SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Some of those Trump voters are experiencing a level suffering that is unimaginable to outsiders. (Photo: Kerem Yucel / AFP via Getty Images)
I recently found myself re-reading Walker Percy's 1970 novel, Love in the Ruins, a deeply problematic work by a writer with extraordinary gifts. Lately, I've found myself repeating these lines as I follow the news:
"Either I am right and a catastrophe will occur, or it won't and I'm crazy. In either case the outlook is not so good."
A catastrophe is occurring, of course. More than 220,000 people are already dead in this country. Millions more are out of work. Fires, storms, floods: signs are upon us, as if from an ancient book. But, like many people, I wonder if this isn't just a prelude. I wonder when the Big One will arrive, and what form it will take. Civil war? Economic implosion? Civilizational collapse? All of the above? Or will the pain of an unjust and failing society linger on for decades?
Either way, the outlook is not so good.
The Sunset Gun
In his essay, American Bloodlands, Chris Hedges wrote of the rage and desperation that consumes so many of us. "Violence is a narcotic," Hedges writes. "It fills the emotional void." That's true of other forms of political aggression, too, forms that fall short of violence but are nonetheless toxic.
In Percy's novel, a character refers to his alcoholic spouse's drinking as "the sunset gun," as in:
"It's 5 o'clock and she's firing the sunset gun." And these days it's like the saying says: it's always 5 o'clock somewhere.
People who refuse to wear masks are like drunk drivers, with the same reckless indifference to their own safety and the safety of others. Chronic drunk drivers are addicted to alcohol. Chronic mask-rejecters are addicted. to political rage, and to our country's deep-seated culture of toxic individualism. They hate those who ask them to wear masks, and they hate many of the people whose lives are endangered by the disease.
Then there are the hate groups - the Proud Boys, the militias - who openly preach racial, religious, and ethnic hatred while others, like the Republican Party, are less direct about it. Their addictions have always been with us.
On the left side of the aisle, hatred for Trump voters - wishing a horrible death upon them, as this Democratic blogger did, or dismissing them as "deplorables" and brutes - is the inverse of MAGA loathing for liberals and socialists. Hate and contempt are gateway drugs to political violence. They dehumanize, they make the stranger an "Other."
Twelve-step programs say that alcoholics and addicts have a disease, but they also say that the disease doesn't absolve people of personal responsibility for the harms they've done. That's true for our violence addiction, too, and for our addiction to hating and dismissing those we don't understand.
Opioids are the Opiates of the Masses
Some of those Trump voters are experiencing a level suffering that is unimaginable to outsiders. Opioid addiction is devastating (I have lost a close family member to it). The opioid and meth epidemics have devastated many rural communities, just as other addictions have devastated urban communities for decades.
And nobody's immune. Alcoholism, addiction, suicide: all are on the rise. So are rage, dehumanization, contempt. In our chaos and isolation, more and more Americans are firing the sunset gun.
Whether by design or not, this has proven useful to today's economic and business elites. An addicted underclass is easier to control than one that is fully functional and aware of its oppression.
It's true that many Trump voters are well-off, even prosperous, as professionals and business people. Yet, aside from some billionaire donors, liberal contempt and hatred seems to be reserved for the impoverished. The liberal community might want to ask itself why that is.
I would ask every Democrat who condemns a poor white Trump voter: What has your party offered to these voters and their communities? Isn't it possible that your contempt for these people allows you to overlook their needs?
Burning Down the Cosmos
A 2018 political science study concluded that growing numbers of marginalized people felt "extreme discontent" with "disliked elites," and were spreading "fake news" for reasons the authors described in striking terms: to "unleash chaos," to ''burn down' the entire established political order," to "disrupt the entire established democratic 'cosmos' and start anew."
Centrism is the failed political philosophy of those "despised elites." Centrism gave us Trump.
The authors claim that up to 40 percent of Americans share these feelings.
The question that remains unasked: Why shouldn't "marginalized people" dislike the elites and want to burn down the established order? In politics, business, the media ... in virtually all areas, elites and their choices have failed working people. The "democratic cosmos" may look orderly to the professionals inhabiting its upper heavens. But the earthbound majority looks up and sees a sky out of Revelations, burning with fire and raining down shooting stars. Some of them pick up a rifle and aim it at the heart of the sun.
It's probable (although far from certain) that Joe Biden will become president next January. For many of us, that will be a refreshing change from a president who has fueled hate and despair. But the addictions that Trump fed on will remain. Centrism will not defeat it. Centrism built today's political cosmos, a cosmos whose stars are jewels on a velvet coffin lining. Centrism is the failed political philosophy of those "despised elites." Centrism gave us Trump.
The Twilight Choice
Repairing the breach left by centrism and fueled by rage will require radical love, the kind of love that condemns a broken system and not its broken people. Biden will undoubtedly conduct himself in a civil way. But radical love doesn't come from the top, especially under this system.
Percy again:
Now in these dread latter days of the old violent beloved U.S.A. and of the Christ-forgetting Christ-haunted death-dealing Western world I came to myself in a grove of young pines and the question came to me: has it happened at last?"
Has it? Not yet, but it could happen sometime soon. To survive it, we'll need a deep sense of compassion, communion, and community. We will have to care for one another, in ways we have yet to fully understand. We'll need to think clearly. We'll have to withdraw from our addictions - to rage, scorn, depression - if we're going to survive. I don't know about you, but that will be hard for me sometimes.
But it's five o'clock everywhere. The chamber of the gun is loaded, and evening is almost upon us. The choice - to tighten our finger around the trigger, or put it down and look toward the dawn - is up to us.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Richard (RJ) Eskow is a journalist who has written for a number of major publications. His weekly program, The Zero Hour, can be found on cable television, radio, Spotify, and podcast media.
I recently found myself re-reading Walker Percy's 1970 novel, Love in the Ruins, a deeply problematic work by a writer with extraordinary gifts. Lately, I've found myself repeating these lines as I follow the news:
"Either I am right and a catastrophe will occur, or it won't and I'm crazy. In either case the outlook is not so good."
A catastrophe is occurring, of course. More than 220,000 people are already dead in this country. Millions more are out of work. Fires, storms, floods: signs are upon us, as if from an ancient book. But, like many people, I wonder if this isn't just a prelude. I wonder when the Big One will arrive, and what form it will take. Civil war? Economic implosion? Civilizational collapse? All of the above? Or will the pain of an unjust and failing society linger on for decades?
Either way, the outlook is not so good.
The Sunset Gun
In his essay, American Bloodlands, Chris Hedges wrote of the rage and desperation that consumes so many of us. "Violence is a narcotic," Hedges writes. "It fills the emotional void." That's true of other forms of political aggression, too, forms that fall short of violence but are nonetheless toxic.
In Percy's novel, a character refers to his alcoholic spouse's drinking as "the sunset gun," as in:
"It's 5 o'clock and she's firing the sunset gun." And these days it's like the saying says: it's always 5 o'clock somewhere.
People who refuse to wear masks are like drunk drivers, with the same reckless indifference to their own safety and the safety of others. Chronic drunk drivers are addicted to alcohol. Chronic mask-rejecters are addicted. to political rage, and to our country's deep-seated culture of toxic individualism. They hate those who ask them to wear masks, and they hate many of the people whose lives are endangered by the disease.
Then there are the hate groups - the Proud Boys, the militias - who openly preach racial, religious, and ethnic hatred while others, like the Republican Party, are less direct about it. Their addictions have always been with us.
On the left side of the aisle, hatred for Trump voters - wishing a horrible death upon them, as this Democratic blogger did, or dismissing them as "deplorables" and brutes - is the inverse of MAGA loathing for liberals and socialists. Hate and contempt are gateway drugs to political violence. They dehumanize, they make the stranger an "Other."
Twelve-step programs say that alcoholics and addicts have a disease, but they also say that the disease doesn't absolve people of personal responsibility for the harms they've done. That's true for our violence addiction, too, and for our addiction to hating and dismissing those we don't understand.
Opioids are the Opiates of the Masses
Some of those Trump voters are experiencing a level suffering that is unimaginable to outsiders. Opioid addiction is devastating (I have lost a close family member to it). The opioid and meth epidemics have devastated many rural communities, just as other addictions have devastated urban communities for decades.
And nobody's immune. Alcoholism, addiction, suicide: all are on the rise. So are rage, dehumanization, contempt. In our chaos and isolation, more and more Americans are firing the sunset gun.
Whether by design or not, this has proven useful to today's economic and business elites. An addicted underclass is easier to control than one that is fully functional and aware of its oppression.
It's true that many Trump voters are well-off, even prosperous, as professionals and business people. Yet, aside from some billionaire donors, liberal contempt and hatred seems to be reserved for the impoverished. The liberal community might want to ask itself why that is.
I would ask every Democrat who condemns a poor white Trump voter: What has your party offered to these voters and their communities? Isn't it possible that your contempt for these people allows you to overlook their needs?
Burning Down the Cosmos
A 2018 political science study concluded that growing numbers of marginalized people felt "extreme discontent" with "disliked elites," and were spreading "fake news" for reasons the authors described in striking terms: to "unleash chaos," to ''burn down' the entire established political order," to "disrupt the entire established democratic 'cosmos' and start anew."
Centrism is the failed political philosophy of those "despised elites." Centrism gave us Trump.
The authors claim that up to 40 percent of Americans share these feelings.
The question that remains unasked: Why shouldn't "marginalized people" dislike the elites and want to burn down the established order? In politics, business, the media ... in virtually all areas, elites and their choices have failed working people. The "democratic cosmos" may look orderly to the professionals inhabiting its upper heavens. But the earthbound majority looks up and sees a sky out of Revelations, burning with fire and raining down shooting stars. Some of them pick up a rifle and aim it at the heart of the sun.
It's probable (although far from certain) that Joe Biden will become president next January. For many of us, that will be a refreshing change from a president who has fueled hate and despair. But the addictions that Trump fed on will remain. Centrism will not defeat it. Centrism built today's political cosmos, a cosmos whose stars are jewels on a velvet coffin lining. Centrism is the failed political philosophy of those "despised elites." Centrism gave us Trump.
The Twilight Choice
Repairing the breach left by centrism and fueled by rage will require radical love, the kind of love that condemns a broken system and not its broken people. Biden will undoubtedly conduct himself in a civil way. But radical love doesn't come from the top, especially under this system.
Percy again:
Now in these dread latter days of the old violent beloved U.S.A. and of the Christ-forgetting Christ-haunted death-dealing Western world I came to myself in a grove of young pines and the question came to me: has it happened at last?"
Has it? Not yet, but it could happen sometime soon. To survive it, we'll need a deep sense of compassion, communion, and community. We will have to care for one another, in ways we have yet to fully understand. We'll need to think clearly. We'll have to withdraw from our addictions - to rage, scorn, depression - if we're going to survive. I don't know about you, but that will be hard for me sometimes.
But it's five o'clock everywhere. The chamber of the gun is loaded, and evening is almost upon us. The choice - to tighten our finger around the trigger, or put it down and look toward the dawn - is up to us.
Richard (RJ) Eskow is a journalist who has written for a number of major publications. His weekly program, The Zero Hour, can be found on cable television, radio, Spotify, and podcast media.
I recently found myself re-reading Walker Percy's 1970 novel, Love in the Ruins, a deeply problematic work by a writer with extraordinary gifts. Lately, I've found myself repeating these lines as I follow the news:
"Either I am right and a catastrophe will occur, or it won't and I'm crazy. In either case the outlook is not so good."
A catastrophe is occurring, of course. More than 220,000 people are already dead in this country. Millions more are out of work. Fires, storms, floods: signs are upon us, as if from an ancient book. But, like many people, I wonder if this isn't just a prelude. I wonder when the Big One will arrive, and what form it will take. Civil war? Economic implosion? Civilizational collapse? All of the above? Or will the pain of an unjust and failing society linger on for decades?
Either way, the outlook is not so good.
The Sunset Gun
In his essay, American Bloodlands, Chris Hedges wrote of the rage and desperation that consumes so many of us. "Violence is a narcotic," Hedges writes. "It fills the emotional void." That's true of other forms of political aggression, too, forms that fall short of violence but are nonetheless toxic.
In Percy's novel, a character refers to his alcoholic spouse's drinking as "the sunset gun," as in:
"It's 5 o'clock and she's firing the sunset gun." And these days it's like the saying says: it's always 5 o'clock somewhere.
People who refuse to wear masks are like drunk drivers, with the same reckless indifference to their own safety and the safety of others. Chronic drunk drivers are addicted to alcohol. Chronic mask-rejecters are addicted. to political rage, and to our country's deep-seated culture of toxic individualism. They hate those who ask them to wear masks, and they hate many of the people whose lives are endangered by the disease.
Then there are the hate groups - the Proud Boys, the militias - who openly preach racial, religious, and ethnic hatred while others, like the Republican Party, are less direct about it. Their addictions have always been with us.
On the left side of the aisle, hatred for Trump voters - wishing a horrible death upon them, as this Democratic blogger did, or dismissing them as "deplorables" and brutes - is the inverse of MAGA loathing for liberals and socialists. Hate and contempt are gateway drugs to political violence. They dehumanize, they make the stranger an "Other."
Twelve-step programs say that alcoholics and addicts have a disease, but they also say that the disease doesn't absolve people of personal responsibility for the harms they've done. That's true for our violence addiction, too, and for our addiction to hating and dismissing those we don't understand.
Opioids are the Opiates of the Masses
Some of those Trump voters are experiencing a level suffering that is unimaginable to outsiders. Opioid addiction is devastating (I have lost a close family member to it). The opioid and meth epidemics have devastated many rural communities, just as other addictions have devastated urban communities for decades.
And nobody's immune. Alcoholism, addiction, suicide: all are on the rise. So are rage, dehumanization, contempt. In our chaos and isolation, more and more Americans are firing the sunset gun.
Whether by design or not, this has proven useful to today's economic and business elites. An addicted underclass is easier to control than one that is fully functional and aware of its oppression.
It's true that many Trump voters are well-off, even prosperous, as professionals and business people. Yet, aside from some billionaire donors, liberal contempt and hatred seems to be reserved for the impoverished. The liberal community might want to ask itself why that is.
I would ask every Democrat who condemns a poor white Trump voter: What has your party offered to these voters and their communities? Isn't it possible that your contempt for these people allows you to overlook their needs?
Burning Down the Cosmos
A 2018 political science study concluded that growing numbers of marginalized people felt "extreme discontent" with "disliked elites," and were spreading "fake news" for reasons the authors described in striking terms: to "unleash chaos," to ''burn down' the entire established political order," to "disrupt the entire established democratic 'cosmos' and start anew."
Centrism is the failed political philosophy of those "despised elites." Centrism gave us Trump.
The authors claim that up to 40 percent of Americans share these feelings.
The question that remains unasked: Why shouldn't "marginalized people" dislike the elites and want to burn down the established order? In politics, business, the media ... in virtually all areas, elites and their choices have failed working people. The "democratic cosmos" may look orderly to the professionals inhabiting its upper heavens. But the earthbound majority looks up and sees a sky out of Revelations, burning with fire and raining down shooting stars. Some of them pick up a rifle and aim it at the heart of the sun.
It's probable (although far from certain) that Joe Biden will become president next January. For many of us, that will be a refreshing change from a president who has fueled hate and despair. But the addictions that Trump fed on will remain. Centrism will not defeat it. Centrism built today's political cosmos, a cosmos whose stars are jewels on a velvet coffin lining. Centrism is the failed political philosophy of those "despised elites." Centrism gave us Trump.
The Twilight Choice
Repairing the breach left by centrism and fueled by rage will require radical love, the kind of love that condemns a broken system and not its broken people. Biden will undoubtedly conduct himself in a civil way. But radical love doesn't come from the top, especially under this system.
Percy again:
Now in these dread latter days of the old violent beloved U.S.A. and of the Christ-forgetting Christ-haunted death-dealing Western world I came to myself in a grove of young pines and the question came to me: has it happened at last?"
Has it? Not yet, but it could happen sometime soon. To survive it, we'll need a deep sense of compassion, communion, and community. We will have to care for one another, in ways we have yet to fully understand. We'll need to think clearly. We'll have to withdraw from our addictions - to rage, scorn, depression - if we're going to survive. I don't know about you, but that will be hard for me sometimes.
But it's five o'clock everywhere. The chamber of the gun is loaded, and evening is almost upon us. The choice - to tighten our finger around the trigger, or put it down and look toward the dawn - is up to us.
The senator said the negotiations could be "a positive step forward" after three and a half years of war.
Echoing the concerns of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders about an upcoming summit between U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, Sen. Bernie Sanders on Sunday said the interests of Ukrainians must be represented in any talks regarding an end to the fighting between the two countries—but expressed hope that the negotiations planned for August 15 will be "a positive step forward."
On CNN's "State of the Union," Sanders (I-Vt.) told anchor Dana Bash that Ukraine "has got to be part of the discussion" regarding a potential cease-fire between Russia and Ukraine, which Putin said last week he would agree to in exchange for major land concessions in Eastern Ukraine.
Putin reportedly proposed a deal in which Ukraine would withdraw its armed forces from the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, giving Russia full control of the two areas along with Crimea, which it annexed in 2014.
