November, 20 2018, 11:00pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
From Amazon Leaders to World Leaders: We Call for an Ambitious Post-2020 Agreement That Heals Our Mother Earth
Leaders from the Coordinator of the Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon River Basin (COICA) present a proposal for the Amazon and call for the consolidation of a new global post 2020 agreement addressed at restoring and protecting half of our Mother Earth and managing the rest in harmony with Her.
SHARM EL SHEIKH, Egypt
The Coordinator of the Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon River Basin (COICA) has presented at the 14th UN Biodiversity Conference a proposal for the Amazon, and has called on the governments of the world to follow the example of indigenous leadership in creating consensus towards ambitious objectives that ensure ecologic stability and the security of this and future generations.
Likewise, and as a result of the tone used in his declarations during the election campaign, the COICA made a pressing and urgent call to Brazil's President Elect Jair Bolsonaro, to respect indigenous rights, the integrity of indigenous territories and international conventions on biodiversity and climate change as well as other agreements such as Convention 169 of the International Labor Organization and the United Nations Declaration on the Right of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).
1. INTERCONNECTIVITY OF THE AMAZON: A PROPOSAL FOR UNITY
COICA will present before the Secretariat of the Convention on Biodiversity, governments and NGOs the "Bogota Declaration", which describes the principles and joint vision of the indigenous confederations to protect the Amazon rainforest by using a traditional and holistic perspective. The area included in this interconnection perspective is the size of Mexico.
The declaration resulted from the COICA summit held last August in Bogota with indigenous leaders from Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, French Guyana, Guyana, Peru, Surinam and Venezuela, representing over 400 nations. At the summit, they discussed alternatives based on ancestral knowledge on how to connect indigenous territories to preserve close to 200 million hectares of tropical rainforest, by connecting the Andes, Amazonas, and up to the Atlantico.
In the declaration, the indigenous delegations invite States and other entities to "join efforts to build visibility strategies, recognizing the importance of this corridor as a first step to guaranteeing the existence of all forms of life on the Planet" and to "weave alliances and commitments to promote, protect and make visible" the Andes, Amazonas, Atlantico corridor, its biodiversity, its cultures and sacredness of the territory" (1).
Tuntiak Katan, the Representative of the Coordinator of the Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon River Basin COICA before the negotiations at the CBD COP 14 in Egypt stated, "Indigenous Peoples and local communities are a solution to the devastation of our ecosystems and climate change both in the Amazon as well as in the rest of the world. But whether policies addressed at mitigating climate change and promoting the restoration of rainforests succeed, depends on the security of having possession of community lands. 65% of the world's lands are indigenous territories, but only 10% are legalized. Thus, guaranteeing indigenous territorial rights is an inexpensive and effective way of reducing carbon emissions and increase natural areas. Ensuring possession of community rainforests is a low cost-high benefit investment to protect our Mother Earth and stop extinctions."
2. TOWARDS A GLOBAL POST-2020 AGREEMENT ADDRESSED AT RESTORING AND PROTECTING HALF OF OUR MOTHER EARTH AND MANAGING THE REST IN HARMONY WITH HER.
COICA is also present at Sharm El Sheikh to start bilateral negotiations with different actors in the quest for an ambitious and fair agreement for 2020. COICA wishes to invite all world leaders to work alongside indigenous leaders in the goal of restoring at least half of the Planet by 2050; COIA also wishes to promote a constructive dialogue with the governments of the Amazon region to avoid the terminal crisis of the Planet's largest forest.
Indigenous leaders have stated that any post-2020 agreement must include active participation of Indigenous Peoples since their territories are home to 80% of biodiversity and 24% of forest carbon, and must also ensure funds for local communities. They additionally stated that they are willing to share their traditional knowledge and wisdom with any government that is genuinely open to listening about specific on site experiences.
COICA wants to open working tables and boards with several actors who are behind a common goal to protect and restore half of the Planet before 2050, which would ensure restoring the habitats and would leave us a minimum base of protected ecosystems to prevent a climate change crisis and the loss of biodiversity. Renowned scientists and conservation experts believe in the need to protect 50% and ensure that the remaining 50% is managed sustainably. Scientists have discovered that if we protect 50% of the Planet from human exploitation (whether from extracting activities such as mining, lumbering, deforestation to give way to monoculture, oil exploration), the Earth's ecosystems may stabilize and regenerate.
Juan Carlos Jintiach, Technical Coordinator on Biodiversity and Climate Change stated, "The scope for action concerning biodiversity must not be alien to the decisions already included in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) 2030, but we need to go much further for our vision as Indigenous Peoples by 2050 to be coherent with our own demands and realities at a local, national and international levels. These must not exclude a gender, and youth focus or the synergy between people, culture and Nature."
3. A CALL TO BOLSONARO: CAUTION, RESPECT FOR INDIGENOUS RIGHTS AND INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS
COICA wishes to express its deep concern for the declarations made during President Elect Jair Bolsonaro's campaign concerning his environmental policy and his approach to indigenous issues.
COICA wishes to remind Bolsonaro that Brazil has national and international obligations to guarantee the territorial rights of Indigenous Peoples and local communities, to protect Indigenous Peoples and local communities, and to respect the free, prior and informed consent of Indigenous Peoples and communities; and wants to advise that Brazil's international credibility will depend on its actions in the environmental and indigenous sphere. COICA will mobilize as much international solidarity as possible to protect Brazil's Indigenous Peoples and communities
Juan Carlos Jintiach, Representative of the Coordinator of the Indigenous Organizations of the Amazon River Basin COICA in the CBD COP 14 in Egypt stated, "Bolsonaro's declarations are concerning because they nurture a disturbing tendency in different parts of the world, where almost 3/4th of environmental defenders assassinated in 2017 were indigenous leaders; where opposing agroindustry is the main cause for assassination of our leaders world wide; and where imposing projects on to communities without their free, prior and informed consent is at the root of all attacks to indigenous and community leaders. Likewise, we see that it is increasingly frequent for Indigenous Peoples and communities to face costly and difficult processes to legalize their lands, while corporations obtain licenses with ease. Because of this and based on the tone used in Brazil's past election campaign, we call upon Bolsonaro to caution and full respect of the law, and particularly to ensure respect for the rights of our brothers and sisters in Brazil, ensuring their safety and physical integrity."
LATEST NEWS
'People Power Works': Shell Backs Down in Anti-Protest Lawsuit Against Greenpeace
"Shell thought suing us for millions over a peaceful protest would intimidate us, but this case became a PR millstone tied around its neck," said the co-executive director of Greenpeace U.K.
Dec 10, 2024
The United Kingdom-based oil giant Shell agreed Tuesday to settle a major lawsuit the company brought against Greenpeace after activists from the group boarded and occupied a company oil platform last year to protest fossil fuel expansion.
Greenpeace said in a statement that as part of the settlement, it agreed to donate £300,000—roughly $382,000—to the Royal National Lifeboat Institution, a charity that helps save lives at sea, but will pay nothing to Shell and accept no liability. The donation represents a fraction of the over $11 million in damages and legal costs defendants faced, the group said.
The Greenpeace defendants have also "agreed to avoid protesting for a period at four Shell sites in the northern North Sea."
"Shell thought suing us for millions over a peaceful protest would intimidate us, but this case became a PR millstone tied around its neck," said Areeba Hamid, co-executive director of Greenpeace U.K. "The public backlash against its bullying tactics made it back down and settle out of court."
"This settlement shows that people power works. Thousands of ordinary people across the country backed our fight against Shell and their support means we stay independent and can keep holding Big Oil to account," Hamid added. "This legal battle might be over, but Big Oil's dirty tricks aren't going away. With Greenpeace facing further legal battles around the world, we won't stop campaigning until the fossil fuel industry stops drilling and starts paying for the damage it is causing to people and planet."
"These aggressive legal tactics, the huge sums of money, and attempts to block the right to protest pose a massive threat."
Shell brought the case, which Greenpeace characterized as a "textbook" strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP), in February 2023 and sought $1 million in damages from activists who boarded a Shell-contracted ship carrying equipment to drill for oil in the North Sea.
"When the protest ended, the only damage Shell could find was a padlock which, they alleged, our activists broke. That's it," Greenpeace U.K. said Tuesday. "Yet they came after us with a million-dollar lawsuit, which they justified for their spending on safety."
The group, which warned that the case had dire implications for the right to protest, credited a "sustained, year-long campaign against the suit" for forcing the oil behemoth to back down. The campaign, according to Greenpeace, "turned the legal move into a PR embarrassment for Shell."
"The case was dubbed the 'Cousin Greg' lawsuit by Forbes after a scene in the Emmy-awarded drama Succession, in which the hapless character threatens to sue Greenpeace to universal dismay," the environmental group noted Tuesday.
Greenpeace is currently facing several other SLAPP suits, including one brought by Energy Transfer, majority-owner of the Dakota Access pipeline. The group said Tuesday that the Energy Transfer suit "threatens the very existence of Greenpeace in the U.S."
"These aggressive legal tactics, the huge sums of money, and attempts to block the right to protest pose a massive threat. It could stop Greenpeace being able to make a real difference on the things that matter most," the organization said Tuesday. "It's part of a growing trend by powerful corporations and governments to crush peaceful protest—using draconian laws or intimidation lawsuits like this."
"It seeks to silence the people most impacted by the climate crisis. This threatens the global fight for climate justice," the group added. "We won't give up. This is Shell versus all of us."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'This Needs to Stop': UN Envoy Condemns Israeli Military's Advance on Syria
"What we are seeing is a violation of the disengagement agreement from 1974," said Geir Pedersen, the United Nations' special envoy to Syria.
Dec 10, 2024
The United Nations' special envoy to Syria said Tuesday that the Israeli military's rapid move to seize Syrian territory following the Assad government's collapse is a grave violation of a decades-old agreement that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claims is now dead.
"What we are seeing is a violation of the disengagement agreement from 1974, so we will obviously, with our colleagues in New York, follow this extremely closely in the hours and days ahead," Geir Pedersen said at a media briefing in Geneva.
Hours earlier, Pedersen told Zeteo's Mehdi Hasan that "this needs to stop," referring to Israel's further encroachment on the occupied and illegally annexed Golan Heights.
"This is a very serious issue," Pedersen said, rejecting Netanyahu's assertion that the 1974 agreement is null. "Let's not start playing with an extremely important part of the peace structure that has been in place."
"The message to Israel is that this needs to stop, What we are seeing in the Golan is a violation of the 1974 agreement. This is a very serious issue."
The UN's Syria Special Envoy tells me on 'Mehdi Unfiltered' that Israel's unlawful actions in Syria need to stop. pic.twitter.com/G7jSWJ8oP0
— Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) December 9, 2024
Netanyahu, who took the stand for the first time Tuesday in his long-running corruption trial, made clear in the wake of Assad's fall that he views developments in Syria as advantageous for Israel, writing on social media that "the collapse of the Syrian regime is a direct result of the severe blows with which we have struck Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran."
The prime minister also thanked U.S. President-elect Donald Trump for "acceding to my request to recognize Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights, in 2019," adding that the occupied territory "will be an inseparable part of the state of Israel forever."
The Washington Postreported late Monday that "within hours of rebels taking control of Syria's capital, Israel moved to seize military posts in that country’s south, sending its troops across the border for the first time since the official end of the Yom Kippur War in 1974."
"Israeli officials defended the move as limited in scope, aimed at preventing rebels or other local militias from using abandoned Syrian military equipment to target Israel or the Golan Heights, an area occupied by Israel after the 1967 Arab-Israeli war," the Post added. "On Monday, more troops could be seen outside this Druze village adjacent to the border, preparing to cross."
The United States, Israel's main ally and arms supplier, also defended the Israeli military's actions, with a State Department spokesman telling reporters Monday that "every country, I think, would be worried about a possible vacuum that could be filled by terrorist organizations on its border, especially in volatile times, as we obviously are in right now in Syria."
Watch StateSpox justify Israel’s invasion of Syria based on hypotheticals.@shauntandon: Israel has gone across the Golan Heights, the UN said it’s a violation, does the US agree
Miller: Every country would be worried about a possible vacuum that could be filled by terrorist… pic.twitter.com/AA7lNhfSt1
— Assal Rad (@AssalRad) December 9, 2024
On Tuesday, Israel denied reports that its tanks reached a point roughly 16 miles from the Syrian capital as it continued to bomb Syrian army bases.
"Regional security sources and officers within the now fallen Syrian army described Tuesday morning's airstrikes as the heaviest yet, hitting military installations and airbases across Syria, destroying dozens of helicopters and jets, as well as Republican Guard assets in and around Damascus," Reutersreported. The U.S. also bombed dozens of targets in Syria in the aftermath of Assad's fall.
The governments of Iraq, Qatar, Iran, and Saudi Arabia have each denounced the Israeli military's seizure of Syrian land, with Qatar's foreign ministry slamming the move as "a dangerous development and a blatant attack on Syria's sovereignty and unity as well as a flagrant violation of international law."
"The policy of imposing a fait accompli pursued by the Israeli occupation, including its attempts to occupy Syrian territories, will lead the region to further violence and tension," the foreign ministry warned.
Keep ReadingShow Less
New Jersey Governor Signs Freedom to Read Act Barring Book Bans
The law, said the Democrat, "cements New Jersey's role on the forefront of preventing book bans and protecting the intellectual freedom of our educators and students."
Dec 09, 2024
Democratic New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy on Monday signed legislation protecting librarians and prohibiting public schools and libraries from banning books—a move that came as Republican state lawmakers are proscribing a record number of titles, many of them works addressing sexual orientation, gender identity, and racial injustice.
Flanked by educators, librarians, and other advocates, Murphy signed
A.3446/S.2421—known as the Freedom to Read Act—in the Princeton Public Library.
"The Freedom to Read Act cements New Jersey's role on the forefront of preventing book bans and protecting the intellectual freedom of our educators and students," said Murphy. "Across the nation, we have seen attempts to suppress and censor the stories and experiences of others. I'm proud to amplify the voices of our past and present, as there is no better way for our children to prepare for the future than to read freely."
According to a statement from Murphy's office:
Under the law, boards of education and governing boards of public libraries are barred from excluding books because of the origin, background, or views of the material or of its authors. Further, boards of education and governing boards of public libraries are prevented from censoring library material based on a disagreement with a viewpoint, idea, or concept, or solely because an individual finds certain content offensive, unless they are restricting access to developmentally inappropriate material for certain age groups.
The legislation "also provides protections for library staff members against civil and criminal lawsuits related to complying with this law."
New Jersey Association of School Librarians President Karen Grant said that "the Freedom to Read Act recognizes the professionalism, honor, work ethics, and performance of school and public library staff" and "promotes libraries as trusted sources of information and recognizes the many roles that libraries play in students' lives."
"The bill will protect the intellectual freedom of students as well as acknowledge that school libraries are centers for voluntary inquiry, fostering students' growth and development," Grant added. "Additionally, we are grateful for the broad coalition of support from so many organizations for this legislation."
The leader of one of those groups—Garden State Equality executive director Christian Fuscarino—said, "Gov. Murphy just made it clear: In New Jersey, censorship loses, and freedom wins."
"At a time when access to diverse and inclusive materials is under attack across the nation, this legislation sends a powerful message that New Jersey will stand firm in protecting intellectual freedom and fostering a culture of understanding and inclusion," Fuscarino added.
The New Jersey law comes amid a near-tripling in the number of books banned or challenged by Republican state lawmakers and right-wing organizations over the past year, with PEN America counting over 10,000 such titles during the 2023-24 academic year—up from 3,362 titles during the previous scholastic year.
With Murphy's signature, New Jersey joins Minnesota and Illinois in passing state legislation to counter GOP book-banning efforts.
As the Chicago Tribunereported Sunday, "a number of school districts, many of them in deeply conservative areas of south and central Illinois," are giving up state grants rather than adopting principles against book-banning."Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular