

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Watching the nightly news last night was a hair-pulling experience -- even more than normal.
The top story on national TV was the Senate testimony of the top military brass, who basically admitted that the U.S. invasion of Iraq had brought on a disaster.
It wasn't the news that prompted my hair-pulling (who doesn't know Iraq's a disaster?) -- but the way it was reported. On NBC News, viewers saw Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld testify that he'd "never painted a rosy picture" of Iraq and that he hadn't been "overly optimistic." And NBC allowed the claim to go unrebutted.
Somehow NBC couldn't dig up the quotes of Rumsfeld saying that he doubted the war would last six months (Feb. 7, 2003) or that US troops "would be welcomed" in Iraq (Feb. 20, 2003) or that "we know where [the WMD] are" (March 30, 2003). The quotes were easily dug up by ThinkProgress.
For me, there was something worse than allowing Rumsfeld's doozy to go unrebutted. It was who NBC News turned to for expert analysis of the testimony: retired General Barry McCaffrey.
I admit that the issue is personal. McCaffrey and I were once TV pundits together -- working for the same boss: NBC/General Electric.
In the months before the invasion of Iraq, I worked at NBC's cable news channel, MSNBC, as an on-air commentator and as senior producer on its most watched show, "Donahue." That show was terminated for political reasons three weeks before the war. I tell the whole story in my upcoming book,"Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media."
Unlike McCaffrey (and Rumsfeld), I warned over and over on the air that invading Iraq would lead to disaster, a quagmire, and hatred for our country in the Muslim world. I repeatedly questioned the evidence that Iraq was an imminent threat. So did my colleague Phil Donahue in primetime. We were on the money. And now we're off the air.
But TV "experts" like Gen. McCaffrey, who echoed White House claims of an Iraqi threat and cheered our country into the war, are still on the air. And they never have to say they're sorry.
On MSNBC two months before the war, McCaffrey warned that Iraq possessed "thousands of gallons of mustard agents, serin, nerve agent VX still in Iraq."
His prewar commentary left viewers ill-prepared for what would follow a U.S. invasion. Nowadays, he's no Rumsfeld booster -- but McCaffrey was upbeat when it mattered, weeks before the war: "I just got an update briefing from Secretary Rumsfeld and his team on what's the aftermath of the fighting. And I was astonished at the complexity and dedication with which they've gone about thinking through this: humanitarian aid, find the weapons of mass destruction, protect the population, jump-start an Iraqi free media. So a lot of energy has gone into this."
During the invasion, McCaffrey crowed, "Thank God for the Abrams tank and the Bradley fighting vehicle." Unknown to MSNBC viewers, the General sat on the boards of several military contracting corporations -- including IDT, which pocketed millions for doing God's work on the Abrams and Bradley.
Last year, McCaffrey was still standing tough on NBC Nightly News, opposing a timetable for withdrawal.
At yesterday's hearing, Senator Hillary Clinton made a big show of holding Rumsfeld accountable for a war she authorized and has vociferously supported. She's calling on Rumsfeld to resign. That's a good idea.
And if voters want to hold Sen. Clinton accountable for her strong support of the Iraq war, they can vote her out of office as early as September's primary.
But how do we hold NBC and MSNBC and McCaffrey accountable? Too bad there aren't term limits for TV pundits and "experts." For getting such a huge story so totally wrong, one might expect an apology. Don't hold your breath.
As I learned when I worked inside the corporate media beast, there's one obvious solution for news consumers: embrace and build independent media that are not in the clutches of the conglomerates.
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Watching the nightly news last night was a hair-pulling experience -- even more than normal.
The top story on national TV was the Senate testimony of the top military brass, who basically admitted that the U.S. invasion of Iraq had brought on a disaster.
It wasn't the news that prompted my hair-pulling (who doesn't know Iraq's a disaster?) -- but the way it was reported. On NBC News, viewers saw Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld testify that he'd "never painted a rosy picture" of Iraq and that he hadn't been "overly optimistic." And NBC allowed the claim to go unrebutted.
Somehow NBC couldn't dig up the quotes of Rumsfeld saying that he doubted the war would last six months (Feb. 7, 2003) or that US troops "would be welcomed" in Iraq (Feb. 20, 2003) or that "we know where [the WMD] are" (March 30, 2003). The quotes were easily dug up by ThinkProgress.
For me, there was something worse than allowing Rumsfeld's doozy to go unrebutted. It was who NBC News turned to for expert analysis of the testimony: retired General Barry McCaffrey.
I admit that the issue is personal. McCaffrey and I were once TV pundits together -- working for the same boss: NBC/General Electric.
In the months before the invasion of Iraq, I worked at NBC's cable news channel, MSNBC, as an on-air commentator and as senior producer on its most watched show, "Donahue." That show was terminated for political reasons three weeks before the war. I tell the whole story in my upcoming book,"Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media."
Unlike McCaffrey (and Rumsfeld), I warned over and over on the air that invading Iraq would lead to disaster, a quagmire, and hatred for our country in the Muslim world. I repeatedly questioned the evidence that Iraq was an imminent threat. So did my colleague Phil Donahue in primetime. We were on the money. And now we're off the air.
But TV "experts" like Gen. McCaffrey, who echoed White House claims of an Iraqi threat and cheered our country into the war, are still on the air. And they never have to say they're sorry.
On MSNBC two months before the war, McCaffrey warned that Iraq possessed "thousands of gallons of mustard agents, serin, nerve agent VX still in Iraq."
His prewar commentary left viewers ill-prepared for what would follow a U.S. invasion. Nowadays, he's no Rumsfeld booster -- but McCaffrey was upbeat when it mattered, weeks before the war: "I just got an update briefing from Secretary Rumsfeld and his team on what's the aftermath of the fighting. And I was astonished at the complexity and dedication with which they've gone about thinking through this: humanitarian aid, find the weapons of mass destruction, protect the population, jump-start an Iraqi free media. So a lot of energy has gone into this."
During the invasion, McCaffrey crowed, "Thank God for the Abrams tank and the Bradley fighting vehicle." Unknown to MSNBC viewers, the General sat on the boards of several military contracting corporations -- including IDT, which pocketed millions for doing God's work on the Abrams and Bradley.
Last year, McCaffrey was still standing tough on NBC Nightly News, opposing a timetable for withdrawal.
At yesterday's hearing, Senator Hillary Clinton made a big show of holding Rumsfeld accountable for a war she authorized and has vociferously supported. She's calling on Rumsfeld to resign. That's a good idea.
And if voters want to hold Sen. Clinton accountable for her strong support of the Iraq war, they can vote her out of office as early as September's primary.
But how do we hold NBC and MSNBC and McCaffrey accountable? Too bad there aren't term limits for TV pundits and "experts." For getting such a huge story so totally wrong, one might expect an apology. Don't hold your breath.
As I learned when I worked inside the corporate media beast, there's one obvious solution for news consumers: embrace and build independent media that are not in the clutches of the conglomerates.
Watching the nightly news last night was a hair-pulling experience -- even more than normal.
The top story on national TV was the Senate testimony of the top military brass, who basically admitted that the U.S. invasion of Iraq had brought on a disaster.
It wasn't the news that prompted my hair-pulling (who doesn't know Iraq's a disaster?) -- but the way it was reported. On NBC News, viewers saw Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld testify that he'd "never painted a rosy picture" of Iraq and that he hadn't been "overly optimistic." And NBC allowed the claim to go unrebutted.
Somehow NBC couldn't dig up the quotes of Rumsfeld saying that he doubted the war would last six months (Feb. 7, 2003) or that US troops "would be welcomed" in Iraq (Feb. 20, 2003) or that "we know where [the WMD] are" (March 30, 2003). The quotes were easily dug up by ThinkProgress.
For me, there was something worse than allowing Rumsfeld's doozy to go unrebutted. It was who NBC News turned to for expert analysis of the testimony: retired General Barry McCaffrey.
I admit that the issue is personal. McCaffrey and I were once TV pundits together -- working for the same boss: NBC/General Electric.
In the months before the invasion of Iraq, I worked at NBC's cable news channel, MSNBC, as an on-air commentator and as senior producer on its most watched show, "Donahue." That show was terminated for political reasons three weeks before the war. I tell the whole story in my upcoming book,"Cable News Confidential: My Misadventures in Corporate Media."
Unlike McCaffrey (and Rumsfeld), I warned over and over on the air that invading Iraq would lead to disaster, a quagmire, and hatred for our country in the Muslim world. I repeatedly questioned the evidence that Iraq was an imminent threat. So did my colleague Phil Donahue in primetime. We were on the money. And now we're off the air.
But TV "experts" like Gen. McCaffrey, who echoed White House claims of an Iraqi threat and cheered our country into the war, are still on the air. And they never have to say they're sorry.
On MSNBC two months before the war, McCaffrey warned that Iraq possessed "thousands of gallons of mustard agents, serin, nerve agent VX still in Iraq."
His prewar commentary left viewers ill-prepared for what would follow a U.S. invasion. Nowadays, he's no Rumsfeld booster -- but McCaffrey was upbeat when it mattered, weeks before the war: "I just got an update briefing from Secretary Rumsfeld and his team on what's the aftermath of the fighting. And I was astonished at the complexity and dedication with which they've gone about thinking through this: humanitarian aid, find the weapons of mass destruction, protect the population, jump-start an Iraqi free media. So a lot of energy has gone into this."
During the invasion, McCaffrey crowed, "Thank God for the Abrams tank and the Bradley fighting vehicle." Unknown to MSNBC viewers, the General sat on the boards of several military contracting corporations -- including IDT, which pocketed millions for doing God's work on the Abrams and Bradley.
Last year, McCaffrey was still standing tough on NBC Nightly News, opposing a timetable for withdrawal.
At yesterday's hearing, Senator Hillary Clinton made a big show of holding Rumsfeld accountable for a war she authorized and has vociferously supported. She's calling on Rumsfeld to resign. That's a good idea.
And if voters want to hold Sen. Clinton accountable for her strong support of the Iraq war, they can vote her out of office as early as September's primary.
But how do we hold NBC and MSNBC and McCaffrey accountable? Too bad there aren't term limits for TV pundits and "experts." For getting such a huge story so totally wrong, one might expect an apology. Don't hold your breath.
As I learned when I worked inside the corporate media beast, there's one obvious solution for news consumers: embrace and build independent media that are not in the clutches of the conglomerates.