January, 12 2021, 11:00pm EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Valentina Stackl, Greenpeace USA Senior Communications Specialist, vstackl@greenpeace.org (734)276 6260
Greenpeace on Impeachment
WASHINGTON
In response to the House vote to impeach Donald Trump, Greenpeace Executive Director Annie Leonard said:
"Trump is and will continue to be a threat to the world if he is not immediately removed from office and prevented from ever holding public office again. Congress must act swiftly to impeach, convict, and remove Donald Trump. The January 6th attack on our country by right-wing militants was directed by the President and complicit Republicans who refuse to honor the will of the people. They threatened the integrity of our democracy, interfered with the peaceful transition of power, and incited a mob that resulted in deaths. These actions are indefensible.
"Never again can we allow those who govern us to attack our democracy. We must hold these traitors to account, starting with the traitor-in-chief, Donald Trump. Additionally, Republican Members of Congress who promoted or supported the January 6th attack should either resign or be censured. There must be consequences for inciting and attempting to overthrow democracy. Republicans must decide whether they are on the side of a people-powered democracy or might-makes-right autocracy. And we have to hold them accountable for their decisions.
"Once Donald Trump and his cronies are held to account, we can finally get back to business to tackle the pandemic, the economy, climate change, and much needed democracy reform, starting with passing the For the People Act (H.R. 1). We have to salvage what we can before it's too late and stop more harm from being done to our planet, our people, our democracy, and our future."
Greenpeace is a global, independent campaigning organization that uses peaceful protest and creative communication to expose global environmental problems and promote solutions that are essential to a green and peaceful future.
+31 20 718 2000LATEST NEWS
'Beyond Unfit': Emil Bove Endorses Trump's 'Unitary Executive' Theory at Confirmation Hearing
The federal judicial nominee supports signing "a blank check for Trump to control every agency," said one government watchdog.
Jun 25, 2025
A whistleblower complaint alleging that top Justice Department official Emil Bove pressured government lawyers to ignore court orders was a primary concern for Democratic members of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday as the panel held Bove's confirmation hearing to be a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit—but a government watchdog urged lawmakers not to overlook another key issue that came to light during the hearing.
Bove told the committee that the whistleblower complaint that was filed by ousted former DOJ attorney Erez Reuveni Tuesday addressed "a dispute about the challenges posed by the unelected bureaucracy to the unitary executive and to the people that elected the president and put him in office."
Accountable.US said Bove had inserted a "buzzword" into his testimony: the far-right "unitary executive" theory, which holds that limits on presidential power over the executive branch are unconstitutional—or that the president should hold absolute power over every government agency, unencumbered by members of "the unelected bureaucracy" like Reuveni and anyone else in the federal government who would express disagreement with President Donald Trump's policies or actions.
As Common Dreamsreported Tuesday, Reuveni's whistleblower complaint detailed allegations that just before Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) to swiftly deport more than 200 immigrants to El Salvador—claiming they were gang members who were part of an "invasion" of the U.S.—Bove told DOJ lawyers that deportation flights "needed to take off no matter what" and that the agency should "consider telling the courts 'fuck you' and ignore any such order" that would try to stop the forced removals.
In his testimony Wednesday, Bove took issue with the idea that a career government attorney like Reuveni, who was acting deputy director of the Office of Immigration Litigation, "was in a position or considered himself to be, to bind the department's leadership and other Cabinet officials."
Bove suggested Reuveni, who served in the department for 15 years under Democratic and Republican administrations, should not have been empowered to say in a court hearing that the Trump White House had mistakenly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was sent to El Salvador's Terrorism Confinement Center, as he did in April—just before he was placed on administrative leave and then fired.
Under the "unitary executive" theory, said Accountable.US, Trump alone would control "the DOJ, the Fed, even election oversight. No president should have that kind of power."
Bove expanded on his views regarding presidential power when Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) questioned him about "the contours of the president's authority to appoint and remove" executive branch officials.
"Generally speaking," said Bove, "I think the court used the phrase 'all of it' is committed to the president of the United States."
In a column in February, John Bergmayer, legal director of Public Knowledge, warned that with an executive order purporting to place independent regulatory agencies under Trump's control, the president had embraced the fringe "unitary executive" theory and posed "a grave threat to the rule of law and the separation of powers—cornerstones of our constitutional system."
"That this 'unitary executive' theory has made its way from the fringes of academia to the halls of power, and that it has even been accepted by some credulous judges, does not mean that it is right," wrote Bergmayer. "Many legal observers have pointed out the shoddy scholarship and selective history that underpins it. We are a nation of laws, and we cannot be ruled by executive fiat."
At the hearing, Bove denied the allegations in the whistleblower complaint, saying he "never advised a Department of Justice attorney to violate a court order." He told Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) under questioning that he "did not recall" whether he made the comments detailed in the complaint.
Accountable compiled a list of numerous concerns about Bove's potential appointment to a lifetime seat on the federal judicial bench as part of its Judicial Nominations Watch project.
In addition to the allegations in the complaint, said the group, Bove:
- Created turmoil and chaos in the Justice Department after dropping corruption charges against New York City Mayor Eric Adams, prompting the resignation of multiple staff attorneys, who left in protest;
- Advanced dubious legal arguments meant to throw out or delay Trump's legal cases when he served as his attorney, including by trying to avoid discovery requirements and petitioning to move Trump's New York state criminal case to federal court; and
- Developed a reputation as a federal prosecutor who belittled subordinates and was the subject of an email from defense attorneys expressing concern about his "professionalism" and "power plays"—a document he pinned to a wall as "a badge of honor."
Lena Zwarensteyn, senior director of the fair courts program and an adviser at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, said Bove has been shown to be "beyond unfit to serve in a lifetime judgeship."
"His temperament, subversion of the rule of law, and efforts to seek retaliation while at the Justice Department demonstrate that he would not be fair-minded, independent, or committed to protecting the rights of all people in America," said Zwarensteyn. "As his actions have shown, he would only be loyal to the president—rather than to the Constitution and the law—at the expense of the American people and our democracy."
"With each day there are more and more damaging reports and questions about Bove's tenure at both the Justice Department and in the U.S. attorney's office in the Southern District of New York," she added. "Senators must take their constitutional responsibility seriously. They must reject his nomination for the 3rd Circuit."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Drag This Process Out': Progressives Push Senate Dems to Obstruct GOP 'Tax Scam' Bill
"That's what this moment demands of them and what we expect," said a progressive group pushing Democrats to slow down Republicans' massive reconciliation bill.
Jun 25, 2025
A progressive group is pressuring Democratic lawmakers to use every tactic available to obstruct passage of the Republican budget reconciliation bill, which contains large tax cuts for the wealthy funded by slashing social safety net programs.
The organization Indivisible put out an urgent call Wednesday, pressing voters to help "disrupt" what it called the "Republican tax scam." The group urged Democrats to call their senators, encouraging them to gum up the works using procedural tactics to stop the bill, which has been described as even more extreme and regressive than the one already passed in the House.
"Your Democratic senators can make voting on this bill slower, more divisive, and more politically damaging than any vote these Republicans have ever taken," an email from the group said. "In fact, that's what this moment demands of them and what we expect."
The Senate's version of the bill introduces new cuts to Medicaid and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) that will hit parents, homeless individuals, and veterans even harder than the House version. It also contains new provisions, including one that would eliminate taxes on many firearms and accessories.
Indivisible noted that the "vote-a-rama" process could begin as soon as Thursday. During this arcane stage of budget reconciliation, senators may propose unlimited amendments to a bill, each of which is voted on in succession.
Using the vote-a-rama has become a tried-and-true strategy for minority parties to drag out votes for these omnibus packages, which can pass with just a simple majority and cannot be filibustered. In 2022, Republicans used the tactic to delay voting for 16 hours in hopes of picking off just one Democrat who could tank Biden's climate, energy, and tax package.
With Democrats in the minority, Indivisible hopes they will launch a similar marathon. The group encouraged constituents not only to call their senators, but also to submit their own amendments for senators to introduce.
The organization gave examples of what sorts of things to propose: Amendments "to transfer all the dollars for [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] funding to NPR and PBS," "to tax recipients of luxury jets gifted by foreign governments at 100% of the jet's market value," or "to cut every lawmaker's salary and per diem by the same percentage SNAP gets cut."
"Some of your suggestions may be silly. Some may be poignant. Some will be genuinely good policy. Pretty much all of them will be better than the disaster MAGA Republicans want to force on us," the email said.
By delaying the process long enough, the group hopes to buy time to fracture the Republican coalition, which is already divided over some provisions of the bill.
Several Republican senators—including Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.)—have voiced concerns about how cuts to Medicaid would affect funding for rural hospitals.
With enough time, Indivisible hopes to use this and other issues as a wedge to pick off enough GOP defectors to stop the bill's passage altogether.
"The longer we can drag this process out, the more we can toxify a bill that Republicans are already publicly tearing apart," Indivisible said. "The more we can toxify the bill, the better the chance we can ultimately defeat it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
As McIver Pleads Not Guilty, Rights Group Sounds Alarm Over Trump 'Intimidation Campaign'
"The Trump administration is attempting to silence opposition through fear, but New Jersey will not be intimidated by authoritarianism," said the head of the ACLU of New Jersey.
Jun 25, 2025
At a hearing in New Jersey on Wednesday, Democratic Rep. LaMonica McIver of New Jersey pleaded not guilty to multiple charges stemming from an incident outside of an Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility in Newark last month.
Politico reported that McIver and her attorney said they plan to challenge the charges on both legal and factual grounds.
"At the end of the day, this is all about political intimidation," McIver said to a crowd that gathered outside the courthouse.
JUST NOW: LaMonica McIver gives a powerful speech after pleading not guilty: "We will fight this. At the end of the day this is all about political intimidation. The Trump administration and his cronies have weaponized the federal government. I will not stand for it. They will… pic.twitter.com/kMeIeXqeDK
— Marco Foster (@MarcoFoster_) June 25, 2025
The executive director of the ACLU of New Jersey, Amol Sinha, said in a statement on Wednesday that the prosecution of McIver is "a shameful escalation of the Trump administration's intimidation campaign against those who refuse to do its bidding."
"The Trump administration is attempting to silence opposition through fear, but New Jersey will not be intimidated by authoritarianism," Sinha also said. "We urge all members of Congress—as well as state and local elected officials—to exercise their oversight authority to provide strong checks and balances on President Trump's abuses of power that continue to undermine the fundamental freedoms at the bedrock of our democracy."
On May 9, McIver two other members of Congress were at an ICE detention facility called Delaney Hall to conduct congressional oversight when the Democratic Newark Mayor Ras Baraka joined them there. When federal agents ordered Baraka to leave and then went to arrest him, McIver and the other lawmakers moved to intervene, according to documentation of the episode and official accounts. NPRreported that the administration's narrative around the episode has shifted over time.
In June, interim U.S. Attorney Alina Habba announced that McIver had been charged with a three-count indictment for forcibly interfering with federal officers.
Following her indictment, McIver released a statement on June 10, saying that the "facts of this case will prove I was simply doing my job and will expose these proceedings for what they are: A brazen attempt at political intimidation."
"This indictment is no more justified than the original charges, and is an effort by Trump's administration to dodge accountability for the chaos ICE caused and scare me out of doing the work I was elected to do. But it won't work—I will not be intimidated," McIver said.
There have been several explosive interactions between federal agents and Democratic officials since May. On June 17, New York City Comptroller Brad Lander was arrested by federal agents at an immigration court in lower Manhattan while escorting an individual out of immigration court. And the week prior, U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) was handcuffed on the ground after being forcibly removed from a news conference that was held by U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem in Los Angeles.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular