

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
It's frustrating that whereas all human beings wish to live meaningful lives, we seem helpless in the face of a few individuals waging wars and exploiting our world.
But we can each do something about this insensible status quo, as ordinary folk of the People's Peace Movement ( PPM ) show us by taking one barefoot-step at a time, traveling to the Northern areas of Afghanistan to persuade fellow Afghans, whether they're with 'insurgent groups' or with the U.S./NATO/Afghan forces, to stop fighting.
Their action of walking without shoes suggest to us that, for us to survive today's militarized and profit-driven norms, we have to live each day differently, and with clarity and compassion.
We've been thinking that we need armies to stop 'terrorists', but armies don't stop 'terrorists'. Instead, they give 'terrorists' reason to keep fighting.
We need to think anew.
Moreover, the roots of 'terrorism' lie within ourselves. We are our own source of wars.
Iqbal Khyber, a representative of PPM, told the Afghan Peace Volunteers ( APVs ) about how violence has taken root in all of us. "A blind member of our group, Zindani ( a name he gave himself after he was blinded by a Taliban-planted roadside bomb, meaning 'imprisoned' ) had so much pain in him that, one evening, when we were camped outside the U.S. Embassy in Kabul, he pleaded with me, 'Can I throw a pebble at the fence?' "
"I advised Zindani, 'No, we need to end the anger inside us.'" Iqbal continued.
Zindani is rightfully angry because he has been hurt by all sides of the Afghan conflict, like all civilians in all wars. His father literally disappeared from his life when he was just seven, as a bomb from a U.S. airstrike in Helmand left 'a crater so large that no trace of his father and uncle could be found'. Years later, another bomb, this time a Taliban device, killed his sister and blinded him. He not only lost his sight, he also lost the chance to marry the teenage love of his life.
At a large gathering in Kabul, Zindani sat in front of a crowd of Afghans who were shouting, "We want peace! Enough war! " He had a brown turban wrapped over his head and eyes, and a Borderfree blue scarf of the Afghan Peace Volunteers draped around his neck.


He was quiet.
But his stand was clear. He had already walked more than 700 km from Helmand to Kabul, and he was ready to persist.
He couldn't see the crowd before him, but he could hear them, and understand their intense desire to end the war.
What makes us think that ordinary people like Zindani, or we ourselves, cannot end 'terrorism' and wars through nonviolent methods? Misinformation has infected us with doubts.
One way to work through those doubts is to emulate Zindani, members of the PPM and the APVs: relate person-to-person, ask, "How can we live better?", listen, love.
And to take courage in not doubting love when we encounter it.
"I was suspicious of their intentions. Politicians and leaders have misused the people so much we can no longer trust one another. But, when I met and conversed with these people from Helmand, I knew we could work together," Masuma testified to the other Volunteers who had gathered on another occasion to hear from four members of the Movement.
How about fear? How do we deal with legitimate fears?
The Volunteers were grappling with multiple concerns before they went to the big meeting organized by the PPM, held just next to Ghazi Stadium, where the Taliban used to execute people publicly.
Surely, Zindani, with his past trauma of losing eight family members to war, has been afraid all through his dark journey. Fear is an emotion we can work with, like our experience of fear even in love, like Zindani did in creating two poetic lines for his teenage girl-friend:
I am too scared to even drink water
It may fade my beloved's name on my heart.
Love triumphs over fear.
"We'll go together, come what may," Khalid, an Afghan Peace Volunteer who is a university undergraduate, had said. At the large gathering, Khalid was so 'fired up' that he overcame his usual shyness for 30 seconds on stage, delivering two lines of a Pashto poem which meant:
"Whatever you destroy,
don't destroy my thoughts and my mind."



That's how we can overcome fear, and end the obsolete human institution of war.
We can love.
We can think anew.
We can turn up together.
The Associated Press provided new evidence Monday that the U.S. military knew that the Doctors Without Borders (MSF) hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, was an active medical facility before they bombed it, bolstering the aid agency's charge that the attack--which killed at least 30 people--amounted to a war crime.
"A day before an American AC130 gunship attacked the hospital, a senior officer in the Green Beret unit wrote in a report that U.S. forces had discussed the hospital with the country director of the medical charity group, presumably in Kabul, according to two people who have seen the document," reports journalist Ken Dilanian.
