The Truth Behind Israel's War on 7 Fronts
There is a difference between a country fighting a defensive war on multiple fronts and another fighting for colonial expansion, for regional hegemony, and for military dominance driven by religious prophecies.
Israeli officials keep repeating that Israel is fighting on multiple fronts. The truth is that Israel chooses to fight on multiple fronts. The two claims are fundamentally different.
Recently, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went as far as saying that his country is fighting on seven different war fronts, all driven by the objective of "defending ourselves against... barbarism."
These supposedly defensive wars are also carried out in the name of protecting "civilization against those who seek to impose a dark age of fanaticism on all of us," Netanyahu said in a speech in early October.
More wars for Israel also translate into more money.
There will be no need to counter Netanyahu's diatribes. It should be obvious that neither is genocide classified as self-defense, nor does preserving human civilization include burning people alive, as was the case with Sha'ban Al-Dalou, who was horrifically killed alongside his family in the recent Israeli shelling of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah.
But is Israel being forced to fight on seven fronts?
According to Netanyahu, but also other top political and military officials, the fronts are Iran, Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen, and groups in Syria, Iraq, and the West Bank.
Though the major fighting is only taking place in Gaza and Lebanon, the official Israeli line is keen on exaggerating the number of war fronts to continue capitalizing on the generous U.S. and Western military and political support. More wars for Israel also translate into more money.
Of course, Israel is fighting actual wars too; a war of extermination and genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza, which has killed and wounded more than 150,000 people in the course of one year.
There is also a war in the West Bank, carried out with the precise aim of subduing all forms of resistance, so that Israel may accelerate its settler-colonial project in the occupied territories.
The above is not an inference, but a statement of fact, based on Netanyahu's own declared policies. "Israel must have security control over all the territory west of the Jordan," he said during a news conference last January. To be more precise, "between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty," he said. "Security control" is an Israeli euphemism for territorial expansion.
In an interview with the European public service channel Arte, Israeli Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich said Israel would expand "little by little" to eventually encompass the whole of the Palestinian territories, in addition to Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, and other Arab countries.
"It is written that the future of Jerusalem is to expand to Damascus," he said.
Religious prophecies are particularly dangerous when they are embraced by unhinged extremist politicians who wield the political clout and military power to put them into action.
Netanyahu is a leading member of the same group. He has already justified his genocide in Gaza and wars everywhere according to religious texts, where he sees his army as the Israelites fighting the Amalekites.
These religious sentiments are common in Israel's political discourses throughout history. However, they have taken center stage in recent years under a succession of far-right governments, mostly formed by Netanyahu. They see in the Gaza war an opportunity to bring about what Smotrich, then the vice-chairman of the Knesset, called in 2017 "Israel's decisive plan."
Ironically named "One Hope," Smotrich's plan is primarily centered on the annexation of the whole of the West Bank, which he, like Netanyahu and others, refers to as "Judea and Samaria." The plan entails "imposing sovereignty on all of Judea and Samaria," with the "concurrent acts of settlements," as in "the establishing of cities and towns," with the aim of "creating a clear and irreversible reality on the ground."
Smotrich's plan, which is being implemented, now that he is one of the two kingmakers in Netanyahu's government—the other is Itamar Ben-Gvir—was prepared years before the ongoing war on Gaza, and is being implemented, per his own admission, "little by little" ever since.
Israel may claim that it is fighting a war on seven or 70 fronts. It may also assign itself the role of the savior of civilizations. But the truth cannot be hidden, especially when the Israelis themselves are the ones who are disclosing their sinister intentions.
Even the ongoing war on Lebanon, which Israeli leaders, along with their U.S. backers, have dubbed a defensive war, is now being promoted by some Israeli politicians and their right-wing supporters as another expansionist war, or more accurately a quest for "Greater Israel."
There is a difference between a country fighting a defensive war on multiple fronts and another fighting for colonial expansion, for regional hegemony, and for military dominance driven by religious prophecies. Those who have chosen the latter path, as Israel has, cannot claim to be in a state of self-defense.
"Self-defense in international law refers to the inherent right of a state to use of force in response to an armed attack," the International Red Cross states on its website. This definition does not apply to a state that is itself a military occupier, thus is in an active state of hostility and unlawful use of violence.
Netanyahu and Smotrich, however, are hardly concerned about international or humanitarian laws. They are driven by ominous, expansionist agendas. If they succeed, more deadly wars are sure to follow. The international community must do everything in its power to ensure their failure.
FINAL DAY! This is urgent.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just hours left in our Spring Campaign, we're still falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Israeli officials keep repeating that Israel is fighting on multiple fronts. The truth is that Israel chooses to fight on multiple fronts. The two claims are fundamentally different.
Recently, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went as far as saying that his country is fighting on seven different war fronts, all driven by the objective of "defending ourselves against... barbarism."
These supposedly defensive wars are also carried out in the name of protecting "civilization against those who seek to impose a dark age of fanaticism on all of us," Netanyahu said in a speech in early October.
More wars for Israel also translate into more money.
There will be no need to counter Netanyahu's diatribes. It should be obvious that neither is genocide classified as self-defense, nor does preserving human civilization include burning people alive, as was the case with Sha'ban Al-Dalou, who was horrifically killed alongside his family in the recent Israeli shelling of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah.
But is Israel being forced to fight on seven fronts?
According to Netanyahu, but also other top political and military officials, the fronts are Iran, Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen, and groups in Syria, Iraq, and the West Bank.
Though the major fighting is only taking place in Gaza and Lebanon, the official Israeli line is keen on exaggerating the number of war fronts to continue capitalizing on the generous U.S. and Western military and political support. More wars for Israel also translate into more money.
Of course, Israel is fighting actual wars too; a war of extermination and genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza, which has killed and wounded more than 150,000 people in the course of one year.
There is also a war in the West Bank, carried out with the precise aim of subduing all forms of resistance, so that Israel may accelerate its settler-colonial project in the occupied territories.
The above is not an inference, but a statement of fact, based on Netanyahu's own declared policies. "Israel must have security control over all the territory west of the Jordan," he said during a news conference last January. To be more precise, "between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty," he said. "Security control" is an Israeli euphemism for territorial expansion.
In an interview with the European public service channel Arte, Israeli Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich said Israel would expand "little by little" to eventually encompass the whole of the Palestinian territories, in addition to Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, and other Arab countries.
"It is written that the future of Jerusalem is to expand to Damascus," he said.
Religious prophecies are particularly dangerous when they are embraced by unhinged extremist politicians who wield the political clout and military power to put them into action.
Netanyahu is a leading member of the same group. He has already justified his genocide in Gaza and wars everywhere according to religious texts, where he sees his army as the Israelites fighting the Amalekites.
These religious sentiments are common in Israel's political discourses throughout history. However, they have taken center stage in recent years under a succession of far-right governments, mostly formed by Netanyahu. They see in the Gaza war an opportunity to bring about what Smotrich, then the vice-chairman of the Knesset, called in 2017 "Israel's decisive plan."
Ironically named "One Hope," Smotrich's plan is primarily centered on the annexation of the whole of the West Bank, which he, like Netanyahu and others, refers to as "Judea and Samaria." The plan entails "imposing sovereignty on all of Judea and Samaria," with the "concurrent acts of settlements," as in "the establishing of cities and towns," with the aim of "creating a clear and irreversible reality on the ground."
Smotrich's plan, which is being implemented, now that he is one of the two kingmakers in Netanyahu's government—the other is Itamar Ben-Gvir—was prepared years before the ongoing war on Gaza, and is being implemented, per his own admission, "little by little" ever since.
Israel may claim that it is fighting a war on seven or 70 fronts. It may also assign itself the role of the savior of civilizations. But the truth cannot be hidden, especially when the Israelis themselves are the ones who are disclosing their sinister intentions.
Even the ongoing war on Lebanon, which Israeli leaders, along with their U.S. backers, have dubbed a defensive war, is now being promoted by some Israeli politicians and their right-wing supporters as another expansionist war, or more accurately a quest for "Greater Israel."
There is a difference between a country fighting a defensive war on multiple fronts and another fighting for colonial expansion, for regional hegemony, and for military dominance driven by religious prophecies. Those who have chosen the latter path, as Israel has, cannot claim to be in a state of self-defense.
"Self-defense in international law refers to the inherent right of a state to use of force in response to an armed attack," the International Red Cross states on its website. This definition does not apply to a state that is itself a military occupier, thus is in an active state of hostility and unlawful use of violence.
Netanyahu and Smotrich, however, are hardly concerned about international or humanitarian laws. They are driven by ominous, expansionist agendas. If they succeed, more deadly wars are sure to follow. The international community must do everything in its power to ensure their failure.
- Ultimately, Israel's Treatment of Its Neighbors Will Come Back to Haunt It ›
- Israel's Pager Bombings Are Blatant Effort to Stoke Regional War ›
- UN Office Details Alleged IDF 'Summary Killing' of Gaza Men in Front of Families ›
- Biden Must Walk Back From Netanyahu’s Iran Trap ›
- What the Abraham Accords Got Wrong ›
- To Prevent War in Lebanon, the US Must Stop Giving Israel the Support to Wage It ›
Israeli officials keep repeating that Israel is fighting on multiple fronts. The truth is that Israel chooses to fight on multiple fronts. The two claims are fundamentally different.
Recently, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went as far as saying that his country is fighting on seven different war fronts, all driven by the objective of "defending ourselves against... barbarism."
These supposedly defensive wars are also carried out in the name of protecting "civilization against those who seek to impose a dark age of fanaticism on all of us," Netanyahu said in a speech in early October.
More wars for Israel also translate into more money.
There will be no need to counter Netanyahu's diatribes. It should be obvious that neither is genocide classified as self-defense, nor does preserving human civilization include burning people alive, as was the case with Sha'ban Al-Dalou, who was horrifically killed alongside his family in the recent Israeli shelling of the al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir al-Balah.
But is Israel being forced to fight on seven fronts?
According to Netanyahu, but also other top political and military officials, the fronts are Iran, Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen, and groups in Syria, Iraq, and the West Bank.
Though the major fighting is only taking place in Gaza and Lebanon, the official Israeli line is keen on exaggerating the number of war fronts to continue capitalizing on the generous U.S. and Western military and political support. More wars for Israel also translate into more money.
Of course, Israel is fighting actual wars too; a war of extermination and genocide against the Palestinian people in Gaza, which has killed and wounded more than 150,000 people in the course of one year.
There is also a war in the West Bank, carried out with the precise aim of subduing all forms of resistance, so that Israel may accelerate its settler-colonial project in the occupied territories.
The above is not an inference, but a statement of fact, based on Netanyahu's own declared policies. "Israel must have security control over all the territory west of the Jordan," he said during a news conference last January. To be more precise, "between the Sea and the Jordan there will only be Israeli sovereignty," he said. "Security control" is an Israeli euphemism for territorial expansion.
In an interview with the European public service channel Arte, Israeli Minister of Finance Bezalel Smotrich said Israel would expand "little by little" to eventually encompass the whole of the Palestinian territories, in addition to Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, and other Arab countries.
"It is written that the future of Jerusalem is to expand to Damascus," he said.
Religious prophecies are particularly dangerous when they are embraced by unhinged extremist politicians who wield the political clout and military power to put them into action.
Netanyahu is a leading member of the same group. He has already justified his genocide in Gaza and wars everywhere according to religious texts, where he sees his army as the Israelites fighting the Amalekites.
These religious sentiments are common in Israel's political discourses throughout history. However, they have taken center stage in recent years under a succession of far-right governments, mostly formed by Netanyahu. They see in the Gaza war an opportunity to bring about what Smotrich, then the vice-chairman of the Knesset, called in 2017 "Israel's decisive plan."
Ironically named "One Hope," Smotrich's plan is primarily centered on the annexation of the whole of the West Bank, which he, like Netanyahu and others, refers to as "Judea and Samaria." The plan entails "imposing sovereignty on all of Judea and Samaria," with the "concurrent acts of settlements," as in "the establishing of cities and towns," with the aim of "creating a clear and irreversible reality on the ground."
Smotrich's plan, which is being implemented, now that he is one of the two kingmakers in Netanyahu's government—the other is Itamar Ben-Gvir—was prepared years before the ongoing war on Gaza, and is being implemented, per his own admission, "little by little" ever since.
Israel may claim that it is fighting a war on seven or 70 fronts. It may also assign itself the role of the savior of civilizations. But the truth cannot be hidden, especially when the Israelis themselves are the ones who are disclosing their sinister intentions.
Even the ongoing war on Lebanon, which Israeli leaders, along with their U.S. backers, have dubbed a defensive war, is now being promoted by some Israeli politicians and their right-wing supporters as another expansionist war, or more accurately a quest for "Greater Israel."
There is a difference between a country fighting a defensive war on multiple fronts and another fighting for colonial expansion, for regional hegemony, and for military dominance driven by religious prophecies. Those who have chosen the latter path, as Israel has, cannot claim to be in a state of self-defense.
"Self-defense in international law refers to the inherent right of a state to use of force in response to an armed attack," the International Red Cross states on its website. This definition does not apply to a state that is itself a military occupier, thus is in an active state of hostility and unlawful use of violence.
Netanyahu and Smotrich, however, are hardly concerned about international or humanitarian laws. They are driven by ominous, expansionist agendas. If they succeed, more deadly wars are sure to follow. The international community must do everything in its power to ensure their failure.
- Ultimately, Israel's Treatment of Its Neighbors Will Come Back to Haunt It ›
- Israel's Pager Bombings Are Blatant Effort to Stoke Regional War ›
- UN Office Details Alleged IDF 'Summary Killing' of Gaza Men in Front of Families ›
- Biden Must Walk Back From Netanyahu’s Iran Trap ›
- What the Abraham Accords Got Wrong ›
- To Prevent War in Lebanon, the US Must Stop Giving Israel the Support to Wage It ›