On Friday, Trump said a peace deal could include "some swapping of territories"—but did not mention potential security guarantees for Ukraine, or what territories the country might gain control of—and announced that talks had been scheduled between the White House and Putin in Alaska this coming Friday.
As Trump announced the meeting, a deadline he had set earlier for Putin to agree to a cease-fire or face "secondary sanctions" targeting countries that buy oil from Russia passed.
Zelenskyy on Saturday rejected the suggestion that Ukraine would accept any deal brokered by the U.S. and Russia without the input of his government—especially one that includes land concessions. In a video statement on the social media platform X, Zelenskyy said that "Ukraine is ready for real decisions that can bring peace."
"Any decisions that are against us, any decisions that are without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace," he said. "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier."
Sanders on Sunday agreed that "it can't be Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump" deciding the terms of a peace deal to end the war that the United Nations says has killed more than 13,000 Ukrainian civilians since Russia began its invasion in February 2022.
"If in fact an agreement can be negotiated which does not compromise what the Ukrainians feel they need, I think that's a positive step forward. We all want to see an end to the bloodshed," said Sanders. "The people of Ukraine obviously have got to have a significant say. It is their country, so if the people of Ukraine feel it is a positive agreement, that's good. If not, that's another story."
A senior White House official told NewsNation that the president is "open to a trilateral summit with both leaders."
"Right now, the White House is planning the bilateral meeting requested by President Putin," they said.
On Saturday, Vice President JD Vance took part in talks with European Union and Ukrainian officials in the United Kingdom, where Andriy Yermak, head of the Office of the President in Ukraine, said the country's positions were made "clear: a reliable, lasting peace is only possible with Ukraine at the negotiating table, with full respect for our sovereignty and without recognizing the occupation."
European leaders pushed for the inclusion of Zelenskyy in talks in a statement Saturday, saying Ukraine's vital interests "include the need for robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity."
"Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a cease-fire or reduction of hostilities," said the leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, German Cancellor Friedrich Merz, and U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer. "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force."
At the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, British journalist and analyst Anatol Lieven wrote Saturday that the talks scheduled for next week are "an essential first step" toward ending the bloodshed in Ukraine, even though they include proposed land concessions that would be "painful" for Kyiv.
If Ukraine were to ultimately agree to ceding land to Russia, said Lieven, "Russia will need drastically to scale back its demands for Ukrainian 'denazification' and 'demilitarization,' which in their extreme form would mean Ukrainian regime change and disarmament—which no government in Kyiv could or should accept."
A recent Gallup poll showed 69% of Ukrainians now favor a negotiated end to the war as soon as possible. In 2022, more than 70% believed the country should continue fighting until it achieved victory.
Suleiman Al-Obeid was killed by the Israel Defense Forces while seeking humanitarian aid.
Mohamed Salah, the Egyptian soccer star who plays for Liverpool's Premiere League club and serves as captain of Egypt's national team, had three questions for the Union of European Football Associations on Saturday after the governing body acknowledged the death of another venerated former player.
"Can you tell us how he died, where, and why?" asked Salah in response to the UEFA's vague tribute to Suleiman Al-Obeid, who was nicknamed the "Palestinian Pelé" during his career with the Palestinian National Team.
The soccer organization had written a simple 21-word "farewell" message to Al-Obeid, calling him "a talent who gave hope to countless children, even in the darkest of times."
The UEFA made no mention of reports from the Palestine Football Association that Al-Obeid last week became one of the nearly 1,400 Palestinians who have been killed while seeking aid since the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), an Israel- and U.S.-backed, privatized organization, began operating aid hubs in Gaza.
As with the Israel Defense Forces' killings of aid workers and bombings of so-called "safe zones" since Israel began bombarding Gaza in October 2023, the IDF has claimed its killings of Palestinians seeking desperately-needed food have been inadvertent—but Israeli soldiers themselves have described being ordered to shoot at civilians who approach the aid sites.
Salah has been an outspoken advocate for Palestinians since Israel began its attacks, which have killed more than 61,000 people, and imposed a near-total blockade that has caused an "unfolding" famine, according to the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification. At least 217 Palestinians have now starved to death, including at least 100 children.
The Peace and Justice Project, founded by British Parliament member Jeremy Corbyn, applauded Salah's criticism of UEFA.
The Palestine Football Association released a statement saying, "Former national team player and star of the Khadamat al-Shati team, Suleiman Al-Obeid, was martyred after the occupation forces targeted those waiting for humanitarian aid in the southern Gaza Strip on Wednesday."
