SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Ziona Eyob, Stand.earth, ziona@stand.earth, 604-757-7279Â
Brenna Two Bears, Climate Access, brenna@climateaccess.org, 812-345-3139
A coalition of policy advisors, academics, and civil society from around the world came together today to urge for more ambitious international cooperation in order to protect the climate and vulnerable people.
Leaders convened for a virtual panel event during Climate Week NYC hosted by the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, where they addressed ways in which a transition away from fossil fuels can be accelerated with care and sensitivity, particularly in a post-Covid world.
While citizens, companies and countries commit to reducing emissions, the main cause of the climate crisis--the fossil fuel industry--continues to expand. Coal, oil, and gas are responsible for almost 80% of all carbon dioxide emissions since the industrial revolution.
"It is high time that the fossil fuel industry take accountability for their substantial role in environmental injustices. Through the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, civil society in the Global South and around the globe is calling for the future of our world to take precedence over industry interests. As the climate emergency looms closer and closer, an equitable move away from fossil fuel production that leaves no worker, community or nation behind is imperative and can be accelerated through international cooperation via a treaty," said Lidy Nacpil, Asian People's Movement on Debt and Development.
Such a complex transition requires a global framework--a Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty--in order to ensure an equitable global transition away from fossil fuels towards clean and low-carbon communities. This includes:
"Over the next four years, the fossil fuel industry plans to invest trillions to expand oil, gas, and coal production. Yet current production could push us well past global temperature limits in as little as 10 years, the time to take action is now. With this treaty, a coalition of supporters around the world are calling for global action to focus on the fossil fuel production gap challenge and fast track solutions. Markets alone can not solve this challenge, we must hold governments to account for rising emissions and production," said Tzeporah Berman, International Program Director at Stand.earth.
If the Paris goals of keeping global temperatures from rising above 1.5degC are going to be met, we need a step-change in climate action and political will.
The Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty is an idea whose time has come. Hundreds of organizations, companies. and individuals have endorsed the concept of a treaty including organizations represented in today's event as well as Powershift Africa, 350.org, Friends of the Earth International, Stand.Earth, Corporate Accountability, the U.K. Youth Climate Coalition, and yesterday the World Future Council many others. Youth leaders around the world are starting to launch campaigns calling for a Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, including in New Zealand, where school striker Aurelie Bray has delivered a petition to the New Zealand Parliament calling for a treaty.
"This is an exquisitely important idea. ...Our response in terms of nuclear weapons has, all things considered, been pretty remarkable. We haven't dropped one for decades and that is because the human imagination was able to understand what those mushroom clouds above big cities looked like. ...Now we can see the fires, we can see the melt, we can see the heatwaves. So the time has come for us to understand that this is another example of people and our systems become simply too large for the planet we inhabit and this is a remarkably good way of organizing some of that sentiment into real action," said Bill McKibben, author and co-founder of 350.org.
"The treaty is a big no that makes the yeses of democratically developed Just Transitions, Green New Deals that recognize the intersection of so many different injustices and climate change as a threat multiplier possible and meaningful. A no keeping the problem from getting so bad that there is no yes that is really possible," said Naomi Klein, author, filmmaker, and activist.
"We've been saying since the beginning 'keep it in the ground' at every strike. The treaty directly explains in a concrete way how it is possible to make it happen. It is filling the gap in the Paris agreement and completely aligns with the basic demands of the youth movement to stay below the 1.5degC targets, support the climate justice principle and base efforts in the best science available. We always say that your generation has been failing us regarding the climate crisis. Now we can unite knowing we need to keep it in the ground," said Loukina Tille, youth activist. "We, as the young generation, are often told we are giving hope to other generations. But for us, it is hard to find hope anywhere because wherever we look at the problem is not being faced as it should be. This Initiative is giving me hope we can really move and bring strong and bold climate policies and tools for moving out of fossil fuels as a whole society."
"Subnational governments have been effective at stopping infrastructure projects but largely they can get forced through by national governments. Cities are an important piece of the puzzle both on the supply and demand side but cooperation is needed. That can be generated along through efforts like the Treaty which can also help hold elected leaders accountable for phasing out fossil fuels and ensuring a just transition for everyone," said Gregor Roberston, global ambassador for the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy and 39th mayor of Vancouver.
"The power of the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty is that it begins with campaigns. It has to and those campaigns are already in place. People who are fighting to stop fracking in their town, in their state are fighting to stop the proliferation of fossil fuels. People who are fighting to stop oil and gas development off their coasts or in Arctic waters or to keep it from spreading in the Amazon are fighting against the proliferation of fossil fuels By recognizing that we are fighting in this common cause. By saying my town is a fossil fuel non-proliferation zone, my state is a fossil fuel non-proliferation zone, my country is a fossil fuel non-proliferation zone--we give ourselves the opportunity to ratchet up ambition, demand greater ambition from our own leaders and for those countries that are willing to move first and early, we give them a way to signal to the markets that this is where the whole world is going, this change is inevitable and you have to respond," said Carroll Muffett, Center for International Environmental Law.
Event speakers included:
Stand.earth (formerly ForestEthics) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with offices in Canada and the United States that is known for its groundbreaking research and successful corporate and citizens engagement campaigns to create new policies and industry standards in protecting forests, advocating the rights of indigenous peoples, and protecting the climate. Visit us at
"Our fight to ensure that voters—not politicians—have the final say is far from over," said one organizer.
Campaigners who last month celebrated the success of their effort to place an abortion rights referendum on November ballots in Missouri faced uncertainty about the ballot initiative Friday night, after a judge ruled that organizers had made an error on their petitions that rendered the measure invalid.
Judge Christopher Limbaugh of Cole County Circuit Court sided with pro-forced pregnancy lawmakers and activists who had argued that Missourians for Constitutional Freedom had not sufficiently explained the ramifications of the Right to Reproductive Freedom initiative, or Amendment 3, which would overturn the state's near-total abortion ban.
The state constitution has a requirement that initiative petitions include "an enacting clause and the full text of the measure," and clarify the laws or sections of the constitution that would be repealed if the amendment were passed.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom included the full text of the measure on their petitions, which were signed by more than 380,000 residents—more than twice the number of signatures needed to place the question on ballots.
Opponents claimed, though, that organizers did not explain to signatories the meaning of "a person's fundamental right to reproductive freedom."
Limbaugh accused the group of a "blatant violation" of the constitution.
Rachel Sweet, campaign manager for the group, said it "remains unwavering in [its] mission to ensure Missourians have the right to vote on reproductive freedom on November 5."
"The court's decision to block Amendment 3 from appearing on the ballot is a profound injustice to the initiative petition process and undermines the rights of the... 380,000 Missourians who signed our petition," said Sweet. "Our fight to ensure that voters—not politicians—have the final say is far from over."
Limbaugh said he would wait until Tuesday, when the state is set to print ballots, to formally issue an injunction instructing the secretary of state to remove the question.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom said it plans to appeal to a higher court, but if the court declines to act, the question would be struck from ballots.
As the case plays out in the coming days, said Missouri state Rep. Eric Woods (D-18), "it's a good time for a reminder that Missouri's current extreme abortion ban has ZERO exceptions for rape or incest. And Missouri Republicans are hell bent on keeping it that way."
The ruling came weeks after the Arkansas Supreme Court disqualified an abortion rights amendment from appearing on November ballots, saying organizers had failed to correctly submit paperwork verifying that paid canvassers had been properly trained.
"We demand our government completely stop arming Israel and push for a cease-fire now," said the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
Thousands of people gathered at London's Picadilly Circus Saturday for the city's latest march against Israel's bombardment of Gaza and the United Kingdom's continued support for the Israel Defense Forces, following what organizers called "a major victory in defense of the democratic right to protest."
The Metropolitan Police on Friday dropped its restrictions on the march, which was the first pro-Palestinian protest since last October to proceed to the Israeli embassy in London.
The police had attempted to stop campaigners from gathering before 2:30 pm, conflicting with plans to begin the rally preceding the march at noon.
"They never provided any convincing explanation or evidence for this delay, and it has caused enormous, unnecessary difficulty to the organization of a large-scale demonstration," Ben Jamal, who leads the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, one of the groups organizing the march, toldMiddle East Eye on Friday.
"It has unfortunately been part of a pattern of obstruction, delay, and lack of communication on the part of the Met which we will press them to review and reflect on for future demonstrations," he added. "For tomorrow, we call on our supporters to turn out in their hundreds of thousands to show we will not be deterred from seeking an end to Israel's genocide and justice for Palestine!"
Jamal said the police "saw sense and abandoned their unjustified and impractical attempt to delay the start of the march by two hours on Saturday," allowing the march to begin at 1:30 pm.
During previous marches in which hundreds of thousands of people have demonstrated in solidarity with Palestinians since last October, police have blocked off the area surrounding the Israeli embassy in Kensington, threatening anyone who protested in the vicinity with arrest.
Marching to the embassy, demonstrators made a "renewed call to end the ongoing genocide in Gaza" and demanded an "immediate and full cessation of arms supplies to Israel."
Earlier this week, the U.K. government announced it was suspending approximately 30 of its 350 arms export licenses for Israel, saying that "there does exist a clear risk that they might be used to commit or facilitate a serious violation of international humanitarian law."
Human rights advocates, medical professionals working in Gaza, and legal experts have for months demanded that Israel's top international funders, including the U.S. and U.K., stop providing military aid as Israel has blocked humanitarian aid from reaching Gaza and waged attacks on civilian infrastructure, killing more than 40,000 people.
The country has also been accused of carrying out genocide in a case led by South Africa at the International Court of Justice; the court has ordered Israel to end its blockade on humanitarian aid and to prevent genocide in Gaza.
"We demand our government completely stop arming Israel and push for a cease-fire now," said the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.
As Londoners marched on Saturday, the Gaza Health Ministry announced that at least 61 Palestinians had been killed by Israeli forces in the last two days. Four people were killed in a strike on Halimah al-Saadiyah school in Jabaliya, where displaced Palestinians have been sheltering, and three were killed in a bombing at Amr Ibn al-As school in Gaza City.
Media outlets in Palestine reported that a baby named Yaqeen al-Astal had become the 37th child in Gaza to die of malnutrition since Israel began its near-total aid blockade.
International outrage also grew on Saturday regarding the killing of a Turkish American activist, Aysenur Ezgi Eygi, in the West Bank on Friday. Local media and eyewitnesses said Eygi had been deliberately shot in the head by Israeli forces at a protest over the expansion of illegal Israeli settlements.
The U.S. called on Israel to investigate the killing on Friday, but Eygi's family said in a statement that such a probe would not be "adequate."
"We call on President [Joe] Biden, Vice President [Kamala] Harris, and Secretary of State [Antony] Blinken to order an independent investigation into the unlawful killing of a U.S. citizen and to ensure full accountability for the guilty parties," said the family.
Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for the United Nations, called for "a full investigation of the circumstances" and said that "people should be held accountable. And again, civilians must be protected at all times."
“If Speaker Johnson drives House Republicans down this highly partisan path," said Democratic leaders, "the odds of a shutdown go way up."
Leading U.S. Senate Democrats on Friday accused House Republicans of "wasting precious time catering to the hard MAGA right" as House Speaker Mike Johnson unveiled a stopgap funding bill tied to a proposal that would require proof of citizenship in order to vote in federal elections.
The proposal—the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act—has been pushed by Republican presidential nominee and former President Donald Trump and was passed by the House in July, with five Democrats joining the GOP in supporting the bill.
Non-citizens are already barred from voting in federal elections. With about 21.3 million eligible voters reporting in a recent survey that they would not be able to quickly access their birth certificate, passport, naturalization certificate, or certificate of citizenship in order to prove their status, critics say the proposal is a clear attempt to stop people of color and young Americans from taking part in elections.
Johnson proposed including the legislation in a stopgap bill, or a continuing resolution, that would keep the government running roughly at current spending levels through March 28—a move that would postpone major spending negotiations until after the next president takes office.
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Patty Murray (D-Wash.) said that "avoiding a government shutdown requires bipartisanship, not a bill drawn up by one party," and alluded to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy's (R-Calif.) attempt last September to ram a spending bill through with immigration and border policy changes in order to avert a government shutdown.
"Speaker Johnson is making the same mistake as former Speaker McCarthy did a year ago," said Schumer and Murray in a statement. "The House Republican funding proposal is an ominous case of déjà vu."
“If Speaker Johnson drives House Republicans down this highly partisan path," they added, "the odds of a shutdown go way up, and Americans will know that the responsibility of a shutdown will be on the House Republicans' hands."
Johnson is expected to bring the bill to the House floor on Wednesday after lawmakers return from summer recess. Congress has a September 30 deadline to make changes to the spending bill in order to avoid a partial government shutdown on October 1.
The House speaker called the proposal "a critically important step" toward funding the government and ensuring "that only American citizens can decide American elections"—prompting one critic to accuse Johnson of pushing a "manufactured" issue.
"Anyone who reads the SAVE Act understands it is a bad bill," said attorney Heath Hixson, "a poorly worded unfunded mandate that'll lead to voter suppression and racist outcomes."