July, 25 2017, 04:30pm EDT
Small Businesses Oppose Senate Vote on Health Care
Small business owners and small business groups across the country staunchly oppose the Senate's Motion to Proceed today on health care legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
WASHINGTON
Small business owners and small business groups across the country staunchly oppose the Senate's Motion to Proceed today on health care legislation to repeal the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This morning, more than one thousand small business owners delivered a letter to Congress, urging Senators to protect the health care gains they made under the ACA.
Senate Republicans have put forward several versions of their bill, including a repeal of the Affordable Care Act without replacement, yet none of the options of the table serve to improve the quality, cost, or coverage of health care for small businesses or their employees. In fact, every version of this bill poses a grave threat to the health care of tens of millions of people and the economy - decimating Medicaid's budget, destabilizing the private market, and throwing no fewer than 22 million people off insurance.
The Main Street Alliance and its allies urge the Senate to stop the Motion to Proceed on reckless legislation that will once again make it difficult for small business owners and their employees to afford high quality health care.
"Senate Republican leadership is gutting our healthcare system in order to give tax breaks to the very wealthy and drug and insurance companies. This is a move that will hurt millions of people and drive up costs for small business owners. Americans do not want this bill, and neither do America's small business owners." -- Amanda Ballantyne, National Director of Main Street Alliance.
"Senate Republicans have had a difficult time mustering support to pass a repeal of the Affordable Care Act, and with good reason. These bills hurt small business owners, entrepreneurs and the economy. Congress should now stop the political games, and work together to find bipartisan solutions that will improve upon the successes of the existing law." -- Rhett Buttle, founder of Public Private Strategies and former director of private sector engagement in the Office of the HHS Secretary.
"If Congress truly cared about American business, it would tackle the high administrative costs and high drug prices that undermine our economy and hamper the international competitiveness of our businesses. Congress should not be playing politics with our healthcare system. Instead we need comprehensive reform with best business practices such as lean production, and processes that are transparent, evidence-based and priced as a function of measurable value." -- David Levine, Co-founder and CEO, American Sustainable Business Council.
"For the good of America's small businesses, the U.S. Senate must immediately stop its efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act. None of the healthcare proposals offered by congressional Republicans thus far will do anything but hurt small firms. In fact, their proposals will make health insurance less accessible for small businesses and aspiring entrepreneurs by driving up premiums, scaling back tax credits and Medicaid expansion and limiting protections for those with pre-existing conditions. Instead of continuing to tinker with a plan that cannot be fixed with minor adjustments, lawmakers should craft a bipartisan solution that focuses on improving the ACA because it is already working for America's job creators." -- John Arensmeyer, Founder & CEO, Small Business Majority.
"If the Senate proceeds to debate healthcare reform, they will vote to have either 32, 22 or 15 million Americans lose their health insurance. Deductibles would soar by thousands of dollars. The end result of all proposals would be an economic disaster for the nation and small businesses." -- Frank Knapp Jr., President & CEO, South Carolina Small Business Chamber of Commerce.
"With all of the talk today in Washington, D.C. about how to address the future of healthcare in the United States, it is clear that there are no easy answers. But let's start with at least this: small businesses and motivated entrepreneurs looking to pursue the American Dream cannot afford to go back to the days before the ACA. One of the great strengths of the American economy is its national backbone of small businesses. Small businesses who desperately need Washington to put policy before politics. If we choose to work together on fixes, and not succumb to the partisan politics that calls for moving backward instead of forward, we can continue on the path to making America's health care system the envy of the world. Our small businesses deserve nothing less." -- David Borris, owner of Hel's Kitchen Catering in Illinois, and Main Street Alliance Executive Committee member.
"The Affordable Care Act is the first real attempt to bring some order and consistency to our approach to delivery of health care in the United States. It didn't address every challenge but there is no question that for millions of Americans and small business owners the ACA has been an important improvement in their lives. The Republican plans are not only cruel and amoral they are an economic travesty that will drive up cost, deny timely care, put lives at risk and draw trillions out of the general economy to prop up an inefficient and cumbersome patch work of health care delivery. This is simple- we cannot afford to move backwards. We need the Senate to reject the motion to proceed." -- Kelly Conklin, owner of Foley-Waite Associates in New Jersey and Main Street Alliance Executive Committee member.
"Affordable health care is critical to the well being of Vermonters and the health of our local economies. I was encouraged to see Governor Phil Scott stand with our congressional delegation in opposition to recent attempts by the Republicans in Washington to dismantle the ACA and slash Medicaid. The bipartisanship in our state sends a clear message. I urge all of Vermont's elected officials to continue to stand together to protect the progress that has been made and build a healthy future for our state." -- Jen Kimmich, Owner of The Alchemist in Stowe, Vermont, and Main Street Alliance Vermont Board Chair.
"The ACA afforded Zootility another way to be risk averse. Instead committing to health plans that all of our employees would be satisfied with and committing to an amount that we cover for all of our employees, we could roll our total compensation into pure salary. This affords us the flexibility to reward the best performing employees differently than across the board. When considering replacing the ACA, legislators should be considering how the result will impact makers and startups as these are the engines of the change that American's are truly hungry for." -- Nate Barr, owner of Zootility in Maine, and Maine Small Business Coalition member.
"As a small businessperson, my family and most of my employees are dependent on the Affordable Care Act (ACA), so I have a hard time understanding the controversy. Keeping the ACA in place puts Pennsylvania's businesses and customers in the best place to succeed. Not without its flaws, it's the best approach to a market dominated by powerful drug manufacturers and healthcare providers with a storied history of putting profits before patients." -- Michael Row, owner of Penn Book Center in Philadelphia, Main Street Alliance member.
"Fulfillment in my career was an intangible dream I never thought I would achieve. The monotony of the daily routine of clocking in and out of a job I didn't enjoy for the sole purpose of providing health benefits for myself and my children was beginning to wear me down and take away my joie de vivre. After the Affordable Care Act was signed into law I able to take a chance and become a small business owner without fear of financial ruin due to a medical catastrophe. The security of having medical benefits for my family and I gave me the opportunity to become the business woman I had always dreamed of -- don't take that away from us." -- Amber Tamayo owner of High Ridge Construction Oregon, and Main Street Alliance member.
"I'm lucky to be afforded the ability to work at building a business around my passions, however, it came at the cost of my husband's dreams. Before the Affordable Care Act, he had to give up his small business to work for the public school system so that we could afford the insurance coverage that our growing family needed. Now my daughter is a budding entrepreneur and I don't want to see her sacrifice her dreams in order to have the health care that every human deserves. I want to see us strengthen the ACA -- not repeal it." -- Martha Ehlman owner of Tenfold Fair Trade in West Virginia and Main Street Alliance member
"As someone who suffers from chronic pain, I'm only able to work because I can get treatment for my illness through Medicaid. If this coverage were taken from me, I definitely wouldn't be able to work or have my own business, and I would probably be on disability." -- Tim Foster, owner of Patriotic Motors in Spokane, Washington, and Main Street Alliance member.
The Main Street Alliance (MSA) is a national network of small business coalitions working to build a new voice for small businesses on important public policy issues. Main Street Alliance members are working throughout the country to build policies that work for business owners, their employees, and the communities they serve.
LATEST NEWS
Billionaire Jeff Bezos Wants to 'Help' Trump Gut Regulations
"Shockingly another one of the richest guys on Earth wants to defund our government and scrap regulations."
Dec 05, 2024
Billionaire Amazon founder Jeff Bezos on Wednesday expressed his optimism about U.S. President-elect Donald Trump's next term and suggested he would "help" the Republican gut regulations.
"If we're talking about Trump, I think it's very interesting, I'm actually very optimistic this time around... I'm very hopeful about this—he seems to have a lot of energy around reducing regulation," Bezos told The New York Times' Andrew Ross Sorkin during the newspaper's DealBook Summit.
"And my point of view, if I can help him do that, I'm gonna help him, because we do have too much regulation in this country. This country is so set up to grow," he continued, suggesting that regulatory cuts would solve the nation's economic problems.
After complaining about the burden of regulations, Bezos added, "I'm very optimistic that President Trump is serious about this regulatory agenda and I think he has a good chance of succeeding."
The comments came during a discussion about Bezos' ownership of The Washington Post, which also addressed the billionaire's recent controversial decisions to block the newspaper's drafted endorsement of Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris and have it stop endorsing presidential candidates.
Bezos said Wednesday that he is "very proud" of the move, that the Post "is going to continue to cover all presidents very aggressively," and the decision did not result from fears about Trump targeting his companies.
As Inc.reported Thursday: "Trump had railed against Bezos and his companies, including Amazon and The Washington Post, during his first term. In 2019, Amazon argued in a court case that Trump's bias against the company harmed its chances of winning a $10 billion Pentagon contract. The Biden administration later pursued a contract with both Amazon and Microsoft."
Bezos owns Blue Origin, an aerospace company and a competitor to Elon Musk's SpaceX. Musk—the world's richest person, followed by Bezos, according to the Bloomberg and Forbes trackers—has been appointed to lead Trump's forthcoming Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) with fellow billionaire Vivek Ramaswamy.
Bezos' remarks at the Times summit led Fortune's Brooke Seipel to suggest that he may be the next billionaire to join DOGE.
Musk and Ramaswamy headed to Capitol Hill on Thursday to speak with GOP lawmakers about their plans for the government.
"Despite its name, the Department of Government Efficiency is neither a department nor part of the government, which frees Musk and Ramaswamy from having to go through the typical ethics and background checks required for federal employment," The Associated Pressnoted. "They said they will not be paid for their work."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Jayapal, Sanders Offer Answer to Elon Musk's Healthcare Cost Question
"The most efficiently run healthcare systems in the world," said National Nurses United, "have been proven time and time again to be single-payer systems."
Dec 05, 2024
Two of the United States' most outspoken critics of the for-profit health system welcomed billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk's criticism of the country's sky-high healthcare spending—and suggested that Musk, a potential Cabinet member in the incoming Trump administration, join the call for Medicare for All.
A social media post by Musk drew the attention of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), who reintroduced legislation to expand Medicare coverage to every American last year and have long called for the for-profit healthcare system to be replaced by a government-run program, or single-payer system, like those in every other wealthy country in the world.
"Shouldn't the American people be getting getting their money's worth?" asked Musk, posting a graph from the nonpartisan Peter G. Peterson Foundation that showed how per capita administrative healthcare costs in the U.S. reached $1,055 in 2020—hundreds of dollars more than countries including Germany, Canada, and the United Kingdom.
"Yes," said Sanders, repeating statistics he has frequently shared while condemning the country's $4.5 trillion health system in which private, for-profit health insurance companies increasingly refuse to pay for healthcare services and Americans pay an average of $1,142 in out-of-pocket expenses each year.
"We waste hundreds of billions a year on healthcare administrative expenses that make insurance CEOs and wealthy stockholders incredibly rich while 85 million Americans go uninsured or underinsured," the senator added. "Healthcare is a human right. We need Medicare for All."
Jayapal added that she has "a solution" to exorbitant healthcare costs in the U.S.: "It's called Medicare for All."
Musk has been nominated by President-elect Donald Trump to lead a new federal agency that he wants to create called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Sanders has expressed support for some of the agency's mission, saying its plan to "cut wasteful expenditures" could be put to use at the Department of Defense, which has repeatedly failed audits of its annual spending.
But Sanders has sharply criticized the economic system and business practices that have helped make Musk the richest person in the world, with a net worth of $343.8 billion.
Another progressive, David Sirota of The Lever, suggested last month that DOGE could be used to eliminate the nation's vast health insurance bureaucracy and replace it with Medicare for All, pointing to a 2020 report from the Republican-controlled Congressional Budget Office that showed that a government-run healthcare program would save the country an estimated $650 billion each year.
"Such a system could achieve this in part because Medicare's 2% administrative costs are so much lower than the 17% administrative costs of the bureaucratic, profit-extracting private health insurance industry," wrote Sirota.
Musk drew the attention of Medicare for All advocates amid online discussion about the greed of for-profit insurance giants.
The killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson on Wednesday prompted discussion about widespread anger over the U.S. healthcare system, and following public outcry, Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield on Thursday backtracked on a decision to stop paying for surgical anesthesia if a procedure goes beyond a certain time limit. The American Society of Anesthesiologists said that if Anthem stopped fully paying doctors who provide pain management for complicated surgeries, patients would be left paying hundreds or thousands of dollars in out-of-pocket costs.
National Nurses United, which advocates for a government-run healthcare system, urged Musk and others who support the broadly popular proposal to "join the movement to win Medicare for All."
"The most efficiently run healthcare systems in the world," said the group, "have been proven time and time again to be single-payer systems."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'We Disagree': US Dismisses Landmark Amnesty Report Accusing Israel of Genocide
"We have said previously and continue to find that the allegations of genocide are unfounded," said a State Department spokesperson.
Dec 05, 2024
A U.S. State Department spokesperson told reporters on Thursday that the United States disagrees with Amnesty International's new report accusing Israel of carrying out genocide in the Gaza Strip.
"We disagree with the conclusions of such a report," spokesperson Vedant Patel said a day after the human rights group released the document. "We have said previously and continue to find that the allegations of genocide are unfounded."
The Israeli government has vehemently rejected the findings in the report.
"The deplorable and fanatical organization Amnesty International has once again produced a fabricated report that is entirely false and based on lies. The genocidal massacre on October 7, 2023, was carried out by the Hamas terrorist organization against Israeli citizens. Since then, Israeli citizens have been subjected to daily attacks from seven different fronts. Israel is defending itself against these attacks acting fully in accordance with international law," wrote the Israel Foreign Ministry in a post on X.
Amnesty Israel also does not accept the findings of Amnesty International's report, according to The Times of Israel.
In a statement, the Israeli branch of the organization—which reportedly did not take part in the funding, research, or writing of the report—said that "the scale of the killing and destruction carried out by Israel in Gaza has reached horrific proportions and must be stopped immediately," per The Times of Israel. However, the groups does not believe the events "meet the definition of genocide as strictly laid out in the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide."
In the 296-page report released Wednesday—titled, "You Feel Like You Are Subhuman": Israel's Genocide Against Palestinians in Gaza—Amnesty International found through its research and legal analysis "sufficient basis to conclude that Israel committed, during the nine-month period under review, prohibited acts under Articles II (a), (b), and (c) of the Genocide Convention, namely killing, causing serious bodily or mental harm, and deliberately inflicting on Palestinians in Gaza conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction in whole or in part."
In order for a conflict to be considered genocide under international law, there must be both evidence of specific criminal acts—such as killing members of a given group—as well as "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such."
In its report, Amnesty International concluded that "these acts were committed with the specific intent to destroy Palestinians in Gaza."
Intent also came up during the State Department press conference Thursday when journalist Said Arikat of the Palestinian paper Al-Quds asked Patel a follow-up question about the report.
"I know that genocide depends a great deal on intent... And [the report] bases its conclusions on the statements, time and time and time again, by Israeli commanders, by Israeli officials," he said. "What is it going to take for you, for the United States of America... to say what is happening is genocide?"
Patel responded, "That's an opinion, and you're certainly welcome and you are entitled to it, as are all the organizations."
Israel faces an ongoing genocide case, led by South Africa, at the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court recently issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, former Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and Hamas leader Mohammed Diab Ibrahim Al-Masri.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular