SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Trump communicates via a sort of semaphore signalling, a verbal and non-verbal system comprising coded tells, oblique references, incoherent digressions and revealing omissions." (Photo: Gage Skidmore/flickr/cc)
In a combative, unprecedented, off-the-hook press conference held Tuesday afternoon in the gilded lobby of Trump Tower in New York City, President Donald Trump alluded plaintively to the "massive, self-inflicted wound on our country," one he termed "disgraceful." Following the weekend of horrific violence at a "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, one that showcased newly emboldened hatred in the U.S. and left one woman, Heather Heyer, dead and 19 injured, one might reasonably assume the president was referring to the scourge of racism. But no. In Trump's America, this "self-inflicted wound" involved the amount of red-tape required to get a permit to build "infrastructure."
When Trump finally responded to reporters' questions about racism and Charlottesville, he did so in a way that won him a thank you from former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard David Duke, and left no doubt that a white-supremacist sympathizer sits in the White House.
During the presser, Trump actually conflated George Washington with Robert E. Lee. He doubled down on blaming the "alt-left," i.e., antiracism activists, for violence and hatred equivalent to that of neo-Nazis: "What about the 'alt-left' that came charging...at the alt-right?" Trump asked. "Do they have any semblance of guilt?" His comment, "You had a group on one side that was bad, you a group on the other side that was very violent," left it unclear which was which, though he was very clear the "alt-left", as he termed it, didn't have an assembly permit. Trump also referred to his white supremacist chief of staff Steve Bannon as "a good man" who is "not a racist" and himself a victim who's "treated unfairly."
Racism could be solved with "job creation" and fixing "inner cities," Trump posited, as if making more money solved all problems. Clearly it hasn't fixed his bottomless need for approbation, a maw so big he heartlessly boasted that Heyer's grieving mother thanked him for his remarks on Twitter (Trump admitted he hasn't yet reached out to Heyer's family).
He ended the presser boasting about the size of his property in Charlottesville, a city besieged by tragedy: "I own one of the largest wineries in the United States," the president bragged. Needless to say, it's not true.
All of it was odious. None of it should come as a surprise. Just as white supremacist marchers boldly showed their faces while brandishing swastikas and Confederate flags in Charlottesville, Trump's response over the days that followed revealed tacit endorsement of neo-Nazis and their tactics. It revealed a presidency so brazen that dog whistles are redundant. As we've seen over the past few days, Trump is now doling out dog biscuits intended to feed and fuel.
Seven months into the Trump presidency, some still naively expect the commander-in-chief to communicate in familiar patterns of public oratory, employing language in eloquent, mutually shared communication. This we saw with the barrage of "what Trump should have said" columnizing on the weekend, as if these were remotely normal times.
Instead, Trump communicates via a sort of semaphore signalling, a verbal and non-verbal system comprising coded tells, oblique references, incoherent digressions and revealing omissions. It's a theatre of now-normalized doublespeak, requiring little translation. The first glimpse was evident early this year when Japan's prime minister was quoted by Reuters saying Trump's team told him not to take the president-elect's campaign remarks "literally." When language can't be taken literally, of course, it's denuded of meaning, ready to be weaponized to obscure, deflect, incite, confuse, connect, and, as George Orwell warned, to "corrupt thought."
Trump's failure to denounce white supremacists, a.k.a. part of his base, specifically by name on Saturday sent as clear a message as his administration's grievous failure to mention Jews or anti-Semitism in the White House's Holocaust Remembrance Day statement. The president's comments were generic, far less impassioned than those uttered after Nordstrom dropped his daughter Ivanka's clothing line.
"We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence, on many sides. On many sides," Trump said. The statement was milquetoast, the moral equivalence false; the deadly violence in Charlottesville was not the product of "many sides," but one. But "on many sides" serves two tasks: it gives cover to white supremacists and highlights mounting national frictions Trump's administration would benefit from igniting. A potentially polarizing cultural civil war would nicely distract the public from the Russia probe, and allow the government to enact its "law and order" promise.
Monday brought louder signalling. Two days after a deadly stand-off between white supremacists and counter-protesters, Trump began his day trying to discredit a powerful black man. This is old territory for Trump, whose arrival on the national stage--and once-improbable presidential run--was paved by "birtherism," the lie that Barack Obama was not born in the U.S., and was thus an illegitimate president. This obsession foreshadowed Trump's focus on his German bloodlines, "the winning gene" and innate superiority," hallmarks of the white supremacy movements.
