Twitter Only Tech Firm of Nine to Say No to Helping Build Muslim Registry
The Intercept reached out to nine companies, including Facebook, to see where they stand on helping Trump's administration track Muslims
Out of nine technology companies, from Facebook to Booz Allen Hamilton, only Twitter confirmed it would refuse to help the Trump administration build a "Muslim registry," The Intercept reported on Friday.
The outlet contacted--or attempted to contact--the companies over the course of two weeks, asking if they would contract out their services to help create the hypothetical database, which President-elect Donald Trump's national security adviser Kris Kobach has said would track immigrants entering the U.S from Muslim nations.
Not all of the companies responded, but only one unequivocally said no. Reporter Sam Biddle's final tally is:
Facebook: No answer.
Twitter: "No," and a link to this blog post, which states as company policy a prohibition against the use, by outside developers, of "Twitter data for surveillance purposes. Period."
Microsoft: "We're not going to talk about hypotheticals at this point," and a link to a company blog post that states that "we're committed to promoting not just diversity among all the men and women who work here, but ... inclusive culture" and that "it will remain important for those in government and the tech sector to continue to work together to strike a balance that protects privacy and public safety in what remains a dangerous time."
Google: No answer.
Apple: No answer.
IBM: No answer.
Booz Allen Hamilton: Declined to comment.
SRA International: No answer.
CGI: No answer.
Although IBM did not respond to the request, the company's CEO Ginni Rometty wrote a personal letter to President-elect Donald Trump after his win, congratulating him and offering her company's services. Notably, IBM has a history of assisting fascist regimes, having "famously helped Nazi Germany computerize the Holocaust," Biddle writes.
"Trump's anti-civil liberty agenda, half-baked and vague as it is, would largely be an engineering project, one that would almost certainly rely on some help from the private sector," he continues. "It may be asking too much to demand that companies that have long contracted with the federal government stop doing so altogether; indeed, this would probably cause as much harm and disruption to good public projects as it would help stop the sinister ones."
Ben Wizner, director of ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, told The Intercept, "Any technology company should resist a government request for assistance that targets a customer on the basis of race, religion, or national origin."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Out of nine technology companies, from Facebook to Booz Allen Hamilton, only Twitter confirmed it would refuse to help the Trump administration build a "Muslim registry," The Intercept reported on Friday.
The outlet contacted--or attempted to contact--the companies over the course of two weeks, asking if they would contract out their services to help create the hypothetical database, which President-elect Donald Trump's national security adviser Kris Kobach has said would track immigrants entering the U.S from Muslim nations.
Not all of the companies responded, but only one unequivocally said no. Reporter Sam Biddle's final tally is:
Facebook: No answer.
Twitter: "No," and a link to this blog post, which states as company policy a prohibition against the use, by outside developers, of "Twitter data for surveillance purposes. Period."
Microsoft: "We're not going to talk about hypotheticals at this point," and a link to a company blog post that states that "we're committed to promoting not just diversity among all the men and women who work here, but ... inclusive culture" and that "it will remain important for those in government and the tech sector to continue to work together to strike a balance that protects privacy and public safety in what remains a dangerous time."
Google: No answer.
Apple: No answer.
IBM: No answer.
Booz Allen Hamilton: Declined to comment.
SRA International: No answer.
CGI: No answer.
Although IBM did not respond to the request, the company's CEO Ginni Rometty wrote a personal letter to President-elect Donald Trump after his win, congratulating him and offering her company's services. Notably, IBM has a history of assisting fascist regimes, having "famously helped Nazi Germany computerize the Holocaust," Biddle writes.
"Trump's anti-civil liberty agenda, half-baked and vague as it is, would largely be an engineering project, one that would almost certainly rely on some help from the private sector," he continues. "It may be asking too much to demand that companies that have long contracted with the federal government stop doing so altogether; indeed, this would probably cause as much harm and disruption to good public projects as it would help stop the sinister ones."
Ben Wizner, director of ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, told The Intercept, "Any technology company should resist a government request for assistance that targets a customer on the basis of race, religion, or national origin."
Out of nine technology companies, from Facebook to Booz Allen Hamilton, only Twitter confirmed it would refuse to help the Trump administration build a "Muslim registry," The Intercept reported on Friday.
The outlet contacted--or attempted to contact--the companies over the course of two weeks, asking if they would contract out their services to help create the hypothetical database, which President-elect Donald Trump's national security adviser Kris Kobach has said would track immigrants entering the U.S from Muslim nations.
Not all of the companies responded, but only one unequivocally said no. Reporter Sam Biddle's final tally is:
Facebook: No answer.
Twitter: "No," and a link to this blog post, which states as company policy a prohibition against the use, by outside developers, of "Twitter data for surveillance purposes. Period."
Microsoft: "We're not going to talk about hypotheticals at this point," and a link to a company blog post that states that "we're committed to promoting not just diversity among all the men and women who work here, but ... inclusive culture" and that "it will remain important for those in government and the tech sector to continue to work together to strike a balance that protects privacy and public safety in what remains a dangerous time."
Google: No answer.
Apple: No answer.
IBM: No answer.
Booz Allen Hamilton: Declined to comment.
SRA International: No answer.
CGI: No answer.
Although IBM did not respond to the request, the company's CEO Ginni Rometty wrote a personal letter to President-elect Donald Trump after his win, congratulating him and offering her company's services. Notably, IBM has a history of assisting fascist regimes, having "famously helped Nazi Germany computerize the Holocaust," Biddle writes.
"Trump's anti-civil liberty agenda, half-baked and vague as it is, would largely be an engineering project, one that would almost certainly rely on some help from the private sector," he continues. "It may be asking too much to demand that companies that have long contracted with the federal government stop doing so altogether; indeed, this would probably cause as much harm and disruption to good public projects as it would help stop the sinister ones."
Ben Wizner, director of ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, told The Intercept, "Any technology company should resist a government request for assistance that targets a customer on the basis of race, religion, or national origin."