Woman holds a sign saying 'No More Bombs' as Canadians held a protest outside the American consulate in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, on January 04, 2020 to protest against American aggression towards Iran following an American airstrike that killed Iranian Major-General Qassem Soleimani.(Photo: Creative Touch Imaging Ltd./NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Now Is the Time for Canada and the World to Adopt a Feminist Foreign Policy
A feminist foreign policy outlines key principles about who needs to be at the negotiating table, like women peacebuilders who have deep community connections and a vested interest in building peace that is durable.
When Ukrainian and Russian representatives meet to attempt to negotiate a way out of the crisis, the absence of women from those tables is glaring. Yet research shows that peace accords are more likely to last when there is meaningful engagement by women.
This is exactly the moment a strong feminist foreign policy is needed most.
Bringing feminist analysis into the heart of our understanding of global affairs is not merely 'value signaling' or woke-speak. It can make the difference between life and death.
A feminist foreign policy outlines key principles about who needs to be at the negotiating table, like women peacebuilders who have deep community connections and a vested interest in building peace that is durable. And it would ensure our international actions are grounded in commitments to human rights, equality, and human security.
In Canada, we still face a severe gap between promises and clear policy. For many years, we have heard that Canada has a feminist foreign policy. Four Foreign Affairs ministers have framed Canada's foreign policy in this way. Yet we have no guiding document or policy paper that outlines what this means and why this is important in a global crisis like the one we are facing right now.
Where is Canada's feminist foreign policy?
Budget 2022 provoked more questions with $8 billion dollars in new defense spending alongside silence on the promised feminist foreign policy.
New research shows us how much is at stake if we don't bridge the gender gap. Gender inequality correlates with instability and armed conflict. Autonomous feminist movements are key drivers of democracy. Understanding gender roles, relations, and inequalities ensures a fuller picture of violent extremism.
Clearly a particular definition of masculinity informs Putin's self-image and his vision of the world.
This is all strong evidence that bringing feminist analysis into the heart of our understanding of global affairs is not merely 'value signaling' or woke-speak. It can make the difference between life and death.
In February 2020, the then Canadian Minister for Foreign Affairs, Francois-Philippe Champagne, committed to the development of a paper outlining Canada's feminist foreign policy commitments. Since then, there have been discussions but no paper.
With a lack of clarity comes a lack of action.
There are many definitions of feminist foreign policy. Sweden, the pioneer in this area, centers its policy around representation, resources, and rights. Analysts push for a nuanced analysis that goes beyond just focusing on "women and girls," arguing that a "gender analysis" must including include men, boys, and nonbinary understandings of gender. Many activists put demilitarization front and center.
With these differences, it is clear why the federal government needs to step up and outline what it sees as the priorities of Canada's feminist foreign policy, the actions it is committed to and the resources it will invest.
The world's response to the invasion in Ukraine is only the latest example that "old school" approaches to conflict resolution are not working.
It is time to bring anti-racist and decolonial analysis to international relations. It is time to bring more diverse perspectives to the table. It is time to ask questions about whose voices matter. This includes going beyond the warriors and including people who have a vested interest in stopping the guns for good, including women building peace at local, national, and international levels.
The benefits would be felt abroad and right here at home.
Advocates are quick to point out that a feminist policy encompasses more than armed conflict. It is about exploring "what makes us safe" in an increasingly fragile and interconnected world. It is about understanding the threats of climate change, pandemics, and global inequality--and the many ways these threats intersect.
It is about asking what values we stand for as Canadians.
It is about reexamining power and structures in the global system. It is about ensuring that we do not talk principles and peace at the United Nations and then support arms sales and companies guilty of environmental destruction.
A feminist foreign policy is not a luxury that Canada turns to when times are good. It is precisely in this moment of crisis that a clear statement of guiding principles is needed. We have evidence of the relevance and potential impact. We have calls from activists. Now is the time for a clear roadmap with concrete steps for implementation.
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
When Ukrainian and Russian representatives meet to attempt to negotiate a way out of the crisis, the absence of women from those tables is glaring. Yet research shows that peace accords are more likely to last when there is meaningful engagement by women.
This is exactly the moment a strong feminist foreign policy is needed most.
Bringing feminist analysis into the heart of our understanding of global affairs is not merely 'value signaling' or woke-speak. It can make the difference between life and death.
A feminist foreign policy outlines key principles about who needs to be at the negotiating table, like women peacebuilders who have deep community connections and a vested interest in building peace that is durable. And it would ensure our international actions are grounded in commitments to human rights, equality, and human security.
In Canada, we still face a severe gap between promises and clear policy. For many years, we have heard that Canada has a feminist foreign policy. Four Foreign Affairs ministers have framed Canada's foreign policy in this way. Yet we have no guiding document or policy paper that outlines what this means and why this is important in a global crisis like the one we are facing right now.
Where is Canada's feminist foreign policy?
Budget 2022 provoked more questions with $8 billion dollars in new defense spending alongside silence on the promised feminist foreign policy.
New research shows us how much is at stake if we don't bridge the gender gap. Gender inequality correlates with instability and armed conflict. Autonomous feminist movements are key drivers of democracy. Understanding gender roles, relations, and inequalities ensures a fuller picture of violent extremism.
Clearly a particular definition of masculinity informs Putin's self-image and his vision of the world.
