
Months after Hurricane Harvey caused an estimated $180 billion in damage in Houston, Texas, President Trump declined to include any mention of climate change in his strategy for national security. (Photo: Texoma Classics/Flickr/cc)
Ignoring Public Opinion and Pentagon, Trump Denies Climate Crisis a National Security Threat
"If we want to keep our country safe, Trump should take military advice from the military, not fossil fuel executives who are pushing to deny climate science and boost their profits at any cost."
While 56 percent of Americans and the Pentagon hold that the deepening climate crisis is a serious threat to the country's safety, President Donald Trump left the issue out of his speech on his national security strategy on Monday--angering critics and green groups.
"Trump is not just ignoring science and public opinion about the dangers of the climate crisis, he's ignoring American generals and the Pentagon about what it takes to keep our military and our country safe," said Michael Brune, the executive director of Sierra Club, in a statement released after the president's speech.
Trump has regarded the efforts of every other country in the world to combat climate change as an endeavor that would harm American businesses and jobs--despite reports of a burgeoning job market in the renewable energy sector. Even in the Appalachian region, long dependent on the coal industry, Americans have expressed interest in moving on from the dangerous and pollution-causing reliance on mining the earth's natural resources.
The president focused his speech on familiar points--touting his promised border wall, pushing the need to deter North Korea from developing its nuclear capability, and pledging to ensure that economic partnerships with other countries benefit the U.S. first and foremost
The Department of Defense has considered climate change to be a threat at least since 2015, when it released a report on its security implications, arguing that rising global temperatures and its impacts including drought and famine could "aggravate problems such as poverty, social tensions, environmental degradation, ineffectual leadership, and weak political institutions that threaten stability in a number of countries."
"If we want to keep our country safe, Trump should take military advice from the military, not fossil fuel executives who are pushing to deny climate science and boost their profits at any cost," said Brune.
In recent months, the devastation wrought by Hurricane Harvey in Texas and Hurricanes Irma and Maria in the Caribbean offered a clear picture of the direct security threats of climate crisis. As the globe becomes warmer, climate scientists say, hurricanes risk becoming stronger and more frequent, as they did this past season.
On social media, Trump critics and national security experts alike denounced the president's decision to ignore climate change as one of the nation's greatest threats.
\u201cAt part of #NationalSecurityStrategy, Trump brags about leaving #ParisClimateAgreement, a move that truly endangers our national security. Bad strategy. Bad.\u201d— Medea Benjamin (@Medea Benjamin) 1513624789
\u201cThe #NationalSecurityStrategy emphasis on protecting the homeland is impossible to reconcile with its failure to address climate change, a far greater risk to our lives and economy than ISIS or refugees.\u201d— Juliette Kayyem (@Juliette Kayyem) 1513602259
\u201cThe number of US natural disasters that caused at least $1 billion in damage (adjusted for inflation) from 1980 to Oct. 2017. \n\nA realistic #NationalSecurityStrategy would acknowledge climate change as an urgent threat\u201d— Samantha Power (@Samantha Power) 1513623655
\u201c#Trump\u2019s #NationalSecurityStrategy is an abdication of leadership on the world stage. Instead of focusing on real threats like climate change the strategy calls for building an impractical and unnecessary border wall.\u201d— Rep. Frank Pallone (@Rep. Frank Pallone) 1513633031
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
While 56 percent of Americans and the Pentagon hold that the deepening climate crisis is a serious threat to the country's safety, President Donald Trump left the issue out of his speech on his national security strategy on Monday--angering critics and green groups.
"Trump is not just ignoring science and public opinion about the dangers of the climate crisis, he's ignoring American generals and the Pentagon about what it takes to keep our military and our country safe," said Michael Brune, the executive director of Sierra Club, in a statement released after the president's speech.
Trump has regarded the efforts of every other country in the world to combat climate change as an endeavor that would harm American businesses and jobs--despite reports of a burgeoning job market in the renewable energy sector. Even in the Appalachian region, long dependent on the coal industry, Americans have expressed interest in moving on from the dangerous and pollution-causing reliance on mining the earth's natural resources.
The president focused his speech on familiar points--touting his promised border wall, pushing the need to deter North Korea from developing its nuclear capability, and pledging to ensure that economic partnerships with other countries benefit the U.S. first and foremost
The Department of Defense has considered climate change to be a threat at least since 2015, when it released a report on its security implications, arguing that rising global temperatures and its impacts including drought and famine could "aggravate problems such as poverty, social tensions, environmental degradation, ineffectual leadership, and weak political institutions that threaten stability in a number of countries."
"If we want to keep our country safe, Trump should take military advice from the military, not fossil fuel executives who are pushing to deny climate science and boost their profits at any cost," said Brune.
In recent months, the devastation wrought by Hurricane Harvey in Texas and Hurricanes Irma and Maria in the Caribbean offered a clear picture of the direct security threats of climate crisis. As the globe becomes warmer, climate scientists say, hurricanes risk becoming stronger and more frequent, as they did this past season.
On social media, Trump critics and national security experts alike denounced the president's decision to ignore climate change as one of the nation's greatest threats.
\u201cAt part of #NationalSecurityStrategy, Trump brags about leaving #ParisClimateAgreement, a move that truly endangers our national security. Bad strategy. Bad.\u201d— Medea Benjamin (@Medea Benjamin) 1513624789
\u201cThe #NationalSecurityStrategy emphasis on protecting the homeland is impossible to reconcile with its failure to address climate change, a far greater risk to our lives and economy than ISIS or refugees.\u201d— Juliette Kayyem (@Juliette Kayyem) 1513602259
\u201cThe number of US natural disasters that caused at least $1 billion in damage (adjusted for inflation) from 1980 to Oct. 2017. \n\nA realistic #NationalSecurityStrategy would acknowledge climate change as an urgent threat\u201d— Samantha Power (@Samantha Power) 1513623655
\u201c#Trump\u2019s #NationalSecurityStrategy is an abdication of leadership on the world stage. Instead of focusing on real threats like climate change the strategy calls for building an impractical and unnecessary border wall.\u201d— Rep. Frank Pallone (@Rep. Frank Pallone) 1513633031
While 56 percent of Americans and the Pentagon hold that the deepening climate crisis is a serious threat to the country's safety, President Donald Trump left the issue out of his speech on his national security strategy on Monday--angering critics and green groups.
"Trump is not just ignoring science and public opinion about the dangers of the climate crisis, he's ignoring American generals and the Pentagon about what it takes to keep our military and our country safe," said Michael Brune, the executive director of Sierra Club, in a statement released after the president's speech.
Trump has regarded the efforts of every other country in the world to combat climate change as an endeavor that would harm American businesses and jobs--despite reports of a burgeoning job market in the renewable energy sector. Even in the Appalachian region, long dependent on the coal industry, Americans have expressed interest in moving on from the dangerous and pollution-causing reliance on mining the earth's natural resources.
The president focused his speech on familiar points--touting his promised border wall, pushing the need to deter North Korea from developing its nuclear capability, and pledging to ensure that economic partnerships with other countries benefit the U.S. first and foremost
The Department of Defense has considered climate change to be a threat at least since 2015, when it released a report on its security implications, arguing that rising global temperatures and its impacts including drought and famine could "aggravate problems such as poverty, social tensions, environmental degradation, ineffectual leadership, and weak political institutions that threaten stability in a number of countries."
"If we want to keep our country safe, Trump should take military advice from the military, not fossil fuel executives who are pushing to deny climate science and boost their profits at any cost," said Brune.
In recent months, the devastation wrought by Hurricane Harvey in Texas and Hurricanes Irma and Maria in the Caribbean offered a clear picture of the direct security threats of climate crisis. As the globe becomes warmer, climate scientists say, hurricanes risk becoming stronger and more frequent, as they did this past season.
On social media, Trump critics and national security experts alike denounced the president's decision to ignore climate change as one of the nation's greatest threats.
\u201cAt part of #NationalSecurityStrategy, Trump brags about leaving #ParisClimateAgreement, a move that truly endangers our national security. Bad strategy. Bad.\u201d— Medea Benjamin (@Medea Benjamin) 1513624789
\u201cThe #NationalSecurityStrategy emphasis on protecting the homeland is impossible to reconcile with its failure to address climate change, a far greater risk to our lives and economy than ISIS or refugees.\u201d— Juliette Kayyem (@Juliette Kayyem) 1513602259
\u201cThe number of US natural disasters that caused at least $1 billion in damage (adjusted for inflation) from 1980 to Oct. 2017. \n\nA realistic #NationalSecurityStrategy would acknowledge climate change as an urgent threat\u201d— Samantha Power (@Samantha Power) 1513623655
\u201c#Trump\u2019s #NationalSecurityStrategy is an abdication of leadership on the world stage. Instead of focusing on real threats like climate change the strategy calls for building an impractical and unnecessary border wall.\u201d— Rep. Frank Pallone (@Rep. Frank Pallone) 1513633031