

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Damn those ungrateful Pakistanis. After U.S. drone attacks killed more than
600 of their people since 2006--most of them civilians--it seems they
think they have some right to say they don't want the U.S.
Damn those ungrateful Pakistanis. After U.S. drone attacks killed more than
600 of their people since 2006--most of them civilians--it seems they
think they have some right to say they don't want the U.S. flying its
"aid" planes to Swat and other "tribal areas." The New York Times reports
that "the Pakistani authorities have refused to allow American workers
or planes to distribute the aid in the camps for displaced people." The
paper reports:
Islamist charities and the United States are competing for
the allegiance of the two million people displaced by the fight against
the Taliban in Swat and other parts of Pakistan -- and so far, the
Islamists are in the lead.
Top US officials (and the Times) make no apologies for the fact that the aid is intended primarily as a counter-insurgency program:
The inconspicuous back seat is not what American officials
had hoped for. At first, the huge exodus of people from Swat, many of
whom had suffered from the brutality of the Taliban, seemed to present
an opportunity for Washington to improve its image in Pakistan.
"There
is an opportunity actually to provide services, much as we did with the
earthquake relief, which had a profound impact on the perception of
America," Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who serves as
chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said during a hearing
attended by the Obama administration's special envoy, Richard C.
Holbrooke, at the start of the exodus.
Here is the best part of the U.S. effort:
In an effort to highlight American concern for the refugees, Mr.
Holbrooke visited the camps in June, sitting on the floor of a
sweltering tent and talking to people about their plight. "President
Obama has sent us to see how we can help you," he said.
Poor Dick Holbrooke, having to sit in that sweaty tent. I really
hope someone at that meeting said, "Obama can help us by stopping his
regular, deadly bombings." The Times claims
that what came out of the meeting "was an effort to send
Pakistani-American female doctors to assist women in the camps, who
according to their cultural traditions must be treated by women."
Meanwhile, a Pakistani human rights lawyer filed a petition at the country's Supreme Court
asking it to order the Pakistani government to undertake a
"comprehensive report" on U.S. drone attacks against the country. "I
have filed the petition in the Supreme Court as a protest to let the
world know about the sentiments of the people of Pakistan on
consecutive drone attacks which are killing scores of people," said the
attorney, M. Tariq Asad.
According to the Pakistani newspaper Dawn:
In his petition, Mr Asad sought the apex court's direction
for the government to submit a complaint against the United States in
the International Court of Justice or any other appropriate judicial
organ of the United Nations for an appropriate action in accordance
with international laws.
The petition said that killing and
causing serious physical and mental harm to the inhabitants of the
northern areas and systemically oppressing them and denying their right
to life and liberty amounted to derogation of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and Convention on
the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid.
A U.S. drone attack in late June on a Pakistani funeral may have killed as many as 70 people and prompted the Pakistani government to call for an end to the strikes. Obama has been bombing Pakistan since the third day of his presidency. Obama has refused to comment directly on the drone attacks, but told a Pakistani journalist last month he did not comment on specific operations.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Damn those ungrateful Pakistanis. After U.S. drone attacks killed more than
600 of their people since 2006--most of them civilians--it seems they
think they have some right to say they don't want the U.S. flying its
"aid" planes to Swat and other "tribal areas." The New York Times reports
that "the Pakistani authorities have refused to allow American workers
or planes to distribute the aid in the camps for displaced people." The
paper reports:
Islamist charities and the United States are competing for
the allegiance of the two million people displaced by the fight against
the Taliban in Swat and other parts of Pakistan -- and so far, the
Islamists are in the lead.
Top US officials (and the Times) make no apologies for the fact that the aid is intended primarily as a counter-insurgency program:
The inconspicuous back seat is not what American officials
had hoped for. At first, the huge exodus of people from Swat, many of
whom had suffered from the brutality of the Taliban, seemed to present
an opportunity for Washington to improve its image in Pakistan.
"There
is an opportunity actually to provide services, much as we did with the
earthquake relief, which had a profound impact on the perception of
America," Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who serves as
chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said during a hearing
attended by the Obama administration's special envoy, Richard C.
Holbrooke, at the start of the exodus.
Here is the best part of the U.S. effort:
In an effort to highlight American concern for the refugees, Mr.
Holbrooke visited the camps in June, sitting on the floor of a
sweltering tent and talking to people about their plight. "President
Obama has sent us to see how we can help you," he said.
Poor Dick Holbrooke, having to sit in that sweaty tent. I really
hope someone at that meeting said, "Obama can help us by stopping his
regular, deadly bombings." The Times claims
that what came out of the meeting "was an effort to send
Pakistani-American female doctors to assist women in the camps, who
according to their cultural traditions must be treated by women."
Meanwhile, a Pakistani human rights lawyer filed a petition at the country's Supreme Court
asking it to order the Pakistani government to undertake a
"comprehensive report" on U.S. drone attacks against the country. "I
have filed the petition in the Supreme Court as a protest to let the
world know about the sentiments of the people of Pakistan on
consecutive drone attacks which are killing scores of people," said the
attorney, M. Tariq Asad.
According to the Pakistani newspaper Dawn:
In his petition, Mr Asad sought the apex court's direction
for the government to submit a complaint against the United States in
the International Court of Justice or any other appropriate judicial
organ of the United Nations for an appropriate action in accordance
with international laws.
The petition said that killing and
causing serious physical and mental harm to the inhabitants of the
northern areas and systemically oppressing them and denying their right
to life and liberty amounted to derogation of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and Convention on
the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid.
A U.S. drone attack in late June on a Pakistani funeral may have killed as many as 70 people and prompted the Pakistani government to call for an end to the strikes. Obama has been bombing Pakistan since the third day of his presidency. Obama has refused to comment directly on the drone attacks, but told a Pakistani journalist last month he did not comment on specific operations.
Damn those ungrateful Pakistanis. After U.S. drone attacks killed more than
600 of their people since 2006--most of them civilians--it seems they
think they have some right to say they don't want the U.S. flying its
"aid" planes to Swat and other "tribal areas." The New York Times reports
that "the Pakistani authorities have refused to allow American workers
or planes to distribute the aid in the camps for displaced people." The
paper reports:
Islamist charities and the United States are competing for
the allegiance of the two million people displaced by the fight against
the Taliban in Swat and other parts of Pakistan -- and so far, the
Islamists are in the lead.
Top US officials (and the Times) make no apologies for the fact that the aid is intended primarily as a counter-insurgency program:
The inconspicuous back seat is not what American officials
had hoped for. At first, the huge exodus of people from Swat, many of
whom had suffered from the brutality of the Taliban, seemed to present
an opportunity for Washington to improve its image in Pakistan.
"There
is an opportunity actually to provide services, much as we did with the
earthquake relief, which had a profound impact on the perception of
America," Senator John Kerry, the Massachusetts Democrat who serves as
chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said during a hearing
attended by the Obama administration's special envoy, Richard C.
Holbrooke, at the start of the exodus.
Here is the best part of the U.S. effort:
In an effort to highlight American concern for the refugees, Mr.
Holbrooke visited the camps in June, sitting on the floor of a
sweltering tent and talking to people about their plight. "President
Obama has sent us to see how we can help you," he said.
Poor Dick Holbrooke, having to sit in that sweaty tent. I really
hope someone at that meeting said, "Obama can help us by stopping his
regular, deadly bombings." The Times claims
that what came out of the meeting "was an effort to send
Pakistani-American female doctors to assist women in the camps, who
according to their cultural traditions must be treated by women."
Meanwhile, a Pakistani human rights lawyer filed a petition at the country's Supreme Court
asking it to order the Pakistani government to undertake a
"comprehensive report" on U.S. drone attacks against the country. "I
have filed the petition in the Supreme Court as a protest to let the
world know about the sentiments of the people of Pakistan on
consecutive drone attacks which are killing scores of people," said the
attorney, M. Tariq Asad.
According to the Pakistani newspaper Dawn:
In his petition, Mr Asad sought the apex court's direction
for the government to submit a complaint against the United States in
the International Court of Justice or any other appropriate judicial
organ of the United Nations for an appropriate action in accordance
with international laws.
The petition said that killing and
causing serious physical and mental harm to the inhabitants of the
northern areas and systemically oppressing them and denying their right
to life and liberty amounted to derogation of the Convention on the
Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and Convention on
the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid.
A U.S. drone attack in late June on a Pakistani funeral may have killed as many as 70 people and prompted the Pakistani government to call for an end to the strikes. Obama has been bombing Pakistan since the third day of his presidency. Obama has refused to comment directly on the drone attacks, but told a Pakistani journalist last month he did not comment on specific operations.