SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
When crony capitalism takes hold, the damage can spiral as mistrust and cynicism allows for deeper capture by corporate interests. (Image: lisbokt/flickr)
Public Cynicism Enables Costly Political Hypocrisy
Beware of crony capitalism – it turns politicians against the taxpayers they allegedly represent in favor of unaccountable corporate interests.
Nov 08, 2017
The political hypocrisy of crony capitalism - touting market capitalism while making taxpayers fund corporate welfare - is a rare and unfortunate case of bipartisan consensus. Republicans openly embrace it, but many Democrats also fall prey to government-guaranteed corporate capitalism when they believe it to be politically expedient.
Maybe these examples will get you steamed enough to tell your members of Congress - "enough already!"
Jeff Bezos recently launched a bidding war pitting cities against one another for Amazon's second headquarters. Imagine shelling out at least 7 billion taxpayer dollars in return for Amazon's unenforceable promise of 50,000 jobs and $5 billion in capital investment.
The bidding frenzy with the taxpayers' money, without a taxpayer referendum, should be an embarrassment to the mayors who are bidding for Amazon's business. Mayor Jeff Cheney of Frisco, Texas (population 160,000) wants to build the city around Amazon and its taxpayer-funded entitlements. Philadelphia's officials have offered a slew of tax incentives for Amazon's empty promises. Never mind that existing businesses would continue to pay taxes that are waived for a giant company that is emptying out property tax-paying Main Street, USA.
So far, Amazon has managed to flim-flam local leaders across North America. GT Bynum, Tulsa's Mayor, is doing somersaults. No problem with tax escapes. "Whatever it takes," he assures them. From the Mayor of Washington, DC to the Mayor of Ottawa, Canada, cities are promising whatever it takes to bring this predatory-pricing Moloch to their city.
Egging them on before the October 15, 2017 deadline for submissions, Bezos' spokesman, Adam Sedo, imperiously declared: "We invited cities to think big, and we are starting to see their creativity."
San Jose, California's Mayor Sam Liccardo said "no way." In a column printed by the Wall Street Journal, Liccardo wrote: "My city won't be offering incentives to Amazon. Why? Because they are a bad deal for taxpayers. With many subsidies, the jobs a company brings to an area don't generate revenues commensurate with public expenditures." He cites the cost to Boston's taxpayers for luring GE's headquarters from Connecticut to be $181,000 for every job promised. Iowa, he added, gave Apple $213 million in tax escapes to locate a 50-job data center in Waukee, IA.
Besides, wrote the forthright Mayor Liccardo, the presence of a skilled workforce, good schools and infrastructure "play a far larger role in determining boards' corporate location decisions."
"Why are they doing this whole dog and pony show?" asks Matthew Gardner, from the nonpartisan Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. "They would like a package of tax incentives for something they were going to do anyway." Professor Art Rolnick of the University of Minnesota went so far as to call Amazon's bidding wars "blackmail."
Meanwhile, Emperor Jeff Bezos, the world's richest man, gets to sit back and watch his "candidates" fight it out.
A Taiwanese giant, Foxconn, the builder of Apple's iPhones in China, enjoys a similar advantage. To build a flat-screen plant, by sheer coincidence, in House Speaker Paul Ryan's district, Ryan's buddy, Governor Scott Walker, compelled his Republican legislature to cobble together a $3 billion taxpayer-funded package for an unenforceable promise of 13,000 jobs (from an initial 8,000 jobs after more taxpayer cash was assured).
The whole deal, repeatedly trumpeted by Trump, with a company notorious for not following through on previous deals elsewhere, was pushed on Wisconsin's elected officials by funding from the extreme right-wing Charles Koch Foundation and the Bradley Foundation.
Not to be outdone, Trump's energy secretary, Rick Perry, is pushing $3.7 billion in loan guarantees to the failing, long-delayed, red-ink doused Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant in Georgia. Add this sum to the $8.3 billion already extended in taxpayer-guaranteed loans to this "boondoggle" and still the New York Times reports that these guarantees "might fall short of what will be required to complete the costly reactors."
These corporate interests see American taxpayers as a limitless honey pot for their giant, bungling, conniving businesses. At the same time, Trump's director of management and budget, Mick Mulvaney, constantly justifies ruthless cuts to important public programs by citing taxpayers' rights. Apparently, these rights are not applicable to protecting taxpayers from predatory big-business executives hungry for corporate welfare that gets Mulvaney's regular approval.
Public cynicism allows the costly hypocrisy of politicians to thrive. So watch out for the "pox on both your houses" public sentiment. Beware of crony capitalism - it turns politicians against the taxpayers they allegedly represent in favor of unaccountable corporate interests. Don't let the "welfare kings" pick your pockets, by letting Congress wallow in cash register politics misusing the very power you have delegated to it.
For more information on accountability in sustainable economic development, see GoodJobsFirst.org.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Ralph Nader
Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate and the author of "The Seventeen Solutions: Bold Ideas for Our American Future" (2012). His new book is, "Wrecking America: How Trump's Lies and Lawbreaking Betray All" (2020, co-authored with Mark Green).
The political hypocrisy of crony capitalism - touting market capitalism while making taxpayers fund corporate welfare - is a rare and unfortunate case of bipartisan consensus. Republicans openly embrace it, but many Democrats also fall prey to government-guaranteed corporate capitalism when they believe it to be politically expedient.
Maybe these examples will get you steamed enough to tell your members of Congress - "enough already!"
Jeff Bezos recently launched a bidding war pitting cities against one another for Amazon's second headquarters. Imagine shelling out at least 7 billion taxpayer dollars in return for Amazon's unenforceable promise of 50,000 jobs and $5 billion in capital investment.
The bidding frenzy with the taxpayers' money, without a taxpayer referendum, should be an embarrassment to the mayors who are bidding for Amazon's business. Mayor Jeff Cheney of Frisco, Texas (population 160,000) wants to build the city around Amazon and its taxpayer-funded entitlements. Philadelphia's officials have offered a slew of tax incentives for Amazon's empty promises. Never mind that existing businesses would continue to pay taxes that are waived for a giant company that is emptying out property tax-paying Main Street, USA.
So far, Amazon has managed to flim-flam local leaders across North America. GT Bynum, Tulsa's Mayor, is doing somersaults. No problem with tax escapes. "Whatever it takes," he assures them. From the Mayor of Washington, DC to the Mayor of Ottawa, Canada, cities are promising whatever it takes to bring this predatory-pricing Moloch to their city.
Egging them on before the October 15, 2017 deadline for submissions, Bezos' spokesman, Adam Sedo, imperiously declared: "We invited cities to think big, and we are starting to see their creativity."
San Jose, California's Mayor Sam Liccardo said "no way." In a column printed by the Wall Street Journal, Liccardo wrote: "My city won't be offering incentives to Amazon. Why? Because they are a bad deal for taxpayers. With many subsidies, the jobs a company brings to an area don't generate revenues commensurate with public expenditures." He cites the cost to Boston's taxpayers for luring GE's headquarters from Connecticut to be $181,000 for every job promised. Iowa, he added, gave Apple $213 million in tax escapes to locate a 50-job data center in Waukee, IA.
Besides, wrote the forthright Mayor Liccardo, the presence of a skilled workforce, good schools and infrastructure "play a far larger role in determining boards' corporate location decisions."
"Why are they doing this whole dog and pony show?" asks Matthew Gardner, from the nonpartisan Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. "They would like a package of tax incentives for something they were going to do anyway." Professor Art Rolnick of the University of Minnesota went so far as to call Amazon's bidding wars "blackmail."
Meanwhile, Emperor Jeff Bezos, the world's richest man, gets to sit back and watch his "candidates" fight it out.
A Taiwanese giant, Foxconn, the builder of Apple's iPhones in China, enjoys a similar advantage. To build a flat-screen plant, by sheer coincidence, in House Speaker Paul Ryan's district, Ryan's buddy, Governor Scott Walker, compelled his Republican legislature to cobble together a $3 billion taxpayer-funded package for an unenforceable promise of 13,000 jobs (from an initial 8,000 jobs after more taxpayer cash was assured).
The whole deal, repeatedly trumpeted by Trump, with a company notorious for not following through on previous deals elsewhere, was pushed on Wisconsin's elected officials by funding from the extreme right-wing Charles Koch Foundation and the Bradley Foundation.
Not to be outdone, Trump's energy secretary, Rick Perry, is pushing $3.7 billion in loan guarantees to the failing, long-delayed, red-ink doused Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant in Georgia. Add this sum to the $8.3 billion already extended in taxpayer-guaranteed loans to this "boondoggle" and still the New York Times reports that these guarantees "might fall short of what will be required to complete the costly reactors."
These corporate interests see American taxpayers as a limitless honey pot for their giant, bungling, conniving businesses. At the same time, Trump's director of management and budget, Mick Mulvaney, constantly justifies ruthless cuts to important public programs by citing taxpayers' rights. Apparently, these rights are not applicable to protecting taxpayers from predatory big-business executives hungry for corporate welfare that gets Mulvaney's regular approval.
Public cynicism allows the costly hypocrisy of politicians to thrive. So watch out for the "pox on both your houses" public sentiment. Beware of crony capitalism - it turns politicians against the taxpayers they allegedly represent in favor of unaccountable corporate interests. Don't let the "welfare kings" pick your pockets, by letting Congress wallow in cash register politics misusing the very power you have delegated to it.
For more information on accountability in sustainable economic development, see GoodJobsFirst.org.
Ralph Nader
Ralph Nader is a consumer advocate and the author of "The Seventeen Solutions: Bold Ideas for Our American Future" (2012). His new book is, "Wrecking America: How Trump's Lies and Lawbreaking Betray All" (2020, co-authored with Mark Green).
The political hypocrisy of crony capitalism - touting market capitalism while making taxpayers fund corporate welfare - is a rare and unfortunate case of bipartisan consensus. Republicans openly embrace it, but many Democrats also fall prey to government-guaranteed corporate capitalism when they believe it to be politically expedient.
Maybe these examples will get you steamed enough to tell your members of Congress - "enough already!"
Jeff Bezos recently launched a bidding war pitting cities against one another for Amazon's second headquarters. Imagine shelling out at least 7 billion taxpayer dollars in return for Amazon's unenforceable promise of 50,000 jobs and $5 billion in capital investment.
The bidding frenzy with the taxpayers' money, without a taxpayer referendum, should be an embarrassment to the mayors who are bidding for Amazon's business. Mayor Jeff Cheney of Frisco, Texas (population 160,000) wants to build the city around Amazon and its taxpayer-funded entitlements. Philadelphia's officials have offered a slew of tax incentives for Amazon's empty promises. Never mind that existing businesses would continue to pay taxes that are waived for a giant company that is emptying out property tax-paying Main Street, USA.
So far, Amazon has managed to flim-flam local leaders across North America. GT Bynum, Tulsa's Mayor, is doing somersaults. No problem with tax escapes. "Whatever it takes," he assures them. From the Mayor of Washington, DC to the Mayor of Ottawa, Canada, cities are promising whatever it takes to bring this predatory-pricing Moloch to their city.
Egging them on before the October 15, 2017 deadline for submissions, Bezos' spokesman, Adam Sedo, imperiously declared: "We invited cities to think big, and we are starting to see their creativity."
San Jose, California's Mayor Sam Liccardo said "no way." In a column printed by the Wall Street Journal, Liccardo wrote: "My city won't be offering incentives to Amazon. Why? Because they are a bad deal for taxpayers. With many subsidies, the jobs a company brings to an area don't generate revenues commensurate with public expenditures." He cites the cost to Boston's taxpayers for luring GE's headquarters from Connecticut to be $181,000 for every job promised. Iowa, he added, gave Apple $213 million in tax escapes to locate a 50-job data center in Waukee, IA.
Besides, wrote the forthright Mayor Liccardo, the presence of a skilled workforce, good schools and infrastructure "play a far larger role in determining boards' corporate location decisions."
"Why are they doing this whole dog and pony show?" asks Matthew Gardner, from the nonpartisan Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. "They would like a package of tax incentives for something they were going to do anyway." Professor Art Rolnick of the University of Minnesota went so far as to call Amazon's bidding wars "blackmail."
Meanwhile, Emperor Jeff Bezos, the world's richest man, gets to sit back and watch his "candidates" fight it out.
A Taiwanese giant, Foxconn, the builder of Apple's iPhones in China, enjoys a similar advantage. To build a flat-screen plant, by sheer coincidence, in House Speaker Paul Ryan's district, Ryan's buddy, Governor Scott Walker, compelled his Republican legislature to cobble together a $3 billion taxpayer-funded package for an unenforceable promise of 13,000 jobs (from an initial 8,000 jobs after more taxpayer cash was assured).
The whole deal, repeatedly trumpeted by Trump, with a company notorious for not following through on previous deals elsewhere, was pushed on Wisconsin's elected officials by funding from the extreme right-wing Charles Koch Foundation and the Bradley Foundation.
Not to be outdone, Trump's energy secretary, Rick Perry, is pushing $3.7 billion in loan guarantees to the failing, long-delayed, red-ink doused Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant in Georgia. Add this sum to the $8.3 billion already extended in taxpayer-guaranteed loans to this "boondoggle" and still the New York Times reports that these guarantees "might fall short of what will be required to complete the costly reactors."
These corporate interests see American taxpayers as a limitless honey pot for their giant, bungling, conniving businesses. At the same time, Trump's director of management and budget, Mick Mulvaney, constantly justifies ruthless cuts to important public programs by citing taxpayers' rights. Apparently, these rights are not applicable to protecting taxpayers from predatory big-business executives hungry for corporate welfare that gets Mulvaney's regular approval.
Public cynicism allows the costly hypocrisy of politicians to thrive. So watch out for the "pox on both your houses" public sentiment. Beware of crony capitalism - it turns politicians against the taxpayers they allegedly represent in favor of unaccountable corporate interests. Don't let the "welfare kings" pick your pockets, by letting Congress wallow in cash register politics misusing the very power you have delegated to it.
For more information on accountability in sustainable economic development, see GoodJobsFirst.org.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.