SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Arizona Rep. Bob Thorpe wants to ban all activities from college campuses in the state which "are designed primarily for a particular ethnic group" and "promote social justice toward a race." (Photo: Ryan VanVelzer/AP)
Is this where our country is going?
A conservative Arizona lawmaker, Rep. Bob Thorpe, is proposing a far-reaching law in Arizona, House Bill 2120, banning virtually every college event, activity or course which discusses social justice, skin privilege, or racial equality. Violating the law would allow the state of Arizona to levy multimillion-dollar fines and penalties against universities -- removing at least 10% of their state aid.
This is no joke. Arizona already passed a law targeting ethnic studies in the state. They are fulling willing and able to pass this bill as well.
Please allow me to highlight some of the most disturbing sections of the bill.
It would ban any courses, activities, or events that:
"Are designed primarily for a particular ethnic group."
"Promote social justice toward a race."
"Advocate solidarity based on ethnicity."
Strangely, so as to not appear anti-Semitic, the bill then makes a very particular allowance for any and all discussions of the Holocaust.
According to Tucson.com:
Thorpe said Thursday his bill is aimed specifically at things like a "privilege walk" exercise sponsored by the University of Arizona and a course entitled "Whiteness and Race Theory" at Arizona State University.
The former is described in UA literature as helping participants "recognize the privileges that they have been granted and to learn about the backgrounds of their peers."
Among the exercises is telling students to step forward if they meet certain criteria, like having more than 50 books in a home, going to a private school or having inherited money. Conversely, those who were raised in a single-parent household, had to rely on public transportation or were ashamed of their clothes while growing up take a step back for each.
Participants are supposed to notice where they are in relation to others.
All of this is completely and utterly disgusting. That an aloof lawmaker wants to actually oversee and monitor individual activities and events to prohibit students and staff from discussing economic and skin privilege in this country is not just petty, it's deeply problematic. What is his aim here?
It appears that Bob Thorpe actually has a bigger problem with students and staff discussing white privilege than he does with the unfair privilege itself. That should disturb all of us. For all of their talk about local rights, it's deeply telling to see conservative lawmakers go so far as to say what individual dormitory directors and instructors can and cannot discuss with their students. Conservatives like Thorpe are fully willing to be control freaks when it protects white supremacy and cultural hegemony -- then say they stand on the principles of local control when it benefits them.
I have a hunch this bill is not an anomaly, but a troubling sign of things to come.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Is this where our country is going?
A conservative Arizona lawmaker, Rep. Bob Thorpe, is proposing a far-reaching law in Arizona, House Bill 2120, banning virtually every college event, activity or course which discusses social justice, skin privilege, or racial equality. Violating the law would allow the state of Arizona to levy multimillion-dollar fines and penalties against universities -- removing at least 10% of their state aid.
This is no joke. Arizona already passed a law targeting ethnic studies in the state. They are fulling willing and able to pass this bill as well.
Please allow me to highlight some of the most disturbing sections of the bill.
It would ban any courses, activities, or events that:
"Are designed primarily for a particular ethnic group."
"Promote social justice toward a race."
"Advocate solidarity based on ethnicity."
Strangely, so as to not appear anti-Semitic, the bill then makes a very particular allowance for any and all discussions of the Holocaust.
According to Tucson.com:
Thorpe said Thursday his bill is aimed specifically at things like a "privilege walk" exercise sponsored by the University of Arizona and a course entitled "Whiteness and Race Theory" at Arizona State University.
The former is described in UA literature as helping participants "recognize the privileges that they have been granted and to learn about the backgrounds of their peers."
Among the exercises is telling students to step forward if they meet certain criteria, like having more than 50 books in a home, going to a private school or having inherited money. Conversely, those who were raised in a single-parent household, had to rely on public transportation or were ashamed of their clothes while growing up take a step back for each.
Participants are supposed to notice where they are in relation to others.
All of this is completely and utterly disgusting. That an aloof lawmaker wants to actually oversee and monitor individual activities and events to prohibit students and staff from discussing economic and skin privilege in this country is not just petty, it's deeply problematic. What is his aim here?
It appears that Bob Thorpe actually has a bigger problem with students and staff discussing white privilege than he does with the unfair privilege itself. That should disturb all of us. For all of their talk about local rights, it's deeply telling to see conservative lawmakers go so far as to say what individual dormitory directors and instructors can and cannot discuss with their students. Conservatives like Thorpe are fully willing to be control freaks when it protects white supremacy and cultural hegemony -- then say they stand on the principles of local control when it benefits them.
I have a hunch this bill is not an anomaly, but a troubling sign of things to come.
Is this where our country is going?
A conservative Arizona lawmaker, Rep. Bob Thorpe, is proposing a far-reaching law in Arizona, House Bill 2120, banning virtually every college event, activity or course which discusses social justice, skin privilege, or racial equality. Violating the law would allow the state of Arizona to levy multimillion-dollar fines and penalties against universities -- removing at least 10% of their state aid.
This is no joke. Arizona already passed a law targeting ethnic studies in the state. They are fulling willing and able to pass this bill as well.
Please allow me to highlight some of the most disturbing sections of the bill.
It would ban any courses, activities, or events that:
"Are designed primarily for a particular ethnic group."
"Promote social justice toward a race."
"Advocate solidarity based on ethnicity."
Strangely, so as to not appear anti-Semitic, the bill then makes a very particular allowance for any and all discussions of the Holocaust.
According to Tucson.com:
Thorpe said Thursday his bill is aimed specifically at things like a "privilege walk" exercise sponsored by the University of Arizona and a course entitled "Whiteness and Race Theory" at Arizona State University.
The former is described in UA literature as helping participants "recognize the privileges that they have been granted and to learn about the backgrounds of their peers."
Among the exercises is telling students to step forward if they meet certain criteria, like having more than 50 books in a home, going to a private school or having inherited money. Conversely, those who were raised in a single-parent household, had to rely on public transportation or were ashamed of their clothes while growing up take a step back for each.
Participants are supposed to notice where they are in relation to others.
All of this is completely and utterly disgusting. That an aloof lawmaker wants to actually oversee and monitor individual activities and events to prohibit students and staff from discussing economic and skin privilege in this country is not just petty, it's deeply problematic. What is his aim here?
It appears that Bob Thorpe actually has a bigger problem with students and staff discussing white privilege than he does with the unfair privilege itself. That should disturb all of us. For all of their talk about local rights, it's deeply telling to see conservative lawmakers go so far as to say what individual dormitory directors and instructors can and cannot discuss with their students. Conservatives like Thorpe are fully willing to be control freaks when it protects white supremacy and cultural hegemony -- then say they stand on the principles of local control when it benefits them.
I have a hunch this bill is not an anomaly, but a troubling sign of things to come.