'Failure of Conscience': Groups Urge Congress to Fund Social Well-Being, Not Fossil Fuel Industry
Diverse coalition launches calculator to measure cost of fossil fuel subsidies
A coalition of environmental and social justice groups has come together to declare collective disgust with the spending of billions of taxpayer dollars on unnecessary subsidies for the oil and gas industries when that same money could be used to improve the lives of millions if spent on social services, renewable energy investments, healthcare, and education.
The coalition includes Friends of the Earth, Public Citizen, People for the American Way, and Oxfam America, among others. As part of its effort, the coalition has launched a Fossil Fuel Subsidies Tradeoff Calculator, a tool which breaks down both the government's giveaways to the oil industry into smaller brackets, such as tax credits for manufacturers and fossil energy research programs, and the social programs that could benefit from those subsidies instead, like school lunches and veteran healthcare.
"Leaving the social safety net in tatters and keeping Big Oil on the dole is not just a failure to prioritize. It is a failure of conscience," said Lukas Ross, climate and energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, one of the organizations in the coalition. "In the face of record inequality, crumbling infrastructure, and looming climate disruption, it is time for Congress to think hard about the government spending we need and the corporate welfare we don't."
Among the programs set to receive funding through the so-called "Cromnibus" spending bill that passed the Senate in December is one that will give the oil and gas industry $571 million a year for research and development. Applying that same amount of money to a swath of different social assistance programs, Congress could fund maximum Pell grants for nearly 100,000 students or the median salaries of more than 18,000 national park rangers, the coalition found.
"It's an abomination that while Americans are working every day for a transition to a more sustainable, more equal and more democratic economy, members of Congress are willingly trading off our future for the short-term profits of fossil fuel executives," said Janet Redman, director of the climate policy program at the Institute for Policy Studies, another coalition member.
The tradeoff calculator also analyzes the expense of the "intangible drilling cost deduction," an accounting tactic often employed by big oil companies to write off much of the price of building new wells in the U.S., as much as $1.67 billion a year. As the Joint Committee on Taxation explains:
Under normal income tax rules, a company that pays expenses in order to make future profits would need to deduct the expenses over the same time period as profits. The costs for drilling exploratory and developmental wells would need to be deducted as resources are extracted from the well.
The break for intangible drilling costs (IDCs) is an exception to the general rule. Independent producers can choose to immediately deduct all of their intangible drilling costs.
That $1.67 billion in write-offs could be applied instead to funding 768,202,765 school lunches a year, healthcare for 563,176 veterans, or food stamps for 13,117,721 people.
Altogether, the cost of government subsidies for the oil and gas industry totals $6.45 billion, according to the coalition. For that amount of funding, 5,469,579 children could receive free or low-cost health insurance up to age 19.
"Congress has stripped food assistance for kids and seniors, but they continue to give billions in handouts to the wealthiest and most polluting companies in the world," said Green for All executive director Jeremy Hays. "Our scarce public resources should protect the health and safety of our communities."
In addition to environmental groups, the coalition included voices from faith-based organizations. "Let's be blunt, the propping up of oil companies while denying climate change is pure corruption," said Ani Zonneveld, president of Muslims for Progressive Values.
Stephen Kretzmann, executive director of Oil Change International, also stated, "There are two words that perfectly describe the ongoing use of public funds to support the fossil fuel industry: climate denial."
"Ending fossil fuel subsidies should be the first step in fighting climate change," Kretzmann said.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
A coalition of environmental and social justice groups has come together to declare collective disgust with the spending of billions of taxpayer dollars on unnecessary subsidies for the oil and gas industries when that same money could be used to improve the lives of millions if spent on social services, renewable energy investments, healthcare, and education.
The coalition includes Friends of the Earth, Public Citizen, People for the American Way, and Oxfam America, among others. As part of its effort, the coalition has launched a Fossil Fuel Subsidies Tradeoff Calculator, a tool which breaks down both the government's giveaways to the oil industry into smaller brackets, such as tax credits for manufacturers and fossil energy research programs, and the social programs that could benefit from those subsidies instead, like school lunches and veteran healthcare.
"Leaving the social safety net in tatters and keeping Big Oil on the dole is not just a failure to prioritize. It is a failure of conscience," said Lukas Ross, climate and energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, one of the organizations in the coalition. "In the face of record inequality, crumbling infrastructure, and looming climate disruption, it is time for Congress to think hard about the government spending we need and the corporate welfare we don't."
Among the programs set to receive funding through the so-called "Cromnibus" spending bill that passed the Senate in December is one that will give the oil and gas industry $571 million a year for research and development. Applying that same amount of money to a swath of different social assistance programs, Congress could fund maximum Pell grants for nearly 100,000 students or the median salaries of more than 18,000 national park rangers, the coalition found.
"It's an abomination that while Americans are working every day for a transition to a more sustainable, more equal and more democratic economy, members of Congress are willingly trading off our future for the short-term profits of fossil fuel executives," said Janet Redman, director of the climate policy program at the Institute for Policy Studies, another coalition member.
The tradeoff calculator also analyzes the expense of the "intangible drilling cost deduction," an accounting tactic often employed by big oil companies to write off much of the price of building new wells in the U.S., as much as $1.67 billion a year. As the Joint Committee on Taxation explains:
Under normal income tax rules, a company that pays expenses in order to make future profits would need to deduct the expenses over the same time period as profits. The costs for drilling exploratory and developmental wells would need to be deducted as resources are extracted from the well.
The break for intangible drilling costs (IDCs) is an exception to the general rule. Independent producers can choose to immediately deduct all of their intangible drilling costs.
That $1.67 billion in write-offs could be applied instead to funding 768,202,765 school lunches a year, healthcare for 563,176 veterans, or food stamps for 13,117,721 people.
Altogether, the cost of government subsidies for the oil and gas industry totals $6.45 billion, according to the coalition. For that amount of funding, 5,469,579 children could receive free or low-cost health insurance up to age 19.
"Congress has stripped food assistance for kids and seniors, but they continue to give billions in handouts to the wealthiest and most polluting companies in the world," said Green for All executive director Jeremy Hays. "Our scarce public resources should protect the health and safety of our communities."
In addition to environmental groups, the coalition included voices from faith-based organizations. "Let's be blunt, the propping up of oil companies while denying climate change is pure corruption," said Ani Zonneveld, president of Muslims for Progressive Values.
Stephen Kretzmann, executive director of Oil Change International, also stated, "There are two words that perfectly describe the ongoing use of public funds to support the fossil fuel industry: climate denial."
"Ending fossil fuel subsidies should be the first step in fighting climate change," Kretzmann said.
A coalition of environmental and social justice groups has come together to declare collective disgust with the spending of billions of taxpayer dollars on unnecessary subsidies for the oil and gas industries when that same money could be used to improve the lives of millions if spent on social services, renewable energy investments, healthcare, and education.
The coalition includes Friends of the Earth, Public Citizen, People for the American Way, and Oxfam America, among others. As part of its effort, the coalition has launched a Fossil Fuel Subsidies Tradeoff Calculator, a tool which breaks down both the government's giveaways to the oil industry into smaller brackets, such as tax credits for manufacturers and fossil energy research programs, and the social programs that could benefit from those subsidies instead, like school lunches and veteran healthcare.
"Leaving the social safety net in tatters and keeping Big Oil on the dole is not just a failure to prioritize. It is a failure of conscience," said Lukas Ross, climate and energy campaigner at Friends of the Earth, one of the organizations in the coalition. "In the face of record inequality, crumbling infrastructure, and looming climate disruption, it is time for Congress to think hard about the government spending we need and the corporate welfare we don't."
Among the programs set to receive funding through the so-called "Cromnibus" spending bill that passed the Senate in December is one that will give the oil and gas industry $571 million a year for research and development. Applying that same amount of money to a swath of different social assistance programs, Congress could fund maximum Pell grants for nearly 100,000 students or the median salaries of more than 18,000 national park rangers, the coalition found.
"It's an abomination that while Americans are working every day for a transition to a more sustainable, more equal and more democratic economy, members of Congress are willingly trading off our future for the short-term profits of fossil fuel executives," said Janet Redman, director of the climate policy program at the Institute for Policy Studies, another coalition member.
The tradeoff calculator also analyzes the expense of the "intangible drilling cost deduction," an accounting tactic often employed by big oil companies to write off much of the price of building new wells in the U.S., as much as $1.67 billion a year. As the Joint Committee on Taxation explains:
Under normal income tax rules, a company that pays expenses in order to make future profits would need to deduct the expenses over the same time period as profits. The costs for drilling exploratory and developmental wells would need to be deducted as resources are extracted from the well.
The break for intangible drilling costs (IDCs) is an exception to the general rule. Independent producers can choose to immediately deduct all of their intangible drilling costs.
That $1.67 billion in write-offs could be applied instead to funding 768,202,765 school lunches a year, healthcare for 563,176 veterans, or food stamps for 13,117,721 people.
Altogether, the cost of government subsidies for the oil and gas industry totals $6.45 billion, according to the coalition. For that amount of funding, 5,469,579 children could receive free or low-cost health insurance up to age 19.
"Congress has stripped food assistance for kids and seniors, but they continue to give billions in handouts to the wealthiest and most polluting companies in the world," said Green for All executive director Jeremy Hays. "Our scarce public resources should protect the health and safety of our communities."
In addition to environmental groups, the coalition included voices from faith-based organizations. "Let's be blunt, the propping up of oil companies while denying climate change is pure corruption," said Ani Zonneveld, president of Muslims for Progressive Values.
Stephen Kretzmann, executive director of Oil Change International, also stated, "There are two words that perfectly describe the ongoing use of public funds to support the fossil fuel industry: climate denial."
"Ending fossil fuel subsidies should be the first step in fighting climate change," Kretzmann said.