

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

President Trump said Wednesday that the FBI is not in the position to investigate Christine Blasey Ford's allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh--even though the bureau investigated Anita Hill's claims of sexual harassment by Justice Clarence Thomas in 1991. (Photo edited by Slate/Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
While Democrats including Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) and women's advocacy groups have demanded for the fair treatment of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her while they were in high school, the White House and the Republican Party are falsely stating that little can be done to investigate Ford's allegations before the Senate votes on whether to give Kavanaugh a lifetime appointment to the high court.
President Donald Trump claimed Wednesday that investigating a criminal allegation against a Supreme Court nominee is outside the FBI's purview, but critics have pointed to incidents where the bureau did just that--and the FBI itself denies that it has declined to investigate.
President Donald Trump told reporters outside the White House on Wednesday morning that Ford's claim is "hard for me to believe," yet suggested his hands were tied in terms of getting to the bottom of the allegations.
"It would seem that the FBI really doesn't do that," Trump said when asked whether federal investigators would probe Ford's claim that Kavanaugh held her down on a bed during a party when they were both teenagers and tried to remove her clothes.
When the journalist replied that the bureau would investigate "if you asked them to," the president shrugged and suggested the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), had the situation under control.
Citing sources familiar with the internal situation, Bloomberg reported Tuesday that the FBI has not said it won't or couldn't conduct an investigation, but that it can't do so with direction from the White House, which it hasn't received.
Investigating Ford's claims would be quite straightforward, former FBI agent Ronald Hosko told Bloomberg.
"The FBI is basically working for the White House," Hosko said. "Their job is to dig into the details and let the White House counsel know if there is derogatory information. You can go get yearbooks and start interviewing high school classmates. For creative-minded FBI people, they can generate leads all day long."
Trump's claim that the FBI "really doesn't" investigate claims like Ford's is discredited further by the 1991 confirmation hearing of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who was subjected to an FBI probe after Anita Hill claimed he had sexually harassed her. The FBI conducted that investigation at the direction of President George H.W. Bush.
As Trump pushed responsibility about calling for an FBI probe onto the GOP members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Grassley dismissed the possibility of delaying Kavanaugh's confirmation and said he "saw no reason" for such an investigation.
Trump and Grassley, along with other Republicans, have said Ford should simply tell her side of the story in a hearing next week while Kavanaugh is able to testify on his own behalf--a proceeding which critics say would amount to a repeat of Thomas's hearing 27 years ago, when Hill was subjected to attacks and ridicule by Republican senators--including Grassley.
Meanwhile, Hill herself on Wednesday called on the president and lawmakers in the Senate to "push the pause button" in order to give Ford and all Americans a proper accounting of the allegations against Kavanaugh before elevating him to one of the most powerful positions in the U.S. government.
"The American public really is expecting something more" than a "sham" hearing designed to quickly push through Kavanaugh's confirmation, Hill told "Good Morning America" on Wednesday. "They want to know that the Senate takes this seriously."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
While Democrats including Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) and women's advocacy groups have demanded for the fair treatment of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her while they were in high school, the White House and the Republican Party are falsely stating that little can be done to investigate Ford's allegations before the Senate votes on whether to give Kavanaugh a lifetime appointment to the high court.
President Donald Trump claimed Wednesday that investigating a criminal allegation against a Supreme Court nominee is outside the FBI's purview, but critics have pointed to incidents where the bureau did just that--and the FBI itself denies that it has declined to investigate.
President Donald Trump told reporters outside the White House on Wednesday morning that Ford's claim is "hard for me to believe," yet suggested his hands were tied in terms of getting to the bottom of the allegations.
"It would seem that the FBI really doesn't do that," Trump said when asked whether federal investigators would probe Ford's claim that Kavanaugh held her down on a bed during a party when they were both teenagers and tried to remove her clothes.
When the journalist replied that the bureau would investigate "if you asked them to," the president shrugged and suggested the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), had the situation under control.
Citing sources familiar with the internal situation, Bloomberg reported Tuesday that the FBI has not said it won't or couldn't conduct an investigation, but that it can't do so with direction from the White House, which it hasn't received.
Investigating Ford's claims would be quite straightforward, former FBI agent Ronald Hosko told Bloomberg.
"The FBI is basically working for the White House," Hosko said. "Their job is to dig into the details and let the White House counsel know if there is derogatory information. You can go get yearbooks and start interviewing high school classmates. For creative-minded FBI people, they can generate leads all day long."
Trump's claim that the FBI "really doesn't" investigate claims like Ford's is discredited further by the 1991 confirmation hearing of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who was subjected to an FBI probe after Anita Hill claimed he had sexually harassed her. The FBI conducted that investigation at the direction of President George H.W. Bush.
As Trump pushed responsibility about calling for an FBI probe onto the GOP members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Grassley dismissed the possibility of delaying Kavanaugh's confirmation and said he "saw no reason" for such an investigation.
Trump and Grassley, along with other Republicans, have said Ford should simply tell her side of the story in a hearing next week while Kavanaugh is able to testify on his own behalf--a proceeding which critics say would amount to a repeat of Thomas's hearing 27 years ago, when Hill was subjected to attacks and ridicule by Republican senators--including Grassley.
Meanwhile, Hill herself on Wednesday called on the president and lawmakers in the Senate to "push the pause button" in order to give Ford and all Americans a proper accounting of the allegations against Kavanaugh before elevating him to one of the most powerful positions in the U.S. government.
"The American public really is expecting something more" than a "sham" hearing designed to quickly push through Kavanaugh's confirmation, Hill told "Good Morning America" on Wednesday. "They want to know that the Senate takes this seriously."
While Democrats including Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) and women's advocacy groups have demanded for the fair treatment of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, who has accused U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexually assaulting her while they were in high school, the White House and the Republican Party are falsely stating that little can be done to investigate Ford's allegations before the Senate votes on whether to give Kavanaugh a lifetime appointment to the high court.
President Donald Trump claimed Wednesday that investigating a criminal allegation against a Supreme Court nominee is outside the FBI's purview, but critics have pointed to incidents where the bureau did just that--and the FBI itself denies that it has declined to investigate.
President Donald Trump told reporters outside the White House on Wednesday morning that Ford's claim is "hard for me to believe," yet suggested his hands were tied in terms of getting to the bottom of the allegations.
"It would seem that the FBI really doesn't do that," Trump said when asked whether federal investigators would probe Ford's claim that Kavanaugh held her down on a bed during a party when they were both teenagers and tried to remove her clothes.
When the journalist replied that the bureau would investigate "if you asked them to," the president shrugged and suggested the Senate Judiciary Committee, led by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), had the situation under control.
Citing sources familiar with the internal situation, Bloomberg reported Tuesday that the FBI has not said it won't or couldn't conduct an investigation, but that it can't do so with direction from the White House, which it hasn't received.
Investigating Ford's claims would be quite straightforward, former FBI agent Ronald Hosko told Bloomberg.
"The FBI is basically working for the White House," Hosko said. "Their job is to dig into the details and let the White House counsel know if there is derogatory information. You can go get yearbooks and start interviewing high school classmates. For creative-minded FBI people, they can generate leads all day long."
Trump's claim that the FBI "really doesn't" investigate claims like Ford's is discredited further by the 1991 confirmation hearing of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who was subjected to an FBI probe after Anita Hill claimed he had sexually harassed her. The FBI conducted that investigation at the direction of President George H.W. Bush.
As Trump pushed responsibility about calling for an FBI probe onto the GOP members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Grassley dismissed the possibility of delaying Kavanaugh's confirmation and said he "saw no reason" for such an investigation.
Trump and Grassley, along with other Republicans, have said Ford should simply tell her side of the story in a hearing next week while Kavanaugh is able to testify on his own behalf--a proceeding which critics say would amount to a repeat of Thomas's hearing 27 years ago, when Hill was subjected to attacks and ridicule by Republican senators--including Grassley.
Meanwhile, Hill herself on Wednesday called on the president and lawmakers in the Senate to "push the pause button" in order to give Ford and all Americans a proper accounting of the allegations against Kavanaugh before elevating him to one of the most powerful positions in the U.S. government.
"The American public really is expecting something more" than a "sham" hearing designed to quickly push through Kavanaugh's confirmation, Hill told "Good Morning America" on Wednesday. "They want to know that the Senate takes this seriously."