SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Growing a Spine? Schumer Sets Stage for Gorsuch Filibuster
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced opposition to right-wing Supreme Court nominee, setting stage for filibuster showdown
Mar 23, 2017
After weeks of outcry and public calls for Senate Democrats to "grow a spine" and filibuster President Donald Trump's right-wing Supreme Court nominee, Judge Neil Gorsuch, Democrats finally appear to be listening.
On Thursday, after three days of Senate Judiciary Committee testimony, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced that he could not support Gorsuch's nomination and indicated that he would join a filibuster against the nominee.
"He will have to earn 60 votes for confirmation," Schumer said. "My vote will be no."
"His career and judicial record suggest not a neutral legal mind but someone with a deep-seated conservative ideology," Schumer said:
Democrats have complained throughout Gorsuch's testimony that the conservative judge has been eliding questions and refusing to explain his judicial philosophy in concrete terms.
When pressed to explain his stance on Roe v. Wade on Wednesday, for example, Gorsuch avoided the line of questioning and simply stated that "a good judge[...] doesn't try to reinvent the wheel."
"For the life of me, I really don't know" what Gorsuch's stance is on the pivotal issue, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said.
Fearing Gorsuch's right-wing credentials and angered by the GOP's stonewalling of former President Barack Obama's Supreme Court pick, progressives have publicly called for a filibuster of his Supreme Court nomination since Trump announced it in January. Over forty labor, environmental, women's, and LGBTQ groups wrote a letter to Senate Democrats urging such a resistance earlier this month, as Common Dreams reported:
"Democrats have failed to demonstrate a strong, unified resistance to this nominee despite the fact that he is an ultra-conservative jurist who will undermine our basic freedoms and threaten the independence of the federal judiciary," they said in a letter sent to the 48-member minority. "We need you to do better."
"Caving to Trump's interests without a fight would take a wind out of the sails of the nascent resistance movement rocking our country," argued the Guardian's Lucia Graves last month.
It appears that Democrats are finally heeding that call. Schumer's Thursday announcement followed a similar statement from Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.), who is "a potential swing vote who faces a tough reelection next year," Politico observes.
"I have serious concerns about Judge Gorsuch's rigid and restrictive judicial philosophy," Casey said, and added that the judge "employs the narrowest possible reading of federal law and exercises extreme skepticism, even hostility, toward executive branch agencies."
Progressive groups also continue to urge Democrats to consider the potential dire ramifications of Gorsuch's lifelong appointment.
"The impact of the Supreme Court on abortion access goes far beyond Roe v. Wade. If Judge Gorsuch is confirmed, there could be grave consequences for women's lives and health for decades to come," said Vicki Saporta, president and CEO of the National Abortion Federation, in a statement Thursday.
As Democrats finally turn against Gorsuch, they're setting the stage for a high-stakes political showdown. As NPR explains: "Republicans control 52 Senate seats, and would need eight Democrats to join them to move Gorsuch's nomination forward under current Senate rules. Short of that, Republican Senate leaders may trigger the so-called 'nuclear option,' changing the rules to allow a simple majority to proceed."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
After weeks of outcry and public calls for Senate Democrats to "grow a spine" and filibuster President Donald Trump's right-wing Supreme Court nominee, Judge Neil Gorsuch, Democrats finally appear to be listening.
On Thursday, after three days of Senate Judiciary Committee testimony, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced that he could not support Gorsuch's nomination and indicated that he would join a filibuster against the nominee.
"He will have to earn 60 votes for confirmation," Schumer said. "My vote will be no."
"His career and judicial record suggest not a neutral legal mind but someone with a deep-seated conservative ideology," Schumer said:
Democrats have complained throughout Gorsuch's testimony that the conservative judge has been eliding questions and refusing to explain his judicial philosophy in concrete terms.
When pressed to explain his stance on Roe v. Wade on Wednesday, for example, Gorsuch avoided the line of questioning and simply stated that "a good judge[...] doesn't try to reinvent the wheel."
"For the life of me, I really don't know" what Gorsuch's stance is on the pivotal issue, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said.
Fearing Gorsuch's right-wing credentials and angered by the GOP's stonewalling of former President Barack Obama's Supreme Court pick, progressives have publicly called for a filibuster of his Supreme Court nomination since Trump announced it in January. Over forty labor, environmental, women's, and LGBTQ groups wrote a letter to Senate Democrats urging such a resistance earlier this month, as Common Dreams reported:
"Democrats have failed to demonstrate a strong, unified resistance to this nominee despite the fact that he is an ultra-conservative jurist who will undermine our basic freedoms and threaten the independence of the federal judiciary," they said in a letter sent to the 48-member minority. "We need you to do better."
