Skip to main content

Sign up for our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values. Direct to your inbox.

For Immediate Release


Seth D. Michaels

Press Release

New EPA Science Restrictions Would Devastate Public Health and Environmental Protections

Statement by Andrew Rosenberg, Union of Concerned Scientists

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler is set to issue a supplemental notice on a proposed rule that will dramatically restrict what science the agency can consider. The supplemental notice expands the scope and severity of the proposed rule, stipulating that the agency can only use scientific research to craft regulations if all of the underlying data is publicly available. These new restrictions would prevent the EPA from using vital health studies that contain confidential medical information to protect the public from environmental threats—an unnecessary change that violates the EPA’s mission, according to the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), which noted that the EPA has relied on studies using confidential medical data to set air, water and chemical rules for decades.

Below is a statement by Dr. Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at UCS.

“Let’s call this what it is: an excuse to abandon clean air, clean water, and chemical safety rules. This new restriction on science would upend the way we protect communities from pollution and other health threats.

“The proposal is even worse than I expected. It doesn’t just restrict the science that EPA can use to institute new rules—it works retroactively, allowing political appointees at the agency to topple standards that have worked for decades to deliver clean air and clean water. There’s no scientific reason or public interest to restricting the science that EPA can consider in this way—it will just make the laws that protect public health and the environment nearly impossible to enforce.

“Administrator Wheeler’s claims about the need for these restrictions don’t pass the laugh test. Everything about this rule makes a mockery of the EPA’s claim that this change is necessary for transparency. This rule was driven by political operatives. It’s being rushed through with minimal opportunity for public comment. And it introduces pointless hurdles and delays into the policymaking process that will compromise the federal government’s ability to protect the public.

“This is a blatant removal of well-established science from the policymaking process, to the benefit of polluters and at a huge cost to the marginalized communities who face the biggest threat from pollution.

“The Trump administration has a clear pattern of sidelining science and undermining public health protections. If this rule is finalized, it would be one of the most damaging and far-reaching policy changes enacted by the administration. It would put the entire enterprise of developing science-based public health safeguards at risk.

“The EPA has one job—to protect public health and the environment, based on the best available science. With this proposal, Administrator Wheeler has effectively announced that he’s abandoning that mission.”

On Thursday, November 13, the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology will hold a hearing looking at the EPA’s use of science in rulemaking.


The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.

Progressives Decry 'Unfathomble Cruelty' of Border Agents Wielding Whips Against Haitian Migrants

"It doesn't matter if a Democrat or Republican is president, our immigration system is designed for cruelty towards and dehumanization of immigrants," said Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Brett Wilkins ·

As Gov. Tim Walz Proclaims 'Minnesota Climate Week,' Ilhan Omar Says 'Stop Line 3'

"The state of Minnesota simply cannot meet our carbon reduction targets if this pipeline goes through," said the Democratic congresswoman. "Our future is on the line."

Kenny Stancil ·

Supreme Court Announces Date for Case Directly Challenging Roe v. Wade

"The fate of Roe v. Wade and legal abortion is on the line."

Julia Conley ·

Avi Lewis Hoping Canadians' Climate Concerns Deliver Electoral 'Upset of Epic Proportions'

"We need to send Avi to Ottawa to shake up the entire political establishment, including his own party, and tip the scales in favor of people and the planet," said environmentalist David Suzuki.

Brett Wilkins ·

Sanders Denounces a Pentagon Budget System Found 'Inherently Susceptible to Fraud'

"They don't seem to want to get serious about spending taxpayer dollars wisely and effectively," said the Vermont senator, declaring it "absolutely unacceptable."

Andrea Germanos ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo