

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Despite widespread worries about what a Donald Trump presidency might mean for the United States and the world, a leaked memo sent from the campaign arm for Senate Republicans reveals the party establishment is more than ready to take lessons from the billionaire celebrity's agenda.
The document is a 7-page memo written by the head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), and outlines a scenario in which the GOP front-runner--who's recently said his White House would set up a database of Muslims living in the US., has mocked a journalist's disability, would bring back waterboarding, kill family members of terrorists, and repeatedly makes false statements--is the party's nominee.
It was written by NRSC executive director head Ward Baker on September 22, 2015, and was first reported by the Washington Post. The NRSC told the Post that it's written similar memos on scenarios where other other candidates secure the nomination.
The memo to the body's senior staff states: "Trump has risen because voters see him as authentic, independent, direct, firm, -- and believe he can't be bought. These are the same character traits our candidates should be advancing in 2016. That's Trump lesson #1."
Baker writes that staff should "understand the Trump phenomenon," and he puts forth both criticism and praise for Trump.
Baker writes that Trump "says what's on his mind and that's a problem," and also characterizes him as a "misguided missile" who "is subject to farcical fits." Baker also notes that the mogul "has said some wacky things about women," and that other candidates should "offer a quick condemnation" of his such statements.
Yet those in the party should should "avoid piling on the nominee" and "limit the Trump criticisms (other than obvious free kicks)," the memo states.
"We may not like it, but Trump has connected with voters on issues like trade with China and America's broken borders. When Trump was criticized on building a wall to stop immigration, he noted how Israel successfully built walls that were cost effective and did the job."
Baker writes that "Trump rises because people understand him" and that he "challenges our politically correct times. Our candidates shouldn't miss this point. Don't insult key voter cohorts by ignoring that America has significant problems and that Trump is offering some basic solutions. Understand the populist points Trump makes and ride that wave."
The Post reports : "Regardless of how far Trump's candidacy ultimately goes, the memo is evidence of the effect he has had on his party."
And what is the possible reach of that effect if his rhetoric and ideology continue to spill over?
Fascism analyst Chip Berlet wrote at Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting in September that Trump's rhetoric aligns with that of the "European populist radical right" which uses "rhetoric of nativism, authoritarianism and populism." He adds that "Trump is not an example of creeping totalitarianism; he is the white man growing hoarse with bigoted canards while riding at the forefront of a new nativist movement."
"Journalists and scholars familiar with the rise of contemporary right-wing populist political parties and social movements in Europe [...] recognize that xenophobic, anti-immigrant and racist rhetoric can lead to acts of violence," Berlet stated, and noted that "the demonization and scapegoating that accompanies right-wing populism in the United States is breeding a counter-subversion panic targeting immigrants, Mexicans, Muslims, feminists, gay people, liberals and leftists. Planned Parenthood has become a special target to appeal to the Christian Right."
"The more we as a nation ignore this process of nativist demonization," he wrote, "the more targets will be painted on the backs of our neighbors."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Despite widespread worries about what a Donald Trump presidency might mean for the United States and the world, a leaked memo sent from the campaign arm for Senate Republicans reveals the party establishment is more than ready to take lessons from the billionaire celebrity's agenda.
The document is a 7-page memo written by the head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), and outlines a scenario in which the GOP front-runner--who's recently said his White House would set up a database of Muslims living in the US., has mocked a journalist's disability, would bring back waterboarding, kill family members of terrorists, and repeatedly makes false statements--is the party's nominee.
It was written by NRSC executive director head Ward Baker on September 22, 2015, and was first reported by the Washington Post. The NRSC told the Post that it's written similar memos on scenarios where other other candidates secure the nomination.
The memo to the body's senior staff states: "Trump has risen because voters see him as authentic, independent, direct, firm, -- and believe he can't be bought. These are the same character traits our candidates should be advancing in 2016. That's Trump lesson #1."
Baker writes that staff should "understand the Trump phenomenon," and he puts forth both criticism and praise for Trump.
Baker writes that Trump "says what's on his mind and that's a problem," and also characterizes him as a "misguided missile" who "is subject to farcical fits." Baker also notes that the mogul "has said some wacky things about women," and that other candidates should "offer a quick condemnation" of his such statements.
Yet those in the party should should "avoid piling on the nominee" and "limit the Trump criticisms (other than obvious free kicks)," the memo states.
"We may not like it, but Trump has connected with voters on issues like trade with China and America's broken borders. When Trump was criticized on building a wall to stop immigration, he noted how Israel successfully built walls that were cost effective and did the job."
Baker writes that "Trump rises because people understand him" and that he "challenges our politically correct times. Our candidates shouldn't miss this point. Don't insult key voter cohorts by ignoring that America has significant problems and that Trump is offering some basic solutions. Understand the populist points Trump makes and ride that wave."
The Post reports : "Regardless of how far Trump's candidacy ultimately goes, the memo is evidence of the effect he has had on his party."
And what is the possible reach of that effect if his rhetoric and ideology continue to spill over?
Fascism analyst Chip Berlet wrote at Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting in September that Trump's rhetoric aligns with that of the "European populist radical right" which uses "rhetoric of nativism, authoritarianism and populism." He adds that "Trump is not an example of creeping totalitarianism; he is the white man growing hoarse with bigoted canards while riding at the forefront of a new nativist movement."
"Journalists and scholars familiar with the rise of contemporary right-wing populist political parties and social movements in Europe [...] recognize that xenophobic, anti-immigrant and racist rhetoric can lead to acts of violence," Berlet stated, and noted that "the demonization and scapegoating that accompanies right-wing populism in the United States is breeding a counter-subversion panic targeting immigrants, Mexicans, Muslims, feminists, gay people, liberals and leftists. Planned Parenthood has become a special target to appeal to the Christian Right."
"The more we as a nation ignore this process of nativist demonization," he wrote, "the more targets will be painted on the backs of our neighbors."
Despite widespread worries about what a Donald Trump presidency might mean for the United States and the world, a leaked memo sent from the campaign arm for Senate Republicans reveals the party establishment is more than ready to take lessons from the billionaire celebrity's agenda.
The document is a 7-page memo written by the head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC), and outlines a scenario in which the GOP front-runner--who's recently said his White House would set up a database of Muslims living in the US., has mocked a journalist's disability, would bring back waterboarding, kill family members of terrorists, and repeatedly makes false statements--is the party's nominee.
It was written by NRSC executive director head Ward Baker on September 22, 2015, and was first reported by the Washington Post. The NRSC told the Post that it's written similar memos on scenarios where other other candidates secure the nomination.
The memo to the body's senior staff states: "Trump has risen because voters see him as authentic, independent, direct, firm, -- and believe he can't be bought. These are the same character traits our candidates should be advancing in 2016. That's Trump lesson #1."
Baker writes that staff should "understand the Trump phenomenon," and he puts forth both criticism and praise for Trump.
Baker writes that Trump "says what's on his mind and that's a problem," and also characterizes him as a "misguided missile" who "is subject to farcical fits." Baker also notes that the mogul "has said some wacky things about women," and that other candidates should "offer a quick condemnation" of his such statements.
Yet those in the party should should "avoid piling on the nominee" and "limit the Trump criticisms (other than obvious free kicks)," the memo states.
"We may not like it, but Trump has connected with voters on issues like trade with China and America's broken borders. When Trump was criticized on building a wall to stop immigration, he noted how Israel successfully built walls that were cost effective and did the job."
Baker writes that "Trump rises because people understand him" and that he "challenges our politically correct times. Our candidates shouldn't miss this point. Don't insult key voter cohorts by ignoring that America has significant problems and that Trump is offering some basic solutions. Understand the populist points Trump makes and ride that wave."
The Post reports : "Regardless of how far Trump's candidacy ultimately goes, the memo is evidence of the effect he has had on his party."
And what is the possible reach of that effect if his rhetoric and ideology continue to spill over?
Fascism analyst Chip Berlet wrote at Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting in September that Trump's rhetoric aligns with that of the "European populist radical right" which uses "rhetoric of nativism, authoritarianism and populism." He adds that "Trump is not an example of creeping totalitarianism; he is the white man growing hoarse with bigoted canards while riding at the forefront of a new nativist movement."
"Journalists and scholars familiar with the rise of contemporary right-wing populist political parties and social movements in Europe [...] recognize that xenophobic, anti-immigrant and racist rhetoric can lead to acts of violence," Berlet stated, and noted that "the demonization and scapegoating that accompanies right-wing populism in the United States is breeding a counter-subversion panic targeting immigrants, Mexicans, Muslims, feminists, gay people, liberals and leftists. Planned Parenthood has become a special target to appeal to the Christian Right."
"The more we as a nation ignore this process of nativist demonization," he wrote, "the more targets will be painted on the backs of our neighbors."