February, 08 2011, 09:10am EDT
Egypt-Inspired Protests Across Middle East Meet Violent Clampdown
Palestinian Authority, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, UAE, Yemen Suppress Demonstrations
WASHINGTON
Governments in the Arab world have violently dispersed
demonstrations apparently inspired by or in solidarity with Egypt's
democracy protesters and have detained some of the organizers, Human
Rights Watch said today.
The security forces' clampdown is part and parcel of regular
prohibitions on public gatherings in Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, the
United Arab Emirates, the West Bank, and Yemen. These governments
curtail free expression and assembly despite the fact that almost all of
the region's countries have signed international agreements protecting
both rights, Human Rights Watch said.
"Images of the uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt have mesmerized the
Arab public but have terrified their rulers," said Sarah Leah Whitson,
Middle East and North Africa director at Human Rights Watch. "They have
responded with their usual mix of repression and intimidation to nip the
buds of any wider democratic blossoming."
Palestinian Authority/Hamas
The Palestinian Authority's police used violence against
peaceful demonstrators during a rally in Ramallah on February 2, 2011,
to support the protesters in Egypt. Witnesses told Human Rights Watch
that regular police and "special forces," identifiable by their
uniforms, punched, kicked, and detained participants, as well as at
least two journalists and a Human Rights Watch research assistant.
On January 30, Palestinian Authority security had shut down a solidarity demonstration
in front of the Egyptian embassy in Ramallah, after calling in one of
the organizers for questioning multiple times on January 29 and ordering
him to cancel the event notice that he had created on Facebook.
Hamas authoritiesin the Gaza Strip quashed a
solidarity demonstration on January 31. The police arbitrarily arrested
six women and threatened to arrest another 20 people, who had responded
to a call on Facebook for a demonstration, as soon as they arrived at
the Park of the Unknown Soldier in Gaza City.
Syria
In Syria, security services detained five young demonstrators for a
few hours each during a series of protests in solidarity with Egyptian
protesters and to protest corruption and high cell phone communication
costs. One was arrested on January 29, the first day of the protests,
another on February 2, and three on February 3.
On February 2, a group of 20 people in civilian clothing beat and
dispersed 15 demonstrators who had assembled in Bab Touma in old
Damascus to hold a candlelight vigil for Egyptian demonstrators. Police
nearby failed to intervene, one of the gathering's organizers told Human
Rights Watch. When demonstrators went to the local police station to
file a complaint, a security official insulted and slapped Suheir
Atassi, one of the main organizers, and accused her of being a "germ"
and an agent of foreign powers. Syria's security services had summoned
more than 10 activists to pressure them not to demonstrate.
On February 4, the police detained Ghassan al-Najjar,
an elderly leader of a small group called the Islamic Democratic
Current, after he issued public calls for Syrians in Aleppo to
demonstrate for more freedom in their country.
UAE
The UAE's State Security arrested Hasan Muhammad al-Hammadi, an
active board member of the Teachers Association in the UAE, on February
4 at his house in Khour Fakkan, a city in the emirate of Sharjah.
Al-Hammadi had spoken out publicly in solidarity with the Egyptian
demonstrators earlier in the day during a mosque sermon. He remains in
detention.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi security forces briefly arrested between 30 and 50
demonstrators in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, after noon prayers on January 28,
Reuters news service and individual sources reported. A Saudi dissident
in London, Dr. Sa'd al-Faqih, allegedly called for the demonstrations
via his satellite TV program to protest the chaos caused by recent heavy
rains, which caused flooding in the city that led to deaths and cuts to
electricity. Police arrested demonstrators as soon as they gathered,
with dozens of others scattering.
Saudi Arabiahas no law regulating assembly and
bans political demonstrations through executive orders. On December 21,
Interior Ministry officials summoned Saudi citizens who had planned a
peaceful sit-in for December 23 to demand better jobs, health care,
education, and urge reform, including an end to corruption, ordering
them to cancel the protest, which they did.
Sudan
Sudanese authorities used excessive force during largely peaceful protests
on January 30 and 31 in Khartoum and other northern cities to call for
an end to the National Congress Party (NCP) rule and government-imposed
price increases. One student, Mohammed Abderahman, reportedly died from
injuries inflicted by security forces on January 30, activists said.
Human Rights Watch could not independently confirm the death, but called
on the Sudanese government to investigate the allegations immediately.
