

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

A retreat from international funding commitments for AIDS threatens
to undermine the dramatic gains made in reducing AIDS-related illness
and death in recent years, according to a new report released today by
the international medical humanitarian organization Doctors Without
Borders/Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF).
International support to combat HIV/AIDS is faltering, as reflected
in significant shortfalls among two of the world's main funding
mechanisms for HIV/AIDS. The board of directors of the Global Fund, a
key financer of AIDS programs in poor countries, is unable to respond
to countries' needs. The board will vote next week in Addis Ababa
whether or not to suspend all new funding proposals in 2010. The US
President's Emergency Plan for Aids Relief (PEPFAR), the American
government's AIDS program, is capping funding for two more years. This
means that new patients will be turned away for treatment.
Report: Punishing Success: Early Signs of a Retreat from Commitment to HIV Care and Treatment.
The MSF report highlights how expanding access to HIV treatment has
not only saved the lives of people living with AIDS but has been
central to reducing overall mortality in a number of high HIV burden
countries in southern Africa in recent years.
In Malawi and South Africa, MSF observed significant decreases in
overall mortality in areas with high antiretroviral therapy (ART)
coverage. Increased treatment coverage has also had an impact on the
burden of other diseases. For example, tuberculosis cases have been
significantly reduced in Thyolo, Malawi and Western Cape Province,
South Africa.
"After almost a decade of progress in rolling out AIDS treatment we
have seen substantial improvements, both for patients and public
health," said Dr. Tido von Schoen-Angerer, director of MSF's Access to
Essential Medicines Campaign. "Recent funding cuts mean doctors and
nurses are being forced to turn HIV patients away from clinics, as if
we were back in the 1990s before treatment was available."
"The Global Fund must not cover up the deficit caused by its funders,"
said von Schoen-Angerer. "The proposed cancellation of the 2010 funding
round and other measures to slow the pace of treatment scale-up are
punishing the successes of the past years and preventing countries from
saving more lives."
PEPFAR has had a huge impact on increasing the number of people on
AIDS care and treatment in poor countries since 2003, supporting more
than two million people on treatment with a commitment to increase
treatment to at least three million by 2013. But U.S. government
HIV/AIDS funding has remained the same for 2009 and 2010 and early
signs indicate there will be no increase in funds for 2011 either. The
proportion of PEPFAR's budged dedicated to treatment has actually
decreased. Only a handful of countries will be able to increase the
number of new patients at a pace similar to what PEPFAR has supported
in the past.
In 2005, world leaders promised to support universal AIDS coverage
by 2010, a promise that encouraged many African governments to launch
ambitious treatment programs.
"What about the promise made to people with AIDS?" said Olesi
Ellemani Pasulani, MSF clinical officer in Thyolo District Hospital in
Malawi. "We gave them hope and life. We have to be there for them. We
all knew from the beginning that this treatment was for life. Passing
on the bill for treating AIDS to very poor countries would be a
colossal betrayal."
Reducing funding at this time will leave people in urgent need of
treatment to die prematurely, and can lead to dangerous interruption of
treatment.
In Uganda, cuts have already begun to hit home, with some facilities
forced to stop treating new patients with HIV. Other countries are
backing away from their earlier treatment coverage targets. In Free
State, South Africa, past funding problems-since resolved-led to
disruption of treatment and a moratorium on treating new patients,
which resulted in an estimated 3,000 deaths.
The report provides evidence that treating AIDS, particularly in
high prevalence settings, has a positive impact on other important
health goals, in particular maternal and child health.
"A stronger commitment to other health priorities must happen, but
this should be in addition to, not instead of, continued, increased
commitment to HIV/AIDS," said von Schoen-Angerer.
At present, over four million people living with HIV/AIDS in the
developing world receive antiretroviral therapy. An estimated six
million people who are in need of life-saving treatment are still
waiting for access. MSF operates HIV/AIDS programs in approximately 30
countries and provides antiretroviral treatment to more than 140,000
HIV-positive adults and children.
