February, 03 2011, 03:28pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167
"Mubarak Will Hunt Us Down One by One"
“May be preparing for something which he does not want the world to see.”
WASHINGTON
Pro-regime forces in Cairo are attacking and detaining media and
human rights workers, leading to wide-spread concerns about an increase
in state violence against pro-democracy protesters. Egypt is 7 hours
ahead of U.S. ET. For online resources; see: accuracy.org/online-resources-on-egypt
KHALED FAHMY
Fahmy is chair of the history department at the American University in Cairo. He was interviewed yesterday by GRITtv.
EMAD MEKAY
Based in Cairo, Mekay
reports for Inter Press Service and other outlets. He just wrote the
Institute for Public Accuracy: "Just outside Tahrir Square right now.
Pro-Mubarak 'hired muscle' is attacking journalists and stopping them
from going into the square. These are the government types, possibly
even police staff in plainclothes. They are confiscating all cameras.
They set up road blocks around most entryways to the square. I sense
they may be preparing for something tomorrow, Friday. Friday has been
called by the anti-Mubarak movement 'The Departure Friday' i.e. a day
in which Mubarak will decide to step down. Government supporters and
apparently former police force members are searching all those heading
towards Tahrir before turning them back. They confiscate food, water
and medicine.
"Mubarak may be preparing for something which he does not want the
world to see. The government is using all tools it can to thwart
tomorrow's big marches in Tahrir Square and elsewhere. They are sending
text messages in Arabic through the local mobile phone companies
warning people about 'getting into trouble.' One message reads: 'Oh you
young people of Egypt, listen to the voice of reason and be warned of
rumors. Egypt is above all.' Mubarak has always portrayed himself as a
wise man and the 'voice of reason.'"
MATTHEW CASSEL
Currently in Cairo, Cassel is based in Beirut, Lebanon and is assistant editor of The Electronic Intifada. His website is JustImage.org and his tweets from Cairo can be followed at twitter.com/justimage.
He said today: "Egyptians are risking their lives to stay in the
streets and demand an end to the U.S.-backed dictatorship in their
country. They've proved they will not surrender their fight until
President Hosni Mubarak leaves. ... As the peaceful protests have
continued at Tahrir (Liberation) Square effectively shutting down all of
Cairo, so has the thuggery of the regime. From Cairo it seems that the
outcome of the massive protests will be nothing other than Mubarak's
immediate resignation." See: https://electronicintifada.net/v2/article11773.shtml and https://electronicintifada.net/v2/article11763.shtml
FAIZA HASSAN
Hassan [a pseudonym] is
foreign student now in Cairo. She said today: "The situation is
changing quickly. Yesterday the army left Tahrir Square at dark,
leaving the protesters open to attacks by pro-regime forces. The
blogger Sandmonkey was beaten and detained. ... The regime might be
following a strategy of creating so much chaos so that the protests
become unsustainable."
Last night Sandmonkey wrote: "I have no illusions about this regime
or its leader, and how he will pluck us and hunt us down one by one
till we are over and done with and eight months from now will pay
people to stage fake protests urging him not to leave power and he will
stay 'because he has to acquiesce to the voice of the people.' This is a
losing battle and they have all the weapons, but we will continue
fighting until we can't. ..." Sandmonkey, however, is no longer being
detained: twitter.com/#!/sandmonkey
ZACHARY LOCKMAN
Lockman is a professor in the department of Middle Eastern and Islamic
Studies at New York University. He said today: "The initial vision of
the Obama administration and key military leaders in Egypt seems to have
been that Mubarak would hang on until his term ended in September.
Meanwhile, the regime would engage in 'dialogue' with the opposition
without actually conceding anything of substance, and the momentum of
the demonstrators in the streets would dissipate. Some of the old
opposition parties, with little popular credibility or support, might be
willing to accept some crumbs from the table of power and cut a deal
with the regime; the hard-line opposition would then be isolated,
marginalized and destroyed. This is more or less how the Iranian regime
crushed the protest movement there after the June 2006 elections. In
the long run, this might enable the Mubarak regime to survive even
without Mubarak at its head, with no real opening to democracy, free
elections, etc. This regime is very good at using a calibrated
combination of repression and incentives to suppress the opposition; it
hasn't stayed in power for three decades for nothing.
"But it is not clear whether this scenario will work. The violent
efforts we saw yesterday to drive the protesters out of Tahrir
[Liberation] Square and other strongholds of the opposition suggest that
Mubarak is not ready to allow himself to be shoved aside, or even to
share power, which may well strengthen the resolve of the demonstrators
to hold out for Mubarak's immediate removal from power. If the masses
return to the streets, Mubarak will have to step up the violence, which
may isolate him further. And it isn't clear if the military is prepared
to let the situation get out of control; its leaders may decide to
throw Mubarak overboard sooner rather than later if that is what it
takes to maintain their position and status, and prevent more extensive
changes. So Friday's demonstration, and the responses to it of the
regime and the military, will be critical."
A nationwide consortium, the Institute for Public Accuracy (IPA) represents an unprecedented effort to bring other voices to the mass-media table often dominated by a few major think tanks. IPA works to broaden public discourse in mainstream media, while building communication with alternative media outlets and grassroots activists.
LATEST NEWS
Alan Greenspan, Longtime Fed Chair and Ayn Rand Disciple, Meets Ultimate ‘Invisible Hand’
"For decades, he preached that the self-interest of the predator was the invisible hand of the common good," Yanis Varoufakis said after the man who led the US central bank under four presidents died aged 100.
Jun 22, 2026
Alan Greenspan, whose policies during nearly 20 years as US Federal Reserve chair fueled soaring economic inequality and helped create the conditions for multiple economic crashes, died Monday at age 100 after a long battle with Parkinson's disease.
While many corporate media outlets published hagiographic obituaries lionizing the "Maestro" who presided over nearly two decades of low inflation, rising stock prices, and American economic confidence, critics focused on Greenspan's role in promoting dangerous deregulation and "easy money" policies that inflated financial bubbles, with sometimes disastrous results.
Robert Reich—who served as US labor secretary under President Bill Clinton during all of Greenspan's tenure—called him "in many ways the most powerful person in America" during that era.
"If any single person was responsible for the financial crisis of 2008, it was Greenspan."
"He maintained an iron grip over the Fed, and almost single-handedly decided on interest rates," Reich wrote. "He essentially fired George H. W. Bush by raising interest rates so high (ostensibly to ward off the inflation then threatening the economy) that the economy took a dive, and voters blamed Bush. This was enough to convince my boss, Bill Clinton, to do exactly what Greenspan wanted—which was to reduce the federal budget deficit and thereby destroy much of the agenda Clinton ran on (and I helped create)."
"I don’t want to speak ill of anyone who has passed. Greenspan was an extremely charming, intelligent, and thoughtful man," Reich added. "But the truth must be told: If any single person was responsible for the financial crisis of 2008, it was Greenspan. That crisis—the worst collapse since 1929, which led to the worst recession in decades, in which millions of Americans lost their jobs, savings, and even their homes—resulted from the deregulation of Wall Street that Greenspan advocated."
Former Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis wrote on X: "His epitaph? A singular, glorious confession, 'I found a flaw in my model of the world.' A flaw, he said, as though it were a leaky pipe, not a total collapse of the intellectual architecture that anointed him Oracle. For decades, he preached that the self-interest of the predator was the invisible hand of the common good.
"Then, in 2008, the beast devoured the table, and to his credit, he blinked, admitting that his entire worldview—the one that central bankers canonized and the world swallowed—was a fairy tale for rentiers," Varoufakis added. "He did not, of course, admit to culpability. That would require a moral compass, a device notably absent from his Ayn Randian toolbelt. No, he merely noted the flaw, as a meteorologist might note a gust of wind, and returned to his well-earned silence."
Born 10 miles from Wall Street in Manhattan's Washington Heights during one of the most infamous economic bubbles of all time, Greenspan was a protégé of libertarian writer and philosopher Ayn Rand and was influenced by the Atlas Shrugged author's moral defense of capitalism, her fierce advocacy of deregulation, and her insidious insistence that self-interest was socially beneficial.
Their relationship cooled as Greenspan embraced more mainstream economic policies despised by Rand and gradually became a leading steward of the very sort of state-shepherded system she deeply distrusted.
After heading President Gerald Ford's Council of Economic Advisers, Greenspan was appointed chair of the Fed by President Ronald Reagan in 1987. He would remain in the post well into George W. Bush's second term.
Greenspan generally favored low interest rates, especially after crises like the 1987 stock market crash, the 1998 Long-Term Capital Management crisis, and the 2001 recession. His fame grew after he suggested that the economy might be experiencing a tech-driven “productivity miracle," language that many investors took as validation that traditional valuation limits were obsolete.
Critics would later call it a "productivity mirage."
Staunch devotion to low interest rates by Greenspan's Fed boosted stock prices and real estate values under "easy money" policies. Many investors came to believe that the Fed would intervene aggressively whenever markets fell sharply—the so-called "Greenspan Put."
However, since ownership of financial assets (and the firms that sell and promote them) is concentrated among the wealthy, it was the rich who benefited most from Greenspan's polices. When bubbles burst, as they did after the dot-com boom that ended in early 2000 and during the 2008 global financial crisis, the rich bounced back thanks to their diversified portfolios and bailouts, while middle- and lower-income households were wiped out through asset devaluation, foreclosures, and job losses.
"It is no exaggeration to say the global financial crisis of 2008 had an enormous and lasting impact on American life and the way ordinary people view elites," New York Times global economic correspondent Peter S. Goodman said on social media. "It is also no exaggeration to say that Alan Greenspan has as much responsibility for the crisis as an individual can."
"For those not old enough to remember, it is difficult to state his aura during his time of greatest influence," Goodman continued. "When he told Americans that they should buy houses and use variable-rate mortgages to do it, they listened. Much is made of his econ jargon-laden vernacular that went over the heads of nearly all listeners."