Al-Obeid represented the Palestinian team 24 times internationally and scored a famous goal against Yemen's National Team in the East Asian Federation's 2010 cup.
He is survived by his wife and five children, Al Jazeera reported.
Bassil Mikdadi, the founder of Football Palestine, told the outlet that he was surprised the UEFA acknowledged Al-Obeid's killing at all, considering the silence of international soccer federations regarding Israel's assault on Gaza, which is the subject of a genocide case at the International Court of Justice and has been called a genocide by numerous Holocaust scholars and human rights groups.
As Jules Boykoff wrote in a column at Common Dreams in June, the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) has mostly "looked the other way when it comes to Israel's attacks on Palestinians," and although the group joined the UEFA in expressing solidarity with Ukrainian players and civilians when Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, "no such solidarity has been forthcoming for Palestinians."
Mikdadi noted that Al-Obeid "is not the first Palestinian footballer to perish in this genocide—there's been over 400—but he's by far the most prominent as of now."
Al-Obeid was killed days before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu approved a plan to take over Gaza City—believed to be the first step in the eventual occupation of all of Gaza.
The United Nations Security Council was holding an emergency meeting Sunday to discuss Israel's move, with U.N. Assistant Secretary-General for Europe, Central Asia, and the Americas Miroslav Jenca warning the council that a full takeover would risk "igniting another horrific chapter in this conflict."
"We are already witnessing a humanitarian catastrophe of unimaginable scale in Gaza," said Jenca. "If these plans are implemented, they will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza, reverberating across the region and causing further forced displacement, killings, and destruction, compounding the unbearable suffering of the population."
"Whoever said West Virginia was a conservative state?" Sanders asked the crowd in Wheeling. "Somebody got it wrong."
On the latest leg of his Fighting Oligarchy Tour, U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders headed to West Virginia for rallies on Friday and Saturday where he continued to speak out against the billionaire class's control over the political system and the Republican Party's cuts to healthcare, food assistance, and other social programs for millions of Americans—and prove that his message resonates with working people even in solidly red districts.
"Whoever said West Virginia was a conservative state?" Sanders (I-Vt.) asked a roaring, standing-room-only crowd at the Capitol Theater in Wheeling. "Somebody got it wrong."
As the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported, some in the crowd sported red bandanas around their necks—a nod to the state's long history of labor organizing and the thousands of coal mine workers who formed a multiracial coalition in 1921 and marched wearing bandanas for the right to join a union with fair pay and safety protections.
Sanders spoke to the crowd about how President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which was supported by all five Republican lawmakers who represent the districts Sanders is visiting this weekend, could impact their families and neighbors.
"Fifteen million Americans, including 50,000 right here in West Virginia, are going to lose their healthcare," Sanders said of the Medicaid cuts that are projected to amount to more than $1 trillion over the next decade. "Cuts to nutrition—literally taking food out of the mouths of hungry kids."
Seven hospitals are expected to shut down in the state as a result of the law's Medicaid cuts, and 84,000 West Virginians will lose Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program benefits, according to estimates.
Sanders continued his West Virginia tour with a stop in the small town of Lenore on Saturday afternoon and was scheduled to address a crowd in Charleston Saturday evening before heading to North Carolina for more rallies on Sunday.
The event in Lenore was a town hall, where the senator heard from residents of the area—which Trump won with 74% of the vote in 2024. Anna Bahr, Sanders' communications director, said more than 400 people came to hear the senator speak—equivalent to about a third of Lenore's population.
Sanders invited one young attendee on stage after she asked how Trump's domestic policy law's cuts to education are likely to affect poverty rates in West Virginia, which are some of the highest in the nation.
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act includes a federal voucher program which education advocates warn will further drain funding from public schools, and the loss of Medicaid funding for states could lead to staff cuts in K-12 schools. The law also impacts higher education, imposing new limits for federal student loans.
"Sometimes I am attacked by my opponents for being far-left, fringe, out of touch with where America is," said Sanders. "Actually, much of what I talk about is exactly where America is... You are living in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, and if we had good policy and the courage to take on the billionaire class, there is no reason that every kid in this country could not get an excellent higher education, regardless of his or her income. That is not a radical idea."
Sanders' events scheduled for Sunday in North Carolina include a rally at 2:00 pm ET at the Steven Tanger Center for the Performing Arts in Greensboro and one at 6:00 pm ET at the Harrah Cherokee Center in Asheville.