Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said he'd speak against Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch "as long as I'm able." (Photo: Screenshot)
Apr 05, 2017
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) held the Senate floor overnight from Tuesday into Wednesday, talking for more than 15 hours about his opposition to Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.
Merkley's talk-a-thon, which began around 6:45pm Tuesday, ended after 10:00am Wednesday. Votes on Gorsuch, who faces a Democratic filibuster, are expected to begin Thursday. Republican leaders--who blockaded former President Barack Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland, for 10 months--have vowed to confirm Gorsuch on Friday, before leaving for Easter recess.
"By stealing a Supreme Court seat for the first time in American history, the Senate is undermining the court and the rule of law, and turning the highest court in the land into a political committee," Merkley wrote on his Facebook page. "This assault on our democracy demands as robust a resistance as we can possibly mount."
The former triathlete explained further as his all-nighter began: "The majority team in this chamber decided to steal a Supreme Court seat... The majority said, 'We intend to pack the court of the United States of America.' It was a warfare tactic of partisanship."
From there, Merkley's overnight resistance covered topics ranging from Gorsuch's anti-worker and anti-woman court decisions to the "premature" nature of confirming a lifetime appointment while the investigations are underway into ties between Russia and President Donald Trump's campaign. He cited Politico's reporting from Tuesday that Gorsuch plagiarized language from a law journal for his book published in 2006, and talked about the federal judge's ties to "secretive billionaire" Philip F. Anschutz, revealed last month by the New York Times. He delved into how Gorsuch could impact efforts to protect the environment and "lamented creeping commercialism and an erosion of civic participation," according to the Times.
Over the course of the verbal marathon, Merkley was cheered on by several of his Senate colleagues.
Clips of Merkley's effort can be watched below:
The progressive senator from Oregon also laid out his opposition in an op-ed published Tuesday at the Huffington Post. "A look at Gorsuch's decisions shows a disturbing pattern of a conservative activist twisting the law to find in favor of corporations and the powerful," he wrote.
He continued:
[M]aybe the best example of Gorsuch's extreme activism was his effort to rewrite the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA). This special education law was expressly crafted to ensure that children with disabilities get an "appropriate education." Yet Gorsuch ruled that an autistic boy's public school had only to provide him with "merely more than de minimus" education under the law. In other words, despite the clear intent and language of the law to educate students, Gorsuch again twisted the law to say that warehousing these children is fine.
This decision is both offensive and far outside the mainstream. Don't take my word for it: Less than two weeks ago the Supreme Court overturned Gorsuch's decision on an 8-0 vote. In the words of Chief Justice Roberts: "When all is said and done, a student offered an educational program providing 'merely more than de minimis' progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all." Even the most conservative justices recognized the Gorsuch decision as changing the entire intent of the IDEA.
Watch Wednesday's Senate proceedings live atC-SPAN.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today! |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
barack obamademocratic partyfacebooklaborneil gorsuchrepublican partytechnologytrump resistancetrumpismus senateus supreme courtwomenworkers
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) held the Senate floor overnight from Tuesday into Wednesday, talking for more than 15 hours about his opposition to Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.
Merkley's talk-a-thon, which began around 6:45pm Tuesday, ended after 10:00am Wednesday. Votes on Gorsuch, who faces a Democratic filibuster, are expected to begin Thursday. Republican leaders--who blockaded former President Barack Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland, for 10 months--have vowed to confirm Gorsuch on Friday, before leaving for Easter recess.
"By stealing a Supreme Court seat for the first time in American history, the Senate is undermining the court and the rule of law, and turning the highest court in the land into a political committee," Merkley wrote on his Facebook page. "This assault on our democracy demands as robust a resistance as we can possibly mount."
The former triathlete explained further as his all-nighter began: "The majority team in this chamber decided to steal a Supreme Court seat... The majority said, 'We intend to pack the court of the United States of America.' It was a warfare tactic of partisanship."
From there, Merkley's overnight resistance covered topics ranging from Gorsuch's anti-worker and anti-woman court decisions to the "premature" nature of confirming a lifetime appointment while the investigations are underway into ties between Russia and President Donald Trump's campaign. He cited Politico's reporting from Tuesday that Gorsuch plagiarized language from a law journal for his book published in 2006, and talked about the federal judge's ties to "secretive billionaire" Philip F. Anschutz, revealed last month by the New York Times. He delved into how Gorsuch could impact efforts to protect the environment and "lamented creeping commercialism and an erosion of civic participation," according to the Times.
