SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Large Pipeline Spill in Alberta 'Stark Reminder' of Dangers of Tar Sands
Rupture near Fort McMurray may be one of province's largest
Jul 17, 2015
A pipeline rupture in the Canadian province of Alberta is "a stark reminder" of the dangers of tar sands, say environmental campaigners.
The spill has been described as one of the largest in the province's history.
Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) manager Peter Murchland said, "It's one of the bigger ones certainly in the last couple of years."
According to a statement from the pipeline company, Nexen, the leak was discovered Wednesday afternoon at its Long Lake tar sands facility near Fort McMurray.
It estimates that five million liters (over 31,000 barrels) of emulsion--what it describes as a mix of bitumen, produced water and sand--spilled over an area roughly 16 thousand square meters (nearly four acres). No injuries were reported.
ThinkProgress offers more detail about the "emulsion" mix:
Bitumen is a combination of viscous tar sands crude oil and liquid chemicals like benzene that dilute the crude so it can be piped to refineries. Produced water is water used during the process of oil or gas extraction that can contain hydraulic fracturing chemical additives and naturally occurring substances and is not suitable for irrigation or drinking. It must be stored in tanks or pits before being treated and disposed.
AER added in a statement Thursday that there are no reported impacts to the public or wildlife, and that the source of the release had been stopped.
The spill comes the same week as provincial premiers hammered out a national energy strategy--a strategy that environmental organizations say should not include tar sands expansion. But the "aspirational" deal the premiers reached Friday, according to the Globe and Mail, "sets no Canada-wide hard targets for greenhouse gas emissions reductions but provides a roadmap for expansion of pipelines and the country's energy industry." And that means, according to Andrea Harden-Donahue, Energy and Climate Campaigner with the Council of Canadians, that the strategy "falls short" of addressing the climate crisis.
Maude Barlow, National Chairperson of the organzation, added, "It is no small irony that Alberta is experiencing one of Canada's biggest pipeline spills while premiers have finalized a Canadian Energy Strategy that gives spaces for massive tar sands pipelines like Kinder Morgan and Energy East."
Mike Hudema with Greenpeace's Climate and Energy team stated Thursday that the Nexen spill offers "a stark reminder of how dangerous [tar sands pipelines] can be."
"This leak is also a good reminder that Alberta has a long way to go to address its pipeline problems, and that communities have good reasons to fear having more built. New pipelines would also facilitate the expansion of the tar sands--Canada's fastest growing source of carbon emissions--and accelerate the climate crisis even more.
"We need to stop new pipeline projects before they're built and focus on building renewable sources of energy that are sustainable and won't threaten communities, our environment, and the planet," Hudema continued.
That's a perspective not shared by Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall, who defended the proposed controversial Energy East pipeline, and said Thursday: "I hope we can be a little bolder in the energy strategy, to say that oil and gas is a good thing."
CBC News adds: "[Alberta's Rachel] Notley said growing energy infrastructure in Canada is not 'incompatible' with protecting the environment."
But a sound national energy policy is about more than the environment, and it should go beyond banning tar sands, Barlow stated.
"Halting extreme energy expansion, including tar sands infrastructure by pipeline and rail, fracking and offshore drilling, is essential, as is respecting Indigenous rights, better regulating the oil and gas industry, shifting subsidies to climate solutions and supporting good jobs that reduce our climate footprint," she stated. "This should be the bedrock of a Canadian Energy Strategy, and there are plenty of ways premiers can achieve this."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A pipeline rupture in the Canadian province of Alberta is "a stark reminder" of the dangers of tar sands, say environmental campaigners.
The spill has been described as one of the largest in the province's history.
Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) manager Peter Murchland said, "It's one of the bigger ones certainly in the last couple of years."
According to a statement from the pipeline company, Nexen, the leak was discovered Wednesday afternoon at its Long Lake tar sands facility near Fort McMurray.
It estimates that five million liters (over 31,000 barrels) of emulsion--what it describes as a mix of bitumen, produced water and sand--spilled over an area roughly 16 thousand square meters (nearly four acres). No injuries were reported.
ThinkProgress offers more detail about the "emulsion" mix:
Bitumen is a combination of viscous tar sands crude oil and liquid chemicals like benzene that dilute the crude so it can be piped to refineries. Produced water is water used during the process of oil or gas extraction that can contain hydraulic fracturing chemical additives and naturally occurring substances and is not suitable for irrigation or drinking. It must be stored in tanks or pits before being treated and disposed.
AER added in a statement Thursday that there are no reported impacts to the public or wildlife, and that the source of the release had been stopped.
The spill comes the same week as provincial premiers hammered out a national energy strategy--a strategy that environmental organizations say should not include tar sands expansion. But the "aspirational" deal the premiers reached Friday, according to the Globe and Mail, "sets no Canada-wide hard targets for greenhouse gas emissions reductions but provides a roadmap for expansion of pipelines and the country's energy industry." And that means, according to Andrea Harden-Donahue, Energy and Climate Campaigner with the Council of Canadians, that the strategy "falls short" of addressing the climate crisis.
Maude Barlow, National Chairperson of the organzation, added, "It is no small irony that Alberta is experiencing one of Canada's biggest pipeline spills while premiers have finalized a Canadian Energy Strategy that gives spaces for massive tar sands pipelines like Kinder Morgan and Energy East."
Mike Hudema with Greenpeace's Climate and Energy team stated Thursday that the Nexen spill offers "a stark reminder of how dangerous [tar sands pipelines] can be."
"This leak is also a good reminder that Alberta has a long way to go to address its pipeline problems, and that communities have good reasons to fear having more built. New pipelines would also facilitate the expansion of the tar sands--Canada's fastest growing source of carbon emissions--and accelerate the climate crisis even more.
"We need to stop new pipeline projects before they're built and focus on building renewable sources of energy that are sustainable and won't threaten communities, our environment, and the planet," Hudema continued.
That's a perspective not shared by Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall, who defended the proposed controversial Energy East pipeline, and said Thursday: "I hope we can be a little bolder in the energy strategy, to say that oil and gas is a good thing."
CBC News adds: "[Alberta's Rachel] Notley said growing energy infrastructure in Canada is not 'incompatible' with protecting the environment."
But a sound national energy policy is about more than the environment, and it should go beyond banning tar sands, Barlow stated.
"Halting extreme energy expansion, including tar sands infrastructure by pipeline and rail, fracking and offshore drilling, is essential, as is respecting Indigenous rights, better regulating the oil and gas industry, shifting subsidies to climate solutions and supporting good jobs that reduce our climate footprint," she stated. "This should be the bedrock of a Canadian Energy Strategy, and there are plenty of ways premiers can achieve this."
A pipeline rupture in the Canadian province of Alberta is "a stark reminder" of the dangers of tar sands, say environmental campaigners.
The spill has been described as one of the largest in the province's history.
Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) manager Peter Murchland said, "It's one of the bigger ones certainly in the last couple of years."
According to a statement from the pipeline company, Nexen, the leak was discovered Wednesday afternoon at its Long Lake tar sands facility near Fort McMurray.
It estimates that five million liters (over 31,000 barrels) of emulsion--what it describes as a mix of bitumen, produced water and sand--spilled over an area roughly 16 thousand square meters (nearly four acres). No injuries were reported.
ThinkProgress offers more detail about the "emulsion" mix:
Bitumen is a combination of viscous tar sands crude oil and liquid chemicals like benzene that dilute the crude so it can be piped to refineries. Produced water is water used during the process of oil or gas extraction that can contain hydraulic fracturing chemical additives and naturally occurring substances and is not suitable for irrigation or drinking. It must be stored in tanks or pits before being treated and disposed.
AER added in a statement Thursday that there are no reported impacts to the public or wildlife, and that the source of the release had been stopped.
The spill comes the same week as provincial premiers hammered out a national energy strategy--a strategy that environmental organizations say should not include tar sands expansion. But the "aspirational" deal the premiers reached Friday, according to the Globe and Mail, "sets no Canada-wide hard targets for greenhouse gas emissions reductions but provides a roadmap for expansion of pipelines and the country's energy industry." And that means, according to Andrea Harden-Donahue, Energy and Climate Campaigner with the Council of Canadians, that the strategy "falls short" of addressing the climate crisis.
Maude Barlow, National Chairperson of the organzation, added, "It is no small irony that Alberta is experiencing one of Canada's biggest pipeline spills while premiers have finalized a Canadian Energy Strategy that gives spaces for massive tar sands pipelines like Kinder Morgan and Energy East."
Mike Hudema with Greenpeace's Climate and Energy team stated Thursday that the Nexen spill offers "a stark reminder of how dangerous [tar sands pipelines] can be."
"This leak is also a good reminder that Alberta has a long way to go to address its pipeline problems, and that communities have good reasons to fear having more built. New pipelines would also facilitate the expansion of the tar sands--Canada's fastest growing source of carbon emissions--and accelerate the climate crisis even more.
"We need to stop new pipeline projects before they're built and focus on building renewable sources of energy that are sustainable and won't threaten communities, our environment, and the planet," Hudema continued.
That's a perspective not shared by Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall, who defended the proposed controversial Energy East pipeline, and said Thursday: "I hope we can be a little bolder in the energy strategy, to say that oil and gas is a good thing."
CBC News adds: "[Alberta's Rachel] Notley said growing energy infrastructure in Canada is not 'incompatible' with protecting the environment."
But a sound national energy policy is about more than the environment, and it should go beyond banning tar sands, Barlow stated.
"Halting extreme energy expansion, including tar sands infrastructure by pipeline and rail, fracking and offshore drilling, is essential, as is respecting Indigenous rights, better regulating the oil and gas industry, shifting subsidies to climate solutions and supporting good jobs that reduce our climate footprint," she stated. "This should be the bedrock of a Canadian Energy Strategy, and there are plenty of ways premiers can achieve this."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.