SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Thursday that Democrats would only "evaluate" Medicare for All proposals if they take back Congress in 2018--while several likely 2020 presidential contenders openly support Medicare for All. (Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Despite mounting evidence that support for Medicare for All is "spreading like wildfire" and has become a winning issue for Democratic candidates, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi is drawing ire from progressives following a press conference on Thursday where she told reporters that she is open only to "evaluating" the idea if the party wins control of Congress in the mid-terms.
\u201cTranslation: My pharmaceutical and health insurance donors hate the idea of Medicare for All,but just vote me back in and, honest, we\u2019ll \u201clook\u201d at it\nThe biggest recruiting tool the GOP has: Nancy Pelosi. Right or wrong, that\u2019s a fact. If she cared about the country she\u2019d retire https://t.co/6syadflw2I\u201d— John Rocco Calabrese (@John Rocco Calabrese) 1528398646
\u201c@thehill Pelosi: "Okay, we won the 'Hosue'! We looked at Medicare for All & determined our corporate donors wouldn't like it, so...\u201d— The Hill (@The Hill) 1528396625
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Pelosi has taken more than $200,000 in donations from the health sector in the 2017-2018 election cycle.
Far from being a fringe issue, Medicare for All now has the support of 51 percent of Americans polled by the Washington Post and Kaiser Family Foundation.
Several Democratic candidates running for congressional seats throughout the country--in both blue and red districts--have won elections in recent months on platforms that proudly support Medicare for All.
Deb Haaland is considered likely to win a congressional seat in New Mexico's 1st district after winning the Democratic primary on Tuesday with a platform that called for Medicare for All. In Texas and Illinois last month, universal healthcare proponents Gina Ortiz-Jones and Sean Casten also won their Democratic primaries for House seats.
And after sharing with voters the story of her mother's inability to afford prescriptions while suffering from cancer, and winning the endorsements of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), Medicare for All advocate Kara Eastman beat Brad Ashford for the Democratic nomination in Nebraska's 2nd district--even as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) threw its support behind Ashford.
Several Democratic lawmakers who are considered potential 2020 presidential candidates have also announced their support for Medicare for All, with Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) joining Sanders in co-sponsoring his Medicare for All bill.
"I've always been for a public option so I'm always eager to talk about that," Pelosi said at a press conference. "Some of the other issues that have been proposed have to be evaluated in terms of the access that they give, the affordability of it and how we would pay for it, but again it's all on the table."
Pelosi's statement echoed her support for reinstating rules, aimed at avoiding legislation that adds to budget deficits, which progressives say undermines ambitious, innovative new policies.
Pelosi's statement coincides with her support this week for reinstating pay-as-you-go rules--a move progressives warn is a direct attack on the kind of bold and inspiring policies that voters are demanding.
\u201cNancy Pelosi and the Democratic leadership are severely undermining any "new New Deal" legislation like Medicare for All, climate and infrastructure jobs, and free college. https://t.co/XGVVCPZm9L\u201d— Waleed Shahid (@Waleed Shahid) 1528380810
Contrary to Pelosi's suggestion that Medicare for All would be prohibitively expensive, Sanders estimates that his plan would cost Americans $6 trillion less than the current for-profit insurance system over the next decade.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Despite mounting evidence that support for Medicare for All is "spreading like wildfire" and has become a winning issue for Democratic candidates, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi is drawing ire from progressives following a press conference on Thursday where she told reporters that she is open only to "evaluating" the idea if the party wins control of Congress in the mid-terms.
\u201cTranslation: My pharmaceutical and health insurance donors hate the idea of Medicare for All,but just vote me back in and, honest, we\u2019ll \u201clook\u201d at it\nThe biggest recruiting tool the GOP has: Nancy Pelosi. Right or wrong, that\u2019s a fact. If she cared about the country she\u2019d retire https://t.co/6syadflw2I\u201d— John Rocco Calabrese (@John Rocco Calabrese) 1528398646
\u201c@thehill Pelosi: "Okay, we won the 'Hosue'! We looked at Medicare for All & determined our corporate donors wouldn't like it, so...\u201d— The Hill (@The Hill) 1528396625
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Pelosi has taken more than $200,000 in donations from the health sector in the 2017-2018 election cycle.
Far from being a fringe issue, Medicare for All now has the support of 51 percent of Americans polled by the Washington Post and Kaiser Family Foundation.
Several Democratic candidates running for congressional seats throughout the country--in both blue and red districts--have won elections in recent months on platforms that proudly support Medicare for All.
Deb Haaland is considered likely to win a congressional seat in New Mexico's 1st district after winning the Democratic primary on Tuesday with a platform that called for Medicare for All. In Texas and Illinois last month, universal healthcare proponents Gina Ortiz-Jones and Sean Casten also won their Democratic primaries for House seats.
And after sharing with voters the story of her mother's inability to afford prescriptions while suffering from cancer, and winning the endorsements of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), Medicare for All advocate Kara Eastman beat Brad Ashford for the Democratic nomination in Nebraska's 2nd district--even as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) threw its support behind Ashford.
Several Democratic lawmakers who are considered potential 2020 presidential candidates have also announced their support for Medicare for All, with Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) joining Sanders in co-sponsoring his Medicare for All bill.
"I've always been for a public option so I'm always eager to talk about that," Pelosi said at a press conference. "Some of the other issues that have been proposed have to be evaluated in terms of the access that they give, the affordability of it and how we would pay for it, but again it's all on the table."
Pelosi's statement echoed her support for reinstating rules, aimed at avoiding legislation that adds to budget deficits, which progressives say undermines ambitious, innovative new policies.
Pelosi's statement coincides with her support this week for reinstating pay-as-you-go rules--a move progressives warn is a direct attack on the kind of bold and inspiring policies that voters are demanding.
\u201cNancy Pelosi and the Democratic leadership are severely undermining any "new New Deal" legislation like Medicare for All, climate and infrastructure jobs, and free college. https://t.co/XGVVCPZm9L\u201d— Waleed Shahid (@Waleed Shahid) 1528380810
Contrary to Pelosi's suggestion that Medicare for All would be prohibitively expensive, Sanders estimates that his plan would cost Americans $6 trillion less than the current for-profit insurance system over the next decade.
Despite mounting evidence that support for Medicare for All is "spreading like wildfire" and has become a winning issue for Democratic candidates, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi is drawing ire from progressives following a press conference on Thursday where she told reporters that she is open only to "evaluating" the idea if the party wins control of Congress in the mid-terms.
\u201cTranslation: My pharmaceutical and health insurance donors hate the idea of Medicare for All,but just vote me back in and, honest, we\u2019ll \u201clook\u201d at it\nThe biggest recruiting tool the GOP has: Nancy Pelosi. Right or wrong, that\u2019s a fact. If she cared about the country she\u2019d retire https://t.co/6syadflw2I\u201d— John Rocco Calabrese (@John Rocco Calabrese) 1528398646
\u201c@thehill Pelosi: "Okay, we won the 'Hosue'! We looked at Medicare for All & determined our corporate donors wouldn't like it, so...\u201d— The Hill (@The Hill) 1528396625
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Pelosi has taken more than $200,000 in donations from the health sector in the 2017-2018 election cycle.
Far from being a fringe issue, Medicare for All now has the support of 51 percent of Americans polled by the Washington Post and Kaiser Family Foundation.
Several Democratic candidates running for congressional seats throughout the country--in both blue and red districts--have won elections in recent months on platforms that proudly support Medicare for All.
Deb Haaland is considered likely to win a congressional seat in New Mexico's 1st district after winning the Democratic primary on Tuesday with a platform that called for Medicare for All. In Texas and Illinois last month, universal healthcare proponents Gina Ortiz-Jones and Sean Casten also won their Democratic primaries for House seats.
And after sharing with voters the story of her mother's inability to afford prescriptions while suffering from cancer, and winning the endorsements of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Keith Ellison (D-Minn.), Medicare for All advocate Kara Eastman beat Brad Ashford for the Democratic nomination in Nebraska's 2nd district--even as the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) threw its support behind Ashford.
Several Democratic lawmakers who are considered potential 2020 presidential candidates have also announced their support for Medicare for All, with Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) joining Sanders in co-sponsoring his Medicare for All bill.
"I've always been for a public option so I'm always eager to talk about that," Pelosi said at a press conference. "Some of the other issues that have been proposed have to be evaluated in terms of the access that they give, the affordability of it and how we would pay for it, but again it's all on the table."
Pelosi's statement echoed her support for reinstating rules, aimed at avoiding legislation that adds to budget deficits, which progressives say undermines ambitious, innovative new policies.
Pelosi's statement coincides with her support this week for reinstating pay-as-you-go rules--a move progressives warn is a direct attack on the kind of bold and inspiring policies that voters are demanding.
\u201cNancy Pelosi and the Democratic leadership are severely undermining any "new New Deal" legislation like Medicare for All, climate and infrastructure jobs, and free college. https://t.co/XGVVCPZm9L\u201d— Waleed Shahid (@Waleed Shahid) 1528380810
Contrary to Pelosi's suggestion that Medicare for All would be prohibitively expensive, Sanders estimates that his plan would cost Americans $6 trillion less than the current for-profit insurance system over the next decade.