January, 17 2021, 11:00pm EDT

Watchdog Group Releases New Report Highlighting Hypocrisy of Republican Senators Who Once Urged the Speedy Confirmation of Cabinet Members for National Security
In a new report, Accountable Senate War Room lays out Senate Republicans’ departure from precedent, hypocrisy regarding the obvious stalling of national security picks, and the inherent danger posed to Americans should this slow-walking continue. Accountable Senate War Room Spox Mairead Lynn: “To see the same Republican senators who clamored for quick confirmations for Trump’s nominees slow walk President-elect Biden’s picks is the height of hypocrisy”
WASHINGTON
Today, Accountable Senate War Room released a new report detailing the rank hypocrisy from Senate Republicans who slow-walked President-elect Biden's national security nominees, now leaving him at risk of entering office without a single confirmed Cabinet secretary. The report focuses on comments from the current chairs of the Intelligence, Armed Services, and Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committees, who in 2017 advocated for a president's right to his national security picks as quickly as possible, but failed to act on advancing President-elect Biden's nominees until the last possible second.
President-elect Biden will take office on January 20, a mere two days from today. Yet, under the leadership of Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and enabled by committee chairs in the Senate, not a single confirmation hearing has taken place -- including for crucial national security positions. This Trumped-up obstructionism is a dramatic breach of precedent, as Presidents Trump, Obama, and George W. Bush had their picks for national security positions confirmed and ready to hit the ground running on day one of their administrations.
"To see the same Republican senators who clamored for the quick confirmation of Trump's nominees slow walk President-elect Biden's picks is the height of hypocrisy," said Mairead Lynn, spokesperson for Accountable Senate War Room. "By abdicating their responsibility to ensure a smooth transition of power and a swift confirmation process for Biden's national security picks, Senate Republicans have put our safety and the security of our nation at risk. It's time for these Republican senators to end their partisanship and hypocrisy and step aside and let President-elect Biden's experienced, crisis-tested team get to work."
Below are some highlights from Accountable Senate War Room's report:
Trump, Obama, and Bush received confirmation from the Senate on a number of defense positions during their first day in office:
- The Senate Confirmed Two Crucial Trump Nominees, For Defense And For Homeland Security, Hours After Trump Was Sworn Into Office. "Just hours after President Trump was sworn into office, the Senate on Friday confirmed two nominees for critical national security positions, approving James N. Mattis as defense secretary and John F. Kelly as homeland security secretary." [New York Times, 1/20/17]
- On Obama's First Day In Office, His Nominees For Homeland Security, Energy, Agriculture, Education, And Interior Were All Confirmed. "The Democratic-led U.S. Senate began confirming new President Barack Obama's Cabinet on Tuesday, but it put off until Wednesday a vote on the designee for secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton. In a single unanimous vote, the Senate confirmed Steven Chu as energy secretary, Tom Vilsack as agriculture secretary, Arne Duncan as education secretary, Ken Salazar as interior secretary and Janet Napolitano as secretary of homeland security. It also approved Peter Orszag as head of the White House budget office." [Reuters, 1/20/09]
- President Obama's First Defense Secretary, Robert Gates, Was A Holdover From The Bush Administration. "President-elect Barack Obama has decided to keep Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates in his post, a show of bipartisan continuity in a time of war that will be the first time a Pentagon chief has been carried over from a president of a different party, Democrats close to the transition said Tuesday." [New York Times, 11/26/08]
- President George W. Bush's Secretary Of State, Treasury Secretary, And Defense Secretary Were Confirmed Within Four Hours Of Bush's Swearing In. "Following a brief flurry of activity on Saturday and the end of a 17-day Democratic takeover, the Senate goes to work this week in the unfamiliar posture of having a Republican majority in both chambers and in the White House. [...] But the narrow majority did not matter on Saturday, when the Senate swiftly confirmed by voice vote seven of President Bush's Cabinet nominees. As planned, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell, Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill, and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld were confirmed within four hours of Bush's swearing in." [Congressional Quarterly, 1/21/00]
During the Trump era, Republican senators called for the president to have his Cabinet on "Day One," saying it was in the national interest to keep Americans safe amidst international uncertainty:
- Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) Justified His Vote For Rex Tillerson To Be Secretary Of State, Despite Concerns, As Grounded In Opposition To Unnecessary Delays That Were Against The "National Interest" In An Uncertain World. "U.S. Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) issued the following statement today announcing his support for Rex Tillerson as America's next secretary of state: I believe the president is entitled to significant deference when it comes to his choices for the cabinet. [...] I have no doubts about Mr. Tillerson's qualifications and patriotism. [...] However, his answers on a number of other important questions were troubling. [...] But in making my decision on his nomination, I must balance these concerns with his extensive experience and success in international commerce, and my belief that the president is entitled to significant deference when it comes to his choices for the cabinet. Given the uncertainty that exists both at home and abroad about the direction of our foreign policy, it would be against our national interests to have this confirmation unnecessarily delayed or embroiled in controversy. Therefore, despite my reservations, I will support Mr. Tillerson's nomination in committee and in the full Senate." [Senator Marco Rubio - Press Release, 1/23/17]
- Senator Rubio Said Mike Pompeo Was Nominated To Be Secretary Of State At A "Critical Juncture" For The Department And Hoped He Would Be "Confirmed Quickly." "Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL): 'I know Mike Pompeo well. He is an excellent choice. His experience as CIA Director, an Army officer, and a congressman, and his proven leadership on national security matters give him unique qualifications to lead the State Department at this critical juncture. I will enthusiastically support his nomination and am hopeful he can be confirmed quickly.'" [White House - Briefing Statement, 3/14/18]
- Senator Johnson Said He Hoped UN Ambassador Nominee Nikki Haley Would Be "Swiftly Confirmed By The Senate" As The Country Needed Leadership "Now More Than Ever." "Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said this Tuesday after voting in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee to confirm Nikki Haley as the next United States ambassador to the United Nations: 'Now more than ever our country needs a steady leader who will aggressively champion American interests and values at the United Nations. I am confident that Governor Nikki Haley's executive experience has fully prepared her to do just that, and I hope she will be swiftly confirmed by the Senate as the next United States ambassador to the United Nations.'" [Senator Ron Johnson - Press Release, 1/24/17]
- Senator Portman Said He Voted To Confirm Rex Tillerson As Secretary Of State As President Trump "Needs A Secretary Of State At His Side" As He Began "Confronting The Many Threats To Our Security." "U.S. Senator Rob Portman (R-OH), a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, announced today that he intends to vote for the nomination of Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State during a vote at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He issued the following statement: 'After much deliberation, I plan to vote for Rex Tillerson to be our next Secretary of State. I have long argued that every president -- no matter the party -- should be given considerable leeway when it comes to putting together his or her team. President Trump needs a Secretary of State at his side as he begins the task of restoring American leadership and confronting the many threats to our security around the world." [Senator Rob Portman - Press Release, 1/23/17]
Former President George W. Bush had his defense team confirmed within four hours of his swearing-in -- and during his term, Republican senators defended the president's claim to a Cabinet of his choosing:
- Asked About A Controversial Bush Nominee, Then Senator-Orrin Hatch (R-UT) Referenced A 50-50 Split In The Senate, And Said The President Deserves To Have The People That He's Nominated As Long As They're Quality People." "HUME: Senator, we're almost out of time, but let ask you -- give you a chance to make a quick response to something that your colleague, Democratic Senator Kerry of Massachusetts, has said this, day which is that in his view the nomination of John Ashcroft is divisive and comes from a man who promised to be a uniter and not a divider. What's your reaction to that? HATCH: Well, I don't see anything divisive about it. Every senator there knows John Ashcroft is a man of integrity. [...] And to be honest with you, I think it's time for us to get together as Democrats and Republicans. We're 50-50. One of the most divisive things they could do is to Bork John Ashcroft, and I might add Linda Chavez or Gale Norton. They're good people. And I'll tell you, the president deserves to have the people that he's nominated as long as they're quality people, and all three of them are." [Fox News - "Fox News Sunday," 1/7/01]
- Referencing News That George Tenet Would Continue In His Role As CIA Director, Senator Richard Shelby (R-AL) Objected, Saying Bush Should Choose Someone New To Have "His Own Person There." "The current [CIA] director, George Tenet, would like to keep his job, according to CIA officials and lawmakers. 'He enjoys the job, and I think he would be willing to continue serving, if asked for some period of time,' said one intelligence official familiar with Tenet's views. [...] On Thursday, Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said Bush should choose a new director of Central Intelligence so that he would have 'his own person there.'" [Chattanooga Times Free Press, 12/29/00]
- Senator McConnell Joined Then-Senator Frist (R-TN) To Say They Looked Forward To Pushing The Nomination Of Defense Secretary Robert Gates During A Lame-Duck Session, With McConnell Expressing Optimism He Would Be Confirmed Before The End Of The Year. "Robert Gates, picked by President Bush to take over at the Pentagon, received initial endorsements from Republican and Democratic Senate leaders Friday after meeting with them on Capitol Hill. [...] Senate Republican Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., and Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell said they looked forward to pushing through the confirmation in the lame-duck session. 'We're optimistic that Bob Gates will be confirmed before the first of the year,' said McConnell, R-Ky., who will become minority leader next year." [Associated Press, 11/18/06]
Watchdog group Accountable.US recently launched the Accountable Senate War Room to fight back against those lawmakers who seek to overturn the will of the people by standing in the way of the smooth transition of power and the swift approval of nominees to ensure that the government can function and deliver results for the American people.
Accountable.US is a nonpartisan watchdog that exposes corruption in public life and holds government officials and corporate special interests accountable by bringing their influence and misconduct to light. In doing so, we make way for policies that advance the interests of all Americans, not just the rich and powerful.
LATEST NEWS
‘Don't Give the Pentagon $1 Trillion,’ Critics Say as House Passes Record US Military Spending Bill
"From ending the nursing shortage to insuring uninsured children, preventing evictions, and replacing lead pipes, every dollar the Pentagon wastes is a dollar that isn't helping Americans get by," said one group.
Dec 10, 2025
US House lawmakers on Wednesday approved a $900.6 billion military spending bill, prompting critics to highlight ways in which taxpayer funds could be better spent on programs of social uplift instead of perpetual wars.
The lower chamber voted 312-112 in favor of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2026, which will fund what President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans call a "peace through strength" national security policy. The proposal now heads for a vote in the Senate, where it is also expected to pass.
Combined with $156 billion in supplemental funding included in the One Big Beautiful Bill signed in July by Trump, the NDAA would push military spending this fiscal year to over $1 trillion—a new record in absolute terms and a relative level unseen since World War II.
The House is about to vote on authorizing $901 billion in military spending, on top of the $156 billion included in the Big Beautiful Bill.70% of global military spending already comes from the US and its major allies.www.stephensemler.com/p/congress-s...
[image or embed]
— Stephen Semler (@stephensemler.bsky.social) December 10, 2025 at 1:16 PM
The Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) led opposition to the bill on Capitol Hill, focusing on what lawmakers called misplaced national priorities, as well as Trump's abuse of emergency powers to deploy National Guard troops in Democratic-controlled cities under pretext of fighting crime and unauthorized immigration.
Others sounded the alarm over the Trump administration's apparent march toward a war on Venezuela—which has never attacked the US or any other country in its nearly 200-year history but is rich in oil and is ruled by socialists offering an alternative to American-style capitalism.
"I will always support giving service members what they need to stay safe but that does not mean rubber-stamping bloated budgets or enabling unchecked executive war powers," CPC Deputy Chair Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) said on social media, explaining her vote against legislation that "pours billions into weapons systems the Pentagon itself has said it does not need."
"It increases funding for defense contractors who profit from global instability and it advances a vision of national security rooted in militarization instead of diplomacy, human rights, or community well-being," Omar continued.
"At a time when families in Minnesota’s 5th District are struggling with rising costs, when our schools and social services remain underfunded, and when the Pentagon continues to evade a clean audit year after year, Congress should be investing in people," she added.
The Congressional Equality Caucus decried the NDAA's inclusion of a provision banning transgender women from full participation in sports programs at US military academies:
The NDAA should invest in our military, not target minority communities for exclusion.While we're grateful that most anti-LGBTQI+ provisions were removed, the GOP kept one anti-trans provision in the final bill—and that's one too many.We're committed to repealing it.
[image or embed]
— Congressional Equality Caucus (@equality.house.gov) December 10, 2025 at 3:03 PM
Advocacy groups also denounced the legislation, with the Institute for Policy Studies' National Priorities Project (NPP) noting that "from ending the nursing shortage to insuring uninsured children, preventing evictions, and replacing lead pipes, every dollar the Pentagon wastes is a dollar that isn't helping Americans get by."
"The last thing Congress should do is deliver $1 trillion into the hands of [Defense] Secretary Pete Hegseth," NPP program director Lindsay Koshgarian said in a statement Wednesday. "Under Secretary Hegseth's leadership, the Pentagon has killed unidentified boaters in the Caribbean, sent the National Guard to occupy peaceful US cities, and driven a destructive and divisive anti-diversity agenda in the military."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Fed Cut Interest Rates But Can't Undo 'Damage Created by Trump's Chaos Economy,' Expert Says
"Working families are heading into the holidays feeling stretched, stressed, and far from jolly."
Dec 10, 2025
A leading economist and key congressional Democrat on Wednesday pointed to the Federal Reserve's benchmark interest rate cut as just the latest evidence of the havoc that President Donald Trump is wreaking on the economy.
The US central bank has a dual mandate to promote price stability and maximum employment. The Federal Open Market Committee may raise the benchmark rate to reduce inflation, or cut it to spur economic growth, including hiring. However, the FOMC is currently contending with a cooling job market and soaring costs.
After the FOMC's two-day monthly meeting, the divided committee announced a quarter-point reduction to 3.5-3.75%. It's the third time the panel has cut the federal funds rate in recent months after a pause during the early part of Trump's second term.
"Today's decision shows that the Trump economy is in a sorry state and that the Federal Reserve is concerned about a weakening job market," House Budget Committee Ranking Member Brendan Boyle (D-Pa.) said in a statement. "On top of a flailing job market, the president's tariffs—his national sales tax—continue to fuel inflation."
"To make matters worse, extreme Republican policies, including Trump's Big Ugly Law, are driving healthcare costs sharply higher," he continued, pointing to the budget package that the president signed in July. "I will keep fighting to lower costs and for an economy that works for every American."
Alex Jacquez, a former Obama administration official who is now chief of policy and advocacy at the Groundwork Collaborative, similarly said that "Trump's reckless handling of the economy has backed the Fed into a corner—stuck between rising costs and a weakening job market, it has no choice but to try and offer what little relief they can to consumers via rate cuts."
"But the Fed cannot undo the damage created by Trump's chaos economy," Jacquez added, "and working families are heading into the holidays feeling stretched, stressed, and far from jolly."
Thanks to the historically long federal government shutdown, the FOMC didn't have typical data—the consumer price index or jobs report—to inform Wednesday's decision. Instead, its new statement and projections "relied on 'available indicators,' which Fed officials have said include their own internal surveys, community contacts, and private data," Reuters reported.
"The most recent official data on unemployment and inflation is for September, and showed the unemployment rate rising to 4.4% from 4.3%, while the Fed's preferred measure of inflation also increased slightly to 2.8% from 2.7%," the news agency noted. "The Fed has a 2% inflation target, but the pace of price increases has risen steadily from 2.3% in April, a fact at least partly attributable to the pass-through of rising import taxes to consumers and a driving force behind the central bank's policy divide."
The lack of government data has also shifted journalists' attention to other sources, including the revelation from global payroll processing firm ADP that the US lost 32,000 jobs in November, as well as Gallup's finding last week that Americans' confidence in the economy has fallen by seven points over the past month and is now at its lowest level in over a year.
The Associated Press highlighted that the rate cut is "good news" for US job-seekers:
"Overall, we've seen a slowing demand for workers with employers not hiring the way they did a couple of years ago," said Cory Stahle, senior economist at the Indeed Hiring Lab. "By lowering the interest rate, you make it a little more financially reasonable for employers to hire additional people. Especially in some areas—like startups, where companies lean pretty heavily on borrowed money—that's the hope here."
Stahle acknowledged that it could take time for the rate cuts to filter down to employers and then to workers, but he said the signal of the reduction is also important.
"Beyond the size of the cut, it tells employers and job-seekers something about the Federal Reserve's priorities and focus. That they're concerned about the labor market and willing to step in and support the labor market. It's an assurance of the reserve's priorities."
The Federal Reserve is now projecting only one rate cut next year. During a Wednesday press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell pointed to the three cuts since September and said that "we are well positioned to wait to see how the economy evolves."
However, Powell is on his way out, with his term ending in May, and Trump signaled in a Tuesday interview with Politico that agreeing with immediate interest rate cuts is a litmus test for his next nominee to fill the role.
Trump—who embarked on a nationwide "affordability tour" this week after claiming last week that "the word 'affordability' is a Democrat scam"—also graded the US economy on his watch, giving it an A+++++.
US Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) responded: "Really? 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck. 800,000 are homeless. Food prices are at record highs. Wages lag behind inflation. God help us when we have a B+++++ economy."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Sanders Champions Those Fighting Back Against Water-Sucking, Energy-Draining, Cost-Boosting Data Centers
Dec 10, 2025
Americans who are resisting the expansion of artificial intelligence data centers in their communities are up against local law enforcement and the Trump administration, which is seeking to compel cities and towns to host the massive facilities without residents' input.
On Wednesday, US Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) urged AI data center opponents to keep up the pressure on local, state, and federal leaders, warning that the rapid expansion of the multi-billion-dollar behemoths in places like northern Virginia, Wisconsin, and Michigan is set to benefit "oligarchs," while working people pay "with higher water and electric bills."
"Americans must fight back against billionaires who put profits over people," said the senator.
In a video posted on the social media platform X, Sanders pointed to two major AI projects—a $165 billion data center being built in Abilene, Texas by OpenAI and Oracle and one being constructed in Louisiana by Meta.
The centers are projected to use as much electricity as 750,000 homes and 1.2 million homes, respectively, and Meta's project will be "the size of Manhattan."
Hundreds gathered in Abilene in October for a "No Kings" protest where one local Democratic political candidate spoke out against "billion-dollar corporations like Oracle" and others "moving into our rural communities."
"They’re exploiting them for all of their resources, and they are creating a surveillance state,” said Riley Rodriguez, a candidate for Texas state Senate District 28.
In Holly Ridge, Lousiana, the construction of the world's largest data center has brought thousands of dump trucks and 18-wheelers driving through town on a daily basis, causing crashes to rise 600% and forcing a local school to shut down its playground due to safety concerns.
And people in communities across the US know the construction of massive data centers are only the beginning of their troubles, as electricity bills have surged this year in areas like northern Virginia, Illinois, and Ohio, which have a high concentration of the facilities.
The centers are also projected to use the same amount of water as 18.5 million homes normally, according to a letter signed by more than 200 environmental justice groups this week.
And in a survey of Pennsylvanians last week, Emerson College found 55% of respondents believed the expansion of AI will decrease the number of jobs available in their current industry. Sanders released an analysis in October showing that corporations including Amazon, Walmart, and UnitedHealth Group are already openly planning to slash jobs by shifting operations to AI.
In his video on Wednesday, Sanders applauded residents who have spoken out against the encroachment of Big Tech firms in their towns and cities.
"In community after community, Americans are fighting back against the data centers being built by some of the largest and most powerful corporations in the world," said Sanders. "They are opposing the destruction of their local environment, soaring electric bills, and the diversion of scarce water supplies."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


