SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
In Wake of Horrific Crash, House GOP Panel Slashes Amtrak Budget
'It is unbelievable that Congress would vote to cut Amtrak funding just hours after this tragedy.'
May 13, 2015
In the same day the nation's eyes were focused on a deadly Amtrak derailment in Pennsylvania, the Republican majority in the House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday slashed nearly $260 million from a bill funding the federally-supported railway service.
As the Huffington Post reports:
The House Appropriations committee rejected multiple amendments to the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Bill that sought to increase funding for Amtrak. The bill cuts the rail service's funding to $1.14 billion, down $251 million from its current level. Democrats offered amendments to raise that funding to the $2.45 billion requested by President Barack Obama, but Republicans rejected the measures, arguing that increasing Amtrak's funding without cutting spending elsewhere would put the legislation above spending caps and threaten to kill the whole bill.
Democrats said it would be worth going over the spending caps to make travel safer for Americans.
"Yesterday's tragedy in Philadelphia should be a wake-up call to this committee -- we must provide sufficient funding for Amtrak's critical infrastructure projects to ensure a safer transportation system," David Price (D-N.C.), ranking member of the Appropriations Committee's transportation subcommittee, said in a statement. "The majority's shortsighted, draconian budget cuts stand in the way of the investments that a great country must make."
With the latest reporting indicating that seven people were killed and hundreds injured when the train--reportedly moving at twice the allowed speed limit--derailed in Philadelphia late Tuesday night, the cut to Amtrak funding was met with ire by public interest and consumer safety advocates.
"It is unbelievable that Congress would vote to cut Amtrak funding just hours after this tragedy," said John Olivieri, national campaign director for transportation at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG). "The nation's intercity rail network has seen growing ridership and Americans increasingly are looking for alternatives to driving. They should be increasing the Amtrak budget, not cutting it."
Though the idea that speed may have played a significant role in the derailment was coming into view late on Wednesday, MSNBC's Zachary Roth reports that GOP attempts to cut funding for Amtrak is nothing new:
It's not yet clear what caused the derailment. But Amtrak, a public funded rail service that's run as a private corporation, has long been in the cross-hairs of Congressional budget-cutters, including high-profile figures like Sens. John McCain and Tom Coburn, and George W. Bush--even as its outdated technology and infrastructure require increasing upgrades, and ridership increases.
Amtrak's critics--many of whom are ideologically committed to shrinking government, and represent areas of the country that aren't heavily dependent on passenger rail transport--describe the system as wasteful and inefficient. Its supporters, including labor unions and many northeastern elected officials, say the problem is that Amtrak, which moves 32 million people a year, has long been inadequately funded.
"Amtrak has been nickel and dimed to death for its entire history," said Ed Wytkind of the AFL-CIO's Transportation Trades Department. "But when something goes wrong, they blame Amtrak, despite all the resource-starving."
Wytkind made clear that since the cause of the derailment isn't yet known, he wasn't linking it to Amtrak's funding issues.
Still, he said, "it's appropriate for the media to ask questions about whether this company has the resources it needs, and if not, why is Congress not funding it, when both Republicans and Democrats rely on Amtrak. I think that's a legitimate question to ask today in the context of Philadelphia."
On Twitter, criticism of the GOP for slashing was Amtrak funds in the wake of the deadly derailment was trending:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
In the same day the nation's eyes were focused on a deadly Amtrak derailment in Pennsylvania, the Republican majority in the House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday slashed nearly $260 million from a bill funding the federally-supported railway service.
As the Huffington Post reports:
The House Appropriations committee rejected multiple amendments to the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Bill that sought to increase funding for Amtrak. The bill cuts the rail service's funding to $1.14 billion, down $251 million from its current level. Democrats offered amendments to raise that funding to the $2.45 billion requested by President Barack Obama, but Republicans rejected the measures, arguing that increasing Amtrak's funding without cutting spending elsewhere would put the legislation above spending caps and threaten to kill the whole bill.
Democrats said it would be worth going over the spending caps to make travel safer for Americans.
"Yesterday's tragedy in Philadelphia should be a wake-up call to this committee -- we must provide sufficient funding for Amtrak's critical infrastructure projects to ensure a safer transportation system," David Price (D-N.C.), ranking member of the Appropriations Committee's transportation subcommittee, said in a statement. "The majority's shortsighted, draconian budget cuts stand in the way of the investments that a great country must make."
With the latest reporting indicating that seven people were killed and hundreds injured when the train--reportedly moving at twice the allowed speed limit--derailed in Philadelphia late Tuesday night, the cut to Amtrak funding was met with ire by public interest and consumer safety advocates.
"It is unbelievable that Congress would vote to cut Amtrak funding just hours after this tragedy," said John Olivieri, national campaign director for transportation at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG). "The nation's intercity rail network has seen growing ridership and Americans increasingly are looking for alternatives to driving. They should be increasing the Amtrak budget, not cutting it."
Though the idea that speed may have played a significant role in the derailment was coming into view late on Wednesday, MSNBC's Zachary Roth reports that GOP attempts to cut funding for Amtrak is nothing new:
It's not yet clear what caused the derailment. But Amtrak, a public funded rail service that's run as a private corporation, has long been in the cross-hairs of Congressional budget-cutters, including high-profile figures like Sens. John McCain and Tom Coburn, and George W. Bush--even as its outdated technology and infrastructure require increasing upgrades, and ridership increases.
Amtrak's critics--many of whom are ideologically committed to shrinking government, and represent areas of the country that aren't heavily dependent on passenger rail transport--describe the system as wasteful and inefficient. Its supporters, including labor unions and many northeastern elected officials, say the problem is that Amtrak, which moves 32 million people a year, has long been inadequately funded.
"Amtrak has been nickel and dimed to death for its entire history," said Ed Wytkind of the AFL-CIO's Transportation Trades Department. "But when something goes wrong, they blame Amtrak, despite all the resource-starving."
Wytkind made clear that since the cause of the derailment isn't yet known, he wasn't linking it to Amtrak's funding issues.
Still, he said, "it's appropriate for the media to ask questions about whether this company has the resources it needs, and if not, why is Congress not funding it, when both Republicans and Democrats rely on Amtrak. I think that's a legitimate question to ask today in the context of Philadelphia."
On Twitter, criticism of the GOP for slashing was Amtrak funds in the wake of the deadly derailment was trending:
In the same day the nation's eyes were focused on a deadly Amtrak derailment in Pennsylvania, the Republican majority in the House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday slashed nearly $260 million from a bill funding the federally-supported railway service.
As the Huffington Post reports:
The House Appropriations committee rejected multiple amendments to the Transportation, Housing and Urban Development Appropriations Bill that sought to increase funding for Amtrak. The bill cuts the rail service's funding to $1.14 billion, down $251 million from its current level. Democrats offered amendments to raise that funding to the $2.45 billion requested by President Barack Obama, but Republicans rejected the measures, arguing that increasing Amtrak's funding without cutting spending elsewhere would put the legislation above spending caps and threaten to kill the whole bill.
Democrats said it would be worth going over the spending caps to make travel safer for Americans.
"Yesterday's tragedy in Philadelphia should be a wake-up call to this committee -- we must provide sufficient funding for Amtrak's critical infrastructure projects to ensure a safer transportation system," David Price (D-N.C.), ranking member of the Appropriations Committee's transportation subcommittee, said in a statement. "The majority's shortsighted, draconian budget cuts stand in the way of the investments that a great country must make."
With the latest reporting indicating that seven people were killed and hundreds injured when the train--reportedly moving at twice the allowed speed limit--derailed in Philadelphia late Tuesday night, the cut to Amtrak funding was met with ire by public interest and consumer safety advocates.
"It is unbelievable that Congress would vote to cut Amtrak funding just hours after this tragedy," said John Olivieri, national campaign director for transportation at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG). "The nation's intercity rail network has seen growing ridership and Americans increasingly are looking for alternatives to driving. They should be increasing the Amtrak budget, not cutting it."
Though the idea that speed may have played a significant role in the derailment was coming into view late on Wednesday, MSNBC's Zachary Roth reports that GOP attempts to cut funding for Amtrak is nothing new:
It's not yet clear what caused the derailment. But Amtrak, a public funded rail service that's run as a private corporation, has long been in the cross-hairs of Congressional budget-cutters, including high-profile figures like Sens. John McCain and Tom Coburn, and George W. Bush--even as its outdated technology and infrastructure require increasing upgrades, and ridership increases.
Amtrak's critics--many of whom are ideologically committed to shrinking government, and represent areas of the country that aren't heavily dependent on passenger rail transport--describe the system as wasteful and inefficient. Its supporters, including labor unions and many northeastern elected officials, say the problem is that Amtrak, which moves 32 million people a year, has long been inadequately funded.
"Amtrak has been nickel and dimed to death for its entire history," said Ed Wytkind of the AFL-CIO's Transportation Trades Department. "But when something goes wrong, they blame Amtrak, despite all the resource-starving."
Wytkind made clear that since the cause of the derailment isn't yet known, he wasn't linking it to Amtrak's funding issues.
Still, he said, "it's appropriate for the media to ask questions about whether this company has the resources it needs, and if not, why is Congress not funding it, when both Republicans and Democrats rely on Amtrak. I think that's a legitimate question to ask today in the context of Philadelphia."
On Twitter, criticism of the GOP for slashing was Amtrak funds in the wake of the deadly derailment was trending:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.