"That was central to the mystique," he added. "When he went to the Hill and spoke to Congress, most people had no idea what he was talking about but assumed that smarter kids did. And so his quasi-religious faith in the efficiency of markets as the ultimate insurance against risk went unchallenged and became dogma, and the risks kept building."
Keep ReadingShow Less
‘Time to Sue This Liar’: Trillionaire Elon Musk Threatens Ro Khanna for Warning of 4.5 Million Child Deaths From DOGE Cuts
"The Dems should have a leader who Elon Musk is threatening to sue and wants imprisoned," said one political observer. "That's the right guy."
Jun 22, 2026
The recently crowned world's first trillionaire Elon Musk threatened Rep. Ro Khanna with legal action on Monday after the California Democrat pointed out the life-ending potential of foreign aid cuts made by the Department of Government Efficiency.
During an appearance on the "I've Had It" podcast on Saturday, Khanna (D-Calif.) said that there must be consequences for Musk, who in February 2025 used DOGE to curtail programs and cut funding for the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
"There needs to be accountability for Elon Musk," Khanna emphasized. "You know, they’re celebrating that he created 4,400 millionaires, but they don’t talk about the 4.5 million children around the world who he possibly sentenced to death by dismantling USAID.”
A peer-reviewed study published by The Lancet in July 2025 estimated that proposed cuts to USAID could lead to as many as 14 million preventable deaths by 2030 worldwide, including the deaths of 4.5 million children under the ages of five years old.
Musk, who earlier this month became the world's first trillionaire, wrote in response to Khanna's interview that it was "time to sue this liar."
It's not clear how Khanna's statement could be defamatory given that it was based on research published by a prestigious medical journal.
Musk, in a separate reaction to Khanna's remarks about USAID, later added that the US lawmaker "should be in prison."
On Monday afternoon, Khanna posted a video in which he challenged Musk to debate him on the impact the DOGE cuts have had on people throughout the Global South who had previously benefited from USAID.
"The world's richest person has spent all day... going after me," Khanna said. "Why? Because I cited an academic study that his DOGE cuts may lead to the deaths of millions of children overseas. You know, Elon, I thought you were a free speech guy. Why not debate me on these issues instead of threatening lawfare?"
"You're not going to be able to intimidate me," Khanna added.
.@elonmusk let's debate. You game?
I am for free speech, not lawfare. pic.twitter.com/gThLggxiOW
— Ro Khanna (@RoKhanna) June 22, 2026
Mehdi Hasan, editor-in-chief of Zeteo News, said that Khanna’s willingness to directly take on Musk exhibited qualities that Democrats could use more of in leadership positions.
"He is picking/making the right enemies on the right, and really pissing them off," Hasan wrote of Khanna. "The Dems should have a leader who Elon Musk is threatening to sue and wants imprisoned. That's the right guy."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'There Will Come a Day When He Faces Prosecution': Trump Condemned After US Murders Two More at Sea
"The summary execution of two more in an alleged drug boat brings the number of murders ordered by Trump to more than 210," noted one human rights defender.
Jun 22, 2026
Two people were killed, and six others survived, a strike on Sunday that the US military claimed—without providing evidence—targeted a boat full of "narco-terrorists," but that human rights defenders called another summary execution worthy of prosecution.
"On June 21, at the direction of the commander of US Southern Command, Gen. Francis L. Donovan, Joint Task Force Southern Spear conducted a lethal kinetic strike on a vessel operated by Designated Terrorist Organizations," USSOUTHCOM said in a statement. "Intelligence confirmed the vessel was transiting along known narco-trafficking routes in the Caribbean and was engaged in narco-trafficking operations."
"Two male narco-terrorists were killed during this action, and there were six male survivors," the statement added. "Following the engagement, USSOUTHCOM immediately notified US Coast Guard to activate the Search and Rescue system for the survivors."
More lawless killing in the Trump administration’s boat bombing campaign.Real killing in a phony armed conflict with “narco-terrorists.”This strike reportedly left 6 survivors.US record for rescuing survivors alive is…not great.
[image or embed]
— Brian Finucane (@bcfinucane.bsky.social) June 21, 2026 at 11:28 PM
According to The Intercept's Nick Turse, who has tracked all of the reported US boat bombings in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, there have now been 66 such strikes, which have killed 215 people and left 12 survivors, based on USSOUTHCOM data.
The fate of previous boat strike survivors is not completely clear. After one April bombing, the US Coast Guard told UPI that search-and-rescue operations were called off after no signs of survivors were found. Last October, President Donald Trump said two strike survivors were repatriated to their home countries of Ecuador and Colombia, where they faced prosecution.
Survivors of some of the strikes have accused US forces of torturing them.
Relatives of people killed in previous US boat bombings, as well as officials in Venezuela and Colombia, have said that numerous victims were fishers who were not involved in the illicit drug trade.
In January, relatives of two Trinidadian fishers killed in the strikes filed a federal wrongful death lawsuit in Massachusetts.
"The summary execution of two more in an alleged drug boat brings the number of murders ordered by Trump to more than 210," former Human Rights Watch executive director Kenneth Roth said on social media. "There will come a day when he faces prosecution for these crimes."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular


