SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
TransCanada's Other Massive Pipeline Plan
TransCanada's Keystone XL tar sands pipeline has been front and center in a heated continental energy and climate debate for over four years now - and President Obama is sounding more and more like he is poised to make the right decision and reject the pipeline that would carry high carbon, high risk, high cost bit
Mar 25, 2015
TransCanada's Keystone XL tar sands pipeline has been front and center in a heated continental energy and climate debate for over four years now - and President Obama is sounding more and more like he is poised to make the right decision and reject the pipeline that would carry high carbon, high risk, high cost bitumen through North America's heartland.
As you probably can imagine, tar sands producers and shippers will not give up easily in their efforts to get Canadian oil to international markets - where they can make more money selling their oil.
TransCanada has recently proposed an even bigger pipeline called Energy East that would carry 1.1 million barrels of tar sands oil from Alberta, across all of central and Eastern Canada to Atlantic refineries and ports.
But opposition was fast and furious even before the proposal was filed late last year. Tar sands pipelines are simply not part of the energy future Canadians want.
Energy East comes after other major pipeline proposals to ship tar sands to the Pacific coast hit the same kinds of hurdles as Keystone XL: massive public opposition and political concern. Critically, both the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, and the Kinder Morgan TransMountain pipeline expansion have run directly into the powerful wall of First Nations in British Columbia, who have committed to using their legal rights to ensure no tar sands pipelines ever cross their lands.
Big Oil just isn't getting it. Major tar sands pipelines are never going to be easy to build on the continent again. They have been blocked to the south and to the west, and now they will be blocked to the east.
Citizens can have their pick of legitimate concerns ranging from the climate impact of the pipeline (like putting 50 million new cars on the road each year*), to TransCanada's abysmal safety record (the first phase of Keystone spilled 12 times in its first year of operation). The provincial governments of Canada's largest provinces, Quebec and Ontario, have both responded coolly to the proposal, and so far close to 30 municipalities have opposed the pipeline on their land.
On April 11th, tens of thousands of people are going to gather in Quebec City where Provincial Premiers are going to be meeting to discuss Canada's climate efforts heading towards the December climate talks in Paris.
Their message will be crystal clear: Act on Climate: say no to Energy East and tar sands expansion.
We know that we simply cannot afford tar sands expansion and that most of the remaining reserves are going to have to stay where they are: underground.
So lets support Canadians on April 11th and in their fight to stop tar sands expansion. North America can do better than a future built around fossil fuels and the sooner we get started the better off we will all be.
*According to our methodology developed in Cooking the Books: the true climate impact of Keystone XL, 1.1 million barrels per day of a range of tar sands crude oils typically imported into the U.S. would generate 240 million tons a year of greenhouse gas emissions on a full life cycle basis. We thus estimate the annual life cycle GHG emissions of Energy East to be roughly equivalent to 50 million vehicles or 63 average U.S. coal plants.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
© 2023 Oil Change International
Hannah Mckinnon
Hannah McKinnon is a program director at Sequoia Climate Foundation, where she leads the Foundation's work on oil and gas. Previously, she was a contributing writer for Oil Change International.
TransCanada's Keystone XL tar sands pipeline has been front and center in a heated continental energy and climate debate for over four years now - and President Obama is sounding more and more like he is poised to make the right decision and reject the pipeline that would carry high carbon, high risk, high cost bitumen through North America's heartland.
As you probably can imagine, tar sands producers and shippers will not give up easily in their efforts to get Canadian oil to international markets - where they can make more money selling their oil.
TransCanada has recently proposed an even bigger pipeline called Energy East that would carry 1.1 million barrels of tar sands oil from Alberta, across all of central and Eastern Canada to Atlantic refineries and ports.
But opposition was fast and furious even before the proposal was filed late last year. Tar sands pipelines are simply not part of the energy future Canadians want.
Energy East comes after other major pipeline proposals to ship tar sands to the Pacific coast hit the same kinds of hurdles as Keystone XL: massive public opposition and political concern. Critically, both the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, and the Kinder Morgan TransMountain pipeline expansion have run directly into the powerful wall of First Nations in British Columbia, who have committed to using their legal rights to ensure no tar sands pipelines ever cross their lands.
Big Oil just isn't getting it. Major tar sands pipelines are never going to be easy to build on the continent again. They have been blocked to the south and to the west, and now they will be blocked to the east.
Citizens can have their pick of legitimate concerns ranging from the climate impact of the pipeline (like putting 50 million new cars on the road each year*), to TransCanada's abysmal safety record (the first phase of Keystone spilled 12 times in its first year of operation). The provincial governments of Canada's largest provinces, Quebec and Ontario, have both responded coolly to the proposal, and so far close to 30 municipalities have opposed the pipeline on their land.
On April 11th, tens of thousands of people are going to gather in Quebec City where Provincial Premiers are going to be meeting to discuss Canada's climate efforts heading towards the December climate talks in Paris.
Their message will be crystal clear: Act on Climate: say no to Energy East and tar sands expansion.
We know that we simply cannot afford tar sands expansion and that most of the remaining reserves are going to have to stay where they are: underground.
So lets support Canadians on April 11th and in their fight to stop tar sands expansion. North America can do better than a future built around fossil fuels and the sooner we get started the better off we will all be.
*According to our methodology developed in Cooking the Books: the true climate impact of Keystone XL, 1.1 million barrels per day of a range of tar sands crude oils typically imported into the U.S. would generate 240 million tons a year of greenhouse gas emissions on a full life cycle basis. We thus estimate the annual life cycle GHG emissions of Energy East to be roughly equivalent to 50 million vehicles or 63 average U.S. coal plants.
Hannah Mckinnon
Hannah McKinnon is a program director at Sequoia Climate Foundation, where she leads the Foundation's work on oil and gas. Previously, she was a contributing writer for Oil Change International.
TransCanada's Keystone XL tar sands pipeline has been front and center in a heated continental energy and climate debate for over four years now - and President Obama is sounding more and more like he is poised to make the right decision and reject the pipeline that would carry high carbon, high risk, high cost bitumen through North America's heartland.
As you probably can imagine, tar sands producers and shippers will not give up easily in their efforts to get Canadian oil to international markets - where they can make more money selling their oil.
TransCanada has recently proposed an even bigger pipeline called Energy East that would carry 1.1 million barrels of tar sands oil from Alberta, across all of central and Eastern Canada to Atlantic refineries and ports.
But opposition was fast and furious even before the proposal was filed late last year. Tar sands pipelines are simply not part of the energy future Canadians want.
Energy East comes after other major pipeline proposals to ship tar sands to the Pacific coast hit the same kinds of hurdles as Keystone XL: massive public opposition and political concern. Critically, both the Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, and the Kinder Morgan TransMountain pipeline expansion have run directly into the powerful wall of First Nations in British Columbia, who have committed to using their legal rights to ensure no tar sands pipelines ever cross their lands.
Big Oil just isn't getting it. Major tar sands pipelines are never going to be easy to build on the continent again. They have been blocked to the south and to the west, and now they will be blocked to the east.
Citizens can have their pick of legitimate concerns ranging from the climate impact of the pipeline (like putting 50 million new cars on the road each year*), to TransCanada's abysmal safety record (the first phase of Keystone spilled 12 times in its first year of operation). The provincial governments of Canada's largest provinces, Quebec and Ontario, have both responded coolly to the proposal, and so far close to 30 municipalities have opposed the pipeline on their land.
On April 11th, tens of thousands of people are going to gather in Quebec City where Provincial Premiers are going to be meeting to discuss Canada's climate efforts heading towards the December climate talks in Paris.
Their message will be crystal clear: Act on Climate: say no to Energy East and tar sands expansion.
We know that we simply cannot afford tar sands expansion and that most of the remaining reserves are going to have to stay where they are: underground.
So lets support Canadians on April 11th and in their fight to stop tar sands expansion. North America can do better than a future built around fossil fuels and the sooner we get started the better off we will all be.
*According to our methodology developed in Cooking the Books: the true climate impact of Keystone XL, 1.1 million barrels per day of a range of tar sands crude oils typically imported into the U.S. would generate 240 million tons a year of greenhouse gas emissions on a full life cycle basis. We thus estimate the annual life cycle GHG emissions of Energy East to be roughly equivalent to 50 million vehicles or 63 average U.S. coal plants.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.