https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=https://theplumline.whorunsgov.com/health-care/anti-reform-group-takes-c\">8/4/09;The New York Times, \u003Ca href=\"https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2009%2F08%2F04%2Fhealth%2Fpolicy%2F04townhalls.html%3F_r%3D1%26ref%3Dpolitics\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"blocked::https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/04/health/policy/04townhalls.html?_r=1&ref=politics\u003Cbr /> https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/04/health/policy/04townhalls.html?_r=1&ref=politics\u003Cbr /> https://www.nytimes.\">8/3/09] America's Health Insurance Plans reportedly deployed employees to \"track[] where local lawmakers hold town-hall meetings,\" \"rebut\" Democrats. On July 30, The Wall Street Journal reported: \"[I]nsurers continue to wage an aggressive campaign against Democrats' proposals to create a public health-insurance plan. America's Health Insurance Plans has stationed employees in 30 states who are tracking where local lawmakers hold town-hall meetings.\" And on August 5, the paper reported: \"The health-insurance industry said Tuesday it is launching an effort to send insurance-company employees to public meetings nationwide this month to rebut increasing criticism of the industry from the White House and top Democrats.\" [The Wall Street Journal; \u003Ca href=\"https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB124891353497192109.html\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"blocked::https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=https://online.wsj.com/article/SB124891353497192109.html\u003Cbr /> https://online.wsj.com/article/SB124891353497192109.html\">7/30/09,\u003Ca href=\"https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB124941851099605703.html%23mod%3Dtodays_us_page_one\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"blocked::https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=https://online.wsj.com/article/SB124941851099605703.html#mod=todays_us_page_one\u003Cbr /> https://online.wsj.com/article/SB124941851099605703.html#mod=todays_us_page_one\">8/5/09] IN AUGUST, the media often gave a distorted view of the town hall meetings: Dionne: Media \"went out of their way to cover the noise\" at town halls, highlighted \"fringe right-wing view.\" Washington Post columnist E.J. Dionne wrote: \"There is an overwhelming case that the electronic media went out of their way to cover the noise and ignored the calmer (and from television's point of view 'boring') encounters between elected representatives and their constituents. It's also clear that the anger that got so much attention largely reflects a fringe right-wing view opposed to all sorts of government programs most Americans support.\" [The Washington Post, \u003Ca href=\"https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2009%2F09%2F02%2FAR2009090202858.html\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"blocked::https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/02/AR2009090202858.html\u003Cbr /> https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/02/AR2009090202858.html\">9/3/09] Kurtz: \"[A]nger at town-hall meetings ... became an endless loop on television.\"Washington Post media critic Howard Kurtz wrote: \"The eruption of anger at town-hall meetings on health care, while real and palpable, became an endless loop on television. The louder the voices, the fiercer the confrontation, the more it became video wallpaper, obscuring the substantive arguments in favor of what producers love most: conflict.\" Kurtz added: \"Twenty members of Congress might have held calm and collected town meetings on any given day, but only the one with raucous exchanges would make it on the air.\" [The Washington Post,\u003Ca href=\"https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2009%2F08%2F23%2FAR2009082302173.html\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"blocked::https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/23/AR2009082302173.html\u003Cbr /> https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/23/AR2009082302173.html\">8/24/09] Fox News only interested in covering \"yelling\" and \"contentious questions.