To:                 
Interested Parties

From:
            Ari Rabin-Havt, Media
Matters for America

Re:
                 Town halls making a comeback?

Date:               Wednesday, November 11, 2009

It looks like the extreme anti-reform town hall protests from August
could be making a return during the November congressional recess. Politico recently reported
that "Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander said
Republicans are 'quietly' planning some 50 in-person and telephone
town hall gatherings over the next three weeks to drum up opposition to
Democratic health care bills."  

Media Matters has put together background
information on the media's coverage of the August town halls, which includes following
observations:

• The town hall protests were characterized as
  "organic," "real," and "genuine"
  despite the fact that conservative groups were actively encouraging
  members to attend.
• The media often gave a distorted view of the town
  hall meetings.
• Fox News featured extreme anti-reform rhetoric
  and ignored substantive,
  pro-reform questions from town halls.

More
details on those observations (included below) could be useful, should you
decide to cover any of the upcoming events.

IN AUGUST, the protests were
characterized as "organic," "real," and
"genuine" despite the fact that conservative groups were actively
encouraging members to attend town halls:

• Several conservative groups engaged in efforts to
  encourage their members to attend town halls. Conservative
  organizations opposed to health care reform -- including FreedomWorks,
  Americans for Prosperity, and Conservatives for Patients' Rights -- conducted
  a campaign to turn out their supporters to attend those events. CPR reportedly
  "confirmed that it has undertaken a concerted effort to get people out to
  the town hall meetings to protest reform," while FreedomWorks and
  Americans for Prosperity reportedly "organized" the town hall protesters and were "harnessing
  social networking Web sites to organize their supporters in much the same way
  Mr. Obama did during his election campaign." [Greg Sargent, The Plum Line,
  8/4/09;
  The New York Times, 8/3/09]

• America's Health Insurance Plans reportedly deployed employees
  to "track[] where local lawmakers hold town-hall meetings,"
  "rebut" Democrats. On July 30, The Wall Street Journal reported:
  "[I]nsurers continue to wage an aggressive campaign against Democrats'
  proposals to create a public health-insurance plan. America's Health Insurance Plans
  has stationed employees in 30 states who are tracking where local lawmakers
  hold town-hall meetings." And on August 5, the paper reported: "The
  health-insurance industry said Tuesday it is launching an effort to send insurance-company
  employees to public meetings nationwide this month to rebut increasing
  criticism of the industry from the White House and top Democrats." [The Wall Street Journal; 7/30/09,
  8/5/09]

IN
AUGUST, the media often gave a distorted view of the town hall meetings:

• Dionne: Media
  "went out of their way to cover the noise" at town halls,
  highlighted "fringe right-wing view." Washington Post columnist E.J.
  Dionne wrote: "There is an overwhelming case that the electronic
  media went out of their way to cover the noise and ignored the calmer (and
  from television's point of view 'boring') encounters between elected
  representatives and their constituents. It's also clear that the anger
  that got so much attention largely reflects a fringe right-wing view
  opposed to all sorts of government programs most Americans support."
  [The Washington Post, 9/3/09]

• Kurtz: "[A]nger
  at town-hall meetings ... became an endless loop on television."
  Washington Post media
  critic Howard Kurtz wrote: "The eruption of anger at town-hall
  meetings on health care, while real and palpable, became an endless loop
  on television. The louder the voices, the fiercer the confrontation, the
  more it became video wallpaper, obscuring the substantive arguments in
  favor of what producers love most: conflict." Kurtz added:
  "Twenty members of Congress might have held calm and collected town
  meetings on any given day, but only the one with raucous exchanges would
  make it on the air." [The Washington Post,
  8/24/09]

• Fox News only
  interested in covering "yelling" and "contentious
  questions." As Kurtz reported: "In
  fact, after the president convened a low-key town hall in New Hampshire,
  press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters: 'I think some of you were
  disappointed yesterday that the president didn't get yelled at.' There was
  a grain of truth in that. As Fox broke away from the meeting, anchor Trace
  Gallagher said, 'Any contentious questions, anybody yelling, we'll bring
  it to you.' " [The Washington Post,
  8/24/09]

IN AUGUST, Fox News featured extreme
anti-reform rhetoric and ignored substantive, pro-reform questions from town
halls:

• Fox News aired 22
  clips of attendees opposed to reform, none of supporters.
  During the week of August 24, Fox News aired 22 clips in which town hall
  attendees expressed an opinion against health care reform, but no clips of
  attendees expressing support. CNN aired three clips of attendees
  expressing support and five voicing opposition to reform; MSNBC aired one
  clip against and none in support.

• Incendiary town hall
  rhetoric highlighted by Fox. During that week, Fox News
  provided a platform for incendiary statements about progressive reform
  efforts. For example, on five separate occasions, Fox aired a clip of an
  attendee who said at an August 25 town hall for Sen. John McCain: "No
  compromises! Senator, nuke it now."

• Substantive, pro-reform
  questions passed over. Despite providing a
  platform for incendiary anti-reform claims, Fox News repeatedly passed
  over substantive and pro-reform questions and comments from the town hall
  meetings that they covered. While those questions could be heard and read
  in unedited footage of the town halls online or in local coverage of the
  events, they were not aired on Fox -- even when the network featured
  footage critical of reform from the same meetings.