

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
We can not address climate change without putting an immediate end to fracking.
That declaration is the overarching message of a report published Tuesday, just days ahead of the People's Climate March and the UN Climate Summit in New York City. Put forth by the environmental watchdog Food & Water Watch, The Urgent Case for a Ban on Fracking tackles head-on the host of dangerous environmental effects caused by shale gas extraction--which politicians, industry stakeholders and even some environmental groups have billed as a "bridge fuel" to a renewable energy future.
Reviewing the most comprehensive scientific research related to fracking, the report details the harmful impacts the practice has on climate, water, air and communities. Fracking--which extracts oil and natural gas by injecting large volumes of water, sand and toxic chemicals deep underground--has been linked to earthquakes, groundwater contamination, birth defects and health issues.
Further, research has found that shale drilling has the potential to unleash massive amounts of methane gas, which is said to be even more effective at trapping heat than carbon dioxide, thus exacerbating and accelerating the climate crisis.
"Gas wells are like chimneys in the earth, and what they leak goes straight into our atmosphere," said Dr. Sandra Steingraber, professor at Ithaca College and science advisor to Americans Against Fracking, a coalition of environmental groups which includes Food & Water Watch, 350.org and the Center for Biological Diversity, among others. Coinciding with the release of the report as well as the climate march, the group has launched a social media campaign under the hashtag #DontFrackOurClimate to pressure lawmakers into enacting a national fracking ban.
"Climate change is the challenge of our lifetimes, and millions of lives and future generations depend on us meeting that challenge," said actor Mark Ruffalo, who sits on the Americans Against Fracking advisory board, on a press call announcing the anti-fracking campaign. "It's past time for President Obama to abandon his disastrous 'all-of-the-above' energy plan and instead provide real leadership by boldly investing in renewable energy and making the United States the renewable energy capital of the world."
"If President Obama wants to be a leader in curbing the global climate crisis, he can't continue to ignore the climate-related effects of methane from fracked gas," added Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch, which in 2011 was one of the first organizations to call for a complete ban on the drilling practice.
"The natural gas obtained by fracking is no more a bridge to renewable energy than swapping push buttons for rotary dials was a bridge to a WiFi connection."
--Dr. Sandra Steingraber
The Food & Water Watch report cites the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which estimates that methane from drilling and fracking will trap 87 times more heat than carbon dioxide in a 20-year time frame.
"The industry has successfully spun fracking as good for the climate, but the science shows it's anything but," said Hauter. The report also calls into question the "favored status under the law" granted to the fossil fuel industry, which the report authors say has created an "inertia that imperils current and future generations, and endangers our economy, as we face the consequences of global warming and the legacy of the industry's pollution."
The industry line, which has successfully been adopted by politicians and others, is that natural gas can be a "bridge fuel" between coal and more renewable options down the road. However, as Steingraber explains in a piece published on Wednesday, "the natural gas obtained by fracking is no more a bridge to renewable energy than swapping push buttons for rotary dials was a bridge to a WiFi connection."
By leaking untold amounts of heat-trapping methane into the atmosphere, she adds that we are "crippling any fighting chance we have to address climate in the critical short window ahead of us."
Going forward, the report calls for: a complete ban on fracking; an end to subsidies for the oil and gas industry; aggressive energy conversation policies; and sweeping investments and incentives for existing renewable energy solutions, as well as for developing the next generation of clean energy solutions.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
We can not address climate change without putting an immediate end to fracking.
That declaration is the overarching message of a report published Tuesday, just days ahead of the People's Climate March and the UN Climate Summit in New York City. Put forth by the environmental watchdog Food & Water Watch, The Urgent Case for a Ban on Fracking tackles head-on the host of dangerous environmental effects caused by shale gas extraction--which politicians, industry stakeholders and even some environmental groups have billed as a "bridge fuel" to a renewable energy future.
Reviewing the most comprehensive scientific research related to fracking, the report details the harmful impacts the practice has on climate, water, air and communities. Fracking--which extracts oil and natural gas by injecting large volumes of water, sand and toxic chemicals deep underground--has been linked to earthquakes, groundwater contamination, birth defects and health issues.
Further, research has found that shale drilling has the potential to unleash massive amounts of methane gas, which is said to be even more effective at trapping heat than carbon dioxide, thus exacerbating and accelerating the climate crisis.
"Gas wells are like chimneys in the earth, and what they leak goes straight into our atmosphere," said Dr. Sandra Steingraber, professor at Ithaca College and science advisor to Americans Against Fracking, a coalition of environmental groups which includes Food & Water Watch, 350.org and the Center for Biological Diversity, among others. Coinciding with the release of the report as well as the climate march, the group has launched a social media campaign under the hashtag #DontFrackOurClimate to pressure lawmakers into enacting a national fracking ban.
"Climate change is the challenge of our lifetimes, and millions of lives and future generations depend on us meeting that challenge," said actor Mark Ruffalo, who sits on the Americans Against Fracking advisory board, on a press call announcing the anti-fracking campaign. "It's past time for President Obama to abandon his disastrous 'all-of-the-above' energy plan and instead provide real leadership by boldly investing in renewable energy and making the United States the renewable energy capital of the world."
"If President Obama wants to be a leader in curbing the global climate crisis, he can't continue to ignore the climate-related effects of methane from fracked gas," added Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch, which in 2011 was one of the first organizations to call for a complete ban on the drilling practice.
"The natural gas obtained by fracking is no more a bridge to renewable energy than swapping push buttons for rotary dials was a bridge to a WiFi connection."
--Dr. Sandra Steingraber
The Food & Water Watch report cites the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which estimates that methane from drilling and fracking will trap 87 times more heat than carbon dioxide in a 20-year time frame.
"The industry has successfully spun fracking as good for the climate, but the science shows it's anything but," said Hauter. The report also calls into question the "favored status under the law" granted to the fossil fuel industry, which the report authors say has created an "inertia that imperils current and future generations, and endangers our economy, as we face the consequences of global warming and the legacy of the industry's pollution."
The industry line, which has successfully been adopted by politicians and others, is that natural gas can be a "bridge fuel" between coal and more renewable options down the road. However, as Steingraber explains in a piece published on Wednesday, "the natural gas obtained by fracking is no more a bridge to renewable energy than swapping push buttons for rotary dials was a bridge to a WiFi connection."
By leaking untold amounts of heat-trapping methane into the atmosphere, she adds that we are "crippling any fighting chance we have to address climate in the critical short window ahead of us."
Going forward, the report calls for: a complete ban on fracking; an end to subsidies for the oil and gas industry; aggressive energy conversation policies; and sweeping investments and incentives for existing renewable energy solutions, as well as for developing the next generation of clean energy solutions.
We can not address climate change without putting an immediate end to fracking.
That declaration is the overarching message of a report published Tuesday, just days ahead of the People's Climate March and the UN Climate Summit in New York City. Put forth by the environmental watchdog Food & Water Watch, The Urgent Case for a Ban on Fracking tackles head-on the host of dangerous environmental effects caused by shale gas extraction--which politicians, industry stakeholders and even some environmental groups have billed as a "bridge fuel" to a renewable energy future.
Reviewing the most comprehensive scientific research related to fracking, the report details the harmful impacts the practice has on climate, water, air and communities. Fracking--which extracts oil and natural gas by injecting large volumes of water, sand and toxic chemicals deep underground--has been linked to earthquakes, groundwater contamination, birth defects and health issues.
Further, research has found that shale drilling has the potential to unleash massive amounts of methane gas, which is said to be even more effective at trapping heat than carbon dioxide, thus exacerbating and accelerating the climate crisis.
"Gas wells are like chimneys in the earth, and what they leak goes straight into our atmosphere," said Dr. Sandra Steingraber, professor at Ithaca College and science advisor to Americans Against Fracking, a coalition of environmental groups which includes Food & Water Watch, 350.org and the Center for Biological Diversity, among others. Coinciding with the release of the report as well as the climate march, the group has launched a social media campaign under the hashtag #DontFrackOurClimate to pressure lawmakers into enacting a national fracking ban.
"Climate change is the challenge of our lifetimes, and millions of lives and future generations depend on us meeting that challenge," said actor Mark Ruffalo, who sits on the Americans Against Fracking advisory board, on a press call announcing the anti-fracking campaign. "It's past time for President Obama to abandon his disastrous 'all-of-the-above' energy plan and instead provide real leadership by boldly investing in renewable energy and making the United States the renewable energy capital of the world."
"If President Obama wants to be a leader in curbing the global climate crisis, he can't continue to ignore the climate-related effects of methane from fracked gas," added Wenonah Hauter, executive director of Food & Water Watch, which in 2011 was one of the first organizations to call for a complete ban on the drilling practice.
"The natural gas obtained by fracking is no more a bridge to renewable energy than swapping push buttons for rotary dials was a bridge to a WiFi connection."
--Dr. Sandra Steingraber
The Food & Water Watch report cites the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which estimates that methane from drilling and fracking will trap 87 times more heat than carbon dioxide in a 20-year time frame.
"The industry has successfully spun fracking as good for the climate, but the science shows it's anything but," said Hauter. The report also calls into question the "favored status under the law" granted to the fossil fuel industry, which the report authors say has created an "inertia that imperils current and future generations, and endangers our economy, as we face the consequences of global warming and the legacy of the industry's pollution."
The industry line, which has successfully been adopted by politicians and others, is that natural gas can be a "bridge fuel" between coal and more renewable options down the road. However, as Steingraber explains in a piece published on Wednesday, "the natural gas obtained by fracking is no more a bridge to renewable energy than swapping push buttons for rotary dials was a bridge to a WiFi connection."
By leaking untold amounts of heat-trapping methane into the atmosphere, she adds that we are "crippling any fighting chance we have to address climate in the critical short window ahead of us."
Going forward, the report calls for: a complete ban on fracking; an end to subsidies for the oil and gas industry; aggressive energy conversation policies; and sweeping investments and incentives for existing renewable energy solutions, as well as for developing the next generation of clean energy solutions.