It’s hard to understand the kind of person who would be taken in by Mitt Romney’s absolutely unsubstantiated claims that he’ll be able to magically produce 23 million new jobs in the next four years, and raise take-home pay while he’s at it.
Do people really think Mitt is a magician?
Watching him struggle to appear mild-mannered and fangless during the debates—an effort that translated into a zombie-like smirk—I began to understand him as the puppet he is, a marionette whose strings are pulled by the cabal behind the curtain: the Koch brothers and their ilk, along with Big Fossil Fuel, Big Pharma, Big Chemical, Big Ag, Big Free Trade, Big Finance, you name it.
Now, it’s true that that gang has their tentacles in Obama too. You can see the strain the President is under, trying to please his popular base while also keeping his pockets open for the big under-the-table donations that keep his campaign afloat.
Guys like the Kochs hedge their bets. Whichever of the two parties wins, they’ll carry on just fine.
But if it’s Romney/Ryan, their agenda will take a great leap forward.
We’ll automate and outsource jobs like crazy, to satisfy Wall Street—the hell with Main Street.
We’ll drill and frack and mine and bulldoze our way to oblivion, and call it Kingdom Come.
We’ll appoint more social conservatives to the Supreme Court, and put women back where they belong: barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen.
We’ll drastically increase our military spending, at the expense of social welfare programs. Those who dare to ask for help with affording health care, education, or retirement, not to mention simply being able to eat regularly and keep a roof overhead, will be asked coldly: Can’t you borrow from your parents? Or, are there no workhouses?
Not only that, but the first thing we’ll do in office—day one!—is pick a fight with the Chinese over currency manipulation.
Yes, Obama is the better of the two choices, for all the reasons he has laid out himself during the Presidential debates.
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Get our best delivered to your inbox.
We must re-elect him, and continue to work to strengthen the progressive movement over the next four years, so we don’t backslide in 2016.
But part of this work must be to stand up for true democracy in our supposedly democratic nation.
The detention of Jill Stein and Cheri Honkala last week was reprehensible, and I am glad to see they are filing suit—at least that way more people will know what happened to them when they tried to enter Hofstra University to participate in the presidential debate there.
You wouldn’t know from reading the mainstream media that Stein and Honkala were taken by police to a secret detention facility and handcuffed tightly to metal chairs for eight hours, without being allowed to consult their lawyers or staff.
Thank goodness for Amy Goodman, who broke this story and has refused to let it die, broadcasting “alternative debates” on Democracy Now! that give the other three candidates on the November ballot a chance to have their views heard on national television.
Goodman is a model for the kind of alert, engaged and impassioned citizenry we desperately need in the coming decade, when the economic and environmental challenges we face are going to be increasingly dire.
We don’t need more goon cops in riot gear to maintain order, we need more ordinary people taking the time and energy and yes, the risk, to stand up for our rights to a safe, sustainable future.
After we re-elect Obama, those of us who understand what is at stake need to get to work with redoubled energy on building a broad coalition of people who care about our future and are willing to lead the way in making the necessary changes to ensure that human civilization survives on this planet.
This is a struggle that concerns all of us: we need to work across ethnicities, across gender, and across nationalities to engage the young and the old, the faith-based groups, centrists and leftists, the elites and the working class.
We can’t let a few shortsighted, greedy, impossibly foolish billionaires hijack our future. It’s ours to save—or to lose.