The super PAC supporting Jeb Bush, called Right to Rise, reported raising more than $103 million between January 6 and June 30 of this year. (Photo: Gage Skidmore/flickr/cc)
Jul 10, 2015
Amid early fundraising disclosures from 2016 presidential candidates--especially the staggering $114 million haul announced Thursday by Jeb Bush's campaign--political observers are warning that the U.S. has "officially ushered in the super PAC era of presidential politics."
Super PACs, or political action committees, are outside spending groups that can raise unlimited donations from corporations and individuals alike, though candidates are not allowed to coordinate with them. They arose partly out of the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision.
The super PAC supporting Bush, called Right to Rise, reported raising more than $103 million between January 6 and June 30 of this year. According to the Center for Responsive Politics and OpenSecrets.org, that's four times as much money as all super PACs--combined--raised during the same period in 2011. Bush's official campaign committee, which is limited to maximum donations of $5,400 per person, brought in a mere $11.4 million.
Those numbers leave little doubt that Bush is at the front of the pack among his Republican rivals for the party's presidential nomination.
But for Politico journalist Kenneth Vogel, they indicated something else, as well:
Any lingering doubts have been erased about whether the lure of seven-figure checks would be powerful enough to offset concerns about a patchwork of recently gutted -- and loosely enforced -- laws intended to restrict the effectiveness of unlimited political spending.
In this new reality, there's less incentive for prospective commanders in chief to invest time and money in building an army of small- and medium sized donors for their campaigns, and more incentive to cultivate a handful of billionaire backers to pour cash into supportive big-money vehicles like super PACs.
"Jeb Bush has truly taken us into the Wild West era of campaign spending, where existing campaign finance rules are to be mocked, ignored and circumvented with a wink and a nod, and where there is no limit on giving--and presumably no limit on what's being promised to the donors," echoed Public Citizen president Robert Weissman. "We can't have a functioning democracy where leading presidential candidates operate in this fashion."
The first Federal Election Commission filing deadline for presidential candidates is Wednesday, July 15, but some organizations have released their totals early.
Democrat Hillary Clinton, for example, has reportedly raised $45 million through her campaign and $15.6 million through her super PAC. Republican Ted Cruz has racked up $14.5 million through his campaign, and an additional $38 million from super PACs.
Meanwhile, campaign finance reform advocate Bernie Sanders--who has said a central consideration for Supreme Court nominees should be their position on Citizens United--has refused a super PAC. Sanders has raised $15 million in small contributions from 250,000 donors.
And with Politico reporting that "not just the money, but also the power and clout are migrating to the super PACs and away from the campaigns and especially the party committees," the call to get big money out of politics is becoming increasingly urgent.
As Public Citizen's Weissman said: "It is clearer by the day that we need a fundamental overhaul of campaign finance rules, starting with a constitutional amendment to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling and reestablish commonsense rules, so everybody's voice is heard."
In its "2016 Money Chase" explainer published in late June, NBC Newsoffered this list of the major Super PACs and which candidate they're backing:
REPUBLICANS:
Jeb Bush: Right to Rise PAC
Ben Carson: Run Ben Run and One Vote
Chris Christie: America Leads
Ted Cruz: Keep the Promise PAC, Keep the Promise PAC I, Keep the Promise PAC II, Keep the Promise PAC III
Carly Fiorina: Conservative, Authentic, Responsive, Leadership for You and America (CARLY For America)
Lindsey Graham: Security Is Strength PAC
Mike Huckabee: Pursuing America's Greatness
John Kasich: New Day for America
George Pataki: We the People - Not Washington PAC
Rand Paul: America's Liberty PAC
Rick Perry: Opportunity and Freedom PAC
Marco Rubio: Conservative Solutions PAC
Donald Trump: Citizens for Restoring USA
Scott Walker: Unintimidated PAC
DEMOCRATS:
Hillary Clinton: Priorities USA
Martin O'Malley: Generation Forward
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
ben carsonbernie sanderscampaign financecitizens unitedelection 2016hillary clintonjeb bushmarco rubiomike huckabeesuper pacs
Amid early fundraising disclosures from 2016 presidential candidates--especially the staggering $114 million haul announced Thursday by Jeb Bush's campaign--political observers are warning that the U.S. has "officially ushered in the super PAC era of presidential politics."
Super PACs, or political action committees, are outside spending groups that can raise unlimited donations from corporations and individuals alike, though candidates are not allowed to coordinate with them. They arose partly out of the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision.
The super PAC supporting Bush, called Right to Rise, reported raising more than $103 million between January 6 and June 30 of this year. According to the Center for Responsive Politics and OpenSecrets.org, that's four times as much money as all super PACs--combined--raised during the same period in 2011. Bush's official campaign committee, which is limited to maximum donations of $5,400 per person, brought in a mere $11.4 million.
Those numbers leave little doubt that Bush is at the front of the pack among his Republican rivals for the party's presidential nomination.
But for Politico journalist Kenneth Vogel, they indicated something else, as well:
Any lingering doubts have been erased about whether the lure of seven-figure checks would be powerful enough to offset concerns about a patchwork of recently gutted -- and loosely enforced -- laws intended to restrict the effectiveness of unlimited political spending.
In this new reality, there's less incentive for prospective commanders in chief to invest time and money in building an army of small- and medium sized donors for their campaigns, and more incentive to cultivate a handful of billionaire backers to pour cash into supportive big-money vehicles like super PACs.
"Jeb Bush has truly taken us into the Wild West era of campaign spending, where existing campaign finance rules are to be mocked, ignored and circumvented with a wink and a nod, and where there is no limit on giving--and presumably no limit on what's being promised to the donors," echoed Public Citizen president Robert Weissman. "We can't have a functioning democracy where leading presidential candidates operate in this fashion."
The first Federal Election Commission filing deadline for presidential candidates is Wednesday, July 15, but some organizations have released their totals early.
Democrat Hillary Clinton, for example, has reportedly raised $45 million through her campaign and $15.6 million through her super PAC. Republican Ted Cruz has racked up $14.5 million through his campaign, and an additional $38 million from super PACs.
Meanwhile, campaign finance reform advocate Bernie Sanders--who has said a central consideration for Supreme Court nominees should be their position on Citizens United--has refused a super PAC. Sanders has raised $15 million in small contributions from 250,000 donors.
And with Politico reporting that "not just the money, but also the power and clout are migrating to the super PACs and away from the campaigns and especially the party committees," the call to get big money out of politics is becoming increasingly urgent.
As Public Citizen's Weissman said: "It is clearer by the day that we need a fundamental overhaul of campaign finance rules, starting with a constitutional amendment to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling and reestablish commonsense rules, so everybody's voice is heard."
In its "2016 Money Chase" explainer published in late June, NBC Newsoffered this list of the major Super PACs and which candidate they're backing:
REPUBLICANS:
Jeb Bush: Right to Rise PAC
Ben Carson: Run Ben Run and One Vote
Chris Christie: America Leads
Ted Cruz: Keep the Promise PAC, Keep the Promise PAC I, Keep the Promise PAC II, Keep the Promise PAC III
Carly Fiorina: Conservative, Authentic, Responsive, Leadership for You and America (CARLY For America)
Lindsey Graham: Security Is Strength PAC
Mike Huckabee: Pursuing America's Greatness
John Kasich: New Day for America
George Pataki: We the People - Not Washington PAC
Rand Paul: America's Liberty PAC
Rick Perry: Opportunity and Freedom PAC
Marco Rubio: Conservative Solutions PAC
Donald Trump: Citizens for Restoring USA
Scott Walker: Unintimidated PAC
DEMOCRATS:
Hillary Clinton: Priorities USA
Martin O'Malley: Generation Forward
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Amid early fundraising disclosures from 2016 presidential candidates--especially the staggering $114 million haul announced Thursday by Jeb Bush's campaign--political observers are warning that the U.S. has "officially ushered in the super PAC era of presidential politics."
Super PACs, or political action committees, are outside spending groups that can raise unlimited donations from corporations and individuals alike, though candidates are not allowed to coordinate with them. They arose partly out of the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision.
The super PAC supporting Bush, called Right to Rise, reported raising more than $103 million between January 6 and June 30 of this year. According to the Center for Responsive Politics and OpenSecrets.org, that's four times as much money as all super PACs--combined--raised during the same period in 2011. Bush's official campaign committee, which is limited to maximum donations of $5,400 per person, brought in a mere $11.4 million.
Those numbers leave little doubt that Bush is at the front of the pack among his Republican rivals for the party's presidential nomination.
But for Politico journalist Kenneth Vogel, they indicated something else, as well:
Any lingering doubts have been erased about whether the lure of seven-figure checks would be powerful enough to offset concerns about a patchwork of recently gutted -- and loosely enforced -- laws intended to restrict the effectiveness of unlimited political spending.
In this new reality, there's less incentive for prospective commanders in chief to invest time and money in building an army of small- and medium sized donors for their campaigns, and more incentive to cultivate a handful of billionaire backers to pour cash into supportive big-money vehicles like super PACs.
"Jeb Bush has truly taken us into the Wild West era of campaign spending, where existing campaign finance rules are to be mocked, ignored and circumvented with a wink and a nod, and where there is no limit on giving--and presumably no limit on what's being promised to the donors," echoed Public Citizen president Robert Weissman. "We can't have a functioning democracy where leading presidential candidates operate in this fashion."
The first Federal Election Commission filing deadline for presidential candidates is Wednesday, July 15, but some organizations have released their totals early.
Democrat Hillary Clinton, for example, has reportedly raised $45 million through her campaign and $15.6 million through her super PAC. Republican Ted Cruz has racked up $14.5 million through his campaign, and an additional $38 million from super PACs.
Meanwhile, campaign finance reform advocate Bernie Sanders--who has said a central consideration for Supreme Court nominees should be their position on Citizens United--has refused a super PAC. Sanders has raised $15 million in small contributions from 250,000 donors.
And with Politico reporting that "not just the money, but also the power and clout are migrating to the super PACs and away from the campaigns and especially the party committees," the call to get big money out of politics is becoming increasingly urgent.
As Public Citizen's Weissman said: "It is clearer by the day that we need a fundamental overhaul of campaign finance rules, starting with a constitutional amendment to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling and reestablish commonsense rules, so everybody's voice is heard."
In its "2016 Money Chase" explainer published in late June, NBC Newsoffered this list of the major Super PACs and which candidate they're backing:
REPUBLICANS:
Jeb Bush: Right to Rise PAC
Ben Carson: Run Ben Run and One Vote
Chris Christie: America Leads
Ted Cruz: Keep the Promise PAC, Keep the Promise PAC I, Keep the Promise PAC II, Keep the Promise PAC III
Carly Fiorina: Conservative, Authentic, Responsive, Leadership for You and America (CARLY For America)
Lindsey Graham: Security Is Strength PAC
Mike Huckabee: Pursuing America's Greatness
John Kasich: New Day for America
George Pataki: We the People - Not Washington PAC
Rand Paul: America's Liberty PAC
Rick Perry: Opportunity and Freedom PAC
Marco Rubio: Conservative Solutions PAC
Donald Trump: Citizens for Restoring USA
Scott Walker: Unintimidated PAC
DEMOCRATS:
Hillary Clinton: Priorities USA
Martin O'Malley: Generation Forward
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.