In addition, MSF spokesperson Tim Shenk told the AP that in the days leading up to the bombing, a U.S. official asked the aid agency whether their Kunduz hospital "had a large group of Taliban fighters in it." According to Shenk, the group "replied that this was not the case. We also stated that we were very clear with both sides to the conflict about the need to respect medical structures."
"Taken together, the revelations add to the growing possibility that U.S. forces destroyed what they knew was a functioning hospital, which would be a violation of the international rules of war," notes Dilanian.
MSF executive director Jason Cone argued in a strongly-worded op-ed published Friday in the New York Times: "Assertions that armed Taliban combatants were on the grounds of our hospital have been discredited, both in this newspaper and elsewhere. Neither our staff members nor Kunduz residents reported seeing armed combatants or any fighting within the hospital compound before the airstrikes."
"Even if there had been 'enemy' activity within the compound," Cone continued, "the warring parties would still have been obligated to uphold basic tenets of the laws of war, including respecting the protected status of hospitals, understanding the nature of targeted structures, and factoring in the potential toll on civilians of any intended attack."
What's more, MSF says that it informed coalition and Afghan officials of its GPS coordinates before and during the attack--to no avail.
Therefore, MSF has charged that the bombing of the hospital--a protected space under humanitarian law--amounts to a war crime, and only an independent probe can be trusted to reveal the truth about the attack. While the U.S., NATO, and Afghan authorities have launched their investigations, MSF argues, "it is impossible to expect parties involved in the conflict to carry out independent and impartial investigations of military actions in which they are themselves implicated."
Earlier this month, the group launched a petition asking the U.S. to consent to "an independent international investigation into the events of October 3 by the International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission (IHFFC), the only permanent body set up specifically to investigate violations of international humanitarian law." The petition has attracted nearly 325,000 signatures so far.
The AP reporting comes just days after MSF announced that the death toll from the attack "is still rising," with the number of known dead including 10 patients, 13 staff, and seven unrecognizable bodies.
While ignoring repeated calls for an independent inquiry, the U.S. Department of Defense announced it would make "condolence payments" to the families of victims of a U.S. airstrike on a Doctors Without Borders/Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF) hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, earlier this month, which killed 22 people.
The Pentagon made its announcement Saturday after two weeks of scrambling to solidify its narrative on the bombing. MSF has labeled the attack a war crime and consistently stated that the airstrike deliberately targeted the hospital, even after the medical charity circulated its coordinates to fighters on both sides.
As the New York Times explained in an article published Sunday, condolence payments are "a way for the United States, without admitting any wrongdoing, to compensate civilians who have been injured, lost a loved one or suffered property damage at the hands of the military."
Though the Pentagon refuses to make available a catalog or record of how often it makes such payments, the Times used public records and media reports to provide a few examples from recent years.
"The Department of Defense believes it is important to address the consequences of the tragic incident at the Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan," said Pentagon spokesperson Peter Cook. He added that the department would also pay to fix the hospital, although MSF staff withdrew from Kunduz following the bombing.
MSF has not directly responded to the Pentagon's announcement. However, on Monday, the medical charity released a "photo story" of its hospital under attack, which included a series of images from MSF staff around the world holding up messages calling for an independent investigation into the bombing.
Currently, three probes are underway by the U.S. military, Afghan officials, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO).
However, following the attack, Doctors Without Borders international president Dr. Joanne Liu said that "given the inconsistencies in the U.S. and Afghan accounts.... We cannot rely on only internal military investigations by the U.S., NATO, and Afghan forces."
President Barack Obama called MSF officials last week to apologize personally for the airstrike, a rare move by a commander-in-chief. However, MSF rebuffed his statement and called again for the U.S. to consent to an investigation led by the International Humanitarian Fact-Finding Commission (IHFFC).
The Afghan Army and security forces were able to repel a morning assault against the nation's parliament complex by Taliban soldiers on Monday, which began with a truck bomb followed by an attempt by gunmen to storm the main building where lawmakers were in session.
Early reports indicate that no members of the Afghanistan Parliament were injured in the attack. However, officials at the scene noted several civilian deaths and dozens of injuries associated with the violence.
Interior Ministry spokesman Sediq Sediqqi told the Associated Press that security forces pushed back the fighters who attempted to shoot their way into the main building and eventually corralled into a nearby building that was under construction. Sediqqi later said security forces killed all seven attackers. "It is over now," he announced.
The incident occurs in the context of a wider summer offensive by the Taliban, which has recently been staging attacks and gaining ground in northern provinces and elsewhere.
According to Reuters:
The brazen assault on the symbolic center of power, along with territorial gains elsewhere, highlight how NATO-trained Afghan security forces are struggling to cope with worsening militant violence.
Fighting has spiraled since the departure of most foreign forces from Afghanistan at the end of last year. The insurgents are pushing to take territory more than 13 years after U.S.-led military intervention toppled them from power.
And the Guardian, as part of its coverage, offered this roundup of the events of the morning:
KABUL - Angry protests have erupted in two Afghan provinces against killings of civilians in military operations by coalition troops on Taliban targets.On Monday, thousands of furious people took to the streets to denounce a "cold blooded massacre" of dozens of civilians by coalition troops in western Herat provinces, which has been relatively calm.
The previous day, protestors blocked the busy Jalalabad-Torkham Road in Ghanikhel district, eastern Nangarhar province, to protest the killings of four rebel fighters and two women by "American soldiers" who raided a compound on a tip-off that the cell was plotting suicide car bomb attacks on coalition forces in the coming weeks.
But the U.S.-led coalition insisted Apr. 30 that the 136 killed by American and Afghan forces in operations over three days in Zerkoh Valley of Herat were Taliban insurgents, including two local commanders.
Belying the coalition assertion, a large number of angry residents - demonstrating against the operations AfA>> torched the Shindand district headquarters. "Scores of civilians have perished in the clash and the subsequent air strike," one demonstrator told Pajhwok Afghan News.
Abdul Ghafoor revealed many scared families had fled the locality in the wake of the battle that lasted several hours. He saw no justification for the coalition action in an area "where there are no armed groups", claiming the troops killed ordinary people without ascertaining enemy locations.
Another dweller of Shindand, Abdul Manan, echoed Ghafoor's version of the situation. The ruthless overnight bombardment continued till 10 am, he said, claiming war-weary residents were shifting to safer places after the fierce battles.
Police spokesman Col. Noor Khan Nekzad, confirming the large-scale demonstration against foreign forces, said he had no information about the burning of the district offices.
Meanwhile, Qari Yousaf Ahmadi, speaking for the insurgents, claimed Taliban fighters had killed at least 28 foreign and Afghan troops in the engagements besides setting alight two military vehicles.
However, the coalition said that the forces, tipped off about militant activity in the Zerkoh Valley, launched an attack on Taliban positions with mortar, small arms and rocket-propelled grenade fire.
Later on, Afghan National Army (ANA) and coalition reinforcements joined the troops, who radioed for close air support to target the rebel positions. An aircraft dropped multiple munitions on several enemy targets, the coalition said.
In a statement issued from the Bagram air-field, the coalition said as Taliban fighters tried to flee, an AC-130 gunship engaged and killed 26 fighters on both sides of the river valley.
"A total of seven enemy positions were destroyed and 87 Taliban fighters killed during a 14-hour engagement," the statement said of the battle that took place 37 miles ( 59.5 km) south of Shindand on Sunday.
Another 49 guerrillas, including two local Taliban commanders, were killed two days earlier by a combination of small-arms fire and close air support near the Parmakan village in the same valley.
The clash was triggered by a rebel attack on a joint patrol of Afghan police and U.S. Special Forces in the area, the coalition said. One U.S. soldier was also killed in the engagement.
"Taliban fighters are no match for ANA and coalition forces," said Army Maj. Chris Belcher, Combined Joint Task Force-82 spokesman.
"We will intensify our operations to rid Afghanistan of all Taliban and foreign fighters who harm innocent Afghan civilians and threaten the government of Afghanistan," the spokesman vowed.
The almost daily gun battles between a resurgent Taliban and coalition troops in Afghanistan to prop up the Hamid Karzai government have claimed at least 4,000 civilian lives since 2006.
Reports from southern Helmand province on Sunday confirmed six children and women were killed as NATO warplanes bombarded houses in Kharko area of Garmser district. But police denied the pounding of civilian targets in the air strike.
Ghulam Shah, a resident of Kharko, told Pajhwok Afghan News all the dead were ordinary villagers with no links to any militant group. The area was pounded after Taliban gunmen attacked an ISAF convoy, he said.
Protestors in Nangarhar province alleged that soldiers shot dead in cold blood six people including two women in the dawn raid. Coffins of the slain lay on the roadside during the noisy protest, a local tribal elder told Pajhwok Afghan News.
But the coalition said in a statement the six people were killed in retaliatory fire from the raiding party. After being fired upon, the forces retaliated, killing four militants, an adult woman and a teenage girl, it added.