SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In Name of Democracy, Progressives Urge DNC to Ditch Superdelegates
"The superdelegate system is unrepresentative, contradicts the purported values of the party and its members, and reduces the party's moral authority."
Jul 14, 2016
Echoing critiques made by Bernie Sanders and supporters of his presidential campaign, 14 progressive organizations are urging the Democratic Party to scrap the superdelegate system, which they say "undermines representative democracy."
The groups, including Democracy for America, National Nurses United, The Other 98%, and Progressive Democrats of America, outline their concerns in a letter, which was obtained by Politico, to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the DNC Rules Committee, and the delegates to the Democratic National Convention.
They're calling on the party to take action to get rid of the system that allows state party elites and elected officials to back the candidate of their choosing when the committee convenes in Philadelphia July 25-28.
"The superdelegate system," the letter (pdf) states, "is unrepresentative, contradicts the purported values of the party and its members, and reduces the party's moral authority."
The system "dilutes the voters' say over the party's platform," and, as "a near super-majority of superdelegates are men," it undermines the Party's pledge to gender equity.
The letter also criticizes the average age of the superdelegates as being far older than the average Democrat, and the fact they they appear "to skew the party away from appropriate representation of communities of color."
The groups' ask is that "moving forward, the DNC retain at least the current total number of delegates, inclusive of superdelegates-4,770-for future national conventions, but allot all of them to states, territories, and Democrats abroad through the rubric that governs pledged delegate allotments, and require that all of them be selected through popular primary and/or caucus processes."
Politico reports that the letter is "yet another sign that liberals and former Sanders supporters remain keen on pushing the party to follow through on a key plank of the Sanders campaign."
Sanders, for his part, has called the system "problematic."
Begun in 1984, and only existing in the Democratic Party, the system includes approximately 712 superdelegates out of roughly 4,700 delegates. These superdelegates can back whomever they choose, regardless of who their state voted for in its primary or caucus, and they are empowered to change their mind at any point before the convention.
Author and RootsAction.org co-founder Norman Solomon has described them as "pillars of the Democratic Party establishment," while Michael Winship, senior writing fellow at Demos and president of the Writers Guild of America-East, wrote that "superdelegates symbolize something that has to go: the entrenched, inside-the-Beltway embrace of power and influence by the Democratic illuminati that does little for the poor and middle class and everything for the one percent that writes the big checks."
Sanders' call to overhaul the system appears to have the backing of some of his fellow members of the U.S. Senate. In addition, several states--California, Nebraska, and Maine--are calling for a revamp of the superdelegate system as well.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
bernie sandersdemocracydemocratic partydemosdncelection 2016michael winshipnational nurses unitednorman solomonprogressive democrats of america
Echoing critiques made by Bernie Sanders and supporters of his presidential campaign, 14 progressive organizations are urging the Democratic Party to scrap the superdelegate system, which they say "undermines representative democracy."
The groups, including Democracy for America, National Nurses United, The Other 98%, and Progressive Democrats of America, outline their concerns in a letter, which was obtained by Politico, to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the DNC Rules Committee, and the delegates to the Democratic National Convention.
They're calling on the party to take action to get rid of the system that allows state party elites and elected officials to back the candidate of their choosing when the committee convenes in Philadelphia July 25-28.
"The superdelegate system," the letter (pdf) states, "is unrepresentative, contradicts the purported values of the party and its members, and reduces the party's moral authority."
The system "dilutes the voters' say over the party's platform," and, as "a near super-majority of superdelegates are men," it undermines the Party's pledge to gender equity.
The letter also criticizes the average age of the superdelegates as being far older than the average Democrat, and the fact they they appear "to skew the party away from appropriate representation of communities of color."
The groups' ask is that "moving forward, the DNC retain at least the current total number of delegates, inclusive of superdelegates-4,770-for future national conventions, but allot all of them to states, territories, and Democrats abroad through the rubric that governs pledged delegate allotments, and require that all of them be selected through popular primary and/or caucus processes."
Politico reports that the letter is "yet another sign that liberals and former Sanders supporters remain keen on pushing the party to follow through on a key plank of the Sanders campaign."
Sanders, for his part, has called the system "problematic."
Begun in 1984, and only existing in the Democratic Party, the system includes approximately 712 superdelegates out of roughly 4,700 delegates. These superdelegates can back whomever they choose, regardless of who their state voted for in its primary or caucus, and they are empowered to change their mind at any point before the convention.
Author and RootsAction.org co-founder Norman Solomon has described them as "pillars of the Democratic Party establishment," while Michael Winship, senior writing fellow at Demos and president of the Writers Guild of America-East, wrote that "superdelegates symbolize something that has to go: the entrenched, inside-the-Beltway embrace of power and influence by the Democratic illuminati that does little for the poor and middle class and everything for the one percent that writes the big checks."
Sanders' call to overhaul the system appears to have the backing of some of his fellow members of the U.S. Senate. In addition, several states--California, Nebraska, and Maine--are calling for a revamp of the superdelegate system as well.
Echoing critiques made by Bernie Sanders and supporters of his presidential campaign, 14 progressive organizations are urging the Democratic Party to scrap the superdelegate system, which they say "undermines representative democracy."
The groups, including Democracy for America, National Nurses United, The Other 98%, and Progressive Democrats of America, outline their concerns in a letter, which was obtained by Politico, to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), the DNC Rules Committee, and the delegates to the Democratic National Convention.
They're calling on the party to take action to get rid of the system that allows state party elites and elected officials to back the candidate of their choosing when the committee convenes in Philadelphia July 25-28.
"The superdelegate system," the letter (pdf) states, "is unrepresentative, contradicts the purported values of the party and its members, and reduces the party's moral authority."
The system "dilutes the voters' say over the party's platform," and, as "a near super-majority of superdelegates are men," it undermines the Party's pledge to gender equity.
The letter also criticizes the average age of the superdelegates as being far older than the average Democrat, and the fact they they appear "to skew the party away from appropriate representation of communities of color."
The groups' ask is that "moving forward, the DNC retain at least the current total number of delegates, inclusive of superdelegates-4,770-for future national conventions, but allot all of them to states, territories, and Democrats abroad through the rubric that governs pledged delegate allotments, and require that all of them be selected through popular primary and/or caucus processes."
Politico reports that the letter is "yet another sign that liberals and former Sanders supporters remain keen on pushing the party to follow through on a key plank of the Sanders campaign."
Sanders, for his part, has called the system "problematic."
Begun in 1984, and only existing in the Democratic Party, the system includes approximately 712 superdelegates out of roughly 4,700 delegates. These superdelegates can back whomever they choose, regardless of who their state voted for in its primary or caucus, and they are empowered to change their mind at any point before the convention.
Author and RootsAction.org co-founder Norman Solomon has described them as "pillars of the Democratic Party establishment," while Michael Winship, senior writing fellow at Demos and president of the Writers Guild of America-East, wrote that "superdelegates symbolize something that has to go: the entrenched, inside-the-Beltway embrace of power and influence by the Democratic illuminati that does little for the poor and middle class and everything for the one percent that writes the big checks."
Sanders' call to overhaul the system appears to have the backing of some of his fellow members of the U.S. Senate. In addition, several states--California, Nebraska, and Maine--are calling for a revamp of the superdelegate system as well.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.