person, Election Day numbers, officials reported Booker had 43.5% of the vote versus 40% for McGrath.
Since the election, McGrath had previously consistently held more votes than Booker, and was about 4,000 votes ahead of him as of Wednesday.
Results in Jefferson County, where Booker's hometown of Louisville lies, were reported on Thursday just before he took the lead, and Courier-Journal reporter Joe Sonka noted that more than 160,000 absentee ballots have yet to be counted there. Absentee ballot results likely won't be known until June 30.
As Intercept journalist Ryan Grim pointed out, Booker has won 80% of the in-person vote in Jefferson County so far, signaling that many of the incoming absentee votes are likely for him as well.
"McGrath will have to hunt extremely hard to find the votes to make that up elsewhere," Grim tweeted.
Sonka cautioned on social media that hundreds of thousands of votes have yet to be counted across Kentucky and that Booker's victory is far from definite.
But Booker expressed confidence as the results were reported that the Democratic Party, which has supported McGrath and was a driving force behind her fundraising success, could soon be stunned by the election result.
Anand Giridharadas tweeted that a victory by Booker would represent an electoral "earthquake" in Kentucky.
Booker ran on a platform prioritizing Medicare for All, a Green New Deal, and universal basic income, and talked extensively throughout the campaign about growing up in poverty in Louisville and his past struggles to afford insulin for his diabetes. In Booker's introductory campaign video, he vilified McConnell for being disconnected from and dismissive of Kentucky voters during the incumbent's three decades in office while pushing legislation that prioritizes corporate profits and the wealthy.
Booker was endorsed by progressives including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and by Kentucky's two largest newspapers and members of the state's Democratic establishment including former Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes.
In its endorsement of Booker, the Courier-Journal editorial board wrote, "It's time to shake up the establishment" and criticized McGrath for being "overly moderate," "unimaginative, and uninspiring."
Progressive state Rep. Charles Booker on Thursday overtook centrist Amy McGrath for the first time in the vote count of Tuesday's primary, raising hopes of a potential upset in the race to face Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in November.
On Thursday morning, with more than 74,000 votes counted and 79% of the state's precincts reporting their in-person, Election Day numbers, officials reported Booker had 43.5% of the vote versus 40% for McGrath.
Since the election, McGrath had previously consistently held more votes than Booker, and was about 4,000 votes ahead of him as of Wednesday.
Results in Jefferson County, where Booker's hometown of Louisville lies, were reported on Thursday just before he took the lead, and Courier-Journal reporter Joe Sonka noted that more than 160,000 absentee ballots have yet to be counted there. Absentee ballot results likely won't be known until June 30.
As Intercept journalist Ryan Grim pointed out, Booker has won 80% of the in-person vote in Jefferson County so far, signaling that many of the incoming absentee votes are likely for him as well.
"McGrath will have to hunt extremely hard to find the votes to make that up elsewhere," Grim tweeted.
Sonka cautioned on social media that hundreds of thousands of votes have yet to be counted across Kentucky and that Booker's victory is far from definite.
But Booker expressed confidence as the results were reported that the Democratic Party, which has supported McGrath and was a driving force behind her fundraising success, could soon be stunned by the election result.
Anand Giridharadas tweeted that a victory by Booker would represent an electoral "earthquake" in Kentucky.
Booker ran on a platform prioritizing Medicare for All, a Green New Deal, and universal basic income, and talked extensively throughout the campaign about growing up in poverty in Louisville and his past struggles to afford insulin for his diabetes. In Booker's introductory campaign video, he vilified McConnell for being disconnected from and dismissive of Kentucky voters during the incumbent's three decades in office while pushing legislation that prioritizes corporate profits and the wealthy.
Booker was endorsed by progressives including Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.), and by Kentucky's two largest newspapers and members of the state's Democratic establishment including former Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes.
In its endorsement of Booker, the Courier-Journal editorial board wrote, "It's time to shake up the establishment" and criticized McGrath for being "overly moderate," "unimaginative, and uninspiring."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.