SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Sixty House Democrats were joined by dozens of public interest groups in calling on House leadership to ensure the next coronavirus relief package does not include immunity for fossil fuel companies which have contributed to the climate crisis. (Photo: Danicek/Shutterstock)
Sixty Democratic members of Congress were joined by dozens of public interest groups Tuesday in demanding that any upcoming coronavirus relief legislation excludes legal immunity for fossil fuel companies.
The fossil fuel industry has been lobbying aggressively for language to be included that would immunize companies from legal liability for the damage their pollution has done to communities, public health, and the environment.
"The nation's efforts to respond to one catastrophic global crisis should not be the occasion to immunize polluters from the legal consequences of helping create another catastrophic global crisis," said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), who led his colleagues in writing a letter to House leaders. "We must respond with speed, wisdom, and foresight to help our constituents survive this public health calamity and put the nation back on its feet."
In an early draft of the third Covid-19 relief package, fossil fuel companies were designated as "covered entities" providing "critical infrastructure" and "lifeline functions."
The draft said covered entities should have "liability protection" and that "no covered entity...should be liable for harm caused by a covered activity."
The language was eventually left out of the final package, but according to Raskin fossil fuel lobbyists are still attempting to include liability protection for the industry in upcoming legislation.
"Now more than ever, we must hold Big Oil accountable and protect working people," tweeted Collin Rees, a campaigner with Oil Change International, one of several groups expressing support for the letter.
\u201cNEW: Letter by @RepRaskin, 60 House members stakes out strong opposition to climate "immunity grabs" by fossil fuel industry in any #COVID19 packages.\n\nNow more than ever, we must hold Big Oil accountable & protect working people. #NoBigOilBailout\n\nREAD: https://t.co/4DlkOZzbbZ\u201d— Collin Rees (@Collin Rees) 1588696977
"The fossil fuel industry has shamelessly used the pandemic to gut hard-won environmental and health protections," said the Center for Climate Integrity. "We can expect that they will try again to kill lawsuits seeking to make them pay their fair share of the billions in climate damages that their decades of lying has inflicted on communities across the country."
Since the pandemic began spreading across the U.S., the Trump administration has lowered emissions standards for the auto industry, loosened compliance rules for companies that face coronavirus-related challenges, and tightened restrictions on the research that can be used by the EPA for rule-making.
"The world is suffering through one of the worst public health disasters we have ever known," wrote the lawmakers, who also included Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), Ro Khanna (Calif.), and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). "History has placed on us an enormous burden to respond with speed, wisdom, and foresight to help our constituents survive this crisis and to put the nation back on its feet. That is where our focus must be. Shielding carbon polluters from proper accountability is an irrelevant and dangerous distraction from the task at hand. It has no place in federal legislation--we think never, but especially not now."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Sixty Democratic members of Congress were joined by dozens of public interest groups Tuesday in demanding that any upcoming coronavirus relief legislation excludes legal immunity for fossil fuel companies.
The fossil fuel industry has been lobbying aggressively for language to be included that would immunize companies from legal liability for the damage their pollution has done to communities, public health, and the environment.
"The nation's efforts to respond to one catastrophic global crisis should not be the occasion to immunize polluters from the legal consequences of helping create another catastrophic global crisis," said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), who led his colleagues in writing a letter to House leaders. "We must respond with speed, wisdom, and foresight to help our constituents survive this public health calamity and put the nation back on its feet."
In an early draft of the third Covid-19 relief package, fossil fuel companies were designated as "covered entities" providing "critical infrastructure" and "lifeline functions."
The draft said covered entities should have "liability protection" and that "no covered entity...should be liable for harm caused by a covered activity."
The language was eventually left out of the final package, but according to Raskin fossil fuel lobbyists are still attempting to include liability protection for the industry in upcoming legislation.
"Now more than ever, we must hold Big Oil accountable and protect working people," tweeted Collin Rees, a campaigner with Oil Change International, one of several groups expressing support for the letter.
