SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) answers questions from reporters on allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh on Capitol Hill September 17, 2018 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
'Beyond Shameful': Attempting to Put Victim on Trial, Collins Wants to Let Kavanaugh's Lawyer Question His Accuser
"Collins seems to have forgotten that Brett Kavanaugh is the one who has been accused of a crime, not Christine Blasey Ford."
Sep 18, 2018
According to her own compelling and credible account, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford is the victim of an attempted rape at the hands of Trump Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh--but critics say Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) wants to put Ford on trial as if she was the one being accused of a serious crime.
"The GOP desperately wants to put Dr. Ford on trial and smear her. But they know that 11 men on the Judiciary Committee badgering a sexual assault survivor is a bad look. So they're pushing for Dr. Ford to be interrogated by Kavanaugh's female counsel instead."
--Ezra Levin, IndivisibleIn a highly unusual move on Tuesday that was immediately denounced by women's rights groups as further evidence that the GOP is more interested in attempting to smear Ford than in pursuing the truth, Collins sent a letter calling on the Senate Judiciary Committee to allow Kavanaugh's counsel to cross-examine Ford during Monday's scheduled hearing.
"Collins seems to have forgotten that Brett Kavanaugh is the one who has been accused of a crime, not Christine Blasey Ford," CREDO Action co-director Heidi Hess said in a statement. "Senate Republicans must not attempt to put Christine Blasey Ford on trial or otherwise use Monday's hearing to attack her character."
Slamming Collins' recommendation to the Senate Judiciary Committee as "beyond shameful," Ultraviolet founder Shaunna Thomas added: "This is not a trial. It is Brett Kavanaugh's sexual assault hearing and a job interview for the highest court in the land, and the burden of proof is solely on Brett Kavanaugh."
While Collins also asked the Senate Judiciary Committee to allow Ford's counsel to question Kavanaugh in an effort to make the process appear equal, women's rights groups noted that giving Kavanaugh's lawyer time to grill and possibly slime Ford would be a distraction from the actual purpose of Monday's hearing: To decide whether Kavanaugh is fit to serve on the Supreme Court.
"We must not conflate this to a court of law where Kavanaugh will be found innocent or guilty," NARAL Pro-Choice America vice president Adrienne Kimmell argued in a statement on Tuesday. "The burden of proof at Brett Kavanaugh's sexual assault hearing is on him to answer for these credible allegations. The goal of these next Senate hearings is to determine whether Kavanaugh can be trusted to make decisions about our most fundamental freedoms--and the verdict is already an overwhelming no."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
brett kavanaughchristine blasey fordcredonaralrepublican partysexual assaultsusan collinstrumpismultravioletus senateus supreme court
According to her own compelling and credible account, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford is the victim of an attempted rape at the hands of Trump Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh--but critics say Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) wants to put Ford on trial as if she was the one being accused of a serious crime.
"The GOP desperately wants to put Dr. Ford on trial and smear her. But they know that 11 men on the Judiciary Committee badgering a sexual assault survivor is a bad look. So they're pushing for Dr. Ford to be interrogated by Kavanaugh's female counsel instead."
--Ezra Levin, IndivisibleIn a highly unusual move on Tuesday that was immediately denounced by women's rights groups as further evidence that the GOP is more interested in attempting to smear Ford than in pursuing the truth, Collins sent a letter calling on the Senate Judiciary Committee to allow Kavanaugh's counsel to cross-examine Ford during Monday's scheduled hearing.
"Collins seems to have forgotten that Brett Kavanaugh is the one who has been accused of a crime, not Christine Blasey Ford," CREDO Action co-director Heidi Hess said in a statement. "Senate Republicans must not attempt to put Christine Blasey Ford on trial or otherwise use Monday's hearing to attack her character."
Slamming Collins' recommendation to the Senate Judiciary Committee as "beyond shameful," Ultraviolet founder Shaunna Thomas added: "This is not a trial. It is Brett Kavanaugh's sexual assault hearing and a job interview for the highest court in the land, and the burden of proof is solely on Brett Kavanaugh."
While Collins also asked the Senate Judiciary Committee to allow Ford's counsel to question Kavanaugh in an effort to make the process appear equal, women's rights groups noted that giving Kavanaugh's lawyer time to grill and possibly slime Ford would be a distraction from the actual purpose of Monday's hearing: To decide whether Kavanaugh is fit to serve on the Supreme Court.
"We must not conflate this to a court of law where Kavanaugh will be found innocent or guilty," NARAL Pro-Choice America vice president Adrienne Kimmell argued in a statement on Tuesday. "The burden of proof at Brett Kavanaugh's sexual assault hearing is on him to answer for these credible allegations. The goal of these next Senate hearings is to determine whether Kavanaugh can be trusted to make decisions about our most fundamental freedoms--and the verdict is already an overwhelming no."
According to her own compelling and credible account, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford is the victim of an attempted rape at the hands of Trump Supreme Court pick Brett Kavanaugh--but critics say Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) wants to put Ford on trial as if she was the one being accused of a serious crime.
"The GOP desperately wants to put Dr. Ford on trial and smear her. But they know that 11 men on the Judiciary Committee badgering a sexual assault survivor is a bad look. So they're pushing for Dr. Ford to be interrogated by Kavanaugh's female counsel instead."
--Ezra Levin, IndivisibleIn a highly unusual move on Tuesday that was immediately denounced by women's rights groups as further evidence that the GOP is more interested in attempting to smear Ford than in pursuing the truth, Collins sent a letter calling on the Senate Judiciary Committee to allow Kavanaugh's counsel to cross-examine Ford during Monday's scheduled hearing.
"Collins seems to have forgotten that Brett Kavanaugh is the one who has been accused of a crime, not Christine Blasey Ford," CREDO Action co-director Heidi Hess said in a statement. "Senate Republicans must not attempt to put Christine Blasey Ford on trial or otherwise use Monday's hearing to attack her character."
Slamming Collins' recommendation to the Senate Judiciary Committee as "beyond shameful," Ultraviolet founder Shaunna Thomas added: "This is not a trial. It is Brett Kavanaugh's sexual assault hearing and a job interview for the highest court in the land, and the burden of proof is solely on Brett Kavanaugh."
While Collins also asked the Senate Judiciary Committee to allow Ford's counsel to question Kavanaugh in an effort to make the process appear equal, women's rights groups noted that giving Kavanaugh's lawyer time to grill and possibly slime Ford would be a distraction from the actual purpose of Monday's hearing: To decide whether Kavanaugh is fit to serve on the Supreme Court.
"We must not conflate this to a court of law where Kavanaugh will be found innocent or guilty," NARAL Pro-Choice America vice president Adrienne Kimmell argued in a statement on Tuesday. "The burden of proof at Brett Kavanaugh's sexual assault hearing is on him to answer for these credible allegations. The goal of these next Senate hearings is to determine whether Kavanaugh can be trusted to make decisions about our most fundamental freedoms--and the verdict is already an overwhelming no."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.