Why Bombing the Kunduz Hospital Was Probably a War Crime
Did the U.S. military commit a war crime when it bombed a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz and killed at least 22 people? It's too early for experts to say for certain, but there's good reason to believe the attack may have violated international humanitarian law.
Hospitals enjoy a special status that protects them from deliberate attack. They are generally filled with protected persons—medical personnel, civilians, sick or wounded soldiers, enemy and friendly—none of whom may be willfully wounded or killed.
"While hospitals can lose that protection if they're being used for military purposes, the standard is very high," says James Ross, the legal and policy director at Human Rights Watch. What if the unsubstantiated Afghan claims about Taliban fighters being deployed at the hospital are true? "Even if this were the case, it would not have allowed for the kind of attacks that struck the hospital," Ross told me.
On October 3, a U.S. AC-130 gunship fired on a Medecins Sans Frontieres hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, for more than 30 minutes, killing 12 staff members and at least 10 patients while wounding 37 others. "There are no words for how terrible it was," said MSF nurse Lajos Zoltan Jecs, who was in the trauma center during the airstrike. "In the Intensive Care Unit, six patients were burning in their beds. The first moments were just chaos. Enough staff had survived so we could help all the wounded with treatable wounds. But there were too many that we couldn't help."
One of the last providers of medical care in Kunduz -- the first major enclave to fall to the Taliban since the Afghanistan War began in 2001 -- MSF has since withdrawn its personnel from the city.
Initial reports from the U.S. military alleged that U.S. forces were under attack in the vicinity of the hospital, prompting the airstrike. Gen. John Campbell, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, later said this was not the case and that Afghan forces requested air support. However, he also said, speaking broadly about sites like medical facilities and schools, that "we do not strike those kind of targets." Afghan officials later claimed the "hospital campus was 100 percent used by the Taliban," a charge that MSF strenuously denies.
Even if there was any truth to those allegations -- and to date, no evidence has emerged of the Taliban fighting from the hospital grounds -- the bombing would likely still be a violation of international law.
"These statements imply that Afghan and U.S. forces working together decided to raze to the ground a fully functioning hospital with more than 180 staff and patients inside because they claim that members of the Taliban were present," Christopher Stokes, MSF's general director, said in a statement. "This amounts to an admission of a war crime."
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Did the U.S. military commit a war crime when it bombed a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz and killed at least 22 people? It's too early for experts to say for certain, but there's good reason to believe the attack may have violated international humanitarian law.
Hospitals enjoy a special status that protects them from deliberate attack. They are generally filled with protected persons—medical personnel, civilians, sick or wounded soldiers, enemy and friendly—none of whom may be willfully wounded or killed.
"While hospitals can lose that protection if they're being used for military purposes, the standard is very high," says James Ross, the legal and policy director at Human Rights Watch. What if the unsubstantiated Afghan claims about Taliban fighters being deployed at the hospital are true? "Even if this were the case, it would not have allowed for the kind of attacks that struck the hospital," Ross told me.
On October 3, a U.S. AC-130 gunship fired on a Medecins Sans Frontieres hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, for more than 30 minutes, killing 12 staff members and at least 10 patients while wounding 37 others. "There are no words for how terrible it was," said MSF nurse Lajos Zoltan Jecs, who was in the trauma center during the airstrike. "In the Intensive Care Unit, six patients were burning in their beds. The first moments were just chaos. Enough staff had survived so we could help all the wounded with treatable wounds. But there were too many that we couldn't help."
One of the last providers of medical care in Kunduz -- the first major enclave to fall to the Taliban since the Afghanistan War began in 2001 -- MSF has since withdrawn its personnel from the city.
Initial reports from the U.S. military alleged that U.S. forces were under attack in the vicinity of the hospital, prompting the airstrike. Gen. John Campbell, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, later said this was not the case and that Afghan forces requested air support. However, he also said, speaking broadly about sites like medical facilities and schools, that "we do not strike those kind of targets." Afghan officials later claimed the "hospital campus was 100 percent used by the Taliban," a charge that MSF strenuously denies.
Even if there was any truth to those allegations -- and to date, no evidence has emerged of the Taliban fighting from the hospital grounds -- the bombing would likely still be a violation of international law.
"These statements imply that Afghan and U.S. forces working together decided to raze to the ground a fully functioning hospital with more than 180 staff and patients inside because they claim that members of the Taliban were present," Christopher Stokes, MSF's general director, said in a statement. "This amounts to an admission of a war crime."
Did the U.S. military commit a war crime when it bombed a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz and killed at least 22 people? It's too early for experts to say for certain, but there's good reason to believe the attack may have violated international humanitarian law.
Hospitals enjoy a special status that protects them from deliberate attack. They are generally filled with protected persons—medical personnel, civilians, sick or wounded soldiers, enemy and friendly—none of whom may be willfully wounded or killed.
"While hospitals can lose that protection if they're being used for military purposes, the standard is very high," says James Ross, the legal and policy director at Human Rights Watch. What if the unsubstantiated Afghan claims about Taliban fighters being deployed at the hospital are true? "Even if this were the case, it would not have allowed for the kind of attacks that struck the hospital," Ross told me.
On October 3, a U.S. AC-130 gunship fired on a Medecins Sans Frontieres hospital in Kunduz, Afghanistan, for more than 30 minutes, killing 12 staff members and at least 10 patients while wounding 37 others. "There are no words for how terrible it was," said MSF nurse Lajos Zoltan Jecs, who was in the trauma center during the airstrike. "In the Intensive Care Unit, six patients were burning in their beds. The first moments were just chaos. Enough staff had survived so we could help all the wounded with treatable wounds. But there were too many that we couldn't help."
One of the last providers of medical care in Kunduz -- the first major enclave to fall to the Taliban since the Afghanistan War began in 2001 -- MSF has since withdrawn its personnel from the city.
Initial reports from the U.S. military alleged that U.S. forces were under attack in the vicinity of the hospital, prompting the airstrike. Gen. John Campbell, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, later said this was not the case and that Afghan forces requested air support. However, he also said, speaking broadly about sites like medical facilities and schools, that "we do not strike those kind of targets." Afghan officials later claimed the "hospital campus was 100 percent used by the Taliban," a charge that MSF strenuously denies.
Even if there was any truth to those allegations -- and to date, no evidence has emerged of the Taliban fighting from the hospital grounds -- the bombing would likely still be a violation of international law.
"These statements imply that Afghan and U.S. forces working together decided to raze to the ground a fully functioning hospital with more than 180 staff and patients inside because they claim that members of the Taliban were present," Christopher Stokes, MSF's general director, said in a statement. "This amounts to an admission of a war crime."