

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

John Olivieri; 21st Century Transportation Campaign Director; (617) 747-4388
A new study by the United States Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) Education Fund and Frontier Group identifies 12 of the most wasteful highway projects across the country, slated to collectively cost at least $24 billion. The study details how despite America's massive repair and maintenance backlog, and in defiance of America's changing transportation needs, state governments continue to spend billions each year on new and wider highways. The study shows how some of these projects are outright boondoggles.
A new study by the United States Public Interest Research Group (U.S. PIRG) Education Fund and Frontier Group identifies 12 of the most wasteful highway projects across the country, slated to collectively cost at least $24 billion. The study details how despite America's massive repair and maintenance backlog, and in defiance of America's changing transportation needs, state governments continue to spend billions each year on new and wider highways. The study shows how some of these projects are outright boondoggles.
"Many state governments continue to prioritize wasteful highway projects that fail to effectively address congestion while leaving our roads and bridges to crumble," said John Olivieri, National Campaign Director for 21st Century Transportation at the United States Public Interest Research Group Education Fund, and co-author of the report. "This in turn saddles future generations with massive repair and maintenance backlogs that only grow more painful and expensive to fix the longer we wait to do so," he noted.
Recent federal data show that more than 61,000 bridges, or roughly 1 in 10, are structurally deficient nationwide. While other data show that states are overwhelming investing scarce transportation dollars in expansion rather than repair - collectively spending 20.4 billion (55 percent) expanding 1 percent of the current system, while spending just 16.5 billion (45 percent) repairing and maintaining the other 99 percent.
At the same time, states are failing to account for changing transportation trends, especially among Millennials. "America's long-term travel needs are changing, especially among Millennials, who are driving fewer miles, getting driver's licenses in fewer numbers, and expressing greater preferences to live in areas where they do not need to use a car often," said Tony Dutzik Senior Policy Analyst at Frontier Group. "Despite the fact that Millennials are the nation's largest generation, and the unquestioned consumers of tomorrow's transportation system, states are failing to adequately respond to these changing trends," he added.
The study recommends that states:
Some of the egregious examples of wasteful projects discussed in the report include:
I-95 Widening, Connecticut, $11.2 billion - Widening the highway across the entire state of Connecticut would do little to solve congestion along one of the nation's most high-intensity travel corridors, while further investment in rail infrastructure has long been overdue.
Tampa Bay Express Lanes, Florida, $3.3 billion - State officials admit that a decades-old plan to construct toll lanes would not solve the region's problems with congestion, while displacing critical community job-training and recreational facilities.
U.S. 20 widening, Iowa, $286 million - Hundreds of millions of dollars that could pay for much-needed repairs to existing roads are being diverted to widen a road that does not need expansion to handle future traffic.
Paseo del Volcan extension, New Mexico, $96 million - A major landholder is hoping to get taxpayer funding to build a road that would open thousands of acres of desert to sprawling development.
The report also looks back at the 11 highway boondoggles identified in 2014. Since the original report came out, several states have revisited plans to expand and build new highways, realizing that the money could be more wisely spent elsewhere. For example, the Trinity Parkway project in Dallas has been revised from a six-lane road to a more limited 4-lane road, and the original proposal to create a double-decker tunnel for I-94 in Milwaukee has been postponed for the foreseeable future. Similarly, the Illiana Expressway, a proposed $1.3 billion to $2.8 billion toll-way intended to stretch from I-55 in Illinois to I-65 in Indiana has been placed on indefinite hold
"Investing so heavily in new and wider highways at a time when so much of our existing infrastructure is in terrible disrepair is akin to putting an extension on your house while the roof is leaking. It just doesn't make any sense," said Olivieri.
The report can be read at this link here.
U.S. PIRG, the federation of state Public Interest Research Groups (PIRGs), stands up to powerful special interests on behalf of the American public, working to win concrete results for our health and our well-being. With a strong network of researchers, advocates, organizers and students in state capitols across the country, we take on the special interests on issues, such as product safety,political corruption, prescription drugs and voting rights,where these interests stand in the way of reform and progress.
"We cannot tolerate an EPA administrator who treats our families as expendable."
Hundreds of health experts are demanding the removal of Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin over his gutting of key regulations that they say will endanger Americans' livelihoods.
A letter released Thursday by Climate Action Campaign outlines Zeldin's threats to public health and explains why he should not be serving as the top US environmental regulator.
"Administrator Zeldin is pursuing a deregulatory agenda that will result in a massive increase in health-damaging air pollution, toxic chemicals, and climate-heating greenhouse gases," says the letter, which is signed by nearly 300 medical experts, including physicians, nurses, and public health researchers.
"And just last month, the administration laid bare its decision to no longer count the economic value of health benefits when setting Clean Air Act rules," the letter adds, "refusing to acknowledge the value of lives saved, hospital visits avoided, and lost work and school days prevented."
The letter also points to the EPA's February decision to revoke the so-called "endangerment finding," which gave the agency authority to regulate greenhouse gases as threats to public health.
Repealing this finding, the letter contends, "will increase the frequency and severity of climate disasters."
According to a Wednesday report from The Associated Press, Zeldin celebrated the EPA's revocation of the finding while delivering a keynote address at the Heartland Institute, a right-wing think tank that has long pushed climate denialism.
"Today is a moment to celebrate," Zeldin said at the event. "It is a day to celebrate vindication."
Margie Alt, director of the Climate Action Campaign, said her group decided to organize the letter among medical experts because "Lee Zeldin is too dangerous to ignore."
"When health experts—the people who see the effects of pollution on their patients every single day—say enough is enough, the rest of us need to pay attention," said Alt. "Zeldin is not just failing Americans. He is actively endangering us. We cannot tolerate an EPA administrator who treats our families as expendable."
This is the second "Game Over Zeldin" letter, following another from over 160 advocacy groups, including Climate Action Campaign and Moms Clean Air Force, last month.
"Our goal from day one was for Iran to open the strait that didn't close until after we attacked."
Comedian Dave Columbo on Wednesday released a parody video that lampooned the Trump administration's contradictory and constantly changing rationales for its unconstitutional war with Iran.
In the video, which was first posted on Instagram and has since gone viral on other social media platforms, Columbo assumes the role of a White House spokesperson trying to explain what the US has achieved so far with its war, which Trump illegally launched without any congressional authorization more than a month ago.
"This is a victory for the US," Columbo says at the start of the video. "Because our goal from day one was for Iran to open the strait that didn't close until after we attacked, which was completely controlled by their military that we had total dominance over. And it was a waterway that we could have taken over, but instead we asked for help that we didn't need, but we'll remember our allies did not give us."
10/10. No notes. pic.twitter.com/YQ3JPNIR02
— Barney Panofsky's Best Intentions (@mynamesnotgordy) April 8, 2026
Columbo then explains that this purported victory has only come about due to "a FIFA Peace Prize recipient's threat to annihilate a civilization in order to liberate them."
The comedian next touts the administration's success in changing the Iranian regime from "an old man who hates us to his younger son, who hates us for those reasons, and that we killed his father."
Columbo acknowledges that the administration is unsure about "the status of Iran's nuclear capabilities that we obliterated last year, but were going to be a problem in two weeks," before boasting that Iran now has "more money and control over the strait than they had when they made the old deal that we ended because it was terrible."
While Columbo's video is intended as satire, much of it simply relies on arguments that the Trump administration has made throughout the course of the war, such as the president's demands that NATO allies give help to reopen the Strait of Hormuz that he also says is unnecessary given US military strength.
As of this writing, the Iran War has cost US taxpayers more than $45 billion, and the Strait of Hormuz has still not reopened.
"Even when kids try to learn, after over two years of nonstop running from the bombs, Israel shoots them."
WARNING: The following article contains graphic video and images that some people may find disturbing…
Israeli forces shot and killed a 9-year-old girl in northern Gaza in front of her third-grade class on Thursday, local news sources report.
According to a report Thursday from the Gaza Education Ministry, Ritaj Rihan was sitting at her desk at Abu Ubaida bin al-Jarrah School in Beit Lahiya when she was shot in front of her classmates, who were left in "psychological shock."
"We suddenly heard the students screaming, so we rushed to the tent to find Ritaj lying face down, blood gushing from her mouth," her teacher told the Xinhua news agency.
Photos of Rihan's dead body were shared on social media by Mosab Abu Toha, a local poet. He said that the makeshift tent where Rihan studied was built on top of the ruins of his former high school, which was destroyed during Israel's genocidal war in Gaza.
"Even when kids try to learn, after over two years of nonstop running from the bombs, Israel shoots them," he wrote in a post which accompanied a photo of Rihan wrapped in a body bag at a hospital in Gaza City.
"It’s painful for me to post this," Toha said. "It seems nothing is moving the world to stop Israel’s terrorism."
Photos and videos showed Rihan's bloodied body being rushed through the streets on foot. The school's principal told the Quds News Network that there was no medical transport in the area, so the only way to carry her to the hospital was via horse-drawn carriage.
Another photograph shows the bullet that reportedly killed the child.
"We were stunned," another of the educators said. "A 9-year-old child. By what right was she martyred? For what sin was she shot while she came just to learn to write?"
The Israeli military has not commented on the shooting.
The killing came on the six-month anniversary of the "ceasefire" in Gaza that has been in place since October. At least 738 Palestinians have been killed and more than 2,000 injured since then, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. In January, the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) reported that more than 100 children had been killed since the ceasefire began.
Authorities in Gaza have accused Israel of violating the ceasefire thousands of times. And according to a report out Thursday from Oxfam and other humanitarian groups, "Palestinians are continuing to suffer extreme deprivation, hunger, injury, and death due to the Israeli government’s continued attacks, movement restrictions, and aid obstructions."
Israel still occupies more than half of the Gaza Strip, leaving more than 2 million residents crammed into about a third of the strip's territory. With most buildings either damaged or totally destroyed, the vast majority of the population lives in makeshift tents and is left with little protection from storms and ongoing attacks by Israel.
According to Human Rights Watch, 97% of schools in Gaza have been damaged or destroyed by Israeli attacks. But educators, most of whom are volunteers, have still tried to use the few resources they have to provide schools for Gaza's more than a million children.
The school attended by Rihan was just two kilometers away from the yellow line dividing Israel's official occupation zone from the rest of Gaza.
Rihan's mother said she woke up excited to go to school that day and was looking forward to wearing her favorite dress to her uncle's wedding the next week.
"It wasn't meant to be," her mother said, while holding her daughter's bloodstained school notebook. "She wore her shroud instead."
The reported attack also comes just a day after Israel launched an unprecedented assault on civilian areas across Lebanon, which has threatened to destroy the ceasefire reached earlier this week between the US and Iran.
The Gaza Ministry of Health described the attack that killed Rihan as a “brutal and horrific crime, adding to Israel’s long, dark record of atrocities."
“It was not an isolated incident," the ministry said, "but a direct extension of a systematic policy targeting the Palestinian people."