This is all strong evidence that bringing feminist analysis into the heart of our understanding of global affairs is not merely 'value signaling' or woke-speak. It can make the difference between life and death.
In February 2020, the then Canadian Minister for Foreign Affairs, Francois-Philippe Champagne, committed to the development of a paper outlining Canada's feminist foreign policy commitments. Since then, there have been discussions but no paper.
With a lack of clarity comes a lack of action.
There are many definitions of feminist foreign policy. Sweden, the pioneer in this area, centers its policy around representation, resources, and rights. Analysts push for a nuanced analysis that goes beyond just focusing on "women and girls," arguing that a "gender analysis" must including include men, boys, and nonbinary understandings of gender. Many activists put demilitarization front and center.
With these differences, it is clear why the federal government needs to step up and outline what it sees as the priorities of Canada's feminist foreign policy, the actions it is committed to and the resources it will invest.
The world's response to the invasion in Ukraine is only the latest example that "old school" approaches to conflict resolution are not working.
It is time to bring anti-racist and decolonial analysis to international relations. It is time to bring more diverse perspectives to the table. It is time to ask questions about whose voices matter. This includes going beyond the warriors and including people who have a vested interest in stopping the guns for good, including women building peace at local, national, and international levels.
The benefits would be felt abroad and right here at home.
Advocates are quick to point out that a feminist policy encompasses more than armed conflict. It is about exploring "what makes us safe" in an increasingly fragile and interconnected world. It is about understanding the threats of climate change, pandemics, and global inequality--and the many ways these threats intersect.
It is about asking what values we stand for as Canadians.
It is about reexamining power and structures in the global system. It is about ensuring that we do not talk principles and peace at the United Nations and then support arms sales and companies guilty of environmental destruction.
A feminist foreign policy is not a luxury that Canada turns to when times are good. It is precisely in this moment of crisis that a clear statement of guiding principles is needed. We have evidence of the relevance and potential impact. We have calls from activists. Now is the time for a clear roadmap with concrete steps for implementation.
When Ukrainian and Russian representatives meet to attempt to negotiate a way out of the crisis, the absence of women from those tables is glaring. Yet research shows that peace accords are more likely to last when there is meaningful engagement by women.
This is exactly the moment a strong feminist foreign policy is needed most.
Bringing feminist analysis into the heart of our understanding of global affairs is not merely 'value signaling' or woke-speak. It can make the difference between life and death.
A feminist foreign policy outlines key principles about who needs to be at the negotiating table, like women peacebuilders who have deep community connections and a vested interest in building peace that is durable. And it would ensure our international actions are grounded in commitments to human rights, equality, and human security.
In Canada, we still face a severe gap between promises and clear policy. For many years, we have heard that Canada has a feminist foreign policy. Four Foreign Affairs ministers have framed Canada's foreign policy in this way. Yet we have no guiding document or policy paper that outlines what this means and why this is important in a global crisis like the one we are facing right now.
Where is Canada's feminist foreign policy?
Budget 2022 provoked more questions with $8 billion dollars in new defense spending alongside silence on the promised feminist foreign policy.
New research shows us how much is at stake if we don't bridge the gender gap. Gender inequality correlates with instability and armed conflict. Autonomous feminist movements are key drivers of democracy. Understanding gender roles, relations, and inequalities ensures a fuller picture of violent extremism.
Clearly a particular definition of masculinity informs Putin's self-image and his vision of the world.
This is all strong evidence that bringing feminist analysis into the heart of our understanding of global affairs is not merely 'value signaling' or woke-speak. It can make the difference between life and death.
In February 2020, the then Canadian Minister for Foreign Affairs, Francois-Philippe Champagne, committed to the development of a paper outlining Canada's feminist foreign policy commitments. Since then, there have been discussions but no paper.
With a lack of clarity comes a lack of action.
There are many definitions of feminist foreign policy. Sweden, the pioneer in this area, centers its policy around representation, resources, and rights. Analysts push for a nuanced analysis that goes beyond just focusing on "women and girls," arguing that a "gender analysis" must including include men, boys, and nonbinary understandings of gender. Many activists put demilitarization front and center.
With these differences, it is clear why the federal government needs to step up and outline what it sees as the priorities of Canada's feminist foreign policy, the actions it is committed to and the resources it will invest.
The world's response to the invasion in Ukraine is only the latest example that "old school" approaches to conflict resolution are not working.
It is time to bring anti-racist and decolonial analysis to international relations. It is time to bring more diverse perspectives to the table. It is time to ask questions about whose voices matter. This includes going beyond the warriors and including people who have a vested interest in stopping the guns for good, including women building peace at local, national, and international levels.
The benefits would be felt abroad and right here at home.
Advocates are quick to point out that a feminist policy encompasses more than armed conflict. It is about exploring "what makes us safe" in an increasingly fragile and interconnected world. It is about understanding the threats of climate change, pandemics, and global inequality--and the many ways these threats intersect.
It is about asking what values we stand for as Canadians.
It is about reexamining power and structures in the global system. It is about ensuring that we do not talk principles and peace at the United Nations and then support arms sales and companies guilty of environmental destruction.
A feminist foreign policy is not a luxury that Canada turns to when times are good. It is precisely in this moment of crisis that a clear statement of guiding principles is needed. We have evidence of the relevance and potential impact. We have calls from activists. Now is the time for a clear roadmap with concrete steps for implementation.