The protesters, organized by youth and student movements using Facebook
and other electronic media, rallied in public places and on university
campuses in Khartoum, Omdurman, El Obeid, and other towns.
Witnesses in Khartoum and Omdurman reported that armed riot
police and national security personnel dispersed groups of protesters
using pipes, sticks, and teargas, injuring several people and preventing
some people from joining the protests. Some protesters threw rocks at
riot police, but most were peaceful, witnesses said. The majority of
those arrested were released within hours, but more than 20 are still
missing and believed to be held by national security forces.
Sudanese authorities also targeted journalists and censored
newspapers covering the protests. On February 2, security officials
arrested more than a dozen staff of al-Maidan, the communist
newspaper, and they have arrested more student activists and opposition
party members in an apparent crackdown on opponents of the ruling party.
Yemen
In southern Yemen, where security forces have violently suppressed
large protests against the central government and for secession for over
three years, police and military forces used live and rubber bullets to
disperse protesters on February 3.
Six people were injured and 28 arrested, the Yemeni Observatory
for Human Rights reported. The Observatory also reported that government
supporters had attacked protesters. Among those arrested was a
journalist, Abd al-Hafith Mu'jib. Six people remain detained at the
Criminal Investigation Department. A Yemeni human rights activist
identified them as: Abd al-Alim al-Quds, Fatah Mahdi, Muhammad Ali
'Ubud, Mahmud Yasin al-Saqqaf, Mushir Abd al-Malik, and Nasir 'Ashal.
Bahrain
In Bahrain, a new group on Facebook has issued a call for a "Day of
Rage," the term used in Egypt, on February 14. The government shut down
the Facebook page.
Human Rights Watch called on Arab governments to guarantee their
citizens the right to assemble peacefully to express their views, and to
abolish laws that restrict speech and assembly.
"Rather than learn the lessons of Cairo and Tunis, Arab leaders are
keeping their heads in the sand, insisting on stifling even the smallest
public gatherings," Whitson said.
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
Supreme Court Signals It Will Uphold 'State-Sanctioned Discrimination' in Transgender Care Case
"We the people means all the people," said the ACLU. "There is no 'transgender' exception to the U.S. Constitution."
Dec 04, 2024
Attorneys who argued against Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming healthcare at the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed hope that the court's nine justices will take "the opportunity to affirm the essential freedom and equality of all people before the law," while reports indicated that the right-wing majority is inclined to uphold the ban.
"Every day this law inflicts further pain, injustice, and discrimination on families in Tennessee and prevents them from receiving the medical care they need," said Lucas Cameron-Vaughn, staff attorney at the ACLU of Tennessee, which represented three families and a physician. "We ask the Supreme Court to commit to upholding the promises of the U.S. Constitution for all people by putting an end to Tennessee's state-sanctioned discrimination against trans youth and their families."
The law, S.B. 1, which was passed in March 2023, bars medical providers from prescribing puberty-delaying medications, other hormonal treatment, and surgical procedures to transgender minors and youths with gender dysphoria.
The Supreme Court case, United States v. Skrmetti, applies only to the ban on puberty blockers and hormonal therapy for minors; a lower court found the plaintiffs did not have legal standing to challenge the surgery ban.
The ACLU, the ACLU of Tennessee, Lambda Legal, and a law firm were joined by the Biden administration in arguing that Tennessee allows doctors to prescribe puberty blockers and other hormonal treatments for youths with congenital defects, early puberty, diseases, or physical injuries.
As such, said the plaintiffs, Tennessee's ban for transgender and nonbinary youths violates the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment, which guarantees equal treatment under the law.
"My heart—and the heart of every transgender advocate fighting this fight—is heavy with the weight of what these laws mean for people's everyday lives."
The court's three liberal justices—Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson—all indicated they believed Tennessee has tried to classify people according to sex or gender with the law.
"One of the articulated purposes of this law is essentially to encourage gender conformity and to discourage anything other than gender conformity," said Kagan. "Sounds to me like, 'We want boys to be boys and we want girls to be girls,' and that's an important purpose behind the law."
Matthew Rice, the lawyer representing Tennessee in the case, claimed the state simply wants to prevent "regret" among minors, and the court's six conservative justices signaled they were inclined to allow Tennessee to ban the treatments—which are endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and other top medical associations.
Chief Justice John Roberts said the nine justices should not overrule the decision made by lawmakers representing Tennessee residents, considering there is debate over the issue, and pointed to changes some European countries have made to their gender-affirming care protocols for minors.
Representing the Biden administration, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar acknowledged that there has been debate about gender-affirming care in the U.S. and abroad, but pointed out that countries including the U.K. and Sweden have not outright banned treatment.
"I think that's because of the recognition that this care can provide critical, sometimes lifesaving benefits for individuals with severe gender dysphoria," she said.
Following the arguments, plaintiff Brian Williams, who has a 16-year-old daughter in need of gender-affirming care, addressed supporters who had assembled outside the Supreme Court.
"Tennessee's ban on gender-affirming medical care is an active threat to the future my daughter deserves," said Williams. "It infringes not only on her freedom to be herself but on our family's love for her. We are not expecting everyone to understand everything about our family or the needs of transgender young people like our daughter. What we are asking for is for her freedom to be herself without fear. We are asking for her to be able to access the care she needs and enter adulthood knowing nothing is holding her back because of who she is."
Sotomayor said there is "very clear" evidence "that there are some children who actually need this treatment."
A 2022 study led by researchers at the University of Washington found that transgender and nonbinary youths aged 13-20 were 60% less likely to experience moderate or severe depression and 73% less likely to be suicidal after receiving gender-affirming care.
Prelogar asked the justices to "think about the real-world consequences of laws like S.B. 1," highlighting the case of a plaintiff identified as Ryan Roe.
Roe had such severe gender dysphoria that "he was throwing up before school every day," said Prelogar. "He thought about going mute because his voice caused him so much distress. And Ryan has told the courts that getting these medications after a careful consultation process with his doctors and his parents, has saved his life."
"But Tennessee has come in and categorically cut off access to Ryan's care," she added. "This law harms Ryan's health and the health of all other transgender adolescents for whom these medications are a necessity."
Tennessee is home to about 3,100 transgender teenagers, and about 110,000 transgender youths between the ages of 13-17 live in the 24 states where gender-affirming care is restricted.
More than 20 states have laws that could be impacted by the court's ruling in United States v. Skrmetti.
"My heart—and the heart of every transgender advocate fighting this fight—is heavy with the weight of what these laws mean for people's everyday lives," said Chase Strangio, co-director of the ACLU's LGBTQ & HIV Project. "But I also know that every out trans person has embraced the unknown in the name of living free from shame or the limits of other people's expectations."
"My heart aches for the parents who spent years watching their children in distress and eventually found relief in the medical care that Tennessee now overrides their judgment to ban," said Strangio. "Whatever happens today, tomorrow, and in the months and years to come, I trust that we will come together to fight for the realized promise of our Constitution's guarantee of equal protection for all."
A ruling in the case is expected in June.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Small Town Sues Utility for Climate Deception
"We have to speak truth to power as we continue to fight the existential threat that is climate change," said the mayor of Carrboro, North Carolina.
Dec 04, 2024
The town of Carrboro, North Carolina filed a lawsuit Wednesday accusing the utility company Duke Energy of carrying out a "knowing deception campaign concerning the causes and dangers posed by the climate crisis."
The municipality—which is near Chapel Hill and is after compensation for damages it has suffered or will suffer as a result of the alleged deception campaign—is the first town in the United States to challenge an electric utility for public deception about the dangers of fossil fuels and seek damages for the harms those emissions have created, according to the town's mayor, Barbara Foushee.
The case was filed in North Carolina Superior Court and argues that Duke Energy has engaged in a "greenwashing" campaign to convince the public it sought to address the climate emergency.
"In reliance upon these misrepresentations, the public has continued to conduct business with Duke under the mistaken belief that the company is committed to renewable energy," according to the filing.
"We have to speak truth to power as we continue to fight the existential threat that is climate change. The climate crisis continues to burden our community and cost residents their hard-earned tax dollars," said Foushee, according to a press release.
Mayor Pro Tem Danny Nowell added that "it's time for us to hold Duke Energy accountable for decades of deception, padding executives' pockets while towns like ours worked to mitigate the harmful effects of climate change. This suit will allow the Town of Carrboro to invest new resources into building a stronger, more climate-resilient community, using the damages justly due to our residents to reimagine the ways we prepare for our climate reality."
According to the lawsuit, Carrboro will be forced to spend millions of dollars either repairing or shoring up public infrastructure as a result of more frequent and devastating storms, which scientists agree are caused by climate change.
The complaint comes not long after the release of a report, Duke Energy Knew: Documenting the Utility’s Early Knowledge and Ongoing Deception About Climate Change, from the Energy and Policy Institute, a watchdog group. According to the report, Duke Energy well understood the risks posed by burning fossil fuels as far back as the 1960s, but chose to take part in promoting disinformation about climate science. In more recent years, the utility continued to pursue fossil fuels while blocking renewable energy development, according to the report's authors. Much of this research is referenced in the lawsuit.
As one example of its "deception," the lawsuit points to Duke Energy's participation in the the Global Climate Coalition, an entity created with the intent of opposing action to curb the climate crisis.
Duke Energy was the third largest emitter of greenhouse gasses in 2021, according to a breakdown from the Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, which ranked U.S. companies in terms of their CO2-equivalent greenhouse gas emissions.
More than 20 states, tribes, cities, and counties have brought similar climate deception lawsuits. Maine, for example, recently became the ninth state to sue a major oil and gas company for deceiving the public about its products' role in the climate crisis.
"We’ll soon have a climate denier-in-chief in the White House, but Carrboro is a shining light in this darkness, taking on one of the country's largest polluters and climate deceivers," Jean Su, energy justice director at the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a press release. The Center for Biological Diversity is advising on the case.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Groups Sound Alarm Over Trump Plot to Install Nominees Without Senate Approval
"If you're trying to ram through nominees without Senate and public scrutiny, it's a pretty good guess that you have something to hide."
Dec 04, 2024
Dozens of civil rights and pro-democracy organizations teamed up Wednesday to express opposition to President-elect Donald Trump's push to use recess appointments to evade the Senate confirmation process for his political nominees, many of which have
glaring conflicts of interest.
The 70 groups—including People For the American Way, Public Citizen, the Constitutional Accountability Center, and the NAACP—sent a letter to U.S. senators arguing that Senate confirmation procedures provide "crucial data" that helps lawmakers and the public "evaluate nominees' fitness for the important positions to which they are nominated."
"The framers of the Constitution included the requirement of Senate 'Advice and Consent' for high-ranking officers for a reason: The requirement can protect our freedom, just as the Bill of Rights does, by providing an indispensable check on presidential power," reads the new letter. "None of that would happen with recess appointments. The American people would be kept in the dark."
Since his victory in last month's election, Trump has publicly expressed his desire to bypass the often time-consuming Senate confirmation process via recess appointments, which are allowed under the Constitution and have been used in the past by presidents of both parties. The need for Senate confirmation is already proving to be a significant obstacle for the incoming administration: Trump's first attorney general nominee, Matt Gaetz, withdrew amid seemingly insurmountable Senate opposition, and Pentagon nominee Pete Hegseth appears to be on the ropes.
"Giving in to the president-elect's demand for recess appointments under the current circumstances would dramatically depart from how important positions have always been filled at the start of an administration," the groups wrote in their letter. "The confirmation process gathers important information that helps ensure that nominees who will be dangerous or ineffective for the American people are not confirmed and given great power, and that those who are confirmed meet at least a minimum standard of acceptability."
"The American people deserve full vetting of every person selected to serve in our nation's highest offices, and Trump's nominees are no exception."
Scholars argue recess appointments were intended as a way for presidents to appoint officials to key posts under unusual circumstances, not as an exploit for presidents whose nominees run up against significant opposition.
The Senate could prevent recess appointments by refusing to officially go on recess and making use of pro forma sessions, but incoming Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has said that "we have to have all the options on the table" to push through Trump's nominees.
"We are not going to allow the Democrats to thwart the will of the American people in giving President Trump the people that he wants in those positions to implement his agenda," Thune said last month.
Trump has also previously threatened to invoke a never-before-used provision of the Constitution that he claims would allow him to force both chambers of Congress to adjourn, paving the way for recess appointments.
Conservative scholar Edward Whelan, a distinguished senior fellow of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, denounced that proposed route as a "cockamamie scheme" that would mean "eviscerating the Senate's advice-and-consent role."
Svante Myrick, president of People For the American Way, said in a statement Wednesday that "if you're trying to ram through nominees without Senate and public scrutiny, it's a pretty good guess that you have something to hide."
"The American people deserve full vetting of every person selected to serve in our nation's highest offices," said Myrick, "and Trump's nominees are no exception."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular