SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Sen. Graham's Abortion Bill: Threat to Women's Lives, Assault on Their Dignity
After similar legislation passed in the U.S. House last month, Republican candidate for president reintroduces bill based on faulty science
Jun 11, 2015
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday led a group of anti-choice lawmakers in introducing a bill to the U.S. Senate that would ban nearly all abortions in the country after 20 weeks, seeking to bring to the Senate the same legislation that passed the House of Representatives last month.
The legislation called the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, would only give narrow exceptions for those with life-threatening conditions, rape survivors who have received medical care or counseling at least 48 hours prior to receiving an abortion, and minors who have reported rape or incest to law enforcement or child protective services.
As many critics of the bill have pointed out, it is based on the false premise that fetuses can feel pain at 20 weeks--a political argument that has been debunked by science and medical experts.
At a press conference following the session on Thursday, Graham told reporters that he would "insist" that the bill gets a vote in the Senate, even if it did not have a chance of being signed into law by President Barack Obama.
"I am dying for that debate. I'm going to quite frankly insist that we have that debate," Graham said.
As the Center for Reproductive Rights noted on Thursday, abortion bans at 20 weeks "take critical medical decisions out of the hands of women and their trusted health care providers at a time when those services may be the best medical option for a variety of reasons."
That includes cases in which medical tests reveal fetal anomalies or other complications that could not be detected earlier.
"At a moment when women's access to essential reproductive health care is in greater peril than at any time since Roe v. Wade, Congress should be acting to alleviate the crisis, not worsen it," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, in a statement on Thursday. "While anti-choice politicians in Congress work relentlessly to criminalize abortion later in pregnancy, their counterparts in state legislatures are making it increasingly difficult or impossible to get safe, legal care even in the first trimester."
"This has to stop," Northup added. "It's time to advance legislation... that promotes access to the care and services supports women's health, safety, and empowerment, not bills like this one that insult women's dignity and threaten their lives."
Graham's bill has 42 Republican co-sponsors, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
However, if the bill does become law, recent legal rulings indicate that it may be challenged in the courts.
A federal appeals court in Idaho last month struck down a similar 20-week abortion ban, which the judges said violated a Supreme Court precedent protecting abortions up to the point of viability--around 24 weeks. Recent medical studies have shown that fetuses do not feel pain before 24 weeks, and possibly even later.
The bill could prove to be politically risky for the senator. As Politico points out, "Graham's effort threatens to hand political ammunition to Democrats trying to knock off GOP senators in purple and blue states that will decide Senate control after the 2016 election."
NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue said Graham, who recently launched his 2016 presidential campaign, "is choosing to use his position in the Senate to advance an abortion ban to bolster his long-shot White House bid in a shameless play to early-state ultra-conservative voters."
"We have seen this playbook over and over from anti-choice Republicans up and down the ballot," Hogue added.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
womenlindsey grahamcenter for reproductive rightsroe v. wadeus senatemitch mcconnellhealthcarenaralreproductive rightsbarack obama
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday led a group of anti-choice lawmakers in introducing a bill to the U.S. Senate that would ban nearly all abortions in the country after 20 weeks, seeking to bring to the Senate the same legislation that passed the House of Representatives last month.
The legislation called the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, would only give narrow exceptions for those with life-threatening conditions, rape survivors who have received medical care or counseling at least 48 hours prior to receiving an abortion, and minors who have reported rape or incest to law enforcement or child protective services.
As many critics of the bill have pointed out, it is based on the false premise that fetuses can feel pain at 20 weeks--a political argument that has been debunked by science and medical experts.
At a press conference following the session on Thursday, Graham told reporters that he would "insist" that the bill gets a vote in the Senate, even if it did not have a chance of being signed into law by President Barack Obama.
"I am dying for that debate. I'm going to quite frankly insist that we have that debate," Graham said.
As the Center for Reproductive Rights noted on Thursday, abortion bans at 20 weeks "take critical medical decisions out of the hands of women and their trusted health care providers at a time when those services may be the best medical option for a variety of reasons."
That includes cases in which medical tests reveal fetal anomalies or other complications that could not be detected earlier.
"At a moment when women's access to essential reproductive health care is in greater peril than at any time since Roe v. Wade, Congress should be acting to alleviate the crisis, not worsen it," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, in a statement on Thursday. "While anti-choice politicians in Congress work relentlessly to criminalize abortion later in pregnancy, their counterparts in state legislatures are making it increasingly difficult or impossible to get safe, legal care even in the first trimester."
"This has to stop," Northup added. "It's time to advance legislation... that promotes access to the care and services supports women's health, safety, and empowerment, not bills like this one that insult women's dignity and threaten their lives."
Graham's bill has 42 Republican co-sponsors, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
However, if the bill does become law, recent legal rulings indicate that it may be challenged in the courts.
A federal appeals court in Idaho last month struck down a similar 20-week abortion ban, which the judges said violated a Supreme Court precedent protecting abortions up to the point of viability--around 24 weeks. Recent medical studies have shown that fetuses do not feel pain before 24 weeks, and possibly even later.
The bill could prove to be politically risky for the senator. As Politico points out, "Graham's effort threatens to hand political ammunition to Democrats trying to knock off GOP senators in purple and blue states that will decide Senate control after the 2016 election."
NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue said Graham, who recently launched his 2016 presidential campaign, "is choosing to use his position in the Senate to advance an abortion ban to bolster his long-shot White House bid in a shameless play to early-state ultra-conservative voters."
"We have seen this playbook over and over from anti-choice Republicans up and down the ballot," Hogue added.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Thursday led a group of anti-choice lawmakers in introducing a bill to the U.S. Senate that would ban nearly all abortions in the country after 20 weeks, seeking to bring to the Senate the same legislation that passed the House of Representatives last month.
The legislation called the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, would only give narrow exceptions for those with life-threatening conditions, rape survivors who have received medical care or counseling at least 48 hours prior to receiving an abortion, and minors who have reported rape or incest to law enforcement or child protective services.
As many critics of the bill have pointed out, it is based on the false premise that fetuses can feel pain at 20 weeks--a political argument that has been debunked by science and medical experts.
At a press conference following the session on Thursday, Graham told reporters that he would "insist" that the bill gets a vote in the Senate, even if it did not have a chance of being signed into law by President Barack Obama.
"I am dying for that debate. I'm going to quite frankly insist that we have that debate," Graham said.
As the Center for Reproductive Rights noted on Thursday, abortion bans at 20 weeks "take critical medical decisions out of the hands of women and their trusted health care providers at a time when those services may be the best medical option for a variety of reasons."
That includes cases in which medical tests reveal fetal anomalies or other complications that could not be detected earlier.
"At a moment when women's access to essential reproductive health care is in greater peril than at any time since Roe v. Wade, Congress should be acting to alleviate the crisis, not worsen it," said Nancy Northup, president and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights, in a statement on Thursday. "While anti-choice politicians in Congress work relentlessly to criminalize abortion later in pregnancy, their counterparts in state legislatures are making it increasingly difficult or impossible to get safe, legal care even in the first trimester."
"This has to stop," Northup added. "It's time to advance legislation... that promotes access to the care and services supports women's health, safety, and empowerment, not bills like this one that insult women's dignity and threaten their lives."
Graham's bill has 42 Republican co-sponsors, including Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.
However, if the bill does become law, recent legal rulings indicate that it may be challenged in the courts.
A federal appeals court in Idaho last month struck down a similar 20-week abortion ban, which the judges said violated a Supreme Court precedent protecting abortions up to the point of viability--around 24 weeks. Recent medical studies have shown that fetuses do not feel pain before 24 weeks, and possibly even later.
The bill could prove to be politically risky for the senator. As Politico points out, "Graham's effort threatens to hand political ammunition to Democrats trying to knock off GOP senators in purple and blue states that will decide Senate control after the 2016 election."
NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue said Graham, who recently launched his 2016 presidential campaign, "is choosing to use his position in the Senate to advance an abortion ban to bolster his long-shot White House bid in a shameless play to early-state ultra-conservative voters."
"We have seen this playbook over and over from anti-choice Republicans up and down the ballot," Hogue added.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.