SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Frances Moore Lappe, Vandana Shiva Blast Award for GMO Scientists
The real future is "GMO-free food, patent-free food, seed freedom, food freedom."
Jun 28, 2013
Frances Moore Lappe and Vandana Shiva, noted figures in the food sovereignty movement, added their voices to the chorus blasting the 2013 World Food Prize going to GMO scientists with the biotechnology giants Monsanto and Syngenta.
The GMO scientists' work contributes to hunger and ecological devastation while not advancing nutrition, said the two Right Livelihood Laureates, also Councillors on the World Future Council. The pair noted the irony of Monsanto being awarded at a time of rising worldwide opposition to the seed giant.
Lappe and Shiva's remarks echo those of the U.S. Food Sovereignty Alliance, which stated that the prize going to the biotech giants "sends precisely the wrong message about sustainable solutions to hunger and poverty."
"Never mind that Monsanto is a sponsor of the prize (and that the list of other backers reads like a who's who of big ag and big food), or that we never get to know the names of either the nominees or the nominators," New York Times' Mark Bittman noted.
Still, the GMO work by the winning scientists "betrays the mandate of the very World Food Prize," explains Lappe, "which is all about focus on the importance of nutritious food and food for all, whereas GMO seeds, their design and the way they are spread to the world has nothing to do with better nutrition."
"In fact, to take advantage of these seeds, small farmers who are among the hungriest people in the world, have to take out loans to buy the costly products that are required--the seeds, the fertilizers... and the pesticides that are required" for the GMO seeds.
"So in fact the honorees ... are actually contributing the problems that keep us locked... in hundreds of millions of people in a world where there is plenty of food," concluded Lappe.
The World Food Prize explained that the GMO work by the new winners has "contributed significantly to increasing the quantity and availability of food."
Not so, says Shiva.
"The evidence is so clear," she says, that "GMOs have not increased production, there's a failure to yield." In addition, "they have not reduced use of chemicals. Worse, they have increased the use of chemicals because they have created superpests and superweeds."
To reward this "failed technology... in 2013, at a time when the world is waking up to the scientific evidence that biodiverse systems, ecological systems produce more food. We could be having enough food for two to three times the world's population by conserving and intensifying our biodiversity, saving our water, rejuvenating our soils. That's agro-ecology The new science of agriculture, of working with nature, and not against her . It's also the science that small farmers practice to bring 80% of the food to the world. It's not the gene giants."
"In a way," she continues, "the award being given to Monsanto is attempt to try and divert the public's attention" away from rising global opposition.
The real future is "GMO-free food, patent-free food, seed freedom, food freedom."
Therefore, "the award for food security and food sovereignty belongs to the millions of women, the millions of small farmers, the millions of market gardeners" who bring true food security to the world, says Shiva.
* * *
Video of Lappe and Shiva expressing their outrage at the biotech scientists' receipt of the prize was posted by the World Future Council:
World Food Prize 2013 - Vandana Shiva and Frances Moore Lappe condemn selection of winnerVandana Shiva and Frances Moore Lappé, members of the World Future Council and laureates of the Right Livelihood Award, ...
__________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
right livelihood awardsyngentamonsantovandana shivagmosgmofoodagroecologyfrances moore lappefood security
Frances Moore Lappe and Vandana Shiva, noted figures in the food sovereignty movement, added their voices to the chorus blasting the 2013 World Food Prize going to GMO scientists with the biotechnology giants Monsanto and Syngenta.
The GMO scientists' work contributes to hunger and ecological devastation while not advancing nutrition, said the two Right Livelihood Laureates, also Councillors on the World Future Council. The pair noted the irony of Monsanto being awarded at a time of rising worldwide opposition to the seed giant.
Lappe and Shiva's remarks echo those of the U.S. Food Sovereignty Alliance, which stated that the prize going to the biotech giants "sends precisely the wrong message about sustainable solutions to hunger and poverty."
"Never mind that Monsanto is a sponsor of the prize (and that the list of other backers reads like a who's who of big ag and big food), or that we never get to know the names of either the nominees or the nominators," New York Times' Mark Bittman noted.
Still, the GMO work by the winning scientists "betrays the mandate of the very World Food Prize," explains Lappe, "which is all about focus on the importance of nutritious food and food for all, whereas GMO seeds, their design and the way they are spread to the world has nothing to do with better nutrition."
"In fact, to take advantage of these seeds, small farmers who are among the hungriest people in the world, have to take out loans to buy the costly products that are required--the seeds, the fertilizers... and the pesticides that are required" for the GMO seeds.
"So in fact the honorees ... are actually contributing the problems that keep us locked... in hundreds of millions of people in a world where there is plenty of food," concluded Lappe.
The World Food Prize explained that the GMO work by the new winners has "contributed significantly to increasing the quantity and availability of food."
Not so, says Shiva.
"The evidence is so clear," she says, that "GMOs have not increased production, there's a failure to yield." In addition, "they have not reduced use of chemicals. Worse, they have increased the use of chemicals because they have created superpests and superweeds."
To reward this "failed technology... in 2013, at a time when the world is waking up to the scientific evidence that biodiverse systems, ecological systems produce more food. We could be having enough food for two to three times the world's population by conserving and intensifying our biodiversity, saving our water, rejuvenating our soils. That's agro-ecology The new science of agriculture, of working with nature, and not against her . It's also the science that small farmers practice to bring 80% of the food to the world. It's not the gene giants."
"In a way," she continues, "the award being given to Monsanto is attempt to try and divert the public's attention" away from rising global opposition.
The real future is "GMO-free food, patent-free food, seed freedom, food freedom."
Therefore, "the award for food security and food sovereignty belongs to the millions of women, the millions of small farmers, the millions of market gardeners" who bring true food security to the world, says Shiva.
* * *
Video of Lappe and Shiva expressing their outrage at the biotech scientists' receipt of the prize was posted by the World Future Council:
World Food Prize 2013 - Vandana Shiva and Frances Moore Lappe condemn selection of winnerVandana Shiva and Frances Moore Lappé, members of the World Future Council and laureates of the Right Livelihood Award, ...
__________________
Frances Moore Lappe and Vandana Shiva, noted figures in the food sovereignty movement, added their voices to the chorus blasting the 2013 World Food Prize going to GMO scientists with the biotechnology giants Monsanto and Syngenta.
The GMO scientists' work contributes to hunger and ecological devastation while not advancing nutrition, said the two Right Livelihood Laureates, also Councillors on the World Future Council. The pair noted the irony of Monsanto being awarded at a time of rising worldwide opposition to the seed giant.
Lappe and Shiva's remarks echo those of the U.S. Food Sovereignty Alliance, which stated that the prize going to the biotech giants "sends precisely the wrong message about sustainable solutions to hunger and poverty."
"Never mind that Monsanto is a sponsor of the prize (and that the list of other backers reads like a who's who of big ag and big food), or that we never get to know the names of either the nominees or the nominators," New York Times' Mark Bittman noted.
Still, the GMO work by the winning scientists "betrays the mandate of the very World Food Prize," explains Lappe, "which is all about focus on the importance of nutritious food and food for all, whereas GMO seeds, their design and the way they are spread to the world has nothing to do with better nutrition."
"In fact, to take advantage of these seeds, small farmers who are among the hungriest people in the world, have to take out loans to buy the costly products that are required--the seeds, the fertilizers... and the pesticides that are required" for the GMO seeds.
"So in fact the honorees ... are actually contributing the problems that keep us locked... in hundreds of millions of people in a world where there is plenty of food," concluded Lappe.
The World Food Prize explained that the GMO work by the new winners has "contributed significantly to increasing the quantity and availability of food."
Not so, says Shiva.
"The evidence is so clear," she says, that "GMOs have not increased production, there's a failure to yield." In addition, "they have not reduced use of chemicals. Worse, they have increased the use of chemicals because they have created superpests and superweeds."
To reward this "failed technology... in 2013, at a time when the world is waking up to the scientific evidence that biodiverse systems, ecological systems produce more food. We could be having enough food for two to three times the world's population by conserving and intensifying our biodiversity, saving our water, rejuvenating our soils. That's agro-ecology The new science of agriculture, of working with nature, and not against her . It's also the science that small farmers practice to bring 80% of the food to the world. It's not the gene giants."
"In a way," she continues, "the award being given to Monsanto is attempt to try and divert the public's attention" away from rising global opposition.
The real future is "GMO-free food, patent-free food, seed freedom, food freedom."
Therefore, "the award for food security and food sovereignty belongs to the millions of women, the millions of small farmers, the millions of market gardeners" who bring true food security to the world, says Shiva.
* * *
Video of Lappe and Shiva expressing their outrage at the biotech scientists' receipt of the prize was posted by the World Future Council:
World Food Prize 2013 - Vandana Shiva and Frances Moore Lappe condemn selection of winnerVandana Shiva and Frances Moore Lappé, members of the World Future Council and laureates of the Right Livelihood Award, ...
__________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.