\u201cNEW: Letter by @RepRaskin, 60 House members stakes out strong opposition to climate "immunity grabs" by fossil fuel industry in any #COVID19 packages.\n\nNow more than ever, we must hold Big Oil accountable & protect working people. #NoBigOilBailout\n\nREAD: https://t.co/4DlkOZzbbZ\u201d— Collin Rees (@Collin Rees) 1588696977
"The fossil fuel industry has shamelessly used the pandemic to gut hard-won environmental and health protections," said the Center for Climate Integrity. "We can expect that they will try again to kill lawsuits seeking to make them pay their fair share of the billions in climate damages that their decades of lying has inflicted on communities across the country."
Since the pandemic began spreading across the U.S., the Trump administration has lowered emissions standards for the auto industry, loosened compliance rules for companies that face coronavirus-related challenges, and tightened restrictions on the research that can be used by the EPA for rule-making.
"The world is suffering through one of the worst public health disasters we have ever known," wrote the lawmakers, who also included Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), Ro Khanna (Calif.), and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). "History has placed on us an enormous burden to respond with speed, wisdom, and foresight to help our constituents survive this crisis and to put the nation back on its feet. That is where our focus must be. Shielding carbon polluters from proper accountability is an irrelevant and dangerous distraction from the task at hand. It has no place in federal legislation--we think never, but especially not now."
Sixty Democratic members of Congress were joined by dozens of public interest groups Tuesday in demanding that any upcoming coronavirus relief legislation excludes legal immunity for fossil fuel companies.
The fossil fuel industry has been lobbying aggressively for language to be included that would immunize companies from legal liability for the damage their pollution has done to communities, public health, and the environment.
"The nation's efforts to respond to one catastrophic global crisis should not be the occasion to immunize polluters from the legal consequences of helping create another catastrophic global crisis," said Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), who led his colleagues in writing a letter to House leaders. "We must respond with speed, wisdom, and foresight to help our constituents survive this public health calamity and put the nation back on its feet."
In an early draft of the third Covid-19 relief package, fossil fuel companies were designated as "covered entities" providing "critical infrastructure" and "lifeline functions."
The draft said covered entities should have "liability protection" and that "no covered entity...should be liable for harm caused by a covered activity."
The language was eventually left out of the final package, but according to Raskin fossil fuel lobbyists are still attempting to include liability protection for the industry in upcoming legislation.
"Now more than ever, we must hold Big Oil accountable and protect working people," tweeted Collin Rees, a campaigner with Oil Change International, one of several groups expressing support for the letter.
\u201cNEW: Letter by @RepRaskin, 60 House members stakes out strong opposition to climate "immunity grabs" by fossil fuel industry in any #COVID19 packages.\n\nNow more than ever, we must hold Big Oil accountable & protect working people. #NoBigOilBailout\n\nREAD: https://t.co/4DlkOZzbbZ\u201d— Collin Rees (@Collin Rees) 1588696977
"The fossil fuel industry has shamelessly used the pandemic to gut hard-won environmental and health protections," said the Center for Climate Integrity. "We can expect that they will try again to kill lawsuits seeking to make them pay their fair share of the billions in climate damages that their decades of lying has inflicted on communities across the country."
Since the pandemic began spreading across the U.S., the Trump administration has lowered emissions standards for the auto industry, loosened compliance rules for companies that face coronavirus-related challenges, and tightened restrictions on the research that can be used by the EPA for rule-making.
"The world is suffering through one of the worst public health disasters we have ever known," wrote the lawmakers, who also included Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), Ro Khanna (Calif.), and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.). "History has placed on us an enormous burden to respond with speed, wisdom, and foresight to help our constituents survive this crisis and to put the nation back on its feet. That is where our focus must be. Shielding carbon polluters from proper accountability is an irrelevant and dangerous distraction from the task at hand. It has no place in federal legislation--we think never, but especially not now."