"Caving to Trump's interests without a fight would take a wind out of the sails of the nascent resistance movement rocking our country," argued the Guardian's Lucia Graves last month.
It appears that Democrats are finally heeding that call. Schumer's Thursday announcement followed a similar statement from Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.), who is "a potential swing vote who faces a tough reelection next year," Politico observes.
"I have serious concerns about Judge Gorsuch's rigid and restrictive judicial philosophy," Casey said, and added that the judge "employs the narrowest possible reading of federal law and exercises extreme skepticism, even hostility, toward executive branch agencies."
Progressive groups also continue to urge Democrats to consider the potential dire ramifications of Gorsuch's lifelong appointment.
"The impact of the Supreme Court on abortion access goes far beyond Roe v. Wade. If Judge Gorsuch is confirmed, there could be grave consequences for women's lives and health for decades to come," said Vicki Saporta, president and CEO of the National Abortion Federation, in a statement Thursday.
As Democrats finally turn against Gorsuch, they're setting the stage for a high-stakes political showdown. As NPR explains: "Republicans control 52 Senate seats, and would need eight Democrats to join them to move Gorsuch's nomination forward under current Senate rules. Short of that, Republican Senate leaders may trigger the so-called 'nuclear option,' changing the rules to allow a simple majority to proceed."
After weeks of outcry and public calls for Senate Democrats to "grow a spine" and filibuster President Donald Trump's right-wing Supreme Court nominee, Judge Neil Gorsuch, Democrats finally appear to be listening.
On Thursday, after three days of Senate Judiciary Committee testimony, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) announced that he could not support Gorsuch's nomination and indicated that he would join a filibuster against the nominee.
"He will have to earn 60 votes for confirmation," Schumer said. "My vote will be no."
"His career and judicial record suggest not a neutral legal mind but someone with a deep-seated conservative ideology," Schumer said:
Democrats have complained throughout Gorsuch's testimony that the conservative judge has been eliding questions and refusing to explain his judicial philosophy in concrete terms.
When pressed to explain his stance on Roe v. Wade on Wednesday, for example, Gorsuch avoided the line of questioning and simply stated that "a good judge[...] doesn't try to reinvent the wheel."
"For the life of me, I really don't know" what Gorsuch's stance is on the pivotal issue, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said.
Fearing Gorsuch's right-wing credentials and angered by the GOP's stonewalling of former President Barack Obama's Supreme Court pick, progressives have publicly called for a filibuster of his Supreme Court nomination since Trump announced it in January. Over forty labor, environmental, women's, and LGBTQ groups wrote a letter to Senate Democrats urging such a resistance earlier this month, as Common Dreams reported:
"Democrats have failed to demonstrate a strong, unified resistance to this nominee despite the fact that he is an ultra-conservative jurist who will undermine our basic freedoms and threaten the independence of the federal judiciary," they said in a letter sent to the 48-member minority. "We need you to do better."
"Caving to Trump's interests without a fight would take a wind out of the sails of the nascent resistance movement rocking our country," argued the Guardian's Lucia Graves last month.
It appears that Democrats are finally heeding that call. Schumer's Thursday announcement followed a similar statement from Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.), who is "a potential swing vote who faces a tough reelection next year," Politico observes.
"I have serious concerns about Judge Gorsuch's rigid and restrictive judicial philosophy," Casey said, and added that the judge "employs the narrowest possible reading of federal law and exercises extreme skepticism, even hostility, toward executive branch agencies."
Progressive groups also continue to urge Democrats to consider the potential dire ramifications of Gorsuch's lifelong appointment.
"The impact of the Supreme Court on abortion access goes far beyond Roe v. Wade. If Judge Gorsuch is confirmed, there could be grave consequences for women's lives and health for decades to come," said Vicki Saporta, president and CEO of the National Abortion Federation, in a statement Thursday.
As Democrats finally turn against Gorsuch, they're setting the stage for a high-stakes political showdown. As NPR explains: "Republicans control 52 Senate seats, and would need eight Democrats to join them to move Gorsuch's nomination forward under current Senate rules. Short of that, Republican Senate leaders may trigger the so-called 'nuclear option,' changing the rules to allow a simple majority to proceed."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.