SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To Those Who Trusted Him on Trade, Trump Prepares 'Punch in the Face'
Should the Trump administration's NAFTA plans come to fruition, it'll be "globalism by Goldman Sachs," according to one commentator
Mar 31, 2017
In yet another broken promise, President Donald Trump appears to be walking back his campaign rhetoric on the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA--preparing to deliver what one critic described as "a punch in the face" to those who trusted Trump to make the trade deal better for working people.
According to the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, a draft proposal being circulated in Congress by the U.S. trade representative's office "would keep some of NAFTA's most controversial provisions, including an arbitration panel that lets investors in the three nations circumvent local courts to resolve civil claims."
Such panels are regarded with suspicion by environmental, labor, public health, and democracy advocates, who say they put corporate welfare above the public interest. As Friends of the Earth president Erich Pica said Thursday, "These tribunals allow corporations to punish governments wishing to enforce sensible environmental and public interest regulations by imposing massive monetary damages."
With the leaked proposal, Pica said, "Trump and members of his administration are proving that they will always prioritize CEOs over the working men and women who have suffered from NAFTA's punishing trade policy."
Citing trade scholar Jeffrey Schott, the Wall Street Journal further reported that "a number of the proposed negotiating objectives echo provisions in the Trans-Pacific Partnership [TPP], a 12-nation trade pact among Pacific Rim countries. Mr. Trump campaigned heavily against the TPP. The president pulled the U.S. from the deal on his first working day in office."
Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, agreed in her analysis on Thursday: "For those who trusted Trump's pledge to make NAFTA 'much better' for working people, it's a punch in the face because the proposal describes TPP or any other same-old, same-old trade deal."
She continued:
If this is Trump's plan for renegotiating NAFTA--expanding the investor protections that promote job offshoring plus maintaining the ban on Buy American and the foreign tribunals that can attack U.S. laws--he will have broken his campaign promises to make NAFTA better for working Americans and will have a deal that cannot get a majority in Congress.
This is the sort of corporations-first, not-better-for-working-Americans agenda that results from Trump's decision to keep the same closed-door process and the 500 corporate advisers that got us into the original NAFTA and TPP debacles. Already, the corporate trade advisers have been consulted on the NAFTA agenda in a meeting two weeks ago, while the few labor advisers included in the system were shut out. But for this leaked document, the public and Congress are being left in the dark about negotiating plans and goals.
"Mostly what I see here is the same corporate wish list and a set of international rules that work quite well for global corporations," added Celeste Drake, the AFL-CIO's trade policy specialist, in a comment to Politico.
In his press briefing on Thursday, White House press secretary Sean Spicer downplayed the proposal, saying it is "not a statement of administration policy" and "not an accurate statement of where we are at this time."
But the Los Angeles Times noted that the draft may reflect lobbying on the part of Trump's pro-corporate advisors such as former Goldman Sachs president Gary Cohn, who now serves as director of the president's National Economic Council. "He and others have been seeking to temper the more protectionist policies articulated during the campaign," the LA Times wrote.
Matt Stoller, fellow at the Open Markets Program at the New America think tank, added in a series of tweets:
On the 2016 campaign trail, Trump called for killing NAFTA altogether, winning him support in Rust Belt states that have seen manufacturing jobs decimated over the last two decades.
As such, "there are a lot of questions for how this document gets translated out for the very workers that voted for him in Ohio and Michigan and Pennsylvania," the AFL-CIO's Drake told Politico. "Of all the things people were voting for in November, it's clear they were not voting for more of the same."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
In yet another broken promise, President Donald Trump appears to be walking back his campaign rhetoric on the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA--preparing to deliver what one critic described as "a punch in the face" to those who trusted Trump to make the trade deal better for working people.
According to the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, a draft proposal being circulated in Congress by the U.S. trade representative's office "would keep some of NAFTA's most controversial provisions, including an arbitration panel that lets investors in the three nations circumvent local courts to resolve civil claims."
Such panels are regarded with suspicion by environmental, labor, public health, and democracy advocates, who say they put corporate welfare above the public interest. As Friends of the Earth president Erich Pica said Thursday, "These tribunals allow corporations to punish governments wishing to enforce sensible environmental and public interest regulations by imposing massive monetary damages."
With the leaked proposal, Pica said, "Trump and members of his administration are proving that they will always prioritize CEOs over the working men and women who have suffered from NAFTA's punishing trade policy."
Citing trade scholar Jeffrey Schott, the Wall Street Journal further reported that "a number of the proposed negotiating objectives echo provisions in the Trans-Pacific Partnership [TPP], a 12-nation trade pact among Pacific Rim countries. Mr. Trump campaigned heavily against the TPP. The president pulled the U.S. from the deal on his first working day in office."
Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, agreed in her analysis on Thursday: "For those who trusted Trump's pledge to make NAFTA 'much better' for working people, it's a punch in the face because the proposal describes TPP or any other same-old, same-old trade deal."
She continued:
If this is Trump's plan for renegotiating NAFTA--expanding the investor protections that promote job offshoring plus maintaining the ban on Buy American and the foreign tribunals that can attack U.S. laws--he will have broken his campaign promises to make NAFTA better for working Americans and will have a deal that cannot get a majority in Congress.
This is the sort of corporations-first, not-better-for-working-Americans agenda that results from Trump's decision to keep the same closed-door process and the 500 corporate advisers that got us into the original NAFTA and TPP debacles. Already, the corporate trade advisers have been consulted on the NAFTA agenda in a meeting two weeks ago, while the few labor advisers included in the system were shut out. But for this leaked document, the public and Congress are being left in the dark about negotiating plans and goals.
"Mostly what I see here is the same corporate wish list and a set of international rules that work quite well for global corporations," added Celeste Drake, the AFL-CIO's trade policy specialist, in a comment to Politico.
In his press briefing on Thursday, White House press secretary Sean Spicer downplayed the proposal, saying it is "not a statement of administration policy" and "not an accurate statement of where we are at this time."
But the Los Angeles Times noted that the draft may reflect lobbying on the part of Trump's pro-corporate advisors such as former Goldman Sachs president Gary Cohn, who now serves as director of the president's National Economic Council. "He and others have been seeking to temper the more protectionist policies articulated during the campaign," the LA Times wrote.
Matt Stoller, fellow at the Open Markets Program at the New America think tank, added in a series of tweets:
On the 2016 campaign trail, Trump called for killing NAFTA altogether, winning him support in Rust Belt states that have seen manufacturing jobs decimated over the last two decades.
As such, "there are a lot of questions for how this document gets translated out for the very workers that voted for him in Ohio and Michigan and Pennsylvania," the AFL-CIO's Drake told Politico. "Of all the things people were voting for in November, it's clear they were not voting for more of the same."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
In yet another broken promise, President Donald Trump appears to be walking back his campaign rhetoric on the North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA--preparing to deliver what one critic described as "a punch in the face" to those who trusted Trump to make the trade deal better for working people.
According to the Wall Street Journal on Thursday, a draft proposal being circulated in Congress by the U.S. trade representative's office "would keep some of NAFTA's most controversial provisions, including an arbitration panel that lets investors in the three nations circumvent local courts to resolve civil claims."
Such panels are regarded with suspicion by environmental, labor, public health, and democracy advocates, who say they put corporate welfare above the public interest. As Friends of the Earth president Erich Pica said Thursday, "These tribunals allow corporations to punish governments wishing to enforce sensible environmental and public interest regulations by imposing massive monetary damages."
With the leaked proposal, Pica said, "Trump and members of his administration are proving that they will always prioritize CEOs over the working men and women who have suffered from NAFTA's punishing trade policy."
Citing trade scholar Jeffrey Schott, the Wall Street Journal further reported that "a number of the proposed negotiating objectives echo provisions in the Trans-Pacific Partnership [TPP], a 12-nation trade pact among Pacific Rim countries. Mr. Trump campaigned heavily against the TPP. The president pulled the U.S. from the deal on his first working day in office."
Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch, agreed in her analysis on Thursday: "For those who trusted Trump's pledge to make NAFTA 'much better' for working people, it's a punch in the face because the proposal describes TPP or any other same-old, same-old trade deal."
She continued:
If this is Trump's plan for renegotiating NAFTA--expanding the investor protections that promote job offshoring plus maintaining the ban on Buy American and the foreign tribunals that can attack U.S. laws--he will have broken his campaign promises to make NAFTA better for working Americans and will have a deal that cannot get a majority in Congress.
This is the sort of corporations-first, not-better-for-working-Americans agenda that results from Trump's decision to keep the same closed-door process and the 500 corporate advisers that got us into the original NAFTA and TPP debacles. Already, the corporate trade advisers have been consulted on the NAFTA agenda in a meeting two weeks ago, while the few labor advisers included in the system were shut out. But for this leaked document, the public and Congress are being left in the dark about negotiating plans and goals.
"Mostly what I see here is the same corporate wish list and a set of international rules that work quite well for global corporations," added Celeste Drake, the AFL-CIO's trade policy specialist, in a comment to Politico.
In his press briefing on Thursday, White House press secretary Sean Spicer downplayed the proposal, saying it is "not a statement of administration policy" and "not an accurate statement of where we are at this time."
But the Los Angeles Times noted that the draft may reflect lobbying on the part of Trump's pro-corporate advisors such as former Goldman Sachs president Gary Cohn, who now serves as director of the president's National Economic Council. "He and others have been seeking to temper the more protectionist policies articulated during the campaign," the LA Times wrote.
Matt Stoller, fellow at the Open Markets Program at the New America think tank, added in a series of tweets:
On the 2016 campaign trail, Trump called for killing NAFTA altogether, winning him support in Rust Belt states that have seen manufacturing jobs decimated over the last two decades.
As such, "there are a lot of questions for how this document gets translated out for the very workers that voted for him in Ohio and Michigan and Pennsylvania," the AFL-CIO's Drake told Politico. "Of all the things people were voting for in November, it's clear they were not voting for more of the same."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.