September, 25 2020, 12:00am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Ziona Eyob, Stand.earth, ziona@stand.earth, 604-757-7279
Brenna Two Bears, Climate Access, brenna@climateaccess.org, 812-345-3139
Fossil Fuel Production Cannot Expand as Part of a Fair Energy Transition, Urges New International Coalition
An equitable energy transition can be fast-tracked with the support of the Fossil Fuel Non Proliferation Treaty.
NEW YORK CITY
A coalition of policy advisors, academics, and civil society from around the world came together today to urge for more ambitious international cooperation in order to protect the climate and vulnerable people.
Leaders convened for a virtual panel event during Climate Week NYC hosted by the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, where they addressed ways in which a transition away from fossil fuels can be accelerated with care and sensitivity, particularly in a post-Covid world.
While citizens, companies and countries commit to reducing emissions, the main cause of the climate crisis--the fossil fuel industry--continues to expand. Coal, oil, and gas are responsible for almost 80% of all carbon dioxide emissions since the industrial revolution.
"It is high time that the fossil fuel industry take accountability for their substantial role in environmental injustices. Through the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative, civil society in the Global South and around the globe is calling for the future of our world to take precedence over industry interests. As the climate emergency looms closer and closer, an equitable move away from fossil fuel production that leaves no worker, community or nation behind is imperative and can be accelerated through international cooperation via a treaty," said Lidy Nacpil, Asian People's Movement on Debt and Development.
Such a complex transition requires a global framework--a Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty--in order to ensure an equitable global transition away from fossil fuels towards clean and low-carbon communities. This includes:
- Preventing the proliferation of coal, oil and gas by ending all new exploration and production;
- Phasing-out existing stockpiles and production of fossil fuels in line with the 1.5degC global climate goal; and
- Fast-tracking real solutions and a just transition for every worker, community and country.
"Over the next four years, the fossil fuel industry plans to invest trillions to expand oil, gas, and coal production. Yet current production could push us well past global temperature limits in as little as 10 years, the time to take action is now. With this treaty, a coalition of supporters around the world are calling for global action to focus on the fossil fuel production gap challenge and fast track solutions. Markets alone can not solve this challenge, we must hold governments to account for rising emissions and production," said Tzeporah Berman, International Program Director at Stand.earth.
If the Paris goals of keeping global temperatures from rising above 1.5degC are going to be met, we need a step-change in climate action and political will.
The Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty is an idea whose time has come. Hundreds of organizations, companies. and individuals have endorsed the concept of a treaty including organizations represented in today's event as well as Powershift Africa, 350.org, Friends of the Earth International, Stand.Earth, Corporate Accountability, the U.K. Youth Climate Coalition, and yesterday the World Future Council many others. Youth leaders around the world are starting to launch campaigns calling for a Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty, including in New Zealand, where school striker Aurelie Bray has delivered a petition to the New Zealand Parliament calling for a treaty.
"This is an exquisitely important idea. ...Our response in terms of nuclear weapons has, all things considered, been pretty remarkable. We haven't dropped one for decades and that is because the human imagination was able to understand what those mushroom clouds above big cities looked like. ...Now we can see the fires, we can see the melt, we can see the heatwaves. So the time has come for us to understand that this is another example of people and our systems become simply too large for the planet we inhabit and this is a remarkably good way of organizing some of that sentiment into real action," said Bill McKibben, author and co-founder of 350.org.
"The treaty is a big no that makes the yeses of democratically developed Just Transitions, Green New Deals that recognize the intersection of so many different injustices and climate change as a threat multiplier possible and meaningful. A no keeping the problem from getting so bad that there is no yes that is really possible," said Naomi Klein, author, filmmaker, and activist.
"We've been saying since the beginning 'keep it in the ground' at every strike. The treaty directly explains in a concrete way how it is possible to make it happen. It is filling the gap in the Paris agreement and completely aligns with the basic demands of the youth movement to stay below the 1.5degC targets, support the climate justice principle and base efforts in the best science available. We always say that your generation has been failing us regarding the climate crisis. Now we can unite knowing we need to keep it in the ground," said Loukina Tille, youth activist. "We, as the young generation, are often told we are giving hope to other generations. But for us, it is hard to find hope anywhere because wherever we look at the problem is not being faced as it should be. This Initiative is giving me hope we can really move and bring strong and bold climate policies and tools for moving out of fossil fuels as a whole society."
"Subnational governments have been effective at stopping infrastructure projects but largely they can get forced through by national governments. Cities are an important piece of the puzzle both on the supply and demand side but cooperation is needed. That can be generated along through efforts like the Treaty which can also help hold elected leaders accountable for phasing out fossil fuels and ensuring a just transition for everyone," said Gregor Roberston, global ambassador for the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy and 39th mayor of Vancouver.
"The power of the Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty is that it begins with campaigns. It has to and those campaigns are already in place. People who are fighting to stop fracking in their town, in their state are fighting to stop the proliferation of fossil fuels. People who are fighting to stop oil and gas development off their coasts or in Arctic waters or to keep it from spreading in the Amazon are fighting against the proliferation of fossil fuels By recognizing that we are fighting in this common cause. By saying my town is a fossil fuel non-proliferation zone, my state is a fossil fuel non-proliferation zone, my country is a fossil fuel non-proliferation zone--we give ourselves the opportunity to ratchet up ambition, demand greater ambition from our own leaders and for those countries that are willing to move first and early, we give them a way to signal to the markets that this is where the whole world is going, this change is inevitable and you have to respond," said Carroll Muffett, Center for International Environmental Law.
Event speakers included:
- Tzeporah Berman, Fossil Fuel Non-Proliferation Treaty Initiative
- Naomi Klein, Journalist/Author/Filmmaker/Activist
- Lidy Nacpil, Asian Peoples' Movement on Debt and Development
- Sanjay Vashist, Climate Action Network in South Asia
- Gregor Robertson, Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy
- Bill McKibben, Author and Founder 350.org
- Carroll Muffett, Center for International Environmental Law
- Mark Campanale, Carbon Tracker
- Carlos Larrea, Universidad Andina Simon Bolivar
- Niclas Hallstrom, What Next?
- Lili Fuhr, Heinrich Boll Foundation
- Kathryn Harrison, University of British Columbia
- David Tong, Oil Change International
- Peter Newell, University of Sussex
- Loukina Tille, Youth Activist
Stand.earth (formerly ForestEthics) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with offices in Canada and the United States that is known for its groundbreaking research and successful corporate and citizens engagement campaigns to create new policies and industry standards in protecting forests, advocating the rights of indigenous peoples, and protecting the climate. Visit us at
LATEST NEWS
Nigerian Village Bombed by Trump Has 'No Known History' of Anti-Christian Terrorism, Locals Say
“Portraying Nigeria’s security challenges as a targeted campaign against a single religious group is a gross misrepresentation of reality,” said Nigeria's information minister.
Dec 27, 2025
When President Donald Trump launched a series of airstrikes in Nigeria on Christmas, he described it as an attack against "ISIS Terrorist Scum in Northwest Nigeria who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians."
But locals in a town that was hit during the strike say terrorism has never been a problem for them. On Friday, CNN published a report based on interviews with several residents of Jabo, which was hit by a US missile during Thursday's attack, which landed just feet away from the town's only hospital.
The rural town of Jabo is part of the Sokoto state in northwestern Nigeria, which the Trump administration and the Nigerian government said was hit during the strike.
Both sides have said militants were killed during the attack, but have not specified their identities or the number of casualties.
Kabir Adamu, a security analyst from Beacon Security and Intelligence in Abuja, told Al Jazeera that the likely targets are members of “Lakurawa,” a recently formed offshoot of ISIS.
But the Trump administration's explanation that their home is at the center of a "Christian genocide" left many residents of Jabo confused. As CNN reported:
While parts of Sokoto face challenges with banditry, kidnappings and attacks by armed groups including Lakurawa–which Nigeria classifies as a terrorist organization due to suspected affiliations with [the] Islamic State–villagers say Jabo is not known for terrorist activity and that local Christians coexist peacefully with the Muslim majority.
Bashar Isah Jabo, a lawmaker who represents the town and surrounding areas in Nigeria's parliament, described the village to CNN as “a peaceful community” that has “no known history of ISIS, Lakurawa, or any other terrorist groups operating in the area.”
While the town is predominantly Muslim, resident Suleiman Kagara, told reporters: "We see Christians as our brothers. We don’t have religious conflicts, so we weren’t expecting this."
Nigeria, Africa's most populous nation with more than 237 million people, has a long history of violence between Christians and Muslims, with each making up about half the population.
However, Nigerian officials have disputed claims by Republican leaders—including US Sen. Ted Cruz (Texas)—who have claimed that the government is “ignoring and even facilitating the mass murder of Christians.”
The senator recently claimed, without citing a source for the figures, that "since 2009, over 50,000 Christians in Nigeria have been massacred, and over 18,000 churches and 2,000 Christian schools have been destroyed" by the Islamist group Boko Haram.
Cruz is correct that many Christians have been killed by Boko Haram. But according to reports by the US-based Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project and the Council on Foreign Relations, the majority of the approximately 53,000 civilians killed by the group since 2009 have been Muslim.
Moreover, the areas where Boko Haram is most active are in northeastern Nigeria, far away from where Trump's strikes were conducted. Attacks on Christians cited in October by Cruz, meanwhile, have been in Nigeria's Middle Belt region, which is separate from violence in the north.
The Nigerian government has pushed back on what they have called an "oversimplified" narrative coming out of the White House and from figures in US media, like HBO host Bill Maher, who has echoed Cruz's overwrought claims of "Christian genocide."
“Portraying Nigeria’s security challenges as a targeted campaign against a single religious group is a gross misrepresentation of reality,” said Nigerian information minister Mohammed Idris Malagi. “While Nigeria, like many countries, has faced security challenges, including acts of terrorism perpetrated by criminals, couching the situation as a deliberate, systematic attack on Christians is inaccurate and harmful. It oversimplifies a complex, multifaceted security environment and plays into the hands of terrorists and criminals who seek to divide Nigerians along religious or ethnic lines."
Anthea Butler, a religious scholar at the University of Pennsylvania, has criticized the Trump administration's attempts to turn the complex situation in Nigeria into a "holy war."
"This theme of persecution of Christians is a very politically charged, and actually religiously charged, theme for evangelicals across the world. And when you say that Christians are being persecuted, that’s a thing," she told Democracy Now! in November. "It fits this sort of savior narrative of this American sort of ethos right now that is seeing itself going into countries for a moral war, a moral suasion, as it were, to do something to help other people."
Nigeria also notably produces more crude oil than any other country in Africa. Trump has explicitly argued that the US should carry out regime change in Venezuela for the purposes of "taking back" that nation's oil.
Butler has doubted the sincerity of Trump's concern for the nation's Christians due to his administration's denial of entry for Nigerian refugees, as well as virtually every other refugee group, with the exception of white South Africans.
She said: "I think this is sort of disingenuous to say you’re going to go in and save Christianity in Nigeria, when you have, you know, banned Nigerians from coming to this country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Russia Launches Drone Barrage on Kyiv Ahead of Zelenskyy-Trump Meeting
The attacks came as Trump and Zelenskyy are expected to discuss critical questions in a Ukraine-Russia peace deal, including its territorial sovereignty, NATO protections, and control over its natural resources.
Dec 27, 2025
As Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy made his way to Florida for a pivotal set of talks this weekend with US President Donald Trump, Russia launched a barrage of drone and missile attacks on Kyiv early Saturday morning.
At least two people were killed in the Ukrainian capital during the 10-hour attack, with 44 more—including two children—injured. Hundreds of thousands of residents are left to brave near-freezing temperatures without heat following the attack, which cut off power supplies.
The attack came as Zelenskyy prepared to stop in Canada before meeting with Trump on Sunday to discuss a 20-point plan to end the nearly four-year war with Russia that has been the subject of weeks of negotiation between US and Ukrainian emissaries.
Zelenskyy is seeking to maintain Ukraine's territorial sovereignty without having to surrender territory—namely, the eastern Donbass region that is largely occupied by Russian forces. He also hopes that any agreement to end the war will come with a long-term security guarantee reminiscent of NATO.
On Friday, Zelenskyy told reporters that the peace deal was 90% complete. But Trump retorted that Zelenskyy "doesn't have anything until I approve it."
Trump has expressed hostility toward Zelenskyy throughout his presidency. In February, before berating him in a now-infamous Oval Office meeting, Trump insisted falsely that Ukraine, not Russia, was responsible for starting the war in 2022.
Zelenskyy's latest peace proposal was issued in response to Trump's proposal last month, which was heavily weighted in Russia's favor.
It called for Ukraine to recognize Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea and cede the entirety of the Donbass, about 2,500 square miles of territory, to Russia, including territory not yet captured. Trump's plan puts a cap of 600,000 personnel on Ukraine's military and calls for Ukraine to add a measure in its constitution banning it from ever joining NATO.
Earlier this year, Trump demanded that Ukraine give up $500 billion worth of its mineral wealth in what he said was "repayment" for US military support during the war (even though that support has only totalled about $175 billion).
In his latest proposal, Trump has pared down his demands to the creation of a "Ukraine Development Fund" that would include the "extraction of minerals and natural resources" as part of a joint US-Ukraine reconstruction effort.
While those terms appear less exploitative, the reconstruction program is expected to be financed by US loans from firms like BlackRock, which have been heavily involved in the diplomatic process.
"The infrastructure rebuilt with these loans—ports, rail lines, power grid—won’t be Ukrainian in any meaningful sense. It’ll be owned by international consortiums, operated for profit, with revenues flowing out to service the debt," wrote the Irish geopolitical commentator Deaglan O'Mulrooney on Tuesday. "In other words, Ukraine will be gutted."
Despite the criticism, Zelenskyy has signaled support in principle for the US reconstruction proposal as an alternative to direct expropriation.
The "red lines" for Zelenskyy heading into his talk with Trump are related to Ukraine's territorial integrity. He has said he will not recognize Russian control of the Donbass, or the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the largest nuclear facility in Europe, which Russia currently controls. He has also demanded that all terms of a peace agreement come up for a referendum among the Ukrainian people, which is strongly against territorial concessions.
At the same time, however, he insisted Saturday that "Ukraine is willing to do whatever it takes to stop this war."
Keep ReadingShow Less
British Activist Blasts 'Sociopathic Greed' of Big Tech After US Judge Blocks His Detention
"I chose to take on the biggest companies in the world, to hold them accountable, to speak truth to power. There is a cost attached to that," said Imran Ahmed, one of five Europeans targeted by the Trump administration.
Dec 26, 2025
After a US judge on Thursday blocked President Donald Trump's administration from detaining one of the European anti-disinformation advocates hit with a travel ban earlier this week, Imran Ahmed suggested that he is being targeted because artificial intelligence and social media companies "are increasingly under pressure as a result of organizations like mine."
Ahmed is the CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH). The 47-year-old Brit lives in Washington, DC with his wife and infant daughter, who are both US citizens. While the Trump administration on Tuesday also singled out Clare Melford of the Global Disinformation Index, Josephine Ballon and Anna-Lena von Hodenberg of HateAid, and Thierry Breton, a former European commissioner who helped craft the Digital Services Act, Ahmed is reportedly the only one currently in the United States.
On Wednesday, Ahmed, who is a legal permanent resident, sued top Trump officials including US Attorney General Pam Bondi, Immigration and Customs Enforcement acting Director Todd Lyons, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio in the District Court for the Southern District of New York.
"Rather than disguise its retaliatory motive, the federal government was clear that Mr. Ahmed is being 'SANCTIONED' as punishment for the research and public reporting carried out by the nonprofit organization that Mr. Ahmed founded and runs," the complaint states. "In other words, Mr. Ahmed faces the imminent prospect of unconstitutional arrest, punitive detention, and expulsion for exercising his basic First Amendment rights."
"The government's actions are the latest in a string of escalating and unjustifiable assaults on the First Amendment and other rights, one that cannot stand basic legal scrutiny," the filing continues. "Simply put, immigration enforcement—here, immigration detention and threatened deportation—may not be used as a tool to punish noncitizen speakers who express views disfavored by the current administration."
Just a day later, Judge Vernon Broderick, an appointee of former President Barack Obama, issued a temporary restraining order, blocking the administration from arresting or detaining Ahmed. The judge also scheduled a conference for Monday afternoon.
The US Department of State said Thursday that "the Supreme Court and Congress have repeatedly made clear: The United States is under no obligation to allow foreign aliens to come to our country or reside here."
Ahmed's lawyer, Roberta Kaplan, said that "the federal government can't deport a green-card holder like Imran Ahmed, with a wife and young child who are American, simply because it doesn't like what he has to say."
In the complaint and interviews published Friday, Ahmed pointed to his group's interactions with Elon Musk, a former member of the Trump and administration and the richest person on Earth. He also controls the social media platform X, which sued CCDH in 2023.
"We were sued by Elon Musk a couple of years ago, unsuccessfully; a court found that he was trying to impinge on our First Amendment rights to free speech by using law to try and silence our accountability work," Ahmed told the BBC.
Months after a federal judge in California threw out that case last year, Musk publicly declared "war" on the watchdog.
CCDH's work is being targeted by the U.S. State Department trying to sanction and deport our CEO, Imran Ahmed. This is an unconstitutional attempt to silence anyone who dares to criticize social media giants. But a federal judge has temporarily blocked his detention.More in BBC ⤵️
[image or embed]
— Center for Countering Digital Hate (@counterhate.com) December 26, 2025 at 4:05 PM
"What it has been about is companies that simply do not want to be held accountable and, because of the influence of big money in Washington, are corrupting the system and trying to bend it to their will, and their will is to be unable to be held accountable," Ahmed told the Guardian. "There is no other industry, that acts with such arrogance, indifference, and a lack of humility and sociopathic greed at the expense of people."
Ahmed explained that he spent Christmas away from his wife and daughter because of the Trump administration's track record of quickly sending targeted green-card holders far away from their families. He said: "I chose to take on the biggest companies in the world, to hold them accountable, to speak truth to power. There is a cost attached to that. My family understands that."
The British newspaper noted that when asked whether he thought UK politicians should use X, the former Labour Party adviser told the Press Association, "Politicians have to make decisions for themselves, but every time they post on X, they are putting a buck in Mr. Musk's pocket and I think they need to question their own consciences and ask themselves whether or not they think they can carry on doing that."
Ahmed also said that it was "telling that Mr. Musk was one of the first and most vociferous in celebrating the press release" about the sanctions against him and the others.
"He said it was great, and it is great, but not for the reasons that he thinks," the campaigner said. "Because what it has actually done is give a chance for the system to show that the advocacy that we do is both important and protected by the First Amendment."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


