Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

Sen. Lindsey Graham told CNN "he would not even meet with any nominee, should he or she make courtesy calls" on Capitol Hill. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/flickr/cc)

'No Hearing, No Vote': GOP Vows Obstruction on Supreme Court Pick

Critics call move 'a shameful new low for a majority that has time and time again put party before country'

Deirdre Fulton

Drawing outrage from many sides, Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee decided in a closed door meeting on Tuesday afternoon to deny hearings or a vote on a Supreme Court nominee in 2016.

"This committee will not hold hearings on any Supreme Court nominee until after our next president is sworn in on Jan. 20, 2017," committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (Iowa) and the other 10 Republican members said in a letter (pdf) Tuesday to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

"That's the consensus view...No hearing, no vote," Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) told reporters as he left the meeting that took place in McConnell's office.

Graham told CNN separately "he would not even meet with any nominee, should he or she make courtesy calls" on Capitol Hill.

The death of Justice Antonin Scalia, which left the nation's highest court evenly split, has spurred a heated debate over whether President Barack Obama should appoint a replacement or wait for the next administration to make a decision.

"Presidents have a right to nominate just as the Senate has its constitutional right to provide or withhold consent. In this case, the Senate will withhold it," McConnell said Tuesday morning on the Senate floor. "The Senate will appropriately revisit the matter after the American people finish making in November the decision they've already started making today."

Justifying their position, several members of the committee cited then-Sen. Joe Biden's 1992 remarks, in which he said the panel ought to "seriously consider" not holding hearings on a nominee for an election-year vacancy. Biden has argued that the GOP is taking his statement out of context. 


The committee's decision drew withering criticism from inside and outside Congress.

"Republicans flat out saying they will deny any nominee a hearing or a vote before the nominee is even named is an unprecedented move and a complete dereliction of their constitutional duty," said Anna Galland, executive director of "It is a shameful new low for a majority that has time and time again put party before country. Republicans need to stop their obstruction and do their job."

"The party of Lincoln is becoming the party of Donald Trump," Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) added, predicting that Grassley would "go down in history as the most obstructionist Judiciary chair" for blocking a hearing.

Other groups and individuals tweeted along similar lines under the hashtag #DoYourJob.

Meanwhile, CBS News White House correspondent Mark Knoller tweeted that the administration is "not taking Judiciary Committee Republicans as final word against hearing on Pres Obama's SCOTUS nominee," pointing to at least four Senate Republicans who support a hearing: Mark Kirk (Ill.), Susan Collins (Maine), Roy Blunt (Mo.), and Dan Coats (Ind.).

Bloomberg reports:

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Tuesday that such actions would subject the Supreme Court to a kind of politics it hasn’t encountered in two centuries.

"This would be a historic and unprecedented acceleration of politicizing a branch of government that’s supposed to be separated from politics," Earnest told reporters. Obama has been telephoning senators to discuss the matter, including some Republican members of the Judiciary Committee, and he will continue making calls, the spokesman said.

A poll released Monday showed that the majority of Americans say the Senate should hold hearings and vote on Obama's choice to fill the vacancy. 

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.

Fetterman Calls for Assault Weapons Ban After July 4th Parade Massacre

The Democratic candidate for Pennsylvania's open U.S. Senate seat also demanded the prosecution of "gun dealers whose weapons routinely wind up at crime scenes."

Jake Johnson ·

Top US Nurses Union Urges Senators to Suspend Filibuster to Protect Abortion Rights

"Reproductive health services," says National Nurses United, are "fundamental to ensuring economic justice for women across the country."

Brett Wilkins ·

'Grave Injustice': Judge Rules Against West Virginia Community Devastated by Opioids

Three pharmaceutical companies distributed 81 million opioid painkillers in a West Virginia county over an eight-year period, but the federal judge ruled they were not liable for the damage done by the opioid epidemic.

Julia Conley ·

Nearly Two Dozen GOP States Attempting to Use Covid Relief Funds for Tax Cuts

Numerous Republican states, having benefited from federal coronavirus aid funds, are "pushing for income tax cuts that would deliver outsized gains to wealthy residents and profitable corporations."

Jake Johnson ·

'Congress Must Do More NOW,' Sanders Says After Mass Shooting at July 4th Parade

"Today's terrible shooting in Highland Park is the latest reminder of our nation's deadly gun violence epidemic," the Vermont senator said. "Grocery stores. Schools. Churches. Fourth of July parades."

Jake Johnson ·

Common Dreams Logo