\" As Kurtz reported: \"In fact, after the president convened a low-key town hall in New Hampshire, press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters: 'I think some of you were disappointed yesterday that the president didn't get yelled at.' There was a grain of truth in that. As Fox broke away from the meeting, anchor Trace Gallagher said, 'Any contentious questions, anybody yelling, we'll bring it to you.' \" [The Washington Post,\u003Ca href=\"https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2009%2F08%2F23%2FAR2009082302173.html\" target=\"_blank\" title=\"blocked::https://mediamatters.org/rd?to=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/23/AR2009082302173.html\u003Cbr /> https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/08/23/AR2009082302173.html\">8/24/09] IN AUGUST, Fox News featured extreme anti-reform rhetoric and ignored substantive, pro-reform questions from town halls: Fox News aired 22 clips of attendees opposed to reform, none of supporters. During the week of August 24, Fox News aired 22 clips in which town hall attendees expressed an opinion against health care reform, but no clips of attendees expressing support. CNN aired three clips of attendees expressing support and five voicing opposition to reform; MSNBC aired one clip against and none in support. Incendiary town hall rhetoric highlighted by Fox. During that week, Fox News provided a platform for incendiary statements about progressive reform efforts. For example, on five separate occasions, Fox aired a clip of an attendee who said at an August 25 town hall for Sen. John McCain: \"No compromises! Senator, nuke it now.\" Substantive, pro-reform questions passed over. Despite providing a platform for incendiary anti-reform claims, Fox News repeatedly passed over substantive and pro-reform questions and comments from the town hall meetings that they covered. While those questions could be heard and read in unedited footage of the town halls online or in local coverage of the events, they were not aired on Fox -- even when the network featured footage critical of reform from the same meetings.","author":{"@type":"Person","description":"Newswire Editor is a Common Dreams staff position.","identifier":"25413159","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://www.commondreams.org/media-library/eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpbWFnZSI6Imh0dHBzOi8vYXNzZXRzLnJibC5tcy8zMjg5OTM0MS9vcmlnaW4ucG5nIiwiZXhwaXJlc19hdCI6MTc4ODc3OTc4NH0.Kro-XRoA7MB_ddUbc_2x6KjtfCnnkFR_VUghmVRfeoE/image.png?width=210"},"name":"newswireeditor","url":"https://www.commondreams.org/author/newswireeditor"},"dateModified":"2022-12-21T23:50:42Z","datePublished":"2009-11-11T20:20:06Z","description":"To: Interested Parties From: Ari Rabin-Havt, Media Matters for America Re: Town halls making a comeback? Date: Wednesday, November 11, 2009","headline":"Town Halls Making a Comeback?","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","height":"600","representativeOfPage":"True","url":"","width":"1200"},"isAccessibleForFree":"True","mainEntityOfPage":"https://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/11/11/town-halls-making-comeback","publisher":{"@id":"https://www.commondreams.org/","@type":"Organization","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","height":"511","url":"https://assets.rbl.ms/32373543/origin.png","width":"1501"},"name":"Common Dreams","sameAs":["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Dreams","https://www.facebook.com/commondreams.org","https://twitter.com/commondreams"],"url":"https://www.commondreams.org/"},"speakable":{"@type":"SpeakableSpecification","cssSelector":["h1",".widget__subheadline",".social-author",".body-description"]}},{"@id":"https://www.commondreams.org/","@type":"Organization","address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","addressCountry":"USA","addressLocality":"Portland","addressRegion":"Maine","postalCode":"04112","streetAddress":"PO Box 443"},"alternateName":"CommonDreams.org","contactPoint":{"@type":"ContactPoint","availableLanguage":"English","email":"info@commondreams.org","telephone":"+1-207-775-0488","url":"https://www.commondreams.org"},"ethicsPolicy":"https://www.commondreams.org/ethics-policy","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","height":"511","representativeOfPage":"True","url":"https://assets.rbl.ms/32373543/origin.png","width":"1501"},"name":"Common Dreams","nonprofitStatus":"Nonprofit501c3","publishingPrinciples":"https://www.commondreams.org/publishing-principles","sameAs":["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_Dreams","https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwaN0010146/","https://www.facebook.com/commondreams.org","https://twitter.com/commondreams","https://www.instagram.com/commondreams/"],"telephone":"207-775-0488","url":"https://www.commondreams.org/"}]}
It looks like the extreme anti-reform town hall protests from August
could be making a return during the November congressional recess. Politico recently reported
that "Senate Republican Conference Chairman Lamar Alexander said
Republicans are 'quietly' planning some 50 in-person and telephone
town hall gatherings over the next three weeks to drum up opposition to
Democratic health care bills."
Media Matters has put together background
information on the media's coverage of the August town halls, which includes following
observations:
The town hall protests were characterized as
"organic," "real," and "genuine"
despite the fact that conservative groups were actively encouraging
members to attend.
The media often gave a distorted view of the town
hall meetings.
Fox News featured extreme anti-reform rhetoric
and ignored substantive,
pro-reform questions from town halls.
More
details on those observations (included below) could be useful, should you
decide to cover any of the upcoming events.
IN AUGUST, the protests were
characterized as "organic," "real," and
"genuine" despite the fact that conservative groups were actively
encouraging members to attend town halls:
Several conservative groups engaged in efforts to
encourage their members to attend town halls. Conservative
organizations opposed to health care reform -- including FreedomWorks,
Americans for Prosperity, and Conservatives for Patients' Rights -- conducted
a campaign to turn out their supporters to attend those events. CPR reportedly
"confirmed that it has undertaken a concerted effort to get people out to
the town hall meetings to protest reform," while FreedomWorks and
Americans for Prosperity reportedly "organized" the town hall protesters and were "harnessing
social networking Web sites to organize their supporters in much the same way
Mr. Obama did during his election campaign." [Greg Sargent, The Plum Line, 8/4/09; The New York Times, 8/3/09]
America's Health Insurance Plans reportedly deployed employees
to "track[] where local lawmakers hold town-hall meetings,"
"rebut" Democrats. On July 30, The Wall Street Journal reported:
"[I]nsurers continue to wage an aggressive campaign against Democrats'
proposals to create a public health-insurance plan. America's Health Insurance Plans
has stationed employees in 30 states who are tracking where local lawmakers
hold town-hall meetings." And on August 5, the paper reported: "The
health-insurance industry said Tuesday it is launching an effort to send insurance-company
employees to public meetings nationwide this month to rebut increasing
criticism of the industry from the White House and top Democrats." [The Wall Street Journal; 7/30/09, 8/5/09]
IN
AUGUST, the media often gave a distorted view of the town hall meetings:
Dionne: Media
"went out of their way to cover the noise" at town halls,
highlighted "fringe right-wing view." Washington Post columnist E.J.
Dionne wrote: "There is an overwhelming case that the electronic
media went out of their way to cover the noise and ignored the calmer (and
from television's point of view 'boring') encounters between elected
representatives and their constituents. It's also clear that the anger
that got so much attention largely reflects a fringe right-wing view
opposed to all sorts of government programs most Americans support."
[The Washington Post, 9/3/09]
Kurtz: "[A]nger
at town-hall meetings ... became an endless loop on television." Washington Post media
critic Howard Kurtz wrote: "The eruption of anger at town-hall
meetings on health care, while real and palpable, became an endless loop
on television. The louder the voices, the fiercer the confrontation, the
more it became video wallpaper, obscuring the substantive arguments in
favor of what producers love most: conflict." Kurtz added:
"Twenty members of Congress might have held calm and collected town
meetings on any given day, but only the one with raucous exchanges would
make it on the air." [The Washington Post, 8/24/09]
Fox News only
interested in covering "yelling" and "contentious
questions." As Kurtz reported: "In
fact, after the president convened a low-key town hall in New Hampshire,
press secretary Robert Gibbs told reporters: 'I think some of you were
disappointed yesterday that the president didn't get yelled at.' There was
a grain of truth in that. As Fox broke away from the meeting, anchor Trace
Gallagher said, 'Any contentious questions, anybody yelling, we'll bring
it to you.' " [The Washington Post, 8/24/09]
IN AUGUST, Fox News featured extreme
anti-reform rhetoric and ignored substantive, pro-reform questions from town
halls:
Fox News aired 22
clips of attendees opposed to reform, none of supporters.
During the week of August 24, Fox News aired 22 clips in which town hall
attendees expressed an opinion against health care reform, but no clips of
attendees expressing support. CNN aired three clips of attendees
expressing support and five voicing opposition to reform; MSNBC aired one
clip against and none in support.
Incendiary town hall
rhetoric highlighted by Fox. During that week, Fox News
provided a platform for incendiary statements about progressive reform
efforts. For example, on five separate occasions, Fox aired a clip of an
attendee who said at an August 25 town hall for Sen. John McCain: "No
compromises! Senator, nuke it now."
Substantive, pro-reform
questions passed over. Despite providing a
platform for incendiary anti-reform claims, Fox News repeatedly passed
over substantive and pro-reform questions and comments from the town hall
meetings that they covered. While those questions could be heard and read
in unedited footage of the town halls online or in local coverage of the
events, they were not aired on Fox -- even when the network featured
footage critical of reform from the same meetings.
Media Matters for America is a Web-based, not-for-profit,
501(c)(3) progressive research and information center dedicated to
comprehensively monitoring, analyzing, and correcting conservative
misinformation in the U.S. media.
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Senior Trump administration officials on Monday made fresh threats to crack down on a nonexistent left-wing "domestic terror movement" following last week's assassination of Charlie Kirk—a move that critics called an attempt to exploit the far-right firebrand's murder to advance an authoritarian agenda targeting nonviolent opposition.
Even as investigators work to determine the motive of Kirk's killer, members of Trump's inner circle and supporters have amplified an unfounded narrative of a coordinated leftist movement targeting conservatives.
On Monday, two senior administration officials, who spoke anonymously to describe the internal planning, said that Cabinet secretaries and federal department heads were working to identify organizations that funded or supported violence against conservatives. The goal, they said, was to categorize left-wing activity that led to violence as domestic terrorism, an escalation that critics said could lay the groundwork for crushing anti-conservative dissent more broadly.
Appearing on the latest episode of "The Charlie Kirk Show" podcast—which was guest hosted by US Vice President JD Vance—White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said that "we are going to use every resource we have at the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and throughout this government to identify, disrupt, dismantle, and destroy these networks and make America safe again for the American people."
"It will happen, and we will do it in Charlie’s name," Miller vowed.
Vance said during the podcast that he wanted to explore “all of the ways that we’re trying to figure out how to prevent this festering violence that you see on the far left from becoming even more and more mainstream."
“You have the crazies on the far left who are saying, ‘Oh, Stephen Miller and JD Vance, they’re going to go after constitutionally protected speech,'” the vice president said. “We’re going to go after the network that foments, facilitates, and engages in violence."
Vance, who like Trump and numerous supporters claim to champion free speech, also took aim at "people who are celebrating" Kirk's killing.
— (@)
Another unnamed administration official told the Times Monday that government agencies would be investigating people, including those accused of vandalizing Tesla electric vehicles and dealerships and allegedly assaulting federal immigration agents, in an effort to implicate US leftists in political violence.
Vance and Miller's threats ignored right-wing violence—which statistically outpaces left-wing attacks—including the recent assassinations of Democratic Minnesota House Speaker Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark Hortman, who were murdered in June by a right-wing masked gunman disguised as a police officer.
Investigative reporter Jason Paladino reported last week that the US Department of Justice apparently removed an academic study previously published on the National Institute for Justice's online library showing that "since 1990, far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides than far-left or radical Islamist extremists, including 227 events that took more than 520 lives" versus "42 ideologically motivated attacks that took 78 lives" committed by "far-left extremists."
“Militant, nationalistic, white supremacist violent extremism has increased in the United States. In fact, the number of far-right attacks continues to outpace all other types of terrorism and domestic violent extremism.”The Trump DOJ scrubbed this study from their website.
Responding to Miller's remarks, New Republic staff writer Greg Sargent noted on social media that "Stephen Miller was directly involved in one of the largest acts of organized domestic political violence the United States has seen in modern times, the January 6 [2021] insurrection."
Congresswoman Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) weighed in Monday on Miller's attempt to exploit Kirk's murder, writing on the social media site Bluesky that "it's never acceptable to kill someone for their political beliefs. But the Trump [administration] exploiting the shooting of Charlie Kirk to follow their authoritarian instincts and crack down on the left is incredibly disturbing."
"We must end any form of political violence—and reject those who try to exploit it," she added.
Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom noted Monday on social media that Miller "has already publicly labeled the Democratic Party as a terrorist organization."
"This isn’t about crime and safety," Newsom added. "It’s about dismantling our democratic institutions. We cannot allow acts of political violence to be weaponized and used to threaten tens of millions of Americans."
The progressive Working Families Party (WFP) said Monday on social media that "JD Vance and Stephen Miller want to use the horrifying murder of Charlie Kirk to target and dismantle pro-democracy groups."
"Their comments call to mind some of the darkest periods in US history," WFP continued. "They're dividing people based on what box we ticked on our voter registration."
Vance and Miller "want to stoke fear and resentment to justify their un-American crackdowns on free speech, mass abductions of working people, and military takeovers of our cities," WFP added. "This isn't going to fly. We’ve survived crises like this before as a country, and we can choose to live in a place where our political freedoms are protected, where we settle disagreements with words not weapons, and where no one has to fear losing a loved one to gun violence."
President Donald Trump said Monday that the US carried out a fresh strike on what he said was a boat used by Venezuelan drug gangs, killing three people in what one human rights campaigner called another "extrajudicial execution."
"This morning, on my Orders, US Military Forces conducted a SECOND Kinetic Strike against positively identified, extraordinarily violent drug trafficking cartels and narcoterrorists in the [US Southern Command] area of responsibility," Trump said on his Truth Social network. "The Strike occurred while these confirmed narcoterrorists from Venezuela were in International Waters transporting illegal narcotics (A DEADLY WEAPON POISONING AMERICANS!) headed to the US."
"These extremely violent drug trafficking cartels POSE A THREAT to US National Security, Foreign Policy, and vital US Interests," the Republican president continued. "The Strike resulted in three male terrorists killed in action. No US Forces were harmed in this Strike."
"BE WARNED—IF YOU ARE TRANSPORTING DRUGS THAT CAN KILL AMERICANS, WE ARE HUNTING YOU!" Trump added. "The illicit activities by these cartels have wrought DEVASTATING CONSEQUENCES ON AMERICAN COMMUNITIES FOR DECADES, killing millions of American Citizens. NO LONGER. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!"
US President Trump just announced that a second drug smuggling boat from Venezuela was hit by a US airstrike in the Caribbean, killing 3 people on board the boat.#Venezuelapic.twitter.com/dO34gYr9GZ — CNW (@ConflictsW) September 15, 2025
Responding to arguments by legal experts and Venezuelan officials that the September 2 strike was illegal, Trump said Sunday that "what's illegal are the drugs that were on the boat... and the fact that 300 million people died last year from drugs."
Only 62 million people died in the entire world of all causes last year, making Trump's claim impossibly false.
Monday's attack followed the September 2 bombing of a vessel allegedly transporting cocaine off the Venezuelan coast, a strike that killed 11 people. Venezuelan officials say none of the 11 men were members of the Tren de Aragua gang, as claimed by Trump.
On his first day back in the White House, Trump signed an executive order designating drug cartels as foreign terrorist organizations. Last month, the president reportedly signed a secret order directing the Pentagon to use military force to combat drug cartels abroad, sparking fears of renewed US aggression in a region that has endured well over 100 US attacks, invasions, occupations, and other interventions since the issuance of the dubious Monroe Doctrine in 1823.
The Intercept's Nick Turse reported Monday that the Trump administration's recently rebranded Department of War "is thwarting congressional oversight" of the September 2 attack.
“I’m incredibly disturbed by this new reporting that the Trump administration launched multiple strikes on the boat off Venezuela,” Congresswoman Sara Jacobs (D-Calif.) said in response to Turse's reporting. “They didn’t even bother to seek congressional authorization, bragged about these killings—and teased more to come.”
Common Dreamsreported last week that Congresswoman Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) introduced a war powers resolution seeking to restrain Trump from conducting attacks in the Caribbean.
Also last week, Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) led a letter signed by two dozen Democratic colleagues and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) asserting that the Trump administration offered "no legitimate justification" for the first boat strike.
It's not just congressional Democrats who have decried Trump's September 2 attack. Last week, Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) said that "the recent drone attack on a small speedboat over 2,000 miles from our shore without identification of the occupants or the content of the boat is in no way part of a declared war, and defies our longstanding Coast Guard rules of engagement."
“What a despicable and thoughtless sentiment it is to glorify killing someone without a trial," Paul later added.
Paul also mirrored Democratic lawmakers' questioning of Trump's narrative that the boat bombed on September 2 was heading to the United States.
Echoing congressional critics, Daphne Eviatar, director of Amnesty International's Security With Human Rights program, said of Monday's attack, "Today, President Trump claimed his administration carried out another lethal strike against a boat in the Caribbean."
"This is an extrajudicial execution, which is murder," Eviatar added. "There is no legal justification for this military strike. The US must be held accountable."
Human rights leaders on Monday called on the 112 countries that are party to a treaty banning cluster munitions to reinforce the ban and demand that other governments sign on to the agreement, as they released an annual report showing that the bombs only serve to cause civilian suffering—sometimes long after conflicts have ended.
The governance board of the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) and the Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC) released the 16th annual Cluster Munition Monitor on Monday, compiling data on the impact of cluster munitions for 2024 and revealing that all reported cluster bomb casualties last year were civilians—and close to half, 42%, were children.
Cluster bombs are particularly dangerous to civilians because after being dropped from aircraft or fired by rockets or other weapon, they open in the air and send multiple submunitions over wide areas—often leaving unexploded bomblets that are sometimes mistaken by children for harmless toys, and can kill and injure people in populated areas for years or even decades after the initial bombing.
The report, which was released as officials prepare to convene in Geneva for the Cluster Munitions Conference, says at least 314 global casualties from cluster munitions were recorded in 202, with 193 civilians killed in attacks in Ukraine—plus 15 who were killed by unexploded munitions.
Since the Convention on Cluster Munitions was adopted in 2008, none of the 112 signatories have used cluster bombs—but countries that are not party to the convention, including Russia and Ukraine, used the munitions throughout 2024 and into this year, and the US has said it transferred cluster bombs to Ukraine at least seven times between July 2023-October 2024.
The report details recent uses of cluster bombs, the impact of which may not be known for years as civilians remain at risk from the unexploded bombs, including by Thailand—by its own apparent admission—in its border conflict with Cambodia and allegedly by Iran, which Israel claimed used cluster munitions in its attack in June. Cluster munitions have also reportedly been used in recent years in Myanmar—including at schools—and Syria.
"Governments should now act to reinforce the stigma against these indiscriminate weapons and condemn their continued use."
This year, the withdrawal of Lithuania from the Convention on Cluster Munitions—an unprecedented step—garnered condemnation from at least 47 countries. While it had never previously used or stockpiled cluster bombs, the country said it was necessary to have the option of using the munitions "to face increased regional security threats."
The casualties that continued throughout 2024 and into 2025 "demonstrate the need to clear more contaminated land and to provide more assistance to victims," said Human Rights Watch, a co-founder of CMC.
"The Convention on Cluster Munitions has over many years made significant progress in reducing the human suffering caused by cluster munitions," said Mark Hiznay, associate crisis, conflict, and arms director for HRW. "Governments should now act to reinforce the stigma against these indiscriminate weapons and condemn their continued use."
The report notes that funding cuts by donor states including the US, which under the second term of President Donald Trump has cut funding for landmine and cluster bomb clearance and aid, have left many affected countries struggling to provide services to survivors.
Children, the report notes, are often particularly in need of aid after suffering the effects of cluster munitions, as they are "more vulnerable to injury and frequently require repeated surgeries, regular prosthetic replacements as they grow, and long-term opportunities to access physical rehabilitation and psychological support."
"Without adequate care for children, complications can worsen, affecting their schooling, social interactions, mental health, and overall well-being," explained IBCL and CMC.
At the Cluster Munitions Conference taking place from September 16-19, said Anne Héry, advocacy director for the group Humanity and Inclusion, states must "reaffirm their commitment to this vital treaty."
"Cluster munitions are banned for a reason: Civilians, including children, account for the vast majority of casualties," said Héry. "Questioning the convention is unacceptable. States convening at the annual Cluster Munition Conference must reaffirm their strong attachment to the treaty and their condemnation of any use by any party."