On Twitter, Trump lashed out at Ken Frazier, chairman and CEO of Merck, who would be the first CEO to resign from the President's Manufacturing Council in an act of "conscience." Frazier earlier had denounced Trump in a statement: "America's leaders must honor our fundamental views by clearly rejecting expressions of hatred, bigotry and group supremacy, which run counter to the American ideal that all people are created equal."
Trump's fallback was to impugn him professionally, as he had Obama, clearly hoping to win points as a consumer crusader: "Now that Ken Frazier of Merck Pharma has resigned from President's Manufacturing Council, he will have more time to LOWER RIPOFF DRUG PRICES!"
Trump's delay in specifically naming hate groups--the KKK, neo-Nazis and white supremacists--undermined his words on Monday. After self-aggrandizing talk about jobs, the economy and trade, Trump spent a mere four minutes on an "update on horrific attack and violence." "Racism is evil," proclaimed a president whose administration is planning to deploy civil rights funds to investigate if affirmative action on college campuses discriminates against whites and Asians. (Just who Trump sees as racist is another question: the Washington Post's recent deep dive into Trump's tweets found him three times more likely to accuse a black person of being racist than a white person.)
Again, omissions spoke volumes. No mention of domestic terrorism. (On Tuesday, Trump said: "You can call it terrorism, you can call it murder, you can call it whatever you want," allowing that the driver is "a murderer" and "disgrace to himself, his family and his country.") Trump made no attempt to disassociate himself from neo-Nazis chanting "Heil Trump" attired in his golf-course uniform of white polo, khakis and MAGA baseball hats. He did name 32-year-old Heyer, but referred to her only as "a young American woman." Notably absent was the sort of fetishistic detail the president likes to employ when talking about the spectre of young women being viciously killed by immigrants.
State troopers Jay Cullen and Burke Bates, killed in a chopper accident, on the other hand, were said to "exemplify the very best of America." Trump used the opportunity to promise to spend more on policing: "We will spare no resource in fighting so that every American child can grow up free from violence and fear," he said.
Some Republicans, including South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, chose to be buoyed by Trump's hollow statements. ("Well done, Mr. President," Graham tweeted.) White supremacist leader Richard Spencer, the homophobic, misogynistic organizer of the "Unite the Right" rally, mocked it as "kumbaya nonsense". Spencer understands Trumpspeak: "only a dumb person would take those lines seriously," he said.
Trump's signalling wasn't over. Lest xenophobes fear he'd abandoned them, Trump floated the promise of a pardon for Joe Arpaio, the ex-Arizona sheriff found guilty two weeks ago of criminal contempt for defying a state judge's order to stop traffic patrols targeting suspected undocumented immigrants. Anybody schooled in the bizarre semiotics of Trump would also see circular linkage between his first tweet of the day targeting Frazier, that birtherism lie and his last: "Feels good to be home after seven months, but the White House is very special, there is no place like it... and the U.S. is really my home!"
In between, the president turned to Twitter to complain that his delayed repudiation of hate groups hadn't met with more acclaim by the media, or, as he described them, "truly bad people," a harsher descriptor than used to describe KKK or neo-Nazis: "Made additional remarks on Charlottesville and realize once again that the #Fake News Media will never be satisfied...truly bad people!"
On Tuesday morning, Trump retweeted, then deleted, a cartoon of a train mowing down a person with a CNN logo placed over their face, under the line: "Nothing can stop the Trump train!!" Three days after a car believed to be driven by a neo-Nazi, Trump supporter killed one and injured more than a dozen counter-protestors, the message was crystal clear: the president of the United States condoned the prospect of a CNN journalist trammelled by the "Trump train."
By the time Trump stood to defend the "fine people on both sides" on Tuesday afternoon, we couldn't pretend we hadn't been warned.
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
In a combative, unprecedented, off-the-hook press conference held Tuesday afternoon in the gilded lobby of Trump Tower in New York City, President Donald Trump alluded plaintively to the "massive, self-inflicted wound on our country," one he termed "disgraceful." Following the weekend of horrific violence at a "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, one that showcased newly emboldened hatred in the U.S. and left one woman, Heather Heyer, dead and 19 injured, one might reasonably assume the president was referring to the scourge of racism. But no. In Trump's America, this "self-inflicted wound" involved the amount of red-tape required to get a permit to build "infrastructure."
When Trump finally responded to reporters' questions about racism and Charlottesville, he did so in a way that won him a thank you from former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard David Duke, and left no doubt that a white-supremacist sympathizer sits in the White House.
During the presser, Trump actually conflated George Washington with Robert E. Lee. He doubled down on blaming the "alt-left," i.e., antiracism activists, for violence and hatred equivalent to that of neo-Nazis: "What about the 'alt-left' that came charging...at the alt-right?" Trump asked. "Do they have any semblance of guilt?" His comment, "You had a group on one side that was bad, you a group on the other side that was very violent," left it unclear which was which, though he was very clear the "alt-left", as he termed it, didn't have an assembly permit. Trump also referred to his white supremacist chief of staff Steve Bannon as "a good man" who is "not a racist" and himself a victim who's "treated unfairly."
Racism could be solved with "job creation" and fixing "inner cities," Trump posited, as if making more money solved all problems. Clearly it hasn't fixed his bottomless need for approbation, a maw so big he heartlessly boasted that Heyer's grieving mother thanked him for his remarks on Twitter (Trump admitted he hasn't yet reached out to Heyer's family).
He ended the presser boasting about the size of his property in Charlottesville, a city besieged by tragedy: "I own one of the largest wineries in the United States," the president bragged. Needless to say, it's not true.
All of it was odious. None of it should come as a surprise. Just as white supremacist marchers boldly showed their faces while brandishing swastikas and Confederate flags in Charlottesville, Trump's response over the days that followed revealed tacit endorsement of neo-Nazis and their tactics. It revealed a presidency so brazen that dog whistles are redundant. As we've seen over the past few days, Trump is now doling out dog biscuits intended to feed and fuel.
Seven months into the Trump presidency, some still naively expect the commander-in-chief to communicate in familiar patterns of public oratory, employing language in eloquent, mutually shared communication. This we saw with the barrage of "what Trump should have said" columnizing on the weekend, as if these were remotely normal times.
Instead, Trump communicates via a sort of semaphore signalling, a verbal and non-verbal system comprising coded tells, oblique references, incoherent digressions and revealing omissions. It's a theatre of now-normalized doublespeak, requiring little translation. The first glimpse was evident early this year when Japan's prime minister was quoted by Reuters saying Trump's team told him not to take the president-elect's campaign remarks "literally." When language can't be taken literally, of course, it's denuded of meaning, ready to be weaponized to obscure, deflect, incite, confuse, connect, and, as George Orwell warned, to "corrupt thought."
Trump's failure to denounce white supremacists, a.k.a. part of his base, specifically by name on Saturday sent as clear a message as his administration's grievous failure to mention Jews or anti-Semitism in the White House's Holocaust Remembrance Day statement. The president's comments were generic, far less impassioned than those uttered after Nordstrom dropped his daughter Ivanka's clothing line.
"We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence, on many sides. On many sides," Trump said. The statement was milquetoast, the moral equivalence false; the deadly violence in Charlottesville was not the product of "many sides," but one. But "on many sides" serves two tasks: it gives cover to white supremacists and highlights mounting national frictions Trump's administration would benefit from igniting. A potentially polarizing cultural civil war would nicely distract the public from the Russia probe, and allow the government to enact its "law and order" promise.
Monday brought louder signalling. Two days after a deadly stand-off between white supremacists and counter-protesters, Trump began his day trying to discredit a powerful black man. This is old territory for Trump, whose arrival on the national stage--and once-improbable presidential run--was paved by "birtherism," the lie that Barack Obama was not born in the U.S., and was thus an illegitimate president. This obsession foreshadowed Trump's focus on his German bloodlines, "the winning gene" and innate superiority," hallmarks of the white supremacy movements.
On Twitter, Trump lashed out at Ken Frazier, chairman and CEO of Merck, who would be the first CEO to resign from the President's Manufacturing Council in an act of "conscience." Frazier earlier had denounced Trump in a statement: "America's leaders must honor our fundamental views by clearly rejecting expressions of hatred, bigotry and group supremacy, which run counter to the American ideal that all people are created equal."
Trump's fallback was to impugn him professionally, as he had Obama, clearly hoping to win points as a consumer crusader: "Now that Ken Frazier of Merck Pharma has resigned from President's Manufacturing Council, he will have more time to LOWER RIPOFF DRUG PRICES!"
Trump's delay in specifically naming hate groups--the KKK, neo-Nazis and white supremacists--undermined his words on Monday. After self-aggrandizing talk about jobs, the economy and trade, Trump spent a mere four minutes on an "update on horrific attack and violence." "Racism is evil," proclaimed a president whose administration is planning to deploy civil rights funds to investigate if affirmative action on college campuses discriminates against whites and Asians. (Just who Trump sees as racist is another question: the Washington Post's recent deep dive into Trump's tweets found him three times more likely to accuse a black person of being racist than a white person.)
Again, omissions spoke volumes. No mention of domestic terrorism. (On Tuesday, Trump said: "You can call it terrorism, you can call it murder, you can call it whatever you want," allowing that the driver is "a murderer" and "disgrace to himself, his family and his country.") Trump made no attempt to disassociate himself from neo-Nazis chanting "Heil Trump" attired in his golf-course uniform of white polo, khakis and MAGA baseball hats. He did name 32-year-old Heyer, but referred to her only as "a young American woman." Notably absent was the sort of fetishistic detail the president likes to employ when talking about the spectre of young women being viciously killed by immigrants.
State troopers Jay Cullen and Burke Bates, killed in a chopper accident, on the other hand, were said to "exemplify the very best of America." Trump used the opportunity to promise to spend more on policing: "We will spare no resource in fighting so that every American child can grow up free from violence and fear," he said.
Some Republicans, including South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, chose to be buoyed by Trump's hollow statements. ("Well done, Mr. President," Graham tweeted.) White supremacist leader Richard Spencer, the homophobic, misogynistic organizer of the "Unite the Right" rally, mocked it as "kumbaya nonsense". Spencer understands Trumpspeak: "only a dumb person would take those lines seriously," he said.
Trump's signalling wasn't over. Lest xenophobes fear he'd abandoned them, Trump floated the promise of a pardon for Joe Arpaio, the ex-Arizona sheriff found guilty two weeks ago of criminal contempt for defying a state judge's order to stop traffic patrols targeting suspected undocumented immigrants. Anybody schooled in the bizarre semiotics of Trump would also see circular linkage between his first tweet of the day targeting Frazier, that birtherism lie and his last: "Feels good to be home after seven months, but the White House is very special, there is no place like it... and the U.S. is really my home!"
In between, the president turned to Twitter to complain that his delayed repudiation of hate groups hadn't met with more acclaim by the media, or, as he described them, "truly bad people," a harsher descriptor than used to describe KKK or neo-Nazis: "Made additional remarks on Charlottesville and realize once again that the #Fake News Media will never be satisfied...truly bad people!"
On Tuesday morning, Trump retweeted, then deleted, a cartoon of a train mowing down a person with a CNN logo placed over their face, under the line: "Nothing can stop the Trump train!!" Three days after a car believed to be driven by a neo-Nazi, Trump supporter killed one and injured more than a dozen counter-protestors, the message was crystal clear: the president of the United States condoned the prospect of a CNN journalist trammelled by the "Trump train."
By the time Trump stood to defend the "fine people on both sides" on Tuesday afternoon, we couldn't pretend we hadn't been warned.
In a combative, unprecedented, off-the-hook press conference held Tuesday afternoon in the gilded lobby of Trump Tower in New York City, President Donald Trump alluded plaintively to the "massive, self-inflicted wound on our country," one he termed "disgraceful." Following the weekend of horrific violence at a "Unite the Right" rally in Charlottesville, one that showcased newly emboldened hatred in the U.S. and left one woman, Heather Heyer, dead and 19 injured, one might reasonably assume the president was referring to the scourge of racism. But no. In Trump's America, this "self-inflicted wound" involved the amount of red-tape required to get a permit to build "infrastructure."
When Trump finally responded to reporters' questions about racism and Charlottesville, he did so in a way that won him a thank you from former Ku Klux Klan grand wizard David Duke, and left no doubt that a white-supremacist sympathizer sits in the White House.
During the presser, Trump actually conflated George Washington with Robert E. Lee. He doubled down on blaming the "alt-left," i.e., antiracism activists, for violence and hatred equivalent to that of neo-Nazis: "What about the 'alt-left' that came charging...at the alt-right?" Trump asked. "Do they have any semblance of guilt?" His comment, "You had a group on one side that was bad, you a group on the other side that was very violent," left it unclear which was which, though he was very clear the "alt-left", as he termed it, didn't have an assembly permit. Trump also referred to his white supremacist chief of staff Steve Bannon as "a good man" who is "not a racist" and himself a victim who's "treated unfairly."
Racism could be solved with "job creation" and fixing "inner cities," Trump posited, as if making more money solved all problems. Clearly it hasn't fixed his bottomless need for approbation, a maw so big he heartlessly boasted that Heyer's grieving mother thanked him for his remarks on Twitter (Trump admitted he hasn't yet reached out to Heyer's family).
He ended the presser boasting about the size of his property in Charlottesville, a city besieged by tragedy: "I own one of the largest wineries in the United States," the president bragged. Needless to say, it's not true.
All of it was odious. None of it should come as a surprise. Just as white supremacist marchers boldly showed their faces while brandishing swastikas and Confederate flags in Charlottesville, Trump's response over the days that followed revealed tacit endorsement of neo-Nazis and their tactics. It revealed a presidency so brazen that dog whistles are redundant. As we've seen over the past few days, Trump is now doling out dog biscuits intended to feed and fuel.
Seven months into the Trump presidency, some still naively expect the commander-in-chief to communicate in familiar patterns of public oratory, employing language in eloquent, mutually shared communication. This we saw with the barrage of "what Trump should have said" columnizing on the weekend, as if these were remotely normal times.
Instead, Trump communicates via a sort of semaphore signalling, a verbal and non-verbal system comprising coded tells, oblique references, incoherent digressions and revealing omissions. It's a theatre of now-normalized doublespeak, requiring little translation. The first glimpse was evident early this year when Japan's prime minister was quoted by Reuters saying Trump's team told him not to take the president-elect's campaign remarks "literally." When language can't be taken literally, of course, it's denuded of meaning, ready to be weaponized to obscure, deflect, incite, confuse, connect, and, as George Orwell warned, to "corrupt thought."
Trump's failure to denounce white supremacists, a.k.a. part of his base, specifically by name on Saturday sent as clear a message as his administration's grievous failure to mention Jews or anti-Semitism in the White House's Holocaust Remembrance Day statement. The president's comments were generic, far less impassioned than those uttered after Nordstrom dropped his daughter Ivanka's clothing line.
"We condemn in the strongest possible terms this egregious display of hatred, bigotry and violence, on many sides. On many sides," Trump said. The statement was milquetoast, the moral equivalence false; the deadly violence in Charlottesville was not the product of "many sides," but one. But "on many sides" serves two tasks: it gives cover to white supremacists and highlights mounting national frictions Trump's administration would benefit from igniting. A potentially polarizing cultural civil war would nicely distract the public from the Russia probe, and allow the government to enact its "law and order" promise.
Monday brought louder signalling. Two days after a deadly stand-off between white supremacists and counter-protesters, Trump began his day trying to discredit a powerful black man. This is old territory for Trump, whose arrival on the national stage--and once-improbable presidential run--was paved by "birtherism," the lie that Barack Obama was not born in the U.S., and was thus an illegitimate president. This obsession foreshadowed Trump's focus on his German bloodlines, "the winning gene" and innate superiority," hallmarks of the white supremacy movements.
On Twitter, Trump lashed out at Ken Frazier, chairman and CEO of Merck, who would be the first CEO to resign from the President's Manufacturing Council in an act of "conscience." Frazier earlier had denounced Trump in a statement: "America's leaders must honor our fundamental views by clearly rejecting expressions of hatred, bigotry and group supremacy, which run counter to the American ideal that all people are created equal."
Trump's fallback was to impugn him professionally, as he had Obama, clearly hoping to win points as a consumer crusader: "Now that Ken Frazier of Merck Pharma has resigned from President's Manufacturing Council, he will have more time to LOWER RIPOFF DRUG PRICES!"
Trump's delay in specifically naming hate groups--the KKK, neo-Nazis and white supremacists--undermined his words on Monday. After self-aggrandizing talk about jobs, the economy and trade, Trump spent a mere four minutes on an "update on horrific attack and violence." "Racism is evil," proclaimed a president whose administration is planning to deploy civil rights funds to investigate if affirmative action on college campuses discriminates against whites and Asians. (Just who Trump sees as racist is another question: the Washington Post's recent deep dive into Trump's tweets found him three times more likely to accuse a black person of being racist than a white person.)
Again, omissions spoke volumes. No mention of domestic terrorism. (On Tuesday, Trump said: "You can call it terrorism, you can call it murder, you can call it whatever you want," allowing that the driver is "a murderer" and "disgrace to himself, his family and his country.") Trump made no attempt to disassociate himself from neo-Nazis chanting "Heil Trump" attired in his golf-course uniform of white polo, khakis and MAGA baseball hats. He did name 32-year-old Heyer, but referred to her only as "a young American woman." Notably absent was the sort of fetishistic detail the president likes to employ when talking about the spectre of young women being viciously killed by immigrants.
State troopers Jay Cullen and Burke Bates, killed in a chopper accident, on the other hand, were said to "exemplify the very best of America." Trump used the opportunity to promise to spend more on policing: "We will spare no resource in fighting so that every American child can grow up free from violence and fear," he said.
Some Republicans, including South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, chose to be buoyed by Trump's hollow statements. ("Well done, Mr. President," Graham tweeted.) White supremacist leader Richard Spencer, the homophobic, misogynistic organizer of the "Unite the Right" rally, mocked it as "kumbaya nonsense". Spencer understands Trumpspeak: "only a dumb person would take those lines seriously," he said.
Trump's signalling wasn't over. Lest xenophobes fear he'd abandoned them, Trump floated the promise of a pardon for Joe Arpaio, the ex-Arizona sheriff found guilty two weeks ago of criminal contempt for defying a state judge's order to stop traffic patrols targeting suspected undocumented immigrants. Anybody schooled in the bizarre semiotics of Trump would also see circular linkage between his first tweet of the day targeting Frazier, that birtherism lie and his last: "Feels good to be home after seven months, but the White House is very special, there is no place like it... and the U.S. is really my home!"
In between, the president turned to Twitter to complain that his delayed repudiation of hate groups hadn't met with more acclaim by the media, or, as he described them, "truly bad people," a harsher descriptor than used to describe KKK or neo-Nazis: "Made additional remarks on Charlottesville and realize once again that the #Fake News Media will never be satisfied...truly bad people!"
On Tuesday morning, Trump retweeted, then deleted, a cartoon of a train mowing down a person with a CNN logo placed over their face, under the line: "Nothing can stop the Trump train!!" Three days after a car believed to be driven by a neo-Nazi, Trump supporter killed one and injured more than a dozen counter-protestors, the message was crystal clear: the president of the United States condoned the prospect of a CNN journalist trammelled by the "Trump train."
By the time Trump stood to defend the "fine people on both sides" on Tuesday afternoon, we couldn't pretend we hadn't been warned.
"The children wept, as no parents were there to share the moment—their parents had been killed by the Israeli army," said one observer.
More than 1,000 Palestinian children orphaned by Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza took part in a bittersweet graduation ceremony Monday at a special school in the south of the embattled enclave as Israeli forces continued their US-backed campaign of annihilation and ethnic cleansing nearby.
Dressed in caps and gowns and waving Palestinian flags, graduates of the school at al-Wafa Orphan Village in Khan Younis—opened earlier this year by speech pathologist Wafaa Abu Jalala—received diplomas as students and staff proudly looked on. It was a remarkable event given the tremendous suffering of Palestinians in Gaza, especially the children, and Israel's obliteration of the strip's educational infrastructure, often referred to as scholasticide.
Organizers said the event was the largest of its kind since Israel began leveling Gaza after the Hamas-led attack of October 7, 2023. Israel's assault and siege, which are the subject of an International Court of Justice genocide case, have left more than 62,000 Palestinians dead, including over 18,500 children—official death tolls that are likely to be a severe undercount.
The Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics reported in April that nearly 40,000 children in Gaza have lost one or both of their parents to Israeli bombs and bullets in what the agency called the world's "largest orphan crisis" in modern history. Other independent groups say the number of orphans is even higher during a war in which medical professionals have coined a grim new acronym: WCNSF—wounded child, no surviving family.
Hundreds of thousands of other Palestinians are starving in what Amnesty International on Monday called a "deliberate campaign." Thousands of Gazan children are treated for malnutrition each month, and at least 122 have starved to death, according to local officials.
Early in the war, the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) called Gaza "the world's most dangerous place to be a child." Last year, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres for the first time added Israel to his so-called "List of Shame" of countries that kill and injure children during wars and other armed conflicts. Doctors and others including volunteers from the United States have documented many cases in which they've concluded Israeli snipers and other troops have deliberately shot children in the head and chest.
Palestinian children take part in a graduation ceremony at al-Wafa Orphan Village in Khan Younis, Gaza on August 18, 2025. (Photo: Abdallah Alattar/Anadolu via Getty Images)
There are also more child amputees in Gaza than anywhere else in the world, with UN agencies estimating earlier this year that 3,000-4,000 Palestinian children have had one or more limbs removed, sometimes without anesthesia. The administration of US President Donald Trump—which provides Israel with many of the weapons used to kill and maim Palestinian children—recently stopped issuing visas to amputees and other victims seeking medical treatment in the United States.
All of the above have wrought what one Gaza mother called the "complete psychological destruction" of children in the embattled enclave.
Indeed, a 2024 survey of more than 500 Palestinian children in Gaza revealed that 96% of them fear imminent death, 92% are not accepting of reality, 79% suffer from nightmares, 77% avoid discussing traumatic events, 73% display signs of aggression, 49% wish to die because of the war, and many more "show signs of withdrawal and severe anxiety, alongside a pervasive sense of hopelessness."
Iain Overton, executive director of the UK-based group Action on Armed Violence, said at the time of the survey's publication that "the world's failure to protect Gaza's children is a moral failing on a monumental scale."
"No state should be above the law," said Younis Alkhatib of the Palestine Red Crescent Society. "The international community is obliged to protect humanitarians and to stop impunity."
The United Nations humanitarian affairs office said Tuesday that the new record of 383 aid workers killed last year while performing their lifesaving jobs was "shocking"—but considering Israel's relentless attacks on civilians, medical staff, journalists, and relief workers in Gaza, it was no surprise that the bombardment of the enclave was a major driver of the rise in aid worker deaths in 2024.
Nearly half of the aid workers killed last year—181 of them—were killed in Israeli attacks in Gaza, while 60 died in Sudan amid the civil war there.
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) recorded a 31% increase in aid worker killings compared to 2023, the agency said as it marked World Humanitarian Day.
"Even one attack against a humanitarian colleague is an attack on all of us and on the people we serve," said Tom Fletcher, the UN under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs. "Attacks on this scale, with zero accountability, are a shameful indictment of international inaction and apathy."
Israel and its top allies, including the United States, have persisted in claiming it is targeting Hamas in its attacks on Gaza, which have killed more than 62,000 people—likely a significant undercount by the Gaza Health Ministry. It has also repeatedly claimed that its attacks on aid workers and other people protected under international law were "accidental."
"Every attack is a grave betrayal of humanity, and the rules designed to protect them and the communities they serve. Each killing sends a dangerous message that their lives were expendable. They were not."
"As the humanitarian community, we demand—again—that those with power and influence act for humanity, protect civilians and aid workers, and hold perpetrators to account," said Fletcher.
The UN Security Council adopted a resolution in May 2024 reaffirming that humanitarian staff must be protected in conflict zones—a month after the Israel Defense Forces struck a convoy including seven workers from the US-based charity World Central Kitchen, killing all of them.
More than a year later, said OCHA, "the lack of accountability remains pervasive."
The UN-backed Aid Worker Security Database's provisional numbers for 2025 so far show that at least 265 aid workers have been killed this year, with one of the deadliest attacks perpetrated by the IDF against medics and emergency responders in clearly marked vehicles in Gaza. Eight of the workers were with the Palestine Red Crescent Society, which on Tuesday noted that "Palestinian humanitarian workers have been deliberately targeted more than anywhere else."
"No state should be above the law," said Younis Alkhatib, president of the humanitarian group. "The international community is obliged to protect humanitarians and to stop impunity."
UN Secretary-General António Guterres said Tuesday that humanitarian workers around the world "are the last lifeline for over 300 million people" living in conflict and disaster zones.
What is missing as advocates demand protection for aid workers and as "red lines are crossed with impunity," said Guterres, is "political will—and moral courage."
"Humanitarians must be respected and protected," he said. "They can never be targeted."
Olga Cherevko of OCHA emphasized that despite Israel's continued bombardment of Gaza's healthcare systemsystem and its attacks at aid hubs, humanitarian workers continue their efforts to save lives "day in and day out."
"I think as a humanitarian, I feel powerless sometimes in Gaza because I know what it is that we can do as humanitarians when we're enabled to do so, both here in Gaza and in any other humanitarian crisis," said Cherevko. "We continue to face massive impediments for delivering aid at scale, when our missions are delayed, when our missions lasted 12, 14, 18 hours; the routes that we're given are dangerous, impassible, or inaccessible."
Israel has blocked the United Nations and other established aid agencies that have worked for years in the occupied Palestinian territories from delivering lifesaving aid in recent months, pushing the entire enclave towards famine.
The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) added in a statement that "our colleagues continue to show up not because they are fearless, but because the suffering is too urgent to ignore. Yet, courage is not protection, and dedication does not deflect bullets."
"The rules of war are clear: Humanitarian personnel must be respected and protected," said the ICRC. "Every attack is a grave betrayal of humanity, and the rules designed to protect them and the communities they serve. Each killing sends a dangerous message that their lives were expendable. They were not."
Along with the aid workers who were killed worldwide last year, 308 were injured, 125 were kidnapped, and 45 were detained for their work.
"Violence against aid workers is not inevitable," said Fletcher. "It must end."
"Equipment manufacturers like John Deere have lost millions, but let's remember that working people are hit hardest by the president's disastrous economic policies," said one lawmaker.
US President Donald Trump has pitched his tariffs on foreign goods as a way to bring more manufacturing jobs back into the United States.
However, it now appears as though the tariffs are hurting the manufacturing jobs that are already here.
As reported by Des Moines Register, iconic American machinery company John Deere announced on Monday that it is laying off 71 workers in Waterloo, Iowa, as well as 115 people in East Moline, Illinois, and 52 workers in Moline, Illinois. The paper noted that John Deere has laid off more than 2,000 employees since April 2024.
In its announcement of the layoffs, the company said that "the struggling [agriculture] economy continues to impact orders" for its equipment.
"This is a challenging time for many farmers, growers, and producers, and directly impacts our business in the near term," the company emphasized.
According to The New Republic, Cory Reed, president of John Deere's Worldwide Agriculture and Turf Division, said during the company's most recent earnings call that the uncertainty surrounding Trump's tariffs has led to many farmers putting off investments in farm equipment.
"If you have customers that are concerned about what their end markets are going to look like in a tariff environment, they're waiting to see the outcomes of what these trade deals look like," he explained.
Josh Beal, John Deere's director of investor relations, similarly said that "the primary drivers" for the company's negative outlook from the prior quarter "are increased tariff rates on Europe, India, and steel and aluminum."
The news of the layoffs drew a scathing rebuke from Nathan Sage, an Iowa Democrat running for the US Senate to unseat Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), who has praised the president's tariff policies.
"John Deere is once again laying off Iowans—a clear sign economic uncertainty hits the working class hardest, not the CEOs at the top," he wrote in a post on X. "Cheered on by Joni Ernst, Republicans in Washington want to play games with tariffs and give tax cuts to billionaires while Iowa families continue to struggle. It's time to stop protecting the top 1% and fight for the working people who keep our economy strong."
Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) also ripped Trump's trade policies for hurting blue-collar jobs.
"Because of Trump's tariffs, farmers can't afford to buy what they need to make a living," he said. "Equipment manufacturers like John Deere have lost millions, but let's remember that working people are hit hardest by the president's disastrous economic policies. Tired of 'winning' yet?"
John Deere is not the only big-name American manufacturer to be harmed by the Trump tariffs, as all three of the country's major auto manufacturers in recent months have announced they expect to take significant financial hits from them.
Ford last month said that its profit could plunge by up to 36% this year as it expects to take a $2 billion hit from the president's tariffs on key inputs such as steel and aluminum, as well as taxes on car components manufactured in Canada and Mexico.
General Motors last month also cited the Trump tariffs as a major reason why its profits fell by $3 billion the previous quarter. Making matters worse, GM said that the impact of the tariffs would be even more significant in the coming quarter when its profits could tumble by as much as $5 billion.
GM's warning came shortly after Jeep manufacturer Stellantis projected that the Trump tariffs would directly lead to $350 million in losses in the first half of 2025.