Over the course of the verbal marathon, Merkley was cheered on by several of his Senate colleagues.
Clips of Merkley's effort can be watched below:
The progressive senator from Oregon also laid out his opposition in an op-ed published Tuesday at the Huffington Post. "A look at Gorsuch's decisions shows a disturbing pattern of a conservative activist twisting the law to find in favor of corporations and the powerful," he wrote.
He continued:
[M]aybe the best example of Gorsuch's extreme activism was his effort to rewrite the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA). This special education law was expressly crafted to ensure that children with disabilities get an "appropriate education." Yet Gorsuch ruled that an autistic boy's public school had only to provide him with "merely more than de minimus" education under the law. In other words, despite the clear intent and language of the law to educate students, Gorsuch again twisted the law to say that warehousing these children is fine.
This decision is both offensive and far outside the mainstream. Don't take my word for it: Less than two weeks ago the Supreme Court overturned Gorsuch's decision on an 8-0 vote. In the words of Chief Justice Roberts: "When all is said and done, a student offered an educational program providing 'merely more than de minimis' progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all." Even the most conservative justices recognized the Gorsuch decision as changing the entire intent of the IDEA.
Watch Wednesday's Senate proceedings live atC-SPAN.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) held the Senate floor overnight from Tuesday into Wednesday, talking for more than 15 hours about his opposition to Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch.
Merkley's talk-a-thon, which began around 6:45pm Tuesday, ended after 10:00am Wednesday. Votes on Gorsuch, who faces a Democratic filibuster, are expected to begin Thursday. Republican leaders--who blockaded former President Barack Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland, for 10 months--have vowed to confirm Gorsuch on Friday, before leaving for Easter recess.
"By stealing a Supreme Court seat for the first time in American history, the Senate is undermining the court and the rule of law, and turning the highest court in the land into a political committee," Merkley wrote on his Facebook page. "This assault on our democracy demands as robust a resistance as we can possibly mount."
The former triathlete explained further as his all-nighter began: "The majority team in this chamber decided to steal a Supreme Court seat... The majority said, 'We intend to pack the court of the United States of America.' It was a warfare tactic of partisanship."
From there, Merkley's overnight resistance covered topics ranging from Gorsuch's anti-worker and anti-woman court decisions to the "premature" nature of confirming a lifetime appointment while the investigations are underway into ties between Russia and President Donald Trump's campaign. He cited Politico's reporting from Tuesday that Gorsuch plagiarized language from a law journal for his book published in 2006, and talked about the federal judge's ties to "secretive billionaire" Philip F. Anschutz, revealed last month by the New York Times. He delved into how Gorsuch could impact efforts to protect the environment and "lamented creeping commercialism and an erosion of civic participation," according to the Times.
Over the course of the verbal marathon, Merkley was cheered on by several of his Senate colleagues.
Clips of Merkley's effort can be watched below:
The progressive senator from Oregon also laid out his opposition in an op-ed published Tuesday at the Huffington Post. "A look at Gorsuch's decisions shows a disturbing pattern of a conservative activist twisting the law to find in favor of corporations and the powerful," he wrote.
He continued:
[M]aybe the best example of Gorsuch's extreme activism was his effort to rewrite the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (IDEA). This special education law was expressly crafted to ensure that children with disabilities get an "appropriate education." Yet Gorsuch ruled that an autistic boy's public school had only to provide him with "merely more than de minimus" education under the law. In other words, despite the clear intent and language of the law to educate students, Gorsuch again twisted the law to say that warehousing these children is fine.
This decision is both offensive and far outside the mainstream. Don't take my word for it: Less than two weeks ago the Supreme Court overturned Gorsuch's decision on an 8-0 vote. In the words of Chief Justice Roberts: "When all is said and done, a student offered an educational program providing 'merely more than de minimis' progress from year to year can hardly be said to have been offered an education at all." Even the most conservative justices recognized the Gorsuch decision as changing the entire intent of the IDEA.
Watch Wednesday's Senate proceedings live atC-SPAN.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.