Doctors Without Borders/Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) is an international medical humanitarian organization created by doctors and journalists in France in 1971. MSF's work is based on the humanitarian principles of medical ethics and impartiality. The organization is committed to bringing quality medical care to people caught in crisis regardless of race, religion, or political affiliation. MSF operates independently of any political, military, or religious agendas.
"Lindsey Graham will forever be remembered as an enabler of a regime that has murdered people, destroyed democratic norms, and caused irreparable harm to this county. What a horrific legacy," said one critic.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of the most relentless proponents for using US military force overseas, died on Saturday night at the age of 71.
In a statement posted on Graham's (R-SC) social media account, the senator's office said that he "passed away from a brief and sudden illness."
"Sen. Graham's family appreciates prayers at this time," the office added, "and asks for privacy during this incredibly difficult period."
During his life, Graham advocated either starting or getting involved in multiple wars across the world, and he was reportedly instrumental in convincing President Donald Trump to launch an illegal attack on Iran without any authorization from the US Congress.
Although Graham was once a Trump critic—he infamously declared in 2016 that the Republican Party would get "destroyed" if it made the former Celebrity Apprentice host its presidential nominee—the South Carolina Republican grew to become one of the president's staunchest allies.
Some critics of Graham reacted to his death by rehashing what they considered to be his least admirable traits.
David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect, remarked that Graham "never met a war he didn't want to send your kids to."
Alejandra Caraballo, clinical instructor at the Harvard Law School Cyberlaw Clinic, also reflected on Graham's lifetime of war mongering.
"You can say a lot about Lindsey Graham," Caraballo wrote, "but at least he got to see the thing he most wanted before he died, bombing school children in Iran."
Princeton historian Kevin Kruse predicted that Graham would leave behind a decidedly poor legacy.
"When Lindsey Graham appears in a history book," wrote Kruse, "it'll be his prediction in 2016 that the Republican Party would be destroyed for supporting Donald Trump and then a few lines about how he proved it by becoming Trump's toady. That's pretty much it. That's his legacy. Pathetic lickspittle."
Steve Schmidt, a former Republican strategist who left the party due to its embrace of Trump, wrote that Graham was "a simple, tragic man" who "lacked a moral core."
"The great empty spaces of his life were filled with an insatiable need for 'relevance,'" Schmidt observed. "He found it as a cast member in the most malignant reality show ever made."
Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, had a similar analysis of Graham's character.
"Lindsey Graham supported the International Criminal Court when it charged [Russian President Vladimir] Putin but turned on it when it charged [Israeli Prime Minister] Netanyahu," wrote Roth. "Principled, he wasn't."
Nicholas Grossman, professor of international relations at the University of Illinois, wrote that Graham "spent the last decade of his life in public service... trying hard to be remembered as an enemy of the Constitution who worked to destroy American democracy."
Grossman added that Graham "exhibited occasional signs that he knew why that was bad but kept doing it anyway."
Ruth Zakarin, CEO of the Massachusetts Coalition to Prevent Gun Violence, offered a grim assessment of the late senator.
"Lindsey Graham will forever be remembered as an enabler of a regime that has murdered people, destroyed democratic norms, and caused irreparable harm to this county," wrote Zakarin. "What a horrific legacy."
"Trump has turned Venezuela into an effective US colony," said one critic.
Some critics of the Trump administration are reacting with horror to revelations that US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has been serving as the de facto ruler of Venezuela.
According to a Saturday report in The New York Times, Rubio for the last several months has been acting informally as the "viceroy" of Venezuela ever since its recognized president, Nicolás Maduro, was abducted by the American military in January and brought to the US to face charges related to "narco-terrorism."
The Times' sources revealed that Rubio "effectively controls Venezuela’s finances, the distribution of its natural resources, and its government" and "is deeply involved in the country’s day-to-day operations," while maintaining regular contact with acting Venezuelan President Delcy Rodríguez.
Under current arrangements, the US Treasury Department takes in revenue from Venezuela's exports, including its petroleum, and then disperses the money back to the country through its private banks with strict conditions set by Rubio over what it can be spent on.
In explaining the system, the Times likened it to "parents handing out allowances to children," adding that it gives Rubio "immense leverage over... Rodríguez, who depends on the money to pay workers and prop up the national currency."
Elizabeth Saunders, professor of political science at Columbia University, described Rubio's power over Venezuela as "insane," as well as "derelict, unconscionable, and impeachable."
"The secretary of state's time is scarce, valuable, and not outsourcable," Saunders emphasized.
Orlando J. Pérez, professor of Political Science at the University of North Texas at Dallas, said the Times report made a mockery of Rubio's professed claims to want to bring democracy back to Venezuela.
"It appears Rubio has transformed from democracy promotion warrior," Pérez commented, "to transactional realpolitik operative!"
Kenneth Roth, former executive director at Human Rights Watch, wrote that US control over Venezuela appeared similar to the kind of imperial power wielded by European nations in the 19th Century.
"Trump has turned Venezuela into an effective US colony," said Roth, "with Marco Rubio as the viceroy and Washington controlling the country’s oil revenue and dictating major foreign and domestic policies. Democracy has been relegated to the distant future."
Bradley Simpson, historian at the University of Connecticut, also saw the current US arrangement with Venezuela as a return to overt imperialism.
"We are literally back in the Dollar Diplomacy days of the 1910s," Simpson wrote, "when the United States invaded countries and took over their financial systems and ran them as effective colonies. Flagrantly illegal, enormously corrupt. Where is the organization of American states or UN in denouncing this?"
"These hoodlums come in with machine guns—M4, an American-made machine gun—and they detain us. They block off the road."
Rep. Ro Khanna this week was detained by a group of Israeli settlers whom he described as "hoodlums... with machine guns" while making a visit to a Palestinian village in the occupied West Bank.
In an interview with Reuters published on Saturday, Khanna (D-Calif.) said he and his tour group were surrounded by armed settlers as they were traveling through the West Bank on Wednesday.
"We were at a village that Israeli settlers had destroyed, they had destroyed the school, they had destroyed that village, and we were just looking at it," said Khanna. "And these hoodlums come in with machine guns—M4, an American-made machine gun—and they detain us. They block off the road."
The California Democrat said that the settlers called in members of the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to help them deal with him and his group.
"The IDF is on their side," Khanna remarked, "not on the side of the Americans."
Cameron Kasky, an aide to Khanna, told Reuters that the group was held for over an hour before officials whom he believed to be police intervened and secured their release.
The IDF told Reuters that both military troops and police officers dispersed the settlers who had set up a roadblock near the small Palestinian village of Khirbet Zanuta.
Khanna wasn't the only American to have a run-in with Israeli settlers this week, as CNN reported that four settlers attacked groups of journalists, including CNN reporters and crew, who were traveling through an area north of the Palestinian city of Ramallah on Saturday.
As the journalists were driving, four settlers blocked off the road with their cars and began attacking the reporters' vehicles with wooden clubs and metal rods.
"The settlers then began to jump on the vehicle behind CNN's—carrying another group of journalists—and smashed the windshield of that vehicle," the network reported. "Another group of settlers tried to block a separate exit route before chasing the journalists towards the town of Sinjil."
Israeli police arrived on the scene and arrested four settlers who were allegedly responsible for the attacks, CNN reported.
"The Israel Police and the IDF view any manifestation of violence or causing damage to property very seriously," the Israeli officers said after the arrests, "especially when it concerns media personnel performing their work."
Israeli settlers for years have carried out violent attacks on Palestinians living in the West Bank, and witnesses have regularly described IDF soldiers at the scene either standing by as the attacks occur or even actively helping the attackers.
In an interview with CNN on Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that claims about settler violence have been "blown up beyond belief," describing attacks as being carried out by a small number of "juvenile delinquents."