In June, the Supreme Court struck down abortion restrictions in Texas in the groundbreaking Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt. (Photo: Victoria Pickering/flickr/cc)
Nov 30, 2016
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Planned Parenthood, and the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) on Wednesday filed lawsuits to challenge abortion restrictions in three states--the first of a promised "wave of litigation" aiming to protect women's access to healthcare around the country.
Wednesday's lawsuits target abortion legislation in Alaska, Missouri, and North Carolina that the groups say are medically unnecessary and are reminiscent of other abortion restrictions already ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court.
"Today's filing is a major step in the fight to ensure all women can get safe and legal abortions in their own communities, when they need them," said CRR president and CEO Nancy Northup. "We are a nation of laws, and the center is prepared to use the full force of the law to ensure women's fundamental rights are protected and respected."
In Alaska, restrictions passed more than 40 years ago ban abortion in outpatient health centers after the first trimester, which force women to travel out of state for procedures, if they are even able.
North Carolina only allows abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy in "extremely limited health emergencies," as the CRR put it. The state defines (pdf) the health emergencies as a "condition which, in reasonable medical judgment, so complicates the medical condition of the pregnant woman as to necessitate the immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death or for which a delay will create serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function, not including any psychological or emotional conditions."
And restrictions in Missouri (pdf) have forced the closure of all but one abortion clinic in the state, meaning women "from all corners" of Missouri are forced to travel 370 miles to obtain an in-state abortion, the lawsuit says.
Dr. Raegan McDonald-Mosley, Planned Parenthood's chief medical officer, said Wednesday, "These restrictions have a disproportionate impact on those who already face far too many barriers to health care as people of color, people who live in rural areas, or people with low incomes. These laws are dangerous, unjust, and unconstitutional--and they will come down."
In June, the Supreme Court struck down abortion restrictions in Texas in the groundbreaking Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, ruling that two provisions of the state's controversial 2013 law--which required abortion providers to obtain hospital admitting privileges and reproductive healthcare facilities offering abortion services to meet ambulatory surgical center standards--posed an undue burden and hindered access to reproductive rights.
The justices' ruling reiterated that the right to choose is protected by the Constitution, stating, "We have found nothing in Texas' record evidence that shows that...the new law advanced Texas' legitimate interest in protecting women's health."
Since the ruling, abortion restrictions have been struck down or blocked in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin.
"The law is clear," wrote ACLU's reproductive rights communications manager Jaweer Brown in a blog post on Wednesday. "States cannot ban abortion."
The lawsuits send a clear message, Brown said. "We will continue to fight until every woman has the dignity to make decisions about her body, her family, and her future. Our bodies, our rights, and our clinics are not going anywhere."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
aclualaskacenter for reproductive rightsconstitutional rightscriminal justice systemhealthcaremissourinorth carolinaplanned parenthoodreproductive rightstexasus supreme courtwomen
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Planned Parenthood, and the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) on Wednesday filed lawsuits to challenge abortion restrictions in three states--the first of a promised "wave of litigation" aiming to protect women's access to healthcare around the country.
Wednesday's lawsuits target abortion legislation in Alaska, Missouri, and North Carolina that the groups say are medically unnecessary and are reminiscent of other abortion restrictions already ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court.
"Today's filing is a major step in the fight to ensure all women can get safe and legal abortions in their own communities, when they need them," said CRR president and CEO Nancy Northup. "We are a nation of laws, and the center is prepared to use the full force of the law to ensure women's fundamental rights are protected and respected."
In Alaska, restrictions passed more than 40 years ago ban abortion in outpatient health centers after the first trimester, which force women to travel out of state for procedures, if they are even able.
North Carolina only allows abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy in "extremely limited health emergencies," as the CRR put it. The state defines (pdf) the health emergencies as a "condition which, in reasonable medical judgment, so complicates the medical condition of the pregnant woman as to necessitate the immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death or for which a delay will create serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function, not including any psychological or emotional conditions."
And restrictions in Missouri (pdf) have forced the closure of all but one abortion clinic in the state, meaning women "from all corners" of Missouri are forced to travel 370 miles to obtain an in-state abortion, the lawsuit says.
Dr. Raegan McDonald-Mosley, Planned Parenthood's chief medical officer, said Wednesday, "These restrictions have a disproportionate impact on those who already face far too many barriers to health care as people of color, people who live in rural areas, or people with low incomes. These laws are dangerous, unjust, and unconstitutional--and they will come down."
In June, the Supreme Court struck down abortion restrictions in Texas in the groundbreaking Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, ruling that two provisions of the state's controversial 2013 law--which required abortion providers to obtain hospital admitting privileges and reproductive healthcare facilities offering abortion services to meet ambulatory surgical center standards--posed an undue burden and hindered access to reproductive rights.
The justices' ruling reiterated that the right to choose is protected by the Constitution, stating, "We have found nothing in Texas' record evidence that shows that...the new law advanced Texas' legitimate interest in protecting women's health."
Since the ruling, abortion restrictions have been struck down or blocked in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin.
"The law is clear," wrote ACLU's reproductive rights communications manager Jaweer Brown in a blog post on Wednesday. "States cannot ban abortion."
The lawsuits send a clear message, Brown said. "We will continue to fight until every woman has the dignity to make decisions about her body, her family, and her future. Our bodies, our rights, and our clinics are not going anywhere."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Planned Parenthood, and the Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR) on Wednesday filed lawsuits to challenge abortion restrictions in three states--the first of a promised "wave of litigation" aiming to protect women's access to healthcare around the country.
Wednesday's lawsuits target abortion legislation in Alaska, Missouri, and North Carolina that the groups say are medically unnecessary and are reminiscent of other abortion restrictions already ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court.
"Today's filing is a major step in the fight to ensure all women can get safe and legal abortions in their own communities, when they need them," said CRR president and CEO Nancy Northup. "We are a nation of laws, and the center is prepared to use the full force of the law to ensure women's fundamental rights are protected and respected."
In Alaska, restrictions passed more than 40 years ago ban abortion in outpatient health centers after the first trimester, which force women to travel out of state for procedures, if they are even able.
North Carolina only allows abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy in "extremely limited health emergencies," as the CRR put it. The state defines (pdf) the health emergencies as a "condition which, in reasonable medical judgment, so complicates the medical condition of the pregnant woman as to necessitate the immediate abortion of her pregnancy to avert her death or for which a delay will create serious risk of substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function, not including any psychological or emotional conditions."
And restrictions in Missouri (pdf) have forced the closure of all but one abortion clinic in the state, meaning women "from all corners" of Missouri are forced to travel 370 miles to obtain an in-state abortion, the lawsuit says.
Dr. Raegan McDonald-Mosley, Planned Parenthood's chief medical officer, said Wednesday, "These restrictions have a disproportionate impact on those who already face far too many barriers to health care as people of color, people who live in rural areas, or people with low incomes. These laws are dangerous, unjust, and unconstitutional--and they will come down."
In June, the Supreme Court struck down abortion restrictions in Texas in the groundbreaking Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt, ruling that two provisions of the state's controversial 2013 law--which required abortion providers to obtain hospital admitting privileges and reproductive healthcare facilities offering abortion services to meet ambulatory surgical center standards--posed an undue burden and hindered access to reproductive rights.
The justices' ruling reiterated that the right to choose is protected by the Constitution, stating, "We have found nothing in Texas' record evidence that shows that...the new law advanced Texas' legitimate interest in protecting women's health."
Since the ruling, abortion restrictions have been struck down or blocked in Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin.
"The law is clear," wrote ACLU's reproductive rights communications manager Jaweer Brown in a blog post on Wednesday. "States cannot ban abortion."
The lawsuits send a clear message, Brown said. "We will continue to fight until every woman has the dignity to make decisions about her body, her family, and her future. Our bodies, our rights, and our clinics are not going anywhere."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.