

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Brian Williams and James Carville speak onstage during Election Night Live With Brian Williams at Amazon Studios on November 05, 2024 in Culver City, California.
This and other idiocy of the elites shows why the Democratic Establishment hasn't learned a damn thing from losing to Trump—not once, but twice.
This week began with the release of a report titled “Deciding to Win,” claiming to light the way “toward a common sense renewal of the Democratic Party.”
But the first mention of healthcare is so far from reality that the authors might have more accurately titled their report “Deciding to Lie.” The report declares that Medicare for All is in the category of “unpopular economic policies.” The claim is false. But it’s in sync with the corporate sensibilities and wishful thinking of party operatives like James Carville, whose praise of the document appears on its first page.
In fact, for many years, public opinion on Medicare for All has been clearly favorable. But the authors of the report, who call themselves The Welcome Team, will have none of it. Shoddy research is required for The Welcome Team (which claims to “represent the middle”) to dismiss Medicare for All as an “unpopular” economic policy. It is, of course, clearly unpopular with the health insurance companies that fund and influence corporate “Third Way” Democrats.
What’s especially important about the recent Economist/YouGov poll and similar polls going back years is that Medicare for All is popular with the public despite a near-total exclusion of media pundits who support the policy—whether at the New York Times or New York Post, whether at CNN or Fox News. In mainstream media, the policy is rarely uplifted and regularly denigrated. During the 2020 Democratic primaries, for example, journalists regularly pressed Bernie Sanders for the price tag of his Medicare for All proposal, but defenders of the private-insurance-dominated system were never pressed on the costs to society of sticking with the status quo—which is far more expensive (due to bureaucracy, huge CEO salaries, insurance company profits).
While the polling is clear, so is the agenda of the “Deciding to Win” authors and their backers in the corporate Democratic Party establishment. They were likely pleased with the headline that one media outlet gave to coverage of the report on Monday: “Left-Wing Ideas Have Wrecked Democrats’ Brand, New Report Warns.” But pretending that Medicare for All is unpopular indicates how far their elitism has taken them from the concerns of most people in the United States.
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. If you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
This week began with the release of a report titled “Deciding to Win,” claiming to light the way “toward a common sense renewal of the Democratic Party.”
But the first mention of healthcare is so far from reality that the authors might have more accurately titled their report “Deciding to Lie.” The report declares that Medicare for All is in the category of “unpopular economic policies.” The claim is false. But it’s in sync with the corporate sensibilities and wishful thinking of party operatives like James Carville, whose praise of the document appears on its first page.
In fact, for many years, public opinion on Medicare for All has been clearly favorable. But the authors of the report, who call themselves The Welcome Team, will have none of it. Shoddy research is required for The Welcome Team (which claims to “represent the middle”) to dismiss Medicare for All as an “unpopular” economic policy. It is, of course, clearly unpopular with the health insurance companies that fund and influence corporate “Third Way” Democrats.
What’s especially important about the recent Economist/YouGov poll and similar polls going back years is that Medicare for All is popular with the public despite a near-total exclusion of media pundits who support the policy—whether at the New York Times or New York Post, whether at CNN or Fox News. In mainstream media, the policy is rarely uplifted and regularly denigrated. During the 2020 Democratic primaries, for example, journalists regularly pressed Bernie Sanders for the price tag of his Medicare for All proposal, but defenders of the private-insurance-dominated system were never pressed on the costs to society of sticking with the status quo—which is far more expensive (due to bureaucracy, huge CEO salaries, insurance company profits).
While the polling is clear, so is the agenda of the “Deciding to Win” authors and their backers in the corporate Democratic Party establishment. They were likely pleased with the headline that one media outlet gave to coverage of the report on Monday: “Left-Wing Ideas Have Wrecked Democrats’ Brand, New Report Warns.” But pretending that Medicare for All is unpopular indicates how far their elitism has taken them from the concerns of most people in the United States.
This week began with the release of a report titled “Deciding to Win,” claiming to light the way “toward a common sense renewal of the Democratic Party.”
But the first mention of healthcare is so far from reality that the authors might have more accurately titled their report “Deciding to Lie.” The report declares that Medicare for All is in the category of “unpopular economic policies.” The claim is false. But it’s in sync with the corporate sensibilities and wishful thinking of party operatives like James Carville, whose praise of the document appears on its first page.
In fact, for many years, public opinion on Medicare for All has been clearly favorable. But the authors of the report, who call themselves The Welcome Team, will have none of it. Shoddy research is required for The Welcome Team (which claims to “represent the middle”) to dismiss Medicare for All as an “unpopular” economic policy. It is, of course, clearly unpopular with the health insurance companies that fund and influence corporate “Third Way” Democrats.
What’s especially important about the recent Economist/YouGov poll and similar polls going back years is that Medicare for All is popular with the public despite a near-total exclusion of media pundits who support the policy—whether at the New York Times or New York Post, whether at CNN or Fox News. In mainstream media, the policy is rarely uplifted and regularly denigrated. During the 2020 Democratic primaries, for example, journalists regularly pressed Bernie Sanders for the price tag of his Medicare for All proposal, but defenders of the private-insurance-dominated system were never pressed on the costs to society of sticking with the status quo—which is far more expensive (due to bureaucracy, huge CEO salaries, insurance company profits).
While the polling is clear, so is the agenda of the “Deciding to Win” authors and their backers in the corporate Democratic Party establishment. They were likely pleased with the headline that one media outlet gave to coverage of the report on Monday: “Left-Wing Ideas Have Wrecked Democrats’ Brand, New Report Warns.” But pretending that Medicare for All is unpopular indicates how far their elitism has taken them from the